Диссертация (1151541), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
Poultry Conf. – Bremen (Germany), 2002. – P. 6-10.102. Molnár, A.K. Effect of different concentrations of Bacillus subtilis ongrowth performance, carcass quality, gut microflora and immune response ofbroiler chickens/A.K. Molnár, B. Podmaniczky, P. Kürti, I. Tenk, R. Glávits,G.Y. Virág, Z.S.
Szabó//Br. Poult. Sci. – 2011. –V. 52, No 6. – P. 658-665.103. Mountzouris, K.C. Effects of a multi-species probiotic on biomarkers ofcompetitive exclusion efficacy in broilers challenged with Salmonellа enteritidis/K.C. Mountzouris, C. Balaskas, I. Xanthakos, A. Tzivinikou, K.Fegeros//Br. Poult. Sci. – 2009. – V. 50, No 4. – P. 467-478.104.
Mountzouris, K.C. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containingLactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in126promoting broiler performance and modulating caecal microflora composition and metabolic activities/K.C. Mountzouris, P. Tsirtsikos, E. Kalamara, S.Nitsch, G. Schatzmayr, K. Fegeros//Poult. Sci. – 2007. – V. 86, No 2.
– P.309-317.105. Nakphaichit, M. The effect of including Lactobacillus reuteri KUB-AC5during post-hatch feeding on the growth and ileum microbiota of broilerchickens/M. Nakphaichit, S. Thanomwongwattana, C. Phraephaisarn, N. Sakamoto, S. Keawsompong, J. Nakayama, S. Nitisinprasert//Poult. Sci. – 2011.– V. 90.
– P. 2753-2765.106.Nhung, N.T. Antimicrobial resistance in bacterial poultry pathogens: Areview/N.T. Hnung, N. Chansiripornchai, J.J. Carrique-Mas//Front. Vet. Sci.- 2017. – V. 4. – P. 126.107.O’Dea, E.E. Investigating the effects of commercial probiotics onbroiler chick quality and production efficiency/E.E.
O’Dea, G.M. Fasenko,G.E. Allison, D.R. Korver, G.W. Tannock, L.L. Guan//Poult. Sci. – 2006. –V. 85. – P. 1855-1863.108.Ohashi, Y. Health-beneficial effects of probiotics: its mode of action/Y.Ohashi, U. Ushida//Anim. Sci. J. – 2009. – V.
80. – P. 361-371.109.Patterson, J.A. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in poultry pro-duction/J.A. Patterson, K.M. Burkholder//Poultry Sci. – 2003. – V. 82. – P.627-631.110.Pilarski, R. Assessment of the effect of α-galactosides injected duringembryogenesis on selected chicken traits/R. Pilarski, M. Bednarczyk, M.Lisowski, A. Rutkowski, Z. Bernacki, M. Wardeńska, K.
Gulewicz//Folia Biologica. – 2005. – V. 53, No 1-2. – P. 13-20.111.Pourakbari, M. Probiotic level effects on growth performance, carcasstraits, blood parameters, cecal microbiota, and immune response of broilers/M. Pourkbari, A. Seidavi, L. Asadpour, A. Martínez//Anais Acad. Bras.Ciênc. – 2016. – V. 88, No 2. – P. 1011-1021.127112.Rantala, M. Prevention of the growth of Salmonella infantis in chickensby flora of the alimentary tract of chickens/M. Rantala, E. Nurmi// Br.
Poult.Sci. –1973. –V. 14, No 6. – P. 627-630.113. Rebolé, A., Effects of inulin and enzyme complex, individually or in combination, on growth performance, intestinal microflora, cecal fermentationcharacteristics, and jejunal histomorphology in broiler chickens fed a wheatand barley-based diet/A. Rebolé, L.T. Ortiz, M.I. Rodríguez, C. Alzueta, J.Treviño, S. Velasco//Poult. Sci.
– 2010. – V. 89. – P.276-286.114. Rehman, H. Indigenous bacteria and bacterial metabolic products in thegastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens/ H. Rehman, W. Vanjen, W. Awad etal.// Arch. Anim. Nutr. – 2007. – V. 61. – P. 319-335.115. Rehman, H. Influence of fermentable carbohydrates on the intestinal bacteria and enteropathogens in broilers/H. Rehman, W. Vanjen, A. KohlParizini, A.
Ojaz, J. Zentek//World’s Poult. Sci. J. – 2009. – V.65, No 1. –P.75-90.116. Rigby, C. Some factors affecting Salmonella typhymurium infection andshedding in chickens raised on litter/C. Rigby, J. Pettit//Avian Dis. – 1979. –V. 23. – P. 442-455.117. Rodríguez, M.L. Wheat- and barley-based diets with or without additivesinfluence broiler chicken performance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal microflora/ M.L.
Rodríguez, A. Rebolé, S. Velasco, L.T. Ortiz, J. Treviño, C.Alzueta//J. Sci. Food Agric. – 2011. – V. 92, No 1. – P. 184-190.118. Rubio, L.A. Correlations between changes in intestinal microbiota composition and performance parameters in broiler chickens/L.A. Rubio, M.J.Peinado, R. Ruiz, E. Suarez-Pereira, C.O. Mellet, J.M.G. Fernandez//J. Anim.Physiol. Anim. Nutr. – 2014. – V. 99, No 3. – P. 418-423.119.
Ruiz, R. Effects of feed additives on ileal mucosa-associated microbiotacomposition of broiler chickens/R. Ruiz, M.J. Peinado, I. Aranda-Olmedo, L.128Abecia, E. Suarez-Pereira et al.//J. Anim. Sci – 2015. – V. 93, No 7. – P. 34103420.120. Salanitro, J.P. Bacteria isolated from the duodenum, ileum, and cecum ofyoung chicks/J.P.
Salanitro, I.G. Blake, P.A. Muirehead, M. Maglio, J.R.Goodman//Appl. Environ. Microbiol. – 1978. – V. 35. – P. 782-790.121. Saleh, A. Aspergillus niger reduces skeletal muscles protein breakdownand stimulates growth in broilers/A. Saleh, K. Hayashi//Res. Opinions Anim.Vet.
Sci. – 2011. – V. 1. – P. 209-212.122. Salminen, S. Gut flora in normal and disordered states/ S. Salminen, E.Isolauri, T. Onela// Chemotherapy. – 1995. – V. 41. –P.5-15.123. Samli, H.E. Effects of Enterococcus faecium and dried whey on broilerperformance, gut histomorphology and intestinal microbiota/H.E. Samli, N.Senkoylu, F. Koc, M. Kanter, A. Agma//Arch. Anim. Nutr. - 2007.
– V. 61.– P. 42-49.124.Scupham, A. J. Campylobacter colonization of the Turkeyintestine inthe context of microbial community development / A. J. Scupham // Appl.Environ. Microbiol. – 2009. - № 75(11). - Р. 3564-3571.125. Servin, A.L. Adhesion of probiotic strains to the intestinal mucosa andinteraction with pathogens/A.L. Servin, M.-H. Coconnier//Best Pract.
Res.Clin. Gastroenterol. – 2003. – V. 17, No 5. – P. 741-754.126. Shimizu, T. Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens, an anaerobic flesh-eater/T. Shimizu, K. Ohtani, H. Hirakawa, K. Ohshima, A.Yamashira et al.//Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. – 2002. – V. 99. – P. 996-1001.127. Snel, J.
Dietary strategies to influence the gastrointestinal microflora ofyoung animals, and its potential to improve intestinal health/J. Snel, H.J.M.Harmsen, P.W.J.J. van der Wielen, B.A. Williams//Nutrition and Health ofthe Gastrointestinal Tract; Block M.C., Ed. – Wageningen (the Netherlands):Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2002. – P. 37-69.129128. Stanley, D.
Intestinal microbiota associated with differential feed conversion efficiency in chickens/D. Stanely, S.E. Denman, R.J. Hughes, M.S.Geier, T.M. Crowley et al.//Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. – 2012. – V. 96. –P. 1361-1369.129. Svihus, B. Function and nutritional roles of the avian caeca: A review/B.Svihus, M. Choct, H.L. Classen//World’s Poult.
Sci. J. – 2013. – V. 69, No 2.– P. 2449-263.130. Tellez, G. Utilizaton of rye as energy source affects bacterial translocation,intestinal viscosity, microbiota composition, and bone mineralization inbroiler chickens//G. Tellez, J.D. Latorre, V.A. Kuttappan, M.H. Kogut, A.Wolfenden et al.//Frontiers in Genetics. – 2014. – V. 5. – Article 339.131.Torok V. A., Ophel-Keller K., Hughes R. J., Forder R., Ali M., Macal-pine R., Environment and age: impact on poultry gut microflora // Proceedings of the 19th Australian Poultry Science Symposium, Sydney, NewSouth Wales, Australia, 12-14February. 2007, P.
149-152.132. Torok, V.A. Application of methods for identifying broiler chicken gutbacterial species linked with increased energy metabolism/V.A. Torok, K.Ophel-Keller, M. Loo//Appl. Environ. Microbiol. – 2008. –V. 74, No 3. – P.783-791.133. Torok, V.A. Identification and characterization of potential performancerelated gut microbiota in broiler chickens across various feeding trials/V.A.Torok, R.J. Hughes, L.L. Mikkelsen et al.// Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. – 2011.– V. 77, No 17. – P. 5868-5878.134. van der Hoeven-Hangoor, E. Ileal microbiota composition of broilers fedvarious commercial diet compositions/E. van der Hoeven-Hangoor, J.M. vander Vossen, F.H. Schuren, M.W. Verstegen, J.E.
de Oliveira, R.C. Montijn,W.H. Hendriks//Poult. Sci. - 2013. – V. 92. – P. 2713-2723.135. van Krimpen, M.M. Effects of rye inclusion in grower diets on immunecompetence-related parameters and performance in broilers/M.M. van130Krimpen, M. Torki, D. Schokker//Poulry Sci. – 2017. – V. 96, No 9. – P.3324-3337.136. Vollard, E.J. Influence of amoxicillin, erythromycin and roxitromycin oncolonization resistance and appearance of secondary colonization in healthyvolunteers/ E.J. Vollard, H. Clasener//J. Antimicrob. Chemother. – 1987. –V.13. – P. 131-138.137.Wei, S. Bacterial census of poultry intestinal microbiome / S.Wei, M.Morrison, Z.
Yu. // Poult Sci.. -2013. - № 92. - Р. 671–683.138. Xiang Zhu, Y. 16SRNA- based analysis of microbiota from the cecum ofbroiler chickens/ Y. Xiang Zhu, T. Zhong, Y. Pandya et al.//Appl. Environ.Microbiol. – 2002. – V.68, No 1. – P.124-137.139.Xiao, Y.P. Microbial community mapping in intestinal tract of broilerchicken/Y.P. Xiao, Y. Xiang, W.D. Zhou, J.G. Chen, K.F. Li, H.
Yang//Poult.Sci. – 2017. – V. 96, No 5. – P. 1387-1393.140. Yang, Y. Dietary modulation of gut microflora in broiler chickens: a review of the role of six kinds of alternatives to in-feed antibiotics/Y.Yang, P.A.Iji, M. Choct// World’s Poult. Sci. J. – 2009. – V. 65, No 1. – P.
97-114.141.Yin, Y. Exposure of different bacterial inocula to newborn chicken af-fects gut microbiota development and ileum gene expression/Y. Yin, F. Lei,L. Zhu, S. Li, Z. Wu et al.//ISME J. – 2010. – V. 4. – P. 367-376.142.Yoruk, M.A. The effects of supplementation of humate and probioticon egg production and quality parameters during the late laying period inhens/M.A. Yoruk, M. Gul, A. Hayirli, M. Macit//Poult. Sci. – 2004.
– V. 83,No 1. – P. 84-88.143.Zduńczyk, Z. Determinants and effects of postileal fermentation inbroilers and turkeys part 1: gut microbiota composition and its modulation byfeed additives/Z. Zduńczyk, J. Jankowski, S. Kaczmarek, J. Juśkiewicz//World’s Poult. Sci.
J. – 2015. – V.71, No 1. – P. 37-57..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
