диссертация (1169699), страница 40
Текст из файла (страница 40)
2003. № 06. p. 129 – 346.348.Haracio Ranguel-Ortiz “Intellectual Property and NAFTA withreference to TRIP’s and Mexican Law” // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law 1996 C.349.Heath C. The Harmonisation of Intellectual Property in the ASEAN andAPEC // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and CompetitionLaw.
2012. p. 2–4.350.Helfer L., Alter K. The Influence of the Andean Intellectual PropertyRegime on Access to Medicines in Latin America // Balancing Wealth andHealth: Global Administrative law and the Battle over Intellelectual Paropertyand Acces to Medicines in Latin Maerica / под ред. R. Dreeyfuss, C.Rodrigues-Garavito.
, 2013. p. 1–13.212351.Helfer L., Alter K., Guerzovich M. Islands of Effective InternationalAdjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in theAndean Community // American Journal of International Law. 2009. Т. 103.№ 1. p. 1–47.352.Hengsbach F. Chances and risks of supranational integration //Intereconomics. 1978. Т. 13. № 3-4. p. 72–76.353.Henning Grosse Ruse-Khan, Thomas Jaeger “Policing PatentsWorldwide? – EC border Measures against Transiting Generic Drugs underEC and WTO Intellectual Property Regimes.” // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law 2009 p.502-538354.Henry L.
The ASEAN Way and Community Integration: Two DifferentModels of Regionalism // European Law Journal. 2007. Т. 13. № 6. p. 857–879.355.Herzstein R., Whitlock J. Regulating Regional Trade Agreements—ALegal Analysis // … : Legal, Economic and Political Analysis. 2005. p. 205 –246.356.Hirsch M. The Sociology of International Economic Law: SociologicalAnalysis of the Regulation of Regional Agreements in the World TradingSystem // European Journal of International Law. 2008.
Т. 19. № 2. p. 277–299.357.Holzapfel H. and others Interpreting Exceptions in Intellectual PropertyLaw. Origin and Proliferation // Transnational Dispute Management. 2006. Т.2. № 2001. p. 355–357. [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/Датаобращения(18.07.2012)358.Hsieh P. The Roadmap for a Prospective US-ASEAN FTA: Legal andGeopolitical Considerations // Journal of World Trade. 2012. Т. 2. № 2.
p.367–395.213359.Hsieh Pasha L. “The Roadmap for a Prospective US- ASEAN FTA:Legal and Geopolitical Consideration” // Journal of World Trade 46 №2(2012) p. 367 – 396360.Huaiwen H. The Development of Free Trade Agreements andInternational Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO Era - Newbilateralism and Its Future // IIC - International Review of IntellectualProperty and Competition Law. 2012. p. 253 – 283.361.Huaiwen He “The Development of Free Trade Agreements andInternational Protection of Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO Era – Newbilateralism and FTA’s Future” // IIC - International Review of IntellectualProperty and Competition Law 2010 p. 253 - 283362.Hurrell A.
Explaining the resurgence of regionalism in world politics //Review of International Studies. 2009. Т. 21. № 04. p. 331.363.Hussain S.M.N.A.S.M. Coercive Consent: The Law in Some ASEANJurisdictions // Netherlands International Law Review. 2009. Т. 43. № 01. p.33.364.Ian David McCluret “Commoditizing Intellectual Property Rights: ThePracticability of a commercialized and Transparent International Intellectualproperty Rights Market and need for International Standart” //BuffaloIntellectual Property Law Journal vol.6 Fall 2008 p.14 – 33365.Implementing Bylaws of the Amanded Patent Regulation of GulfCooperationCouncil[Электронныйресурс]//Режимдоступа:http://www.gccpo.org/conven//ImplementingBylaws.pdf Дата обращения21.11.2012366.Mortenson J.D. Intellectual Property as Transnational Investment:Some Preliminary Observations // Transnational Dispute Management Issue: Vol.
6, issue 2 Published : August 2009 [Электронный ресурс] // Режимдоступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/обращения ( 25.08.2012)214Дата367.Correa C.M. Intellectual Property Rights as an Investment: Options forDeveloping Countries// Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol. 6,issue 2 Published : August 2009 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Дата обращения (22.08.2012)368.Liberti L. Intellectual Property Rights in International InvestmentAgreements: An Overview// Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol.6, issue 2 Published : August 2009 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/Датаобращения(17.08.2012)369.Anderson A.M.,Young C.A., Razavi B.
International Arbitration: TheOnly Way to Resolve Multi-Jurisdictional Patent Disputes in a Single Forum//Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol. 6, issue 1 Published : March2009 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.transnationaldispute-management.com/ Дата обращения ( 25.08.2012)370.International Investment Arrangements: Trends and Emerging Issuesby UNCTAD// Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol. 5, issue 1Published : February 2008 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/ Дата обращения (25.08.2012)371.International K.L. Common Market Law Review // Common MarketLaw Review. 2009. Т.
46. № 2004. p. 1113–1134.372.Anderson A.M., Razavi B. International Standards for Protection ofIntellectual Property Rights Post-TRIPS: The Search for Consistency //Transnational Dispute Management Issue : Vol. 6, issue 2 Published : August2009 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим доступа: http://www.transnationaldispute-management.com/ Дата обращения ( 25.08.2012)373.Hwang M., Thio N. Investment Treaty Arbitration in Asia:Contemporary Issues and Challenges // Transnational Dispute ManagementIssue : Vol. 9, issue 3 Published : April 2012 [Электронный ресурс] // Режим215доступа:http://www.transnational-dispute-management.com/Датаобращения ( 25.08.2012)374.Jaeger T. All Back to Square One?-An Assessment of the LatestProposals for a Patent and Court for the Internal Market and PossibleAlternatives // International Review of Intellectual Property and ….
2011. p.286 – 308.375.Jaeger T. S. Luginbuehl: European patent law: towards a uniforminterpretation // China-EU Law Journal. 2011. Т. 1. № 1-2. p. 131–136.376.James A.R. Nafzigert “NAFTA’s regime for intellectual property: inthe mainstream of Public International Law” // Houston Journal ofinternational Law vol.19 1997 p. 807 – 828377.Pooley J., Huang V.
Multi-national Patent Litigation: Management ofDiscovery and Settlement Issues and the Role of the Judiciary// FordhaminterProperty Media & Entertainment Law Jornal vol.22 2011 p. 45 – 67378.Jan Kees Lousie, Nicole Torka & Stefan Zagelmeyer “IndustrialRelations System, Innovation and Economic Performance: Uncovering Mythand Reality from a Dutch Point of View”// The International Journal ofComparative Labor Law and Industrial Reltions vol.28 no 2 2012 p. 249 –276379.Kleinheisterkamp J. Legal Certainty in the MERCOSUR: the uniforminterpretation of Community Law//NAFTA. Law and Business Review of theAmericas winter 2000 p.5 – 34380.Jeremy De Beer “Implementing International Trade Agreements inFederal System: A look at the Canada – EU CETA’s Intellectual PropertyIssues // Legal Issues of Economic Integration 39 no.1 (2012) p.
51 – 71381.Jochen Glockner “The regulatory Framework for ComparativeAdvertising in Europe - Time for New Round of Harmonization” // IIC International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2012p.35-67216382.Johnston A.I. What (If Anything) Does East Asia Tell Us AboutInternational Relations Theory? // Annual Review of Political Science. 2012.Т. 15. № 1. p.
53–78.383.Jolls C., Sunstein C.R., Thaler R. A Behavioral Approach to Law andEconomics // Stanford Law Review. 1998. Т. 50. № 5. p. 1471–1550.384.Joseph Straus, Nina-Sophie Klunker “Harmonisation of InternationalPatent Law” // IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property andCompetition Law 2007 p. 907 – 936385.Jugurnath B., Stewart M., Brooks R.
Asia/Pacific Regional TradeAgreements: An empirical study // Journal of Asian Economics. 2007. Т. 18.№ 6. p. 974–987.386.Schade J. Is the Community (EU) Patent Behind the Times? –Globalization Urges Multilateral Cooperation // IIC - International Review ofIntellectual Property and Competition Law 2010 p. 806 – 818387.Justine Pila On the European Requirement for an invention // IIC -International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2010p.906 – 926388.Kali Murray Rules for Radicals: A politics of Patent Law // Journal ofIntellectual Property Law vol.14 2006 p.
64 – 110389.Kawai M., Wignaraja G. Multilateralizing Regionalism Challenges forthe Global Trading System Multilateralizing regional trade arrangements inAsia// Multilateralizing Regionalism Challenges for the Global TradingSystem. , 2013. p. 495–549.390.Kerry A. Chase “Economic Interests and Regional TradingArrangements: the Case of NAFTA”// International organizations 57 winter2003 p. 137 – 174391.Kerry J. Begleyth“Multinational Patent Enforcement: What The“Parochial” United States Can Learn From Past and Present European” //Cornell International Law Journal vol.40 2007 p.
522 – 570217392.Kim J., Mahoney J.T. Property rights theory, transaction costs theory,and agency theory: an organizational economics approach to strategicmanagement // Managerial and Decision Economics. 2005. Т. 26. № 4. p.223–242.393.Knill C., Lenschow A. Compliance, Competition and Communication:Different Approaches of European Governance and their Impact on NationalInstitutions // JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 2005.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
