диссертация (1169699), страница 38
Текст из файла (страница 38)
Sommer “Trouble on the Commons: A LockeanJustification for Patent Law Harmonization”// Journal of the Patent &Trademark Office Society February 2005230.Anthony D.Sabatelly“ImpedimenttoGlobalPatentLawHarmonization” // Northern Kentucky Law Review vol.22 (1995) p.579 – 620231.Antoni E., Matthew S., Kati S. Multilateralizing RTAs in the Americas :state // Multilateralizing Regionalism Challenges for the Global Trading200System Multilateralizing regional trade arrangements in Asia 1 / под ред. B.Richard, L. Patrick. , 2013.
p. 427 – 491.232.Antons C. Law and Development in East and South-East Asia. , 2013.233.Arlene Nolan Farolan “Harmonization of the Patent Systems ofNAFTA nations”// Currents: International Trade Law Journal summer 2001p. 54 – 64234.Aubert S., Müller J.-P. Incorporating institutions, norms and territoriesin a generic model to simulate the management of renewable resources //Artificial Intelligence and Law. 2012. Т. 21. № 1. p. 47–78.235.Baccini L. Cheap Talk: Transaction Costs, Quality of Institutions, andTrade Agreements // European Journal of International Relations. 2012. p. 1– 38.236.Bagley C.E.
What’s Law Got to Do With It?: Integrating Law andStrategy // American Business Law Journal. 2010. Т. 47. № 4. p. 587–639.237.Baldwin R. Introduction // Multilateralizing Regionalism Challengesfor the Global Trading System. , 2013. С. 1–10.238.Baldwin R., Carpenter T. Why not in the WTO? The erosion of WTOcentricity in trade liberalisation // Centre for Trade …. 2009. № September.p.
17–18.239.Barber W. Global Patent Harmonization: An Idea Whose Time HasCome // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and CompetitionLaw. 2013.240.Barroso W., Quoniam L., Pacheco E. Patents as technologicalinformation in Latin America // World Patent Information. 2009. Т. 31. № 3.p.
207–215.241.Beer J. Applying Best Practice Principles to International IntellectualProperty Lawmaking // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law. 2013. Т. 44. № 8. p. 884–901.201242.Beier F. Governmental promotion of innovation and the patent system// IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law.1982. p. 1–16.243.Belov D., Starostina E. European Yearbook of International EconomicLaw 2010 // International Affairs. 2010.
Т. 1997. p. 313–330.244.Bhala R. Competitive Liberalization, Competitive Imperialism, andIntellectual Property // Liverpool Law Review. 2007. Т. 28. № 1. p. 77–105.245.Bielig A. Intellectual property and economic development in Germany:empirical evidence for 1999–2009 // European Journal of Law andEconomics. 2012.246.Black J. Lord Acton’s theory of the supranational state and today'sEurope: Between the tradition of the British Empire and of the Holy RomanEmpire // The European Legacy.
1998. Т. 3. № 6. p. 76–86.247.Blakeney M. The Role of Intellectual Property Law in RegionalCommercial Unions in Europe and Asia // Prometheus. 1998. Т. 16. № 3. p.341–350.248.Blakeney M. The role of intellectual property law in regionalcommercial unions // The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 1998. Т. 1.p. 691 – 709.249.Blyde J.S., Fernández-Arias E., Giordano P. Deepening Integration ofMERCOSUR: Dealing with Disparities. , 2008.250.Bontis N. Intellectual capital: an exploratory study that developsmeasures and models // Management decision.
1998. p. 63–76.251.Bouzas R., Veiga P. da M., Torrent R. In-depth analysis of Mercosurintegration, its prospectives and the effects thereof on the market access ofEU goods, services and investment // … , Observatory of Globalization, ….2002. № November. p. 1 – 530.252.Boyle a. E. Some Reflections on the Relationship of Treaties and SoftLaw // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2008. Vol. 48. № 04.
p.901-913202253.Brandi-Dohrn M. Some Critical Observations on Competence andProcedure of the Unified Patent Court // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law. 2012. p. 1–16.254.Brian Cimdolic The Impact of Regional Trade Areas on InternationalIntellectual Property Rights // IDEA – The Intellectual Property Law Reviewvol.48 №1 (2007) p.53 –255.Briggs K. Does patent harmonization impact the decision and volumeof high technology trade? // International Review of Economics & Finance.2013.
Т. 25. p. 35–51.256.Bryer L., Lebson S., Asbell M. Intellectual Property Operations andImplementation in the 21st Century Corporation. , 2011.257.Burhop C. The transfer of patents in Imperial Germany // Journal ofEconomic History. 2010. p. 921 – 939.258.Burk D.L. Law and Economics of Intellectual Property: In Search ofFirst Principles // Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2012.
Т. 8. №1. p. 397–414.259.Burk D.L. Law and Economics of Intellectual Property: In Search ofFirst Principles // Annual Review of Law and Social Science. 2012. Т. 8. №1. p. 397–414.260.Busch M.L. Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and DisputeSettlement in International Trade // International Organization. 2007. Т. 61.№ 04.261.Busche J. National Treatment, Principle ), // Max Planck Encyclopediaof Public International Law. 2012.262.C.M.Correa “Bilateral Investment Agreements: Agents of New GlobalStandards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights” // TransnationalDispute Management vol.4 issue 4 october 2004 [Электронный ресурс] //Режим доступа: http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Датаобращения ( 14.07.2012)203263.C.O’Neal Taylor “Regionalism the second – best option?” // Saint LouisUniversity Public Law Review vol.XXVIII p.
155 – 200264.Calabresi G., Melamed A.D. Property Rules, Liability Rules, andInalienability: One View of the Cathedral // Harvard Law Review. 1972. Т.85. № 6. p. 1089–1128.265.Calboli I. Reviewing the (Shrinking) Principle of TrademarkExhaustion in the European Union (Ten Years Later) // Marq. Intell.
Prop. L.Rev. 2012. Т. 7. № 1. p. 1–15.266.Carbonara E., Parisi F. The paradox of legal harmonization // PublicChoice. 2007. Т. 132. № 3-4. p. 367–400.267.Cardwell R., Ghazalian P.L. The Effects of the TRIPS Agreement onInternational Protection of Intellectual Property Rights // The InternationalTrade Journal. 2012. Т. 26. № 1. p. 19–36.268.Carvalho N.P. De. Toward a Unified Theory of Intellectual Property:The Differentiating Capacity (and Function) as the Thread That Unites All itsComponents // The Journal of World Intellectual Property.
2012. Т. 15. № 4.p. 251–279.269.Chartrand H.H. Intellectual Property Rights in the Postmodern World //The Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society. 1996. Т. 25. № 4. p. 306–319.270.Chase K. a. Economic Interests and Regional Trading Arrangements:The Case of NAFTA // International Organization. 2003. Т. 57. № 01.
p. 137–174.271.Chinkin C.M. The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change inInternational Law // International & Comparative Law Quarterly. 2008. Т. 38.№ 04. p. 850 –866.272.Chiou J. The Patent Quality Control Process: Can We Afford An(Rationally) Ignorant Patent Offices? // American Law & EconomicsAssociation Annual …. 2008. № February.204273.Christian H. Nguyen “A Unitary ASEAN Patent Law in the Aftermathof TRIPS” // Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association vol.8 №2 (1999)p.453 – 488274.Christian von D. Patent Scope in English and German Law Under theEuropean Patent Convention 1973 and 2000 // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law. 2008. p.
384 – 418.275.ChristopherAnthons,MichaelBlakeney,ChristopherHeathIntellectual property harmonization within ASEAN and APEC / Kluwer LawInternational 2004276.Christopher Arnold “Chalk Talks – The AIA and TTOS: HowTechnology Transfer Offices Can Best Handle the Changes in Patent LawBrought By the Americas Inventions Act” // Journal of Law’s Evolutionvol.41 April 2012 p.417 – 425277.Christopher Health “Intellectual property harmonization withinASEAN and APEC” // Kluwer law INTERNATIONAL (Max Plank institutefor Foreign and International Patent, Copyright and Competition Law Vol.10)278.Christopher Hunter, William Manson, Margaret Ann Wilkinson“Intellectual Property Rights Canada – United States Relationships” // Canada– United States Law Journal vol.36 №1 p.170 – 198279.Christopher Wadlow “Strasbourg, the forgotten Patent Convention, andthe Origins of the European Patent Jurisdiction” // IIC - International Reviewof Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2010 p.123-149280.Cimbolic B.
The Impact of Regional Trade Areas on InternationalIntellectual Property Rights // IDEA - The Intellectual Property Law Review.2007. Т. 417. № 2006. p. 1–9.281.Claudia Germinario “Double Patenting in the practice of the EPO” //IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2011p. 387-395282.Cockerham G.B. Regional Integration in ASEAN: Institutional Designand the ASEAN Way // East Asia. 2009.
Т. 27. № 2. p. 165–185.205283.Comparative Analysis of NAFTA's Chapter 20 and the WTO's DisputeSettlement Understanding by R. Leal-Arcas// Transnational DisputeManagement Issue : Vol. 8, issue 3 Published : September 2011[Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.transnational-disputemanagement.com/ Дата обращения ( 14.07.2012)284.Correa C. Bilateral investment agreements: Agents of new globalstandards for the protection of intellectual property rights? // TransnationalDispute Management.
2004. Т. 1. № 4. p. 1–31. [Электронный ресурс] //Режим доступа: http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Датаобращения ( 14.07.2012)285.R.A. Lavery Coverage of Intellectual Property Rights in InternationalInvestment Agreements: An Empirical Analysis of Definitions in a Sample ofBilateral Investment Treaties and Free Trade Agreements // TransnationalDispute Management Issue : Vol. 6, issue 2 Published : August 2009[Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.transnational-disputemanagement.com/ Дата обращения (14.07.2012)286.Cowan R., Harison E.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
