диссертация (1169699), страница 42
Текст из файла (страница 42)
Szczepanik Remedies Available Under BilateralInvestment Treaties for Breach of Intellectual Property Rights// TransnationalDispute Management Issue : Vol. 6, issue 2 Published : August 2009[Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.transnational-disputemanagement.com/ Дата обращения ( 14.08.2012)462.Report of the Advisory Committee on International Economic PolicyRegarding the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (September 2009) //Transnational Dispute Management issue: Vol.
7, issue 1 Published : April2010 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.transnationaldispute-management.com/ Дата обращения ( 15.08.2012)463.Rhoten D., Powell W.W. The Frontiers of Intellectual Property:Expanded Protection versus New Models of Open Science // Annual Reviewof Law and Social Science. 2007. Т. 3. № 1. p. 345–373.464.Rhoten D., Powell W.W.
The Frontiers of Intellectual Property:Expanded Protection versus New Models of Open Science // Annual Reviewof Law and Social Science. 2007. Т. 3. № 1. p. 345–373.465.Ribstein L., Kobayshi B. Economic Analysis of Uniform State Laws,An // J. Legal Stud. 1996. Т. 25. № 1. p. 131–199.466.Robert R.Willis “International Patent Law: Should United States andForeign Patent Laws be Uniform? An Analysis of the benefits, problems andbarriers // North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology vol.10 issue2: Spring2009 p. 283 – 312467.Rodrik D.
Globalization and growth — looking in the wrong places //Journal of Policy Modeling. 2004. Т. 26. № 4. p. 513–517.468.Roffe P. Free Trade Agreements and the Americas // IIC - InternationalReview of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2013. Т. 44.
№ 8. p.932–942.224469.Ron J.T. Corbett “Impact of NAFTA and TRIPS on intellectualproperty rights protections in Canada and the United States” // NAFTA. Lawand Business Review of the Americas Fall 2000 p.591470.Rosenberg J. Encyclopedia of the North American Free TradeAgreement, the New American Community, and Latin-American Trade. ,1995.471.Rößler M.
The court of jurisdiction for joint parties in internationalpatent disputes // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law. 2007. Т. 66. № 1. p. 1–17.472.Ruse-Khan H., Jaeger T. Policing Patents Worldwide?-EC BorderMeasures Against Transiting Generic Drugs Under EC and WTO IntellectualProperty Regimes // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law.
2009. p. 1–18.473.Ushakova E., Lazarev G. Russia: Domestic Litigation or InternationalArbitration? // Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol. 9, issue 3Published : April 2012 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Дата обращения (25.08.2012)474.Ryan H. Flax “NAFTA & the Patent systems of its Members: is TherePotential for a Unification of the North American Patent System” // NAFTA.Law and Business Review of the Americas Summer 1999475.Said M.K. El.
The European Trips-Plus Model and The Arab World:From Co-Operation to Association— A New Era in the Global IPRS Regime?// Liverpool Law Review. 2007. Т. 28. № 1. p. 143–174.476.Salmon P. Cooperation Between the World Intellectual PropertyOrganization (WIPO) and the World Trade Organization (WTO) // .
John’s J.Legal Comment. 2003. Т. 17. № 3. p. 429 – 441.477.Sánchez-Ancochea D., Shadlen K. The political economy ofhemispheric integration: responding to globalization in the Americas. , 2008.225478.Sandro Hassan “Patent Equivalence – Some Italian Decisions from anInternational Perspective” // IIC - International Review of IntellectualProperty and Competition Law p. 661-678479.Scafidi S.
The “good old days” of TRIPS: the U.S. trade agenda and theextension of pharmaceutical test data protection. // Yale journal of healthpolicy, law, and ethics. 2004. Т. 4. № 2. p. 341–51.480.Schafar Lifshitz “The Liberal Transformation of Spousal Law: Past,Present and Future”//Theoretical Inquires in Law vol.13 (2012) p.15 – 73481.Schickl L. Protection of Industrial Design in the United States and inthe EU: Different Concepts or Different Labels? // The Journal of WorldIntellectual Property.
2013. Т. 16. № 1. p. 15–38.482.Schlag P. The Problems of Transaction Costs // Southern CaliforniaLaw Review. Т. 61. p. 1661–1700.483.Schmidt J.P. Mercado Común del Sur // Max Planck Encyclopedia ofPublic International Law. 2012.484.Schmitt-Egner P. The Concept of “Region”: Theoretical andMethodological Notes on its Reconstruction // Journal of EuropeanIntegration. 2002. Т. 24.
№ 3. p. 179–200.485.Schneider D. Patenting of pharmaceuticals-Still a challenge? // IIC -International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2008. p.1–13.486.Schoenknecht M. Determination of Patent Damages in Germany // IIC- International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2012. p.309 – 332.487.Schreuer C. Regionalism v . Universalism // Eur. J.
Int’l L. 1995. №1979. p. 477–499.488.Schuster M.I. The Court of Justice of the European Union’s Ruling onthe Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem-Cell-Related Invention (Case C34/10) // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and CompetitionLaw. 2012. Т. 2. № 1. p. 1–12.226489.Sehgal S. The Evolution of NAFTA: An Experience in Regionalism //India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs. 2011.
Т. 66. № 3. p. 303–316.490.Shiue C. From political fragmentation towards a customs union: Bordereffects of the German Zollverein, 1815 to 1855 // European Review ofEconomic History. 2005. Т. 9. p. 129 – 162.491.Sommer A. Trouble on the Commons: A Lockean Justification forPatent Law Harmonization // J. Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y. 2005. Т. 6. №1994. p. 1–18.492.Zamora S. A proposal North American Regional Development Fund:The Next Phase of North American Integration Under NAFTA// LoyolaUniversity Chicago Law Journal vol.40 may 2008 p. 93 – 140493.Zamora S. Rethinking North America: Why NAFTA’s Laissez Faireapproach to integration is flawed and what to do about it // Villanova LawReview 2011 vol.56 p.
631 – 669494.Straus J., Klunker N. Harmonisation of international patent law // IIC -International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2007. p.1–22.495.Brophy S.D., B.A. Honours “A Procedurals Theory of SupranationalLaw” A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the requirements for the degree ofMaster of Arts Department of Law Carleton University Ottawa OntarioAugust 22, 2005496.Sweet A.S., Sandholtz W.
European integration and supranationalgovernance // Journal of European Public Policy. 1997. Т. 4. № 3. p. 297–317.497.Tamanaha B.Z. Understanding Legal Pluralism: Past to Present, Localto Global // Review Literature And Arts Of The Americas. 2007. Т. 30. №July. p. 375.227498.Tan L.H.
Will Asean Economic Integration Progress Beyond a FreeTrade Area? // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2008. Т. 53. №04.499.Taylor C. Regionalism: The Second-best Option //Louis U. Pub. L. Rev.2008. Т. 98. p. 155–200.500.Woodhouse E.J. The IPP Experience in Developing Countries //Transnational Dispute Management Vol. 4, issue 2 April 2007 [Электронныйресурс]//Режимдоступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Дата обращения ( 14.07.2012)501.Perkams M., Hosking J. The Protection of Intellectual Property Rightsthrough International Investment Agreements: Only a Romance or TrueLove?//Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol. 6, issue 2 Published :August2009[Электронныйресурс]//Режимдоступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Дата обращения (14.07.2012)502.Thimothy A. Lemper, Joshua R. Brucet “Beware the Scrivener Error:Curing the Drafting Error in the Federal Registration Defense to TrademarkDilution Claims”// Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal vol.19 (2011) p.169 – 192503.Thomas Jaeger “Back to the Square One? – An Assessment of LatestProposal for a Patent and Court for the Internal Market and PossibleAlternatives” // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law 2012 p.
186 – 308504.Thompson J. The North American Patent Office-A Comparative Lookat the NAFTA, The European Community, and the Community PatentConvention// Geo. Wash. J. Int’l L. & Econ. 1993. Т. 302. № 2. p. 1–19.505.Tilmann W. Moving towards completing the European Patent System:an Overview of the draft Agreement on a Unified Patent Court // ERA Forum.2012. Т.
13. № 1. p. 87–101.228506.Tomi Suryo Utomo “Pharmaceutical patent protection and theIntroduction of Generic Drugs in Indonesia in the Post-TRIPS Era – Is PatentLaw the only Factor Affecting the Introduction of Generic Drugs?” // IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2011 p.759 – 784507.Torremans P.L.C.
Benedetta Ubertazzi: Exclusive Jurisdiction inIntellectualProperty,Max-Planck-InstitutfürAusländischesundInternationales Privatrecht, Studien zum Ausländischen und InternationalenPrivatrecht, Vol. 273. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck 2012. pp. XVIII, 341. // IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2013.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
