диссертация (1169629), страница 73
Текст из файла (страница 73)
Baums, K.E. Scott // American Journal of Comparative Law.– 2005. – No. 53. – Pp. 31 – 76.187.Bayne D.C. Philosophy of Corporate Control / D.C. Bayne // University of Pennsylvania LawReview. – 1963. – Vol. 112. – Pp. 22 – 67.188.Bayne D.C. The Definition of Corporate Control / D.C. Bayne // Saint Louis University LawJournal. – 1965. – Vol. 9. – Pp. 445 – 463.189.Beatty R.L.
Corporate Control and the Corporate Asset Theory / R.L. Beatty // Montana LawReview. – 1966. – Vol. 27. – Pp. 153 – 171.190.Bebchuk L.A., Ferrel A. On Takeover Law and Regulatory Competition / L.A. Bebchuk, A.Ferrel // The Business Lawyer. – 2002. – Vol. 57. – Pp. 1047 – 1068.191.Berle A.A. Jr. “Control” in corporate law / A.A. Berle // Columbia Law Review. – 1958.
– Vol.58. – Pp. 1212 – 1225.192.Berle A. A. Jr. Price of Power Sale of Corporate Control / A.A. Berle // Cornell Law Quarterly.– 1964-1965. – Vol. 50. – Pp. 628 – 640.193.Berle A. A. Jr., Means G. C. The Modern Corporation and Private Property / A.A. Berle.Transaction Publishers, 1991. – 380 p.194.BIS calls for evidence in review of “long-term focus for corporate Britain”.
Company LawNewsletter. – 2010. – No. 285. – Pp. 1 – 3.195.Blair M.M., Stout L.A. A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law / M.M. Blair, L.A. Stout //Journal of Corporation Law. – 1999. – No. 24. – Pp. 751 – 806.196.Bodie, M.T. The Post-Revolutionary Period in Corporate Law: Returning to the Theory of theFirm / M.T. Bodie // Seattle University Law Review.
– 2012. – No. 35. – Pp. 1033 – 1059.197.Bowdren A. Contextualising Short-Termism: Does the Corporate Legal Landscape FacilitateManagerial Myopia? / A. Bowdren // UCL Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. – 2016. – Vol. 5,No. 2. – Pp. 285 – 312.198.Brandt F., Georgiou K. Shareholders vs Stakeholders Capitalism.
Comparative CorporateGovernance and Financial Regulation. Research paper No. 10, 2016. Доступ по адресу:http://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/fisch_2016/10 (дата обращения: 19.08.2019).199.Bratton W. W., Wachter M. W. The Case Against Shareholder Empowerment / W.W. Bratton,M.W. Wachter // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. – 2010. Vol.
158. – Pp. 653 – 728.200.Bushee B. The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior / B.Bushee // The Accounting Review. – 1998. – No. 73. – Pp. 305 – 333.241201.Cahn A. The Shareholders’ Fiduciary Duty in German Company Law. In: Shareholders’ Duties.Hanne S. Birkmose (ed.). Kluwer Law International, 2017. – 472 p. Also in: Nordic & EuropeanCompany Law Working Paper No.
18-13. [Электронный ресурс] Доступ по адресу:https://ssrn.com/abstract=3126695 (дата обращения: 20.08.2019).202.Campbell D. Ronald Coase's the Problem of Social Cost / D. Campbell // University ofQueensland Law Journal. – 2016. – No. 35. – Pp. 75 – 98.203.Carbone J., Levit N. The Death of the Firm / J. Carbone, N. Levit // Minnesota Law Review.– 2017. – Vol. 101. – Pp. 963 – 1029.204.Carr R.
Speech to Said Business School. Oxford, 9 February 2010. Доступ по адресу:http://www.efinancialnews.com/share/media/downloads/2010/02/1056530329.pdf(датаобращения: 19.08.2019).205.Cerioni L. The Success of the Company in S. 172(1) of the UK Companies Act 2006: Towardsan Enlightened Directors Primacy / L. Verioni // Original Law Review. – 2008. Vol. 4. – Pp. 8 –38.206.Cheng R. Why technology companies loathe dividends. Cnet, 19.03.2012.
[Электронныйресурс] Доступ по адресу: https://www.cnet.com/news/why-technology-companies-loathedividends/ (дата обращения: 19.04.2019).207.Cioffi J.W. Restructuring Germany Inc.: The Politics of Company and Takeover Law Reform inGermany and the European Union / J.W. Cioffi // Law & Policy. – 2002. – No. 24. – Pp. 355 –402.208.Coase R.H. The Nature of the Firm: Origin / R.H.
Coase // Journal of Law, Economics andOrganization. – 1988. – Vol. IV:1. – Pp. 3 – 18.209.Coase R.H. The Nature of the Firm: Meaning / R.H. Coase // Journal of Law, Economics andOrganization. – 1988. – Vol. IV:1. – Pp. 19 – 32.210.Coase R.H. The Nature of the Firm: Influence / R.H. Coase // Journal of Law, Economics andOrganization. – 1988. – Vol. IV:1. – Pp. 33 – 47.211.Coase R.H. The Problem of Social Cost / R.H. Coase // The Journal of Law and Economics.
–1960. – Vol. 3. – Pp. 1 – 44.212.Conac P.-H., Enriques L., Gelter M. Constraining Dominant Shareholders' Self-dealing: TheLegal Framework in France, Germany, and Italy / P.-H. Conac, L. Enriques, M. Gelter //European Company and Financial Law Review. – 2007. – No. 4. – Pp. 491 – 528.213.Deakin S., Hobbs R., Nash D., Slinger G. Implicit Contracts and Corporate Governance: theImpact of the City Code on Mergers and Takeovers.
In: Campbell D. and Collins H. (eds.)Implicit Dimensions of Contracts. – Oxford: Hart, 2003. – 396 p.242214.Demsetz H. The Theory of the Firm Revisisted / H. Demsetz // Journal of Law, Economics, AndOrganization. – 1988. – Vol. IV:1. – Pp. 141 – 161.215.Dent G.W. Stakeholder Governance: A Bad Idea Getting Worse / G.W. Dent // Case WesternReserve Law Review. – 2008. – No.
58. – Pp. 1107 – 1144.216.Dodd E. М. For Whom Are Corporate Managers Trustees? / E.M. Dodd // Harvard Law Review.– 1932. – Vol. 45, No. 7. – Pp. 1145 – 1163.217.Duruigbo E. Tackling Shareholder Short-Termism and Managerial Myopia / E. Duruigbo //Kentucky Law Journal. – 2011. – Vol. 100. – Pp. 531 – 584.218.Elson C.M., Goossen N.J. E. Merrick Dodd & the Rise and Fall of Corporate Stakeholder Theory.Working paper. University of Delaware, 2017. 30 p. [Электронный ресурс] Доступ по адресу:https://ssrn.com/abstract=2966331 (дата обращения: 20.08.2019).219.Enriquez L., Gilson R.G., Pacces A.M.
The case for an unbiased takeover law / L. Enriquez, R.G.Gilson, A.M. Pacces // Harvard Business Law Review. – 2014. – Vol. 4, Issue 1. – Pp. 85 – 127.220.Fairfax L.M. The Rhetoric of Corporate Law: The Impact of Stakeholder Rhetoric on CorporateNorms / L.M. Fairfax // Journal of Corporation Law. – 2006. – No.
31. – Pp. 675 – 718.221.Fama E.F. Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm / E.F. Fama // Journal of PoliticalEconomy. – 1988. – No. 88. – Pp. 288 – 307.222.Fang V.W., Tian X., Tice S. Does Stock Liquidity Enhance or Impede Firm Innovation? / V.W.Fang, X.
Tian, S. Tice // Journal of Finance. – 2014. – No. 69(5). – Pp. 2085-2125.223.Fisher D. The enlightened shareholder - leaving stakeholders in the dark: will section 172(1) ofthe Companies Act 2006 make directors consider the impact of their decisions on third parties?/ D. Fisher // International Company and Commercial Law Review. – 2009. – Vol. 20(1). – Pp.10 – 16.224.Fiske W. Mark Warner says average holding time for stocks has fallen to four months.
PolitifactVirginia,06.06.2016.[Электронныйресурс]Доступпоадресу:http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/jul/06/mark-warner/mark-warner-saysaverage-holding-time-stocks-has-f/ (дата обращения: 19.08.2019).225.Flannigan R. Control and the Control Basis of Legal Relationships and Business Organizations/ R. Flannigan // Saskatchevan Law Review.
– 1989. – No. 53. – Pp. 1 – 46.226.Franks J., Mayer C. Governance as a Source of Managerial Discipline. Report for the CompanyLaw Review, Committee E on Corporate Governance. 2000. 27 pages. [Электронный ресурс]Доступпоадресу:https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20050303182308/http://www2.dti.gov.uk/cld/franksreport.pdf (дата обращения: 16.08.2019).227.Gelter M. Taming or Protecting the Modern Corporation? Shareholder - Stakeholder Debates ina Comparative Light. Fordham University School of Law, Research Paper No. 1669444.
– 2010.243– 99 pages. [Электронный ресурс] Доступ по адресу: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1669444 (датаобращения: 19.04.2019).228.Gordon Smith D. The Dystopian Potential of Corporate Law / D. Gordon Smith // Emory LawJournal. – 2008. – Vol. 57. – Pp. 985 – 1010.229.Grant J., Kirchmaier T., Kirshner J. Financial Tunneling and the Mandatory Bid Rule. Workingpaper. Manchester Business School, 2009.
20 p. [Электронный ресурс] Доступ по адресу:http://ssrn.com/abstract=613945 (дата обращения: 19.08.2019).230.Greenfield K. Defending Stakeholder Governance / K. Greenfield // Case Western Reserve LawReview. – 2008. – No. 58. – Pp. 1043 – 1065.231.Greenfield K., Gordon Smith D.
Proposition: Saving the World with Corporate Law? / K.Greenfield, D. Gordon Smith // Emory Law Journal. – 2007. – No. 57. – Pp. 947 – 984.232.Hill A. The Sale of Controlling Shares / A. Hill // Harvard Law Review. – 1957. – Vol. 70, No. 6.– Pp. 986 – 1039.233.Hommel U. Regulating the Market for Corporate Control: Lessons from Germany / Hommel U.// International Joural of Business. – 1998. – No. 3(1). – S. 101 – 122.234.Hughes A. Short-Termism, Impatient Capital and Finance for Manufacturing Innovation in theUK. Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, 2014.
Working Paper No. 457.– 117 p.235.Imbert F. Investors are losing out on billions because tech stocks don’t pay dividends. CNBC,06.10.2017.[Электронныйресурс]Доступпоадресу:https://www.cnbc.com/2017/10/06/investors-are-losing-out-on-billions-because-tech-dont-paydividends.html (дата обращения: 19.08.2019).236.Franks J., Mayer C. Governance as a Source of Managerial Discipline. Report for the CompanyLaw Review, Committee E on Corporate Governance. 2000.
27 pages. Доступ по адресу:https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20050303182308/http://www2.dti.gov.uk/cld/franksreport.pdf (дата обращения: 19.08.2019).237.German and Nordic Perspectives on Company Law and Capital Markets Law. Edited by HolgerFleischer, Jesper Lau Hansen and Wolf-Georg Ringe. Max-Planck-Institut für ausländisches undinternationales Privatrecht.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
