диссертация (1169699), страница 39
Текст из файла (страница 39)
Intellectual property rights in a knowledge-basedeconomy. , 2001.287.Creech K. Introduction to the Legal System. , 2007.288.Cremona M. The European Union and Regional Trade Agreements //European Yearbook of International Economic Law / C. Herrmann, J.P.Terhechte. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010. p. 245–268.289.Crowne E. Fishing TRIPS: A Look at the History of the Agreement onTrade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property // Creighton Int’l & Comp. LJ.2011. p. 1–19.290.D. Blandford .
Regionalism versus Multilateralism: the world tradingsystem //Economic Integration in the Western Hemisphere. Proceeding of aSymposium Sponsored by international Agricultural Trade ResearchConsortium and Inter-American institute for Cooperation on agriculture june7- 9 1995 San Jose (Costa Rica)206291.Darryl C. Wilson “The Carribean Intellectual Property Office(CARIPO) // Michigan State Journal of International Law vol.19 (2011) p.551– 587292.Darryl C.Wilson “The carribean intellectual property office:new,usefull, and neccesary “//Michigan State University college of lawJournal of International law Vol 19, issue 3 2011 г.
p. 551-552293.Dau-Schmidt K., Rasmusen E., Stake J. On game theory and the law //Law & Society Review,. 1997. Т. 31. № 3. P. 613–630.294.Davis N., Hayashi C. The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) Countriesand the World: Scenarios to 2025: Implications for Competitiveness // MDHanouz, S. El Diwany & T. Yousef, eds. 2007. p. 129–141.295.Desierto D., Diane A. ASEAN’s Constitutionalization of InternationalLaw: Challenges to Evolution under the new ASEAN Charter // ColumbiaJournal of Transnational Law. 2010.296.S. Theurich Designing Tailored Alternative Dispute Resolution inIntellectual Property: The Experience of WIPO // Transnational DisputeManagement Issue : Vol.
8, issue 2 Published : May 2011 [Электронныйресурс]//Режимдоступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Дата обращения (14.07.2012)297.Diane A. Desierto “ASEAN’s Constitutionalization of InternationalLaw: Challenges to Evolution under the New ASEAN Charter // ColumbiaJournal of Transnational Law vol.49 №2 (2011) p.268 – 320298.Dieter R. Schneider “Patenting of Pharmaceuticals – still a challenge?”// IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law2008 p. 511-525299.Dinwoodie G., Dreyfuss R. TRIPS and the Dynamics of IntellectualProperty Lawmaking’'(2004) // Case W. Res.
J. Int’l L. 2004. Т. 1. №forthcoming. p. 95–122.207300.Dinwoodie G.B., Dreyfuss R.C. International Intellectual Property Lawand the Public Domain of Science // Journal of International Economic Law.2004. Т. 7. p. 431–448.301.Doctor M. Prospects for deepening Mercosur integration: Economicasymmetry and institutional deficits // Review of International PoliticalEconomy. 2013. Т. 20. № 3. p. 515–540.302.Doctor M. Prospects for deepening Mercosur integration: Economicasymmetry and institutional deficits // Review of International PoliticalEconomy. 2013. Т. 20.
№ 3. p. 515–540.303.Duina F. Regional market building as a social process: an analysis ofcognitive strategies in NAFTA, the European Union and Mercosur //Economy and Society. 2004. Т. 33. № 3. p. 359–389.304.Duina F. Varieties of Regional Integration: The EU, NAFTA andMercosur // Journal of European Integration. 2006. Т. 28.
№ 3. С. 247–275.305.Duina F., Buxbaum J. Regional trade agreements and the pursuit ofstate interests: institutional perspectives from NAFTA and Mercosur //Economy and Society. 2008. Т. 37. № 2. p. 193–223.306.Dunoff J. North American Regional Economic Integration: RecentTrends and Developments // European Yearbook of International EconomicLaw ….
2010. p. 297–311.307.Dutfield G. Turning knowledge into power: intellectual property andthe world trade system // Australian Journal of International Affairs. 2005. Т.59. № 4. p. 533–547.308.Dutfield G., Suthersanen U. Harmonisation or differentiation inintellectual property protection? The lessons of history // Prometheus. 2005.Т. 23.
№ 2. p. 131–147.309.Dutfield G., Suthersanen U. Harmonisation or differentiation inintellectual property protection? The lessons of history // Prometheus. 2005.Т. 23. № 2. p. 131–147.208310.Ee Y.L. The Beginning of Economic Integration Between East Asia andNorth America? - Forming the Third Largest Free Trade Area Between theUnited States and the Republic of Korea // Journal of World Trade. 2009. Т.41. № May 2007. p. 1091–1123.311.Ellan M.I.S.P., Ong M.W. Trade Facilitation in ASEAN and ASEAN +1 FTAs : An Analysis of Provisions and Progress // Nature. 2009.
Т. 2. № 2.p. 243–279.312.El-Said M. Editorial: Free Trade, Intellectual Property and Trips-PlusWorld // Liverpool Law Review. 2007. Т. 28. № 1. p. 1–9.313.Emir Aly Crowne “Fishing TRIPS: A look at the History of theagreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property // CreightonInternational and Comparative Law Journal vol.2 p.77 – 99314.Endeshaw A.
Harmonization of Intellectual Property Laws in Asean //The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 1999. Т. 1. № 2.315.Erstling J., Boutillon I. Patent Cooperation Treaty: At the Center of theInternational Patent System, The // Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 2005.316.Estevadeordal A. Harmonizing preferential rules of origin regimesaround the world // Multilateralizing Regionalism Challenges for the GlobalTrading System Multilateralizing regional trade arrangements in Asia 1. ,2009. p.
262–363.317.European Patent Convention // Published by European Patent OfficeAugust 2010318.Evans G. The Comparative Advantages of Geographical Indicationsand Community Trade Marks for the Marketing of Agricultural Products inthe European Union // IIC. International review of industrial property ….2010. p. 1–24.319.Fabbricotti A. European Community, Membership in InternationalOrganizations or Institutions ). // Max Planck Encyclopedia of PublicInternational Law.
2012.209320.Mendenhall J. Fair Treatment of Intellectual Property Rights UnderBilateral Investment Treaties // Transnational Dispute Management Issue :Vol. 6, issue 2 August 2009 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/Датаобращения(14.07.2012)321.Fawcett L. Exploring regional domains: a comparative history ofregionalism // International Affairs. 2004. p.
429–446.322.Fernand de Visscher “European Unified Patent Court: Another Morerealistic and more Equitable Approach should be Examinated” // GRUR Int.2012 p. 214 – 224323.Fernández-Alvarez D. The IP and patent information scene in Mexico// World Patent Information. 2013. Т.
35. № 1. p. 31–37.324.Ficsor M. Coexistence of national patents, European patents and patentswith unitary effect // ERA Forum. 2013. Т. 14. № 1. p. 95–115.325.Fiorentino R. The landscape of regional trade agreements and WTOsurveillance // … for the global trading …. 2009.326.Forteau M. Regional Cooperation // Max Planck Encyclopedia ofPublic International Law. 2012.327.Foster K., Alexander D. Opportunities for Mexico, Canada and theUnited States: A Summary of Intellectual Property Rights Under the NorthAmerican Free Trade Agreement // Rutgers Computer & Tech. LJ. 1994.
Т.1992. № 1993. p. 1–27.328.Frangois Dessemontet A European Point of View on the ALI principles– Intellectual property: Principles Governing Jurisdiction, Choice of Law, andJudgment in Transnational Disputes// Brooklyn Journal Int’l L vol.30 (2005)329.Frank D. Prager A History of Intellectual Property from 1545 to 1787”// Journal of the Patent Office Society 1944 vol.XXVI №11330.Frankenberg G. National, Supranational, and Global: Ambivalence inthe Practice of Civil Society // Law and Critique.
2008. Т. 19. № 3. С. 275–296.210331.Franzosi M., Sanctis G. De. Increasing Worldwide Significance ofEuropean Patent Litigation, The // AIPLA QJ. 1997. Т. 25. № 1. С. 68 – 100.332.Friedrich-Karl Beier Governmental Promotion of Innovation and thePatent System// IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law 1982 p. 545 - 565333.Frisch D. Commercial Law’s Complexity // Geo. Mason L. Rev. 2010.Т. 1. № 2006. P. 245–300.334.G.Aguilar Alvarez and W.W.Park The New Face of InvestmentArbitration: NAFTA Chapter 11 // The Yale Journal of International Lawvol.28 2003 p.365 – 406335.G.E.
Evans The Comparative Advantages of Geographical Indicationsand Community Trade Marks from the Marketing of Agricultural Products inthe European Union // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law 2010 p. 645 – 674336.Gardini G.L. MERCOSUR: What You See Is Not (Always) What YouGet // European Law Journal. 2011.
Т. 17. № 5. С. 683–700.337.Gathii J. Neoliberal Turn in Regional Trade Agreements, The // Wash.L. Rev. 2011. p. 1–30.338.Geldi H.K. Trade effects of regional integration: A panel cointegrationanalysis // Economic Modelling. 2012. Т. 29. № 5. p. 1566–1570.339.Germinario C. Double patenting in the practice of the European PatentOffice // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and CompetitionLaw. 2011. Т. 54.
№ 3. p. 3–9.340.Gitter D.M. the Conflict in the European Community BetweenCompetition Law and Intellectual Property Rights: a Call for LegislativeClarification of the Essential Facilities Doctrine // American Business LawJournal. 2008. Т. 40. № 2. p. 217–300.341.Gómez-Mera L. Domestic constraints on regional cooperation:Explaining trade conflict in MERCOSUR // Review of International PoliticalEconomy. 2009.
Т. 16. № 5. p. 746–777.211342.Gross L., Wetzel R.G., Rauschning D. Vienna Convention on the Lawof Treaties // The American Journal of International Law. 1969. Т. 63. № 4.p. 875.343.Grosse Ruse-Khan H. и др. Principles for Intellectual PropertyProvisions in Bilateral and Regional Agreements // IIC - International Reviewof Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2013. Т. 44. № 8.
p. 878–883.344.Grossi P. The Foundations of the Modern Legal System // A History ofEuropean Law.345.Hamanaka S. Comparative analysis of technical assistance obligationsunder WTO and FTAs: the missing perspective of the regionalismmultilateralism debate // Legal issues of economic integration. 2011. Т. 4. №4. p. 341–388.346.Hanonako Shintano “Corporative Analysis of Technical AssistanceObligations under WTO and FTA’s: The Missing Perspectives of theRegionalism Multilateralism Debate” // Legal Issues of Economic Integration2011 38 no.4 p. 341 – 388347.Hanson J., Yosifon D. The situation: An introduction to the situationalcharacter, critical realism, power economics, and deep capture // Universityof Pennsylvania Law Review.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
