диссертация (1169769), страница 61
Текст из файла (страница 61)
Brand,S. R. Jablonski. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2007. –358 p.212. Briggs, A. Agreements on jurisdiction and choice of law / A. Briggs. –Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2008. – XLIX, 572 p.213. Briggs, A. Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments / A. Briggs, P. Rees. – 5thed. – London : Informa Law, 2009. – 1008 p.214. Brussels I Regulation – European Commentaries on Private InternationalLaw / U. Magnus, P. Mankowski (Eds). – European Law Publishers, 2007. – XXVIII,852 p.215.
Comparative International Commercial Arbitration [Electronic resource] /Julian D.M. Lew, Loukas A.Mistelis, Stefan Kröll – Kluwer Law International : 2003. –904 p.–Modeofaccess:URL:http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/book-258toc?title=ComparativeInternationalCommercialArbitration(dateofaccess:16.04.2019).216. European Commentaries on Private International Law. Vol.
I–IV: BrusselsIbis Regulation – Commentary / U. Magnus, P. Mankowski (Eds). – Köln : Verlag Dr.Otto Schmidt, 2016. – 1200 p.217. Fentiman, R. International Commercial Litigation / R. Fentiman. – 2nded. – New York : Oxford University Press, 2015. – 816 p.218. Fouchard, Gaillard, Goldman on International Commercial Arbitration /E. Gaillard, J. Savage (Eds). – Hague, Boston, London : Kluwer Law International,1999. – 1280 p.219. Jurisdiction, Admissibility and Choice of Law in International Arbitration:Liber Amicorum Michael Pryles / Ed. by N.
Kaplan, M. Moser. – Kluwer LawInternational,2018.–440 p.–Modeofaccess:http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/booktoc?title=Jurisdiction%2C%20Admissibility%20and%20Choice%20of%20Law%20in%20International%20Arbitration%3A%20Liber%20Amicorum%20Michael%20Pryles(date of access: 16.04.2019).220. Geimer, R. Internationales Zivilprozessrecht / R. Geimer. – 7. neubearbeitete Auflage. – Köln : Dr. Otto Schmidt, 2014.
– 1744 S.221. Hartley, T. Explanatory Report on the 2005 Hague Choice of CourtAgreements Convention. 2013 [Electronic resource] / T. Hartley, M. Dogauchi. – Modeof access: https://www.hcch.net/en/publications-and-studies/details4/?pid=3959 (date ofaccess: 16.04.2019).222. Hartley, T. Explanatory Report on the Preliminary Draft Convention onChoice of Court Agreements.
Prel. Doc. № 25. 2004 [Electronic resource] / T. Hartley,M. Dogauchi.–Modeofaccess:https://www.hcch.net/en/publications-and-studies/details4/?pid=3510&dtid=35 (date of access: 16.04.2019).223. Hartley, T. C. Choice-of-Court Agreements under the European andInternational Instruments. The revised Brussels I Regulation, the Lugano Convention,and the Hague Convention.
– New York : Oxford University Press, 2013. – 472 p.259224. Heldrich, A. Internationale Zuständigkeit und anwendbares Recht /A. Heldrich. – Berlin : Walter de Gruyter & Co., 1969. – 279 S.225. Joseph, D. Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreements and their Enforcement /D. Joseph. – London : Sweet & Maxwell, 2005. – 584 p.226. Kegel, G.
Internationales Privatrecht: Ein Studienbuch / G. Kegel,K. Schurig. – München : C. H. Beck, 2004. – XLV, 1190 S.227. Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung: ZPO, Band 10: §§ 1025–1066.Kommentar. – 22. Auflage / Herausgegeben von F. Stein, M. Jonas; Bearbeitet vonP. Schlosser. – Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2011. – XXXI, 668 S.228. Kropholler, J.
Europäisches Zivilprozessrecht : Kommentar zu EuGVO,Lugano-Übereinkommen 2007, EuVTVO, EuMVVO und EuGFVO / J. Kropholler,J. Hein. – 9., neubearbeitete Auflage. – Frankfurt-am-Mein : Verlag Recht undWirtschaft GmbH, 2011. – XXX, 1328 S.229. Kropholler,J.InternationalesPrivatrecht :EinschliesslichderGrundbegriffe des internationalen Zivilverfahrensrechts / J. Kropholler. – 4., neubearb.u. erw.
Auflage. – Tübingen : Mohr (Siebeck), 2001. – XXXIX, 693 S.230. Lindenmayr, B. Vereinbarung über die internationale Zuständigkeit unddas darauf anwendbare Recht / B. Lindenmayr. – Berlin : Duncker & Humblot, 2002. –473 S.231. Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch. Band 11:Internationales Privatrecht – 2; internationales Wirtschaftsrecht; Einführungsgesetz zumBürgerlichen Gesetzbuche (Art. 25–248) [Elektronische Ressource] / J. Hein (Red.), H.J. Bieber, R.
Birk, J. Busche, M. Casper, J. Drexl. – 6. Auflage. – München :C. H. Beck,2015.–XLIX,1653 S.Zugriffsmodus:https://beck-online.beck.de/?vpath=bibdata/komm/MuekoBGB_6_Band11/cont/MuekoBGB.Inhaltsverzeichnis%2Ehtm (Zugriffsdatum:16.04.2019).232. Musielak,H.-J.ZivilprozessordnungmitGerichtsverfasungsgesetz.Kommentar [Elektronische Ressource] / H.-J. Musielak, W. Voit.
– 14. Auflage. –München : Verlag Franz Vahlen GmbH., 2017. – Zugriffsmodus: https://beck-260online.beck.de/?vpath=bibdata/komm/MusielakZPOKO_14/cont/MusielakZPOKO.Inhaltsverzeichnis.htm (Zugriffsdatum:16.04.2019).233. Neuhaus, P. H. Die Grundbegriffe des Internationalen Privatrechts /P. H. Neuhaus. – Tübingen : J. C. B. Mohr, 1976. – XV, 325 S.234. Nygh, P. Report on the preliminary draft Convention on Jurisdiction andForeign Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters.
Preliminary Document № 11.August 2000 [Electronic resource] / P. Nygh, F. Pocar. – Mode of access:https://www.hcch.net/en/publications-and-studies/details4/?pid=3494&dtid=35 (date ofaccess: 16.04.2019).235. Nygh, P. E. Autonomy in international contracts / P. E. Nygh.
– Oxford:Clarendon Press, 1999. – 282 p.236. On International Arbitration / N. Blackaby, C. Partasides, A. Redfern,M. Hunter. – 6 ed. – New York : Oxford University Press, 2015. – 928 p.237. Raphael, T. The Anti-suit injunction / T.
Raphael. – New York : OxfordUniversity Press, 2011. – 100 p.238. Schack, H. Internationales Zivilverfahrensrecht mit internationalemInsolvenz- und Schiedsverfahrensrecht. Ein Studinebuch / H. Schack. – München :C. H. Beck, 2014. – 608 S.239. Stein, F. Kommentar zur Zivilprozessordnung / F. Stein, M. Jonas. – 23.Auflage. – Herausgegeben von R. Bork und H. Roth. – Band 1.
Einleitung §§ 1–77. –Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 2014. – XXXII, 1197 S.240. Stingl, H. Forum selection in the conflict of laws / H. Stingl. – Wien :Verlag Österreich, 2001. – 252 S.241. Vorwerk, V. Beck'scher Online-Kommentar ZPO. Buch 1. AllgemeineVorschriften / V. Vorwerk, Ch. Wolf. – 25. Auflage. – München : C. H. Beck, 2017.Zugriffsmodus:https://beck-online.beck.de/?vpath=bibdata/komm/beckok_25_BandZPO/cont/beckok.ZPO.Inhaltsverzeichnis.htm (Zugriffsdatum:16.04.2019).242. Wagner, G.
Prozessverträge – Privatautonomie im Verfahrensrecht /G. Wagner. – Tübingen : Mohr Siebeck, 1998. – 849 S.261Статьи на английском и немецком языках243. Ballesteros, M. H. The regime of party autonomy in the Brussels I Recast:the solutions adopted for agreements on jurisdiction / M. H. Ballesteros // Journal ofPrivate International Law. – 2014. – Vol. 10, Iss.
2. – P. 291–308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5235/17441048.10.2.291.244. Burkhardt, H. Report on the application of Regulation Brussels I in theMember States. Study JLS/C4/2005/03. September 2007 [Electronic resource] /H. Burkhardt,Th.Pfeiffer,P. Schlosser.–Modeofaccess:http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/news/docs/study_application_brussels_1_en.pdf (date ofaccess: 16.04.2019).245. Camilleri, S. P. Article 23: Formal validity, material validity or both? /S. P.
Camilleri // Journal of Private International Law. – 2011. – Vol. 7, No. 2. –P. 297–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/174410411796868670.246. Dickinson, A. Surveying the Proposed Brussels I bis Regulation: SolidFoundations but Renovation Needed / A. Dickinson // Yearbook of Private InternationalLaw. – 2010. – Vol. 12. – P. 247–309.247. Giuliano, M. Report on the Convention on the law applicable to contractualobligations [Electronic resource] / M. Giuliano, P. Lagarde // Official Journal.31.10.1980–P. 0001–0050.–Modeofaccess:http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31980Y1031(01):EN:HTML(date of access: 16.04.2019).248.
Gottwald,P.InternationaleGerichtsstandsvereinbarungen:Verträgezwischen Prozeßrecht und materiellem Recht / P. Gottwald // Festschrift für WolframHenckel zum 70. Geburtstag am 21. April 1995 ; Ed. by W. Gerhardt, U. Diederichsen,B. Rimmelspacher, J. Costede. – Berlin, New York : Walter de Gruyter, 1995. – P. 295–310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110903355.249. Heinze, Ch. A. Choice of Court Agreements, Coordination of Proceedingsand Provisional Measures in the Reform of the Brussels I Regulation / Ch.
A. Heinze //Rabel Journal of Comparative and International Private Law (RabelsZ). – 2011. –Vol. 75, Iss. 3. – P. 581–618.262250. Kegel, G. Paternal Home and Dream Home: Traditional Conflict of Lawsand the American Reformers / G. Kegel // The American Journal of ComparativeLaw. – 1979. – Vol. 27, No. 4. – P. 615–633.251. Kessedjian, C. Synthesis of the work of the Special Commission of June1997 on international jurisdiction and the effects of foreign judgments in civil andcommercial matters. Preliminary Document No. 8. November 1997 [Electronicresource] / C. Kessedjian. – Mode of access: https://www.hcch.net/en/publications-andstudies/details4/?pid=3491&dtid=35 (date of access: 16.04.2019).252.
Magnus, U. Choice of Court Agreements in the Review Proposal for theBrussels I Regulation / U. Magnus // The Brusssels Review Proposal uncovered ed. byE. Lein. – London : British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2012. –P. 83–103.253. Merett, L. Article 23 of the Brussels I Regulation: a Comprehensive Codefor Jurisdiction Agreements? / L. Merett // International and Comparative LawQuarterly. – 2009. – Vol. 58, Iss.
3. – P. 545–564.254. Merrett, L. Interpreting non-exclusive jurisdiction agreements / L. Merett //Journal of Private International Law. – 2018. – Vol. 14, Iss. 1. – P. 38–65.255. Ratković, T. Choice-of-court agreements under the Brussels I Regulation(Recast) / T. Ratković, D. Zgrabljić Rotar // Journal of Private International Law. –2013. – Vol. 9, Iss. 2. – P.
245–268. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/17441048.9.2.245.256. Takahashi, K. Damages for Breach of a Choice-of-Court Agreement /K. Takahashi // Yearbook of Private International Law. – 2008. – Vol. 10. – P. 57–91.257. Tan, D. C. Damages for Breach of Forum Selection Clauses, PrincipledRemedies, and Control of International Civil Litigation / D.