Диссертация (1154491), страница 16
Текст из файла (страница 16)
–V. 90. – P.590-610.65.Enciso M., Alfarawati S., Wells D. Increased numbers of DNA-damagedspermatozoa in samples presenting an elevated rate of numerical chromosomeabnormalities//HumReprod.–2013.V.10.–P.1707-15.doi: 10.1093/humrep/det07766.Erenpreiss J., Elzanaty S., Giwercman A. Sperm DNA damage in men frominfertile couples // Asian J Androl. – 2008.
V.10. – P.786–90.9667.Evgeni E., Charalabopoulos K., Asimakopoulos B. Human sperm DNAfragmentation and its correlation with conventional semen parameters // JReprod Infertil. –2014. –V.151. – P.2-14.68.Fishel S.C., Craig A., Lynch C., Dowell K., Ndukwe G., Jenneer L., Cater E.,Brown A., Thornton S., Campbell A. Assessment of 19,803 pairedchromosomes and clinical outcome from first 150 cycles using array CGH ofthe first polar body for embryo selection and transfer // J Fertiliz In vitro. –2011. – V.1. – P.1– 869.Forman E., Tao X., Ferry K., Taylor D., Treff N., Scott R. Single embryotransfer with comprehensive chromosome screening results in improvedongoing pregnancy rates and decreased miscarriage rates // Hum Reprod. –2012.
– V.27. – P.1217 –1222.70.Forman E.J., Hong K.H., Ferry K.M., Tao X., Taylor D., Levy B., Treff N.R.,Scott R.T Jr. In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: arandomized controlled trial // Fertil Steril. –2013. – V.100. – P. 100 – 107.71.Forman E.J., Hong K.H, Franasiak J.M, Scott R.T Jr. Obstetrical and neonataloutcomes from the BEST trial: Single Embryo transfer with aneuploidyscreening improves outcomes after in vitro fertilization without compromisingdelivery rates // Am J Obstet Gynecol.
–2014. – V. 210, №157. - P.151-157.72.Forman E.J., Upham K.M., Cheng M., Zhao T., Hong K.H., Treff N.R., ScottR.TJr.Comprehensivechromosomescreeningalterstraditionalmorphologybased embryo selection: a prospective study of 100 consecutivecycles of planned fresh euploid blastocyst transfer // Fertil Steril. –2013a.– V.100.
–P. 718 – 72473.Foresta C., Moro E., Ferlin A. Y chromosome microdeletions and alterationsof spermatogenesis // Endocr. Rev. –2001. – V. 22, №2. – P. 226–239.74.Fraczek M., Hryhorowicz M., Gaczarzewicz D., Szumala-Kakol A.,Kolanowski T.J., Beutin L., Kurpisz M. Can apoptosis and necrosis coexist inejaculated human spermatozoa during in vitro semen bacterial infection? //97Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. –2015. – V. 32, № 5.
–P. 771779. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0462-x.–201575.Fragouli E., Alfarawati S., Daphnis D.D., Goodall N-n., Mania A., GriffithsT., Gordon A., Wells D. Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with theuse of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation // HumReprod. –2011. – V.26. – P.480– 490.76.Fragouli E., Alfarawati S., Spath K., Wells D. Morphological and cytogeneticassessment of cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos // Mol Hum Reprod. –2014. – V.20, №2. – P.117-26. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gat07377.Gandini L., Lombardo F., Paoli D., Caruso F., Eleuteri P. Full-termpregnancies achieved with ICSI despite high levels of sperm chromatindamage // Hum Reprod.
–2004. –V. 1. – P.1409-1417.78.Gardner D.K., Balaban B. Choosing between day 3 and day 5 embryotransfers. Review // Clin Obstet Gynecol. –2006. – V.49, №1.– P.85-92.79.Gawlik A., Malecka-Tendera E. Transition in endocrinology; treatment ofTurner’s syndrome during transition // Eur J Endocrinol. –2013. V. 170. – P.57-74. doi:10.1530/EJE-13-090080.Geraedts J., Montag M., Magli M.C., Repping S., Handyside A., Staessen C.,Harper J., Schmutzler A., Collins .J, Goossens V. Polar body array CGH forprediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results //Hum Reprod. –2011. –V.26.
– P. 3173-3180.81.Gersen S. L. The principles of clinical Cytogenetics // New York: Springer. –2013. – P. 275-29282.Gianaroli L., Magli C., Ferraretti A.P., Munne S. Preimplantation diagnosisfor aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with poorprognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed //Fertil Steril. –1999. –V.72. –P. 837-844.83.Gianaroli L., Magli M., Ferraretti A. The beneficial effects of PGD foraneuploidy support extensive clinical application // Reprod Biomed Online.
–2005. –V. 10. –P. 633-640.9884.Gianaroli L., Magli M.C., Cavallini G., Crippa A., Capoti A., Resta S., RoblesF., Ferraretti A.P. Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors whichaffect the meiotic process // Hum Reprod. –2010. –V. 25. – P. 2374-2386.85.Gianaroli L., Magli M.C., Ferraretti A.P., Tabanelli C., Trengia V., Farfalli V.,Cavallini G. The beneficial effects of PGD for aneuploidy support extensiveclinical application // Reprod Biomed Online.
–2005. – V. 10. – P.633– 640.86.Gianaroli L., Magli M.C., Ferraretti A.P. The in vivo and in vitro efficiencyand efficacy of PGD for aneuploidy // Mol Cell Endocrinol. – 2001. – V. 183.– P.13–18.87.Gleicher N., Kushnir V.A, Barad D.H. Preimplantation genetic screening(PGS) still in search of a clinical application: a systematic review // ReprodBiol Endocrinol. –2014. – V. 12. - P.22.88.Gorlin R., Cohen M., Hennekam R.
Orofacial clefting syndromes. In: BobrowM, Harper P, Scriver C. Syndromes of the head and neck // New York: OxfordUniversity Press. –2001. – P. 850–860.89.Gunes S., Al-Sadaan M., Agarwal A. Spermatogenesis, DNA damage andDNA repair mechanisms in male infertility // Reprod Biomed Online.
–2015. –T.3. –C.309-19. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.–2015.06.010.90.Handyside A.H., Kontogianni E.H., Hardy K., Winston R. Pregnancies frombiopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNAamplification // Nature. –1990. –V. 344. –P.768–770.91.Harper J. C., SenGupta S. B. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: state of the art2011 // Human genetics. — 2012. — V. 131, № 2.
— P. 175-186.92.Harton G. L., Magli M., Lundin K., Montag M, Lemmen J, Harper J. ESHREPGDConsortium/EmbryologySpecialInterestGroup—bestpracticeguidelines for polar body and embryo biopsy for preimplantation geneticdiagnosis/screening (PGD/PGS) // Hum Reprod –2011. –V. 26. – P. 41-46.93.Harton G.L., Munne´ S., Surrey M., Grifo J., Kaplan B., McCulloh D.H.,Griffin D.K., Wells D. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after99preimplantationgeneticdiagnosiswitharraycomparativegenomichybridization // Fertil Steril. –2013. – V. 100. – P. 1695-1703.94.Hodes-Wertz B., Grifo J., Ghadir S., Kaplan B., Laskin C.A., Glassner M.,Munne´ S.
Idiopathic recurrent miscarriage is caused mostly by aneuploidembryo // Fertil Steril. –2012. – V.98. – P.675 – 680.95.Hosseinzadeh Colagar A., Karimi F. Large scale deletions of themitochondrial DNA in astheno, asthenoterato and oligoasthenoterato-spermicmen//MitochondrialDNA.–2014.–V.254.–P.321-8.doi: 10.3109/19401736.2013.796512.96.Jaroudi S., Kakourou G., Cawood S., Doshi A., Ranieri D.M., Serhal P.,Harper J.C., SenGupta S.B.
Expression profiling of DNA repair genes inhuman oocytes and blastocysts using microarrays // Hum Reprod. –2009. –V.24, №10. – P. 2649-55. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep224.97.Jungwirth A., Diemer T., Dohle G.R., Giwercman A., Kopa Z., Tournaye H.,Krausz C. Guidelines on male infertility.
Arnhem The Netherlands // EuropeanAssociation of Urology EAU. –2013.98.Kaarouch I., Bouamoud N., Louanjli N., Madkour A., Copin H., BenkhalifaM. Impact of sperm genome decay on Day-3 embryo chromosomalabnormalities from advanced-maternal-age patients // Mol Reprod Dev.
–2015. –V. 82, №10. – P. 809-19. doi: 10.1002/mrd.22526.99.Kahraman S., Bahce M., S¸amlı H., I˙mirzalıog˘lu N., Yakısn K., Cengiz G.,Do¨nmez E. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained bypreimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age andrecurrent implantation failure // Hum Reprod. –2000. – V.15. – P.2003–2007.100. Keltz M.D., Vega M., Sirota I., Lederman M., Moshier E.L., Gonzales E.,Stein D. Preimplantation Genetic Screening (PGS) with ComparativeGenomic Hybridization (CGH) following day 3 single cell blastomere biopsymarkedly improves IVF outcomes while lowering multiple pregnancies andmiscarriages // J Assist Reprod Genet.
–2013. – V. 30. – P.1333 – 1339100101. Kirkpatrick G., Ferguson K., Gao H., Tang S. A comparison of spermaneuploidy rates between infertile men with normal and abnormal karyotypes// Hum Reprod. –2008. –V.23, №7. – P.1679-83. doi: 10.1093102. Klinefelter H.F. Klinefelter syndrome: historical background and development// Southern Medical Journal. –1986. – V. 79, №45. –P.1089-1093.103. Krausz C., Forti G. Clinical aspects of male infertility // Results Probl CellDiffer. –2000.
–V. 28. –P.1-21.104. Krausz C., McElreavey K. Y chromosome and male infertility // Frontiers inBiosunce. –1999. – V.2 – P. 943-949.105. Kruger T.F., Menkveld R., Stanger F.S.H. Sperm morphologic features as aprognostic factor in in vitro fertilization // Fertil Steril. –1986. – V.46. –P.1118-1123.106.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
