Диссертация (1151073), страница 48
Текст из файла (страница 48)
– №. 10. – P. 1533-1549.241.Cohen, W.M. R&D appropriability, opportunity and market structure: new evi-dence on some Schumpeterian hypotheses / W.M. Cohen, R.C. Levin, D.C. Mowery // AmericanEconomic Review Proc. – 1985. – Vol.75. – P. 20–24.242.Cohen, W. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation /W. Cohen, D.
Levinthal // Administrative Science Quarterly. – 1990. – Vol. 35. – P. 128-152.243.Comanor, W. S. Market Structure, Product Differentiation, and Industrial Re-search / W. S. Comanor // The Quarterly Journal of Economics. – 1967. - Vol. 81, No. 4. – P.639–657.244.Connolly, R. R&D, Market Structure and Profits: A Value-Based Approach / R.Connolly, M.
Hirschey // The Review of Economics and Statistics. – Nov.1984. - Vol.66, No.4. P.682-686.245.Crépon, B. Research and Development, innovation and productivity: an econo-metric analysis at the firm level / B. Crépon, E. Duguet, J. Mairesse // Economics of Innovationand New Technology. – 1998. – Vol. 7(2).
– P. 115-158.246.Culbertson, J. D. The Influence of Market Structure on Technological Perfor-mance in the Food-Manufacturing Industries / J. D. Culbertson, W.F. Mueller// Review of Industrial Organization. – 1985. – Vol. 2. – P. 40-54.187247.Dahlander, L. How open is innovation? / L. Dahlander, D. M. Gann //Researchpolicy. – 2010. – Т.
39. – №. 6. – P. 699-709.248.Dasgupta, P. Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity / P. Das-gupta, J. Stiglitz // Economic Journal. – 1980. - Vol. 90 - P. 226-293.249.De Bondt, R. Reflections on the relation between competition and innovation / R.De Bondt, J. Vandekerckhove // Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. – 2012. – Vol. 12(1). – P.7-19.250.Demsetz, H. Information and Efficiency: Another Viewpoint / H. Demsetz// Jour-nal of Law &Economics.
– Vol.12. – 1969. – P. 1-22.251.Dopfer, K. Micro–meso–macro / K. Dopfer, J. Foster, J. Potts // Journal of Evolu-tionary Economics. – 2004. - V. 14. – P. 263-279.252.Evans, D. S. Some economic aspects of antitrust analysis in dynamically competi-tive industries / D. S. Evans, R. Schmalensee //Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 2. –MIT Press, 2002. – P. 1-50.253.Enkel, E. Creative imitation: exploring the case of cross-industry innovation / E.Enkel, O.
Gassmann // R&D Management. - 2010. – Vol. 40(3). – P. 256-270.254.Fagerberg, J. Innovation studies - The emerging structure of a new scientific field/ J. Fagerberg, B. Verspagen // Research Policy, Vol. 38. – 2009. – P. 218–233.255.Feldman, M. Innovation in cities: Science-based diversity, specialization and lo-calized competition / M. Feldman, D. Audretsch // European Economic Review. – 1999.
– Vol.43. – P. 409-429.256.Fritsch, M. Who cooperates on R&D? / M. Fritsch, R. Lukas // Research Policy. -2001. - Vol. 30 (2). - P. 297–312.257.Fritsch, M. Innovation, regional knowledge spillovers and R&D cooperation / M.Fritsch, G. Franke // Research Policy. – 2004. - Vol. 33. – P. 245–255.258.Gambardella, A. Competitive advantages from in-house scientific research: theUS pharmaceutical industry in the 1980s / A. Gambardella // Research Policy.
– 1992. – Vol.21.– P. 391-407.259.Geroski, P. Innovation, technological opportunity and market structure / P. Gero-ski // Oxford Economic Papers. New Series. - 1990. - No. 3. Vol. 42 - P. 599-602.260.Geroski, P. Innovation and the Evolution of Market Structure / P. Geroski, R.Pomroy // Journal of Industrial Economics. – 1990. – Vol.
38, Issue 3. – P. 299-314.261.Gorodnichenko, Yu. Globalization and innovation in emerging markets / Yu. Go-rodnichenko, J. Svejnar, K. Terrell //American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics. – 2010. –Vol. 2 (2). – P. 194–226.188262.Goto, A. Innovation and competition policy / A. Goto // The Japanese EconomicReview. – 2009. - Vol. 60, No. 1. – P. 55-62.263.Greenaway, D. Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment / D.Greenaway, R. Kneller // Economic Journal.
– 2007. – Vol. 117. – P. 134–161.264.Grossman, S. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateralintegration / S. Grossman, O. Hart// Journal of Political Economy. – 1986. – Vol. 94. – P. 691719.265.Hagedoorn, J. Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in usingmultiple indicators? / J. Hagedoorn, M. Cloodt // Research Policy. – 2003. – Vol. 32.
– P. 1365–1379.266.Hall, B. J. Innovation and productivity in SMEs: empirical evidence for Italy / B.Hall, F. Lotti, J. Mairesse // Small Business Economics. – 2009. - Vol. 33(1). - P. 13-33.267.Hart, O. Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm / O. Hart, J. Moore // Journalof Political Economy. – 1990. – Vol. 98. – P. 1119 – 1158.268.Hernan, R. An empirical evaluation of the determinants of research joint ventureformation / R. Hernan, P. Martin, G.
Siotis // Journal of Industrial Economics. - 2003. - Vol.1. P.75–89.269.Jaffe, A. Real effects of academic research / A. Jaffe // The American EconomicReview. -1989. – Vol. 79. – P. 957-970.270.Jarillo, J. C. On strategic networks / J. C. Jarillo //Strategic management journal.
–1988. – №. 9 (1). – P. 31-41.271.Kafouros, M. Economic returns to industrial research / M. Kafouros // Journal ofBusiness Research. – 2008. Vol. 61, Issue 8. – P.868-876.272.Kamien, M. Market Structure and Innovation: A Survey / M. Kamien, N.Schwartz // Journal of Economic Literature. – 1975. - No.1.
Vol.13. - P. 1-37.273.Katz, M. R&D Cooperation and Competition / M. Katz, J. Ordover, F. Fisher, R.Schmalensee // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. Microeconomics. – 1990. Vol. 1990. P. 137-203.274.Kirner, E. Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technologyfirms-An empirical analysis of German industry / E. Kirner, S. Kinkel, A. Jaeger //Research Policy. – 2009. – Т. 38. – №. 3. – P. 447-458.275.Kleinknecht, A. Why do firms cooperate in R&D: An empirical study / A.
Klein-knecht, J. van Reijnen // Research Policy. - 1992. - Vol.21. - P 347–360.189276.Klevorick, A. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in tech-nological opportunities / A. Klevorick, R. Levin, R. Nelson, S. Winter // Research Policy. –1995. – Vol. 24. – P. 185-205.277.Koeller, T. Technological Opportunity and the Relationship between InnovationOutput and Market Structure / T. Koeller // Managerial and decision economics.
- 2005. Vol.26. - P. 209-222.278.Kraft, K. Market Structure, Firm Characteristics and Innovative Activity / K.Kraft // Journal of Industrial Economics. 1989. - №3. - Vol.37. - P. 329-336.279.Laukkanen, T. The Effect of Strategic Orientation on Business Performance inSMEs: A Multigroup Analysis Comparing Hungary and Finland / T. Laukkanen, G. Nagy, S.Hirvonen, H.
Reijonen, M. Pasanen // International Marketing Review. - 2013. - Vol. 30. - N 6. P.510–535.280.Laursen, K. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovationperformance among UK manufacturing firms / K. Laursen, A. Salter //Strategic managementjournal. – 2006. – Vol. 27. – №. 2. – P. 131-150.281.Lee, C.Y. Competition favors the prepared firm: firm’s R&D response to competi-tive market pressure / C.Y.
Lee // Research Policy. – 2009. – Vol.38. – P. 861-870.282.Lee Dong-Soo. A Study of Firm Size and Technology Innovation / Lee Dong-Soo//Journal of Economic Research. – 1999. – Volume 4, No.1 May. – P. 61-87.283.Levin, R. Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development / A.Klevorick, R. Levin, R. Nelson, S. Winter // Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. – 1987. –Vol. 3. - P. 783 – 820.284.Levin, R.C. R&D, Appropriability and Market Structure: New Evidence andSome Schumpeterian Hypotheses / R.C.
Levin, W.M. Cohen, D.C. Mowery // American Economic Review. – 1985. – Volume 75. May. - P. 524-531.285.Link, A. N. Concentration and the Returns to R&D / A. N. Link, J. Lunn // Re-view of Industrial Organization. – 1984. – Vol. 1. – P. 232-239.286.Malerba, F. Innovation and the evolution of industries / F.
Malerba // Journal ofEvolutionary Economics. – 2006. - V. 16. – P. 3-23.287.Mansfield, E. Size of Firm, Market Structure, and Innovation / E. Mansfield // TheJournal of Political Economy. - Dec., 1963. - Vol. 71.No. 6. - P. 556-576.288.Mansfield, E. Imitation Costs and Patens: An Empirical Study / E. Mansfield, M.Schwartz, S. Wagner // The Economic Journal. - Dec., 1981. - Vol.91.
- No. 364. - P.907-918.289.Ménard, C. The economics of hybrid organizations / C. Ménard //Journal of Insti-tutional and Theoretical Economics JITE. – 2004. – №160 (3) – P. 345-376.190290.Naidoo, V. Firm survival through a crisis: The influence of market orientation,marketing innovation and business strategy / V. Naidoo // Industrial Marketing Management. –2010. – Vol.
39 (8). – P. 1311-1320.291.Naidu, G. M. Does relationship marketing pay? An empirical investigation of re-lationship marketing practices in hospitals / G. M. Naidu, A. Parvatiyar, J. N. Sheth, L. Westgate// Journal of Business Research. – 1999. – Vol. 46(3). – P. 207-218.292.Nelson, R. Investmentin Humans, Technological Diffusion and EconomicGrowth / R. Nelson, E. Phelps // American Economic Review.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
