Диссертация (1154840), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
— Vol. 23. —N. 7. — P. 823–825.108. Mamy L. Correlation between shrinkage and infection of implantedsynthetic meshes using an animal model of mesh infection / L. Mamy // Int. Urogyn.J. — 2011. — Vol. 22. — N. 1. — P. 47–52.109. Marinkovic, S.P. Incontinence and voiding difficulties associated withprolapsed / S.P. Marinkovic, S.L. Stanton / J. Urol.
— 2004. — N. 171. — P. 10211028.110. Marks, B.K. What is the gold standard for posterior vaginal wall prolapserepair: mesh or native tissue? / B.K. Marks, H.B. Goldman // Curr. Urol. Rep. —2012. — Vol. 13. — N. 3. — P. 216–221.111. McCall, ML. Posterior culdeplasty; surgical correction of enterocele during131vaginal hysterectomy; a preliminary report. ML. McCall // Obstet. Gynecol. — 1957.— N. 10. — P. 595-602.112. Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginalprolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device / T.
Sayer, J. Lim, J. Gauld[et al.] // International Urogynecology Journal. — 2011. — Vol. 11. — N. 6. — P. 45–78.113. Mesh erosion in robotic sacrocolpopexy / B.C. Osmundsen, A. Clark, C.Goldsmith [et al.] // Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. — 2012. — N. 18.
— P. 86–88.114. Midterm outcome of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with anterior andposterior polyester mesh for treatment of genito-urinary prolapse / F. Sergent, B. Resch,C. Loisel [et al.] // Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. — 2011. — N. 156. —P. 217–222.115. Mourik, S.L. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robotassisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique / S.L. Mourik,J.E. Martens, M. Aktas // Eur. J.
Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. — 2012. — N.165. —P. 122–127.116. Muffly, T.M. Insertion and removal of vaginal mesh for pelvic organprolapse / T.M. Muffly, M.D. Barber // Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010. — Vol. 53. —N. 1. — P. 99–114.117. Nager, C.W. The urethra is a reliable witness: simplifying the diagnosisofstress urinary incontinence / C.W.
Nager // Int. Urogynecol. J. — 2012. — Vol. 23 —N. 12. — P. 1649-1651.118. Nguyen, J.N. Outcome after anterior vaginal prolapse repair: a randomizedcontrolled trial / J.N. Nguyen, R.J. Burchette // Obstet. Gynecol. — 2008. —N. 111(4). — P. 891–898.119. Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHOConsultation. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2000 (WHO Technical ReportSeries, No. 894; http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_ 894.pdf, accessed 19 March2007).132120.
Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinaryincontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery / R. Svenningsen, E. Borstad,A.E. Spydslaug [et al.] // Int Urogynecol J. — 2012. — Vol. 23. — N. 7. — P. 843-849.121. One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored meshand vaginal support device / H.M. Zyczynski, M.P. Carey, A.R. Smith [et al.] // Am. J.of Obstet. Gynecol. — 2010.
— Vol. 203. — N. 6. — P. 587–589.122. Outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy using barbed delayed absorbablesutures / M.A. Borahay, T. Oge, T.M. Walsh [et al.] // J Minim Invasive Gynecol. —2014. — N. 21. — P.412–416.123. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery with and without tension-free vaginal tape inwomen with occult or asymptomatic urodynamic stress incontinence: a randomisedcontrolled trial / L. Schierlitz, P.L. Dwyer, A. Rosamilia [et al.] // Int.
Urogynecol. J. —2014. — Vol. 25, N. 1. — P. 33-40.124. Postoperative pain outcomes after transvaginal mesh revision / J.M.Danford, D.J. Osborn, W.S. Reynolds [et al.] // Int Urogynecol J. — 2015. — N. 26. —P. 65–69.125. Predictor of de novo stress urinary incontinence following TVM procedure:a further analysis of preoperative voiding function / M. Kuribayashi, Y.
Kitagawa,K. Narimoto [et al.] // Int Urogynecol J. — 2013. — Vol. 24, N. 3. — P. 407-411.126. Prosima Study Investigators «Medium-term clinical outcomes followingsurgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal supportdevice» / T. Sayer, J. Lim, J.M. Gauld [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol.
J. — 2012. —Vol. 23. — N. 4. — P. 487-493.127. Prospective clinical as-sessment of the transvaginal mesh technique fortreatment of pelvic organ prolapse 5-year results / D. Miller, V. Lucente, E. Babin, P.Beach [et al.] // Female Pelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. — 2011. — Vol. 17. — P. 139–143.128. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained afterpure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy / J. Seror, D.R.
Yates,E. Seringe [et al.] // World J. Urol. — 2012. — N. 30. — P. 393–398.133129. Prospective study of an ultra-lightweight polypropylene Y mesh for roboticsacrocolpopexy / C.G. Salamon, C. Lewis, J. Priestley, [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. —2013. — N. 24. — 1371–1375.130. Prospective study on total pelvic reconstruction surgery with Prosima in thetreatment of pelvic organ prolapse stage III / J. Chen, L. Zhu, J.H. Lang [et al.] //Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi.
— 2012. — Vol. 47. — N. 9. — P. 664–668.131.Re: Comparison of 2 Transvaginal Surgical Approaches and PerioperativeBehavioral Therapy for Apical Vaginal Prolapse: The OPTIMAL Randomized Trial /M.D. Barber, L. Brubaker, K.L. Burgio [et al.] // JAMA. — 2014. — N. 311. —P. 1023–1034.132. Re: Outcome of Transvaginal Mesh and Tape Removed for Pain Only /J.C.
Hou, F. Alhalabi, G.E. Lemack [et al.] // J. Urol. — 2014. — N. 192. — P. 856–860.133. Re: Trocar-Guided Mesh Compared With Conventional Vaginal Repair inRecurrent Prolapse / M.I. Withagen, A.L. Milani, J. den Boon [et al.] // Obstet.Gynecol. — 2011. — N. 117. — P. 242–250.134. Robot-assisted Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A SystematicReview and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies / S.
Maurizio, B. Giorgio, S. Paola[et al.] // European Urology. — 2014. — N. 66. — P. 303–318.135. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematicreview and meta-analysis of comparative studies / M. Serati, G. Bogani, P. Sorice[et al.] // Eur. Urol. — 2014. — N.
66. — P. 303–318.136. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgicaltechnique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution / A. Ploumidis, A.F. Spinoit,G. de Naeyer [et al.] // Eur. Urol. — 2014. — N. 65. — P.138–145.137. Robotic assisted and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: comparing operativetimes, costs and outcomes / J. Tan-Kim, S.A. Menefee, K.M. Luber [et al.] // FemalePelvic Med. Reconstr. Surg. — 2011.
— N. 17. — P. 44–49.138. Rosen, R. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensionalself-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function / R. Rosen,134C. Brown, J. Heiman // J. Sex. Marital Ther. — 2000. — Vol. 26. — N. 2. — Р. 191–208.139. Sf-36 Health Survey. Manuel and Interpretation Guide / J.E.
Ware, K.K.Snow, M. Kosinski [et al.] // Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated, 2000. — P.6882.140. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacralcolpopexy / D.D. Antosh, S.A. Grotzke, M.A. McDonald [et al.] // Female Pelvic MedReconstr Surg. — 2012.
— N.18. — P. 158–161.141. Siddiqui, N.Y. Symptomatic and anatomic 1-year outcomes after roboticand abdominal sacrocolpopexy / N.Y. Siddiqui, E.J. Geller, A.G. Visco // Am. J. Obstet.Gynecol. — 2012. — N. 206. — P. 435.142. Single-incision apical and posterior mesh repair: 1-year prospectiveoutcomes / J.C. Lukban, J.P. Roover, D.M. VanDri [et al.] // Int. Urogynecol. J. —2012. — Vol. 23.
— P. 1413–1419.143. Stanford, E.J. Elevate anterior/apical: safety and efficacy in surgicaltreatment of pelvic organ prolapsed / E.J. Stanford, R. Moore, J. Roovers // NeurourolUrodynam. — 2011. — Vol. 30. — N. 6. — P. 875–876.144. Subjective and objective results 1 year after robotic sacrocolpopexy using alightweight Y-mesh / P.J. Culligan, E. Gurshumov, C. Lewis [et al.] // Int. UrogynecolJ. — 2014. — N. 25. — P. 731–735.145. Surgical management of mesh-related complications after prior pelvic floorreconstructive surgery with mesh. M.M. Tijdink, M.E. Vierhou, J.P. Heesakkers[et al.] // Int.
Urogynecol. J. — 2011. — N. 22. — P. 1395–1404.146. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: the updatedsummary version / C.M. Maher, B. Feiner, K. Baessler [et al.] // Int Urogynecol J. —2011. — Vol. 22. — N. 11. — P. 1445-1457.147. Surgical mesh for treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapsed andstressurinaryincontinence.FDAexecutivesummery.URL:http://www.fda.gov/downloads/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/MedicalDevices/MedicalDevicesAdvisoryCommittee/ObstetricsandGynecologyDevices/U135CM270402.pdf148.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
