диссертация (1169699), страница 41
Текст из файла (страница 41)
Т. 43. № 3.p. 583–606.394.Koh P.M.C. Enhancing Economic Co-Operation: A RegionalArbitration Centre for Asean? // International & Comparative Law Quarterly.2008. Т. 49. № 02.395.Kondo E. The effect of patent protection on foreign direct investment //Journal of World Trade. 1995. № 1990. p. 97–102.396.Koskenniemi M.
The Politics of International Law - 20 Years Later //European Journal of International Law. 2009. Т. 20. № 1. p. 7–19.397.Koskenniemi M., Leino P. Fragmentation of International Law?Postmodern Anxieties // Leiden Journal of International Law. 2002. Т. 15. №3. p. 553–579.398.Kreinin M.E., Plummer M.G. Effects of regional integration on FDI:An empirical approach // Journal of Asian Economics. 2008.
Т. 19. № 5-6. p.447–454.399.Lam N., Wattanapruttipaisan T. Intellectual property rights andenterprise development in ASEAN // … of World Intellectual Property. 2004.400.Larouche P., Cserne P. National Legal Systems and Globalization //Springer. 2013.401.Laruelle M., Peyrouse S. Regional Organisations in Central Asia:Patterns of Interaction, Dilemmas of Efficiency // ucentralasia.org. 2012. №10.218402.Lenz T. Spurred Emulation: The EU and Regional Integration inMercosur and SADC // West European Politics.
2012. Т. 35. № 1. p. 155–173.403.Lifshitz S. The Liberal Transformation of Spousal Law: Past, Presentand Future // Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2012. № 1989. p. 1–40.404.Liza Vertinsky “An Organisational Approach to the Design of PatentLaw” // Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology vol.13 (2012)p.211 – 279405.Looise J., Torka N., Zagelmeyer S.
Industrial Relations Systems,Innovation and Economic Performance: Uncovering Myth and Reality from aDutch Point of View. // … Law and Industrial Relations. 2012. Т. 2. № 2. p.249–276.406.Luca Gardini G. Who Invented Mercosur? // Diplomacy & Statecraft.2007. Т. 18.
№ 4. p. 805–830.407.Luhmann N. Law as a social system. , 2004.408.Malamud A. Latin American Regionalism and EU Studies // Journal ofEuropean Integration. 2010. Т. 32. № 6. p. 637–657.409.Malloy John Cyrill III “The Caribbean basin initiative: a proposal toattract corporate investment and technological infusion via an inter-Americansystem of cooperative protection for intellectual property” University ofMiami inter American Law review vol 23 issue 1 1991 стр175-194410.Mann C., Liu X. The information technology agreement: sui generis ormodel stepping stone // Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the ….2009.411.Mansfield E.D., Solingen E.
Regionalism // Annual Review of PoliticalScience. 2010. Т. 13. № 1. p. 145–163.412.Marar A.D. The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf //Law and Business Review of the Americas. 2004. Т. 10. № 3.219413.Marceau G., Wyatt J. Dispute Settlement Regimes Intermingled:Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO // … of International DisputeSettlement. 2010. Т. 1. № 1. p. 67–95.414.Marcilio Toscana Franca Filho, Lucas Lixinski, Maria Belen OlmosGiupponi The law of MERCOSUR / Oxford and Portland, Oregon 2010415.Marcus Schon Knecht “Determination of Patent Damages in Germany”// IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law2012 p. 309 – 332416.Marinescu C.
Transaction Costs and Institutions’ Efficiency: A CriticalApproach // American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2012. Т. 71. №2.417.Mario Franzosi, Giustino de Santis //AIPLA Quarterly Journal vol.25№1 winter 1997 p.67 – 99418.Martina Ines Schuster “The Court of Justice of the European Union’sRuling on the Patentability of Human Embryonic Stem-Cell-RelatedInventions (case C-34/10) // IIC - International Review of IntellectualProperty and Competition Law 2012 p.626-640419.Mathias Brandi-Dohrn “Some Critical Observation on Competence andprocedure of the unified patent court” // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law 4/2012 vol.43 p.372 – 390420.Matthias Brandi-Dohrn “Some Critical Observation on Competenceand Procedure of the Unified Patent Court” // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law 2012 p. 372 – 289421.Matthias James “Multilateral Aspects of Advanced RegulatoryCooperation Considerationfor Canada – EU Comprehensive TradeAgreement (CETA)” // Legal Issues of Economic Integration 39 no.1 (2012)422.Matthias Lamping “Enhanced cooperation – A proper approach tomarket integration in the Field of unitary patent protection” //IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 8/2011vol.42 p.879-926220423.Medema S.G.
A case of mistaken identity: George Stigler, “TheProblem of Social Cost,” and the Coase theorem // European Journal of Lawand Economics. 2010. Т. 31. № 1. p. 11–38.424.Mejer M., Pottelsberghe de la Potterie B. van. Economic incongruitiesin the European patent system // European Journal of Law and Economics.2011. Т. 34. № 1. p. 215–234.425.Mercosur : Resoluciones y decisiones 1991-1995/ Buenos Aires :Cámara de Comercio Argentino-Brasileña 1996426.MERCOSUR S.
del. Normas Del Mercosur Relativas A CuestionesLaborales Y De La Seguridad Social / Vasa. 2006.427.Merges R. From medieval guilds to open source software: Informalnorms, appropriability institutions, and innovation // AppropriabilityInstitutions, and Innovation November, 2005. p. 1–25.428.Mestral A. De. NAFTA: The Unfulfilled Promise of the FTA //European Law Journal.
2011. Т. 17. № 5. p. 649–666.429.Michael Hasseme «Gewerbliche Schutzrechte im Mercosur: Patent-,Muster-, Sorten- und Kennzeichenschutz in Argentinien, Brasilien, Paraguayund Uruguay»/ Nomos 2000430.Michael N. Meller “Principles of Patentability and some other Basic fora Global Patent System” // Journal of Patent and Trademark Office Society431.Mireille van Eechoud, P. Bernt Hugenholtz, Lucie Guibault, Stef vanGompel, Natali Helberger, Harmonizing European Copyright Law: TheChallenges of Better Lawmaking /Kluwer Law international 2009432.Mohamed R.
Hassanien “Bilateral WTO-Plus Free Trade Agreementsin the Middle East: a Case Study of OFTA in the Post Trips Era” // WakeforestIntellectual Property Law Journal vol.8 №2 (2007-2008) p. 161 – 195433.Mohammed F. Al-Hajeri The gulf cooperation council patent office//World Patent Information № 28 Elsevier 2006221434.Moravcsik A. A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs andInternational Cooperation // International Organization.
1999. Т. 53. № 2. p.267–306.435.Mossinghoff G., Kuo V. World Patent System Circa 20XX, AD // J.Pat. & Trademark Off. Soc’y. 1998. p. 1–26.436.Murray P. East Asian Regionalism and EU Studies // Journal ofEuropean Integration. 2010. Т. 32. № 6. p. 597–616.437.Murray P. East Asian Regionalism and EU Studies // Journal ofEuropean Integration. 2010. Т. 32. № 6. p. 597–616.438.Ng E. ASEAN IP Harmonization: Striking the Delicate Balance // PaceInt’l L. Rev. 2013. p.
1–21.439.Ng-Loy Wee Loon /Law of intellectual property of Singapore/Singapore; Sweet & Maxwell Asia 2008440.Normativa seleccionada «Instrumentos fundacionales del Mercosur» /Secretaria del Mercosur:sector de normativa, documentación y divulgaciónMontevideo agosto de 2012441.O’Brien D. CARICOM: Regional Integration in a Post-Colonial World// European Law Journal. 2011. Т. 17.
№ 5. p. 630–648.442.O’Keefe T. Latin American and Caribbean trade agreements: Keys to aprosperous community of the Americas. Brill, 2009.443.Oesch M. Commercial Treaties // Max Planck Encyclopedia of PublicInternational Law. 2012.444.Office P. Council Regulation (EU) No 1260/2012 of 17 December 2012implementing enhanced cooperation in the area of the creation of unitarypatent protection with regard to the applicable translation arrangements //Official Journal of the European Union. 2012. Т. 14.
№ 1260. p. 89–92.445.Otto J. Sharia Incorporated: A Comporative Overview of the LegalSystems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. , 2010.446.Pagenberg J. Unitary patent and Unified Court -- What lies ahead? //Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.
2013. Т. 8. № 6. p. 480–485.222447.Paikin D. UNASUR -A First Step to Bi-Regional Integration in SouthAmerica? // ZEI Regional Integration Observer. 2008. Т. 2. № 3.448.Parish M. International Courts and the European Legal Order //European Journal of International Law. 2012. Т. 23. № 1. p. 141–153.449.Pateriya S. and others Regulatory Aspects of Pharmaceuticals’ Exportsin Gulf Cooperation Council Countries // Journal of young pharmacists JYP.2011.
Т. 3. p. 155–162.450.Peerenboom R. School of Law // Social Science Research. 2006. Т. 93.№ February. p. 833–842.451.Peeters C., Potterie B.D. La. Economic and management perspectiveson intellectual property rights. , 2006.452.Peter K. Yu “Sinic trade agreement” // University of California, Davis2011 C. 953 – 1028453.Peter Schmitt-Egner “The Concept of ‘Region’: Theoretical andMethodological Notes on its Reconstruction” // Journal of EuropeanIntegration (2002) 24:3 179 – 200454.Piattoni S.
Multi‐level Governance: a Historical and ConceptualAnalysis // Journal of European Integration. 2009. Т. 31. № 2. p. 163–180.455.Pila J. On the European Requirement for an Invention // InternationalReview of Intellectual Property and …. 2010. Т. 52. № 1. p. 1–17.456.Rachel Brewster “The Surprising Benefits to Developing Countries ofLinking International Trade and Intellectual Property” // Chicago Journal ofIntellectual Law Summer 2011 vol.12 №1 p.1 – 54457.Rajasingh B. Parental lines of extant hybrids cannot be registered asnew plant varieties // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice.
2013.Т. 8. № 2. p. 112–114.458.Rangel-Ortiz H. Intellectual Property, NAFTA, Trips and Mexican Law// Int’l Intell. Prop. L. & Pol'y 30-. 1998. № Article 19. p. 1–12.459.Ravenhill J. East Asian regionalism: Much Ado about Nothing? //Review of International Studies. 2009. Т. 35. № S1. p. 215.223460.Ravenhill J. The “new East Asian regionalism”: A political dominoeffect // Review of International Political Economy. 2010. Т. 17. № 2. p. 178–208.461.White B.A., R.J.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
