Диссертация (1173751), страница 87
Текст из файла (страница 87)
Щербак Н.В. Интернет-сайты и интернет-посредники: некоторые проблемыгражданско-правового регулирования // Законодательство. Май, 2013. № 5.265. Щербак Н.В. Некоторые проблемы защиты авторских и смежных прав //Законодательство. Январь 2015. N 1.266. Щербак Н.В.Пределыавторскогоправаисмежныхправ/Законодательство. 2011. № 8.267.
Щербак Н.В. Свободное использование объектов авторского права напримере цитирования, пародирования и карикатуры // Законодательство. Март,2014. № 3.268. Яковлева Р.Б. Проблемы перехода произведения в общественное достояниедо истечения срока действия исключительного права на произведение //Имущественные отношения в Российской Федерации. N 2, февраль. 2010.Научные статьи на иностранных языках269. Abruzzi B.E. Copyright and the vagueness doctrine // University of MichiganJournal of Law Reform. 2012.
Vol. 45:2.396270. Andre L. Law Аpplicable in Copyright Infringement in the Digital Environment.URL: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001396/139652e.pdf271. Atkinson-Bonasio A. Intellectual Property in Photographs: Bridgeman ArtLibrary, Ltd. v. Corel Corp.
2011.272. Austin G.W. Domestic Laws and Foreign Rights: Choice of Law in TransnationalCopyright Infringement Litigation. 1999. 23 Colum.-VLA J.L. & Arts.273. Barthes C., Carral R., Gaillard G., Schuler M. France. In: InternationalLicensing. ed. by Campbell D., BNA International Inc. London, 2005. (Rel. 1 -Apr.1998).274. Basedow J.
Сodification of private law in the European Union: the making of ahybrid // Europ. Rev. of private law. Kluwer, 2001. Vol. 9. № 1.275. Beam B. Untangling Jurisdiction and Contract Scope Issues with IntellectualProperty Licenses // Heinonline. Citation: 34 UALR L. Rev. 391 2011-2012.276. Beeber J., Wogan M. Is Scènes à Faire Really 'Necessary'? // Entertainment, Artsand Sports Law Journal. Spring 2004.
Vol.15. No.1.277. Beier F.K. Conflict of Law Problems of Trademark License Agreements //International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law. 1982. Vol. 13.278. Bentley L. Sampling and Copyright: Is the law on the right track // Journal ofBusiness Law. 1989. № 1.279. Berlowe P.E., Berlowe-Heinish L.J., Koziol P.A. In this Digital Age, Are WeProtecting Tomorrow's "Masterpieces"? Protection of the Moral Rights of the DigitalGraphic Artist / The Florida Bar. 2007. №30.280. Boyl M., Nazzaro S., O’Connor D. Moral rights protection for the visual arts //Journal of Cultural Economics. February 2010. V.34.
Is.1.281. Bracha O. The Adventures of the Statute of Anne in the Land of UnlimitedPossibilities: The Life of a Legal Transplant // Berkeley Technology Law Journal (UCBerkeley School of Law) 25(1).282. Bradley L.C., Mahony I.G., Psyhogeos N.J., Naughton E.J.
United States. In:International Licensing. ed. by Campbell D., BNA International Inc. London, 2005(Rel.16 -Sept. 2005).397283. Brooke O. New Media Art Works Bioart, Digital Media, Installations &Copyleft// The Art Newspaper. Vol.XVII. May 2008. No.191.284. Chao C.G. Conflict of Laws and the International Licensing of IndustrialProperty in the United States, the European Union and Japan // The North CarolinaJournal of International Lawand Commercial Regulation. Vol.
22. 1996. № 2.285. Christmas G.R., York H.D. Australia. In: International Licensing. ed. byCampbell D., BNA International Inc. London, 2005 (Rel. 0 -Sept. 1997).286. De Miguel Asensio P.A. Applicable Law in the Absence of Choice to ContractsRelating to Intellectual or Industrial Property Rights // Yearbook of Private InternationalLaw. Vol. 10. 2008.287. Dietz A.
Elements of moral right protection in the Copyright UniversalConvention // Copyright bulletin. 1987. № 3.288. Dobson K.N. The Originality of Photographs for Purposes of Copyright LawBefore and after Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd. v. Corel. Corp. // Florida Coastal LawReview. Vol. X:319. 2009.289. Fichte J.G.BeweisderUnrechtmäßigkeitdesBüchernachdrucks.EinRäsonnement und eine Parabel // Berliner Monatsschrift. 1791. Bd. 21.290. Fukai T. Japan. In: International Licensing. ed. by Campbell D., BNAInternational Inc.
London, 2005 (Rel. 14 -Sept. 2004).291. Giannini M. The Substantial Similarity Test and its Use in DeterminingCopyright Infringement through Digital Sampling // Rutgers Computer and TechnicalLaw Journal. 1990. № 509.292. Ginsburg J.C. Moral Rights in the U.S.: Still in need of a Guardian ad LITEAP //HeinOnline. Citation: 30 Cardozo Arts & Ent. L.J. 73 2012.293. Ginsburg J.C. Une Chose Publique’? The Author’s Domain and the PublicDomain in Early British, French and U.S.
Copyright Law // Cambridge Law Journal.2006. 65, № 3.294. Golosker V. The Transformative Tribute: How Mash-Up Music Constitutes FairUse of Copyrights // HeinOnline. Citation: 34 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 381 20112012.398295. Hansen D.R. A State Law Approach to Preserving Fair Use in AcademicLibraries // HeinOnline. Citation: 22 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L.J. 1 20112012.296. Hanson M. The Right to Display Public Domain Images. March 6, 2015. URL:URL: http://englishhistory.net/art/.297. Harrison S.B.
Fair Use & the Quotation of Song Lyrics in fiction // HeinOnline.Citation: 11 J. Intell. Prop. 214. 2012.298. Hart M., Holmes S. Implementation of the Copyright Directive in the UnitedKingdom. EIPR, 2004. № 6.299. Hughes J.A. Shot history of «Intellectual Property» in Relation to Copyright //HeinOnline. Citation: 33 Cardozo L. Rev. 1293 2011-2012.300. Hunter С., Manson W., Wilkinson M.A. Intellectual Property Rights un theCanadaunited States Relationship // HeinOnline. Citation: 36 Can.-U.S.
L.J. 169 20112012.301. International Licensing / ed. by Campbell D.L., 2005 (Rel. 13 — March 2004).302. Janssen A. Copyright Licensing Revisited // HeinOnline. Citation: 13German L.J. 124 2012.303. Jiang P. China. In: International Licensing. ed. by Campbell D., BNAInternational Inc. London, 2005 (Rel. 16 -Sept. 2005).304. Kellogg C. «Pride and Prejudice and Zombies» by Seth Grahame-Smith.URL: http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/la-et-zombies4-2009apr04-story.html305.
Kelsen H. Hundredth Birthday of Josef Kohler // American Journal ofInternational Law. April 1949. Bd.43. Nr. 2.306. Lange D. Recognizing the Public Domain // Law and Contemporary Problems.1981. Vol. 44.307. Leidy M. Protecting Creation: the Twilight Series, Creation Stories, and theConversion of Intangible Cultural Property // HeinOnline. Citation: 41 Sw.
L. Rev. 5092011-2012.308. Leval P.N. Toward a Fair Use Standard. 103 Harv. L. Rev. 1105. 1990.399309. Madison M.J. Madisonian Fair Use // HeinOnline. Citation: 30 Cardozo Arts &Ent. L.J. 39 2012.310. Makovec P.T. Moral Rights of Composers: The Protection of Attribution andIntegrity Available to Musicians in the European Union and the United States //HeinOnline. Citation: 22 Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent.
L.J. 359.311. Masiyakurima P. The Trouble with Moral Rights / The modern law review.Oxford, USA. 2005. №68.312. Matulionytė R. IP and Applicable Law in Recent International Proposals: Reportfor the International Law Association // Jipitec. 2012. Vol. 3.313. Ochoa T. Origin and Meanings of the Public Domain. Dayton L. Rev., 2002.Vol. 28.314. Owens R. TRIPs and the Fairness in Music Arbitration: The Repercussions. In 25EIPR, 2003.315. Patry W. Choice of Law and International Copyright. Law Journal Library. 2000.Vol.48.316.
Peukert А. Territoriality and Extraterritoriality in Intellectual Property Law:URL: http://ssrn.com.317. Plenter S. Choice of Law Rules for Copyright Infringements in the GlobalInformation Infrastructure: A Never-ending Story? EIPR 2000.318. Ptaff D. Conflict of Laws Aspects of License Contracts in Germany and theSocialist Countries: Part One // International Review of Industrial Property andCopyright Law. 1977.
Vol.8.319. Roberts C.M. Violation of copyright by an art gallery: what kind of professionaldiligence is required? // Art, Cultural Institutions and Heritage Law, Newsletter of theInternational Bar Association Legal Practice Division. Vol.9. October, 2011. No 1.320. Rosati E. Originality in a Work, or a Work of Originality: The Effects of theInfopaq Decision // European Intellectual Property Review. 2011. V.33. I.12.321. Rose M. Nine-Tenths of the Law: The English Copyright Debates and theRhetoric of the Public Domain // Law and Contemporary Problems.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
