Диссертация (1148722), страница 35
Текст из файла (страница 35)
— N 1. — P. 166–190.120. Humphreys, G. W. Orthographic processing in visual word identification / G. W.Humphreys, L. J. Evett, P. T. Quinlan // Cognit. Psychol. — 1990. — Vol. 22. — N 4.— P. 517–560.121. Inhoff, A. W. Integrating information across eye fixations in reading: The role ofletter and word units / A. W. Inhoff // Acta Psychol. (Amst.). — 1990. — Vol.
73. —N 3. — P. 281–297.122. Inhoff, A. W. Distinct subsystems for the parafoveal processing of spatial andlinguistic information during eye fixations in reading / A. W. Inhoff, B. Eiter, R.Radach, B. Juhasz // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A. — 2003. — Vol. 56. — N 5. —P. 803–827.123. Jacobs, A. M. Models of visual word recognition: Sampling the state of the art /A. M.
Jacobs, J. Grainger // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. — 1994. —Vol. 20. — N 6. — P. 1311–1334.200124. James, C. T. Sequential dependencies in letter search / C. T. James, D. E. Smith //J. Exp. Psychol. — 1970. — Vol. 85. — N 1. — P. 56–60.125. Johnson, R. L. Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eyemovements and parafoveal preview / R.
L. Johnson, M. Perea, K. Rayner // J. Exp.Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. — 2007. — Vol. 33. — N 1. — P. 209–229.126. Juhasz, B. J. Eye Movements and the Use of Parafoveal Word LengthInformation in Reading / B. J. Juhasz, S. J. White, S. P. Liversedge, K. Rayner // J. Exp.Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. — 2008. — Vol. 34.
— N 6. — P. 1560–1579.127. Keuleers, E. The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730monosyllabic and disyllabic English words / E. Keuleers, P. Lacey, K. Rastle, M.Brysbaert // Behav. Res. Methods. — 2012. — Vol. 44. — N 1. — P. 287–304.128. Kliegl, R. Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eyemovements in reading / R. Kliegl, E. Grabner, M. Rolfs, R. Engbert // Eur. J. Cogn.Psychol. — 2004. — Vol.
16. — N 1–2. — P. 262–284.129. Korobov, M. Morphological analyzer and generator for Russian and Ukrainianlanguages / M. Korobov // International Conference on Analysis of Images, SocialNetworks and Texts. — s.1.: Springer, 2015. — P. 320–332.130. Krueger, L. E. Visual comparison in a redundant display / L. E. Krueger // Cognit.Psychol.
— 1970. — Vol. 1. — N 4. — P. 341–357.131. Ktori, M. Letter string processing and visual short-term memory / M. Ktori, J.Grainger, S. Dufau // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. — 2012. — Vol. 65. — N 3. — P. 465–473.132. Ktori, M. Effect of orthographic transparency on letter position encoding: Acomparison of Greek and English monoscriptal and biscriptal readers / M. Ktori, N. J.Pitchford // Lang. Cogn.
Process. — 2008. — Vol. 23. — N 2. — P. 258–281.133. Ktori, M. Development of letter position processing: effects of age andorthographic transparency / M. Ktori, N. J. Pitchford // J. Res. Read. — 2009. —Vol. 32. — N 2. — P. 180–198.134. Ktori, M.
Letter position encoding across deep and transperent orthographies / M.Ktori, N. J. Pitchford // Reading and Dyslexia in Different Orthographies / ed. by. N.201Brunswick, S. McDougall, P. de M. Davies. — Hove, UK: Psychology Press, 2010. —P. 69–86.135. Ktori, M. GreekLex: A lexical database of Modern Greek / M.
Ktori, W. J. B. vanHeuven, N. J. Pitchford // Behav. Res. Methods. — 2008. — Vol. 40. — N 3. —P. 773–783.136. Kučera, H. Computational analysis of present-day American English. / H. Kučera,W. N. Francis // RI: Dartmouth Publishing Group, 1967. — 424 p.137. Kwantes, P. J. Evidence for sequential processing in visual word recognition /P. J. Kwantes, D. J. K. Mewhort // J.
Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. — 1999. —Vol. 25. — N 2. — P. 376–381.138. Kyparissiadis, A. GreekLex 2: A comprehensive lexical database with part-ofspeech, syllabic, phonological, and stress information / A. Kyparissiadis, W. J. B. vanHeuven, N. J. Pitchford, T. Ledgeway // PLOS ONE. — 2017. — Vol. 12. — N 2. —P.
e0172493.139. Lavidor, M. Evaluating a split processing model of visual word recognition:effects of word length / M. Lavidor, A. W. Ellis, R. Shillcock, T. Bland // Cogn. BrainRes. — 2001. — Vol. 12. — N 2. — P. 265–272.140. Levi, D. M. Crowding—An essential bottleneck for object recognition: A minireview / D. M. Levi // Vision Res. — 2008. — Vol.
48. — N 5. — P. 635–654.141. Lima, S. D. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word-initialletter sequence / S. D. Lima, A. W. Inhoff // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. —1985. — Vol. 11. — N 3. — P. 272–285.142. Lindell, A. K. Castles A.E. The effect of orthographic uniqueness and deviationpoints on lexical decisions: Evidence from unilateral and bilateral-redundantpresentations / A.
K. Lindell, M. E. Nicholls // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A. — 2003. —Vol. 56. — N 2. — P. 287–307.143. Liow, S. J. R. The development of visual search strategies in biscriptal readers /S. J. R. Liow, D. W. Green, M. M. L.-J. Tam // Int. J.
Biling. — 1999. — Vol. 3. — N 4.— P. 333–349.202144. Luke, S. G. The influence of frequency across the time course of morphologicalprocessing: Evidence from the transposed-letter effect / S. G. Luke, K. Christianson // J.Cogn. Psychol.
— 2013. — Vol. 25. — N 7. — P. 781–799.145. Marian, V. CLEARPOND: Cross-Linguistic Easy-Access Resource forPhonological and Orthographic Neighborhood Densities / V. Marian, J. Bartolotti, S.Chabal, A. Shook // PLoS ONE. — 2012. — Vol. 7. — N 8. — P.
e43230.146. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding/ W. D. Marslen-Wilson, L. K. Tyler // Cognition. — 1980. — Vol. 8. — N 1. — P. 1–71.147. Marslen-Wilson, W. D. Dissociating types of mental computation / W. D.Marslen-Wilson, L. K.
Tyler // Nature. — 1997. — Vol. 387. — N 6633. — P. 592–594.148. Mason, M. Reading ability and letter search time: Effects of orthographicstructure defined by single-letter positional frequency / M. Mason // J. Exp. Psychol.Gen. — 1975.
— Vol. 104. — N 2. — P. 146–166.149. Mason, M. Recognition time for letters and nonletters: Effects of serial position,array size, and processing order / M. Mason // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform.— 1982. — Vol. 8. — N 5. — P. 724–738.150.
Mason, M. Visual processing of nonlinguistic strings: Redundancy effects andreading ability / M. Mason, L. Katz // J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. — 1976. — Vol. 105. —N 4. — P. 338–348.151. Masserang, K. M. Transposed letter effects in prefixed words: Implications formorphological decomposition / K.
M. Masserang, A. Pollatsek // J. Cogn. Psychol. —2012. — Vol. 24. — N 4. — P. 476–495.152. Masson, M. E. Modulation of Additive and Interactive Effects by Trial HistoryRevisited / M. E. Masson, M. M. Rabe, R. Kliegl // Mem. Cognit. — 2017. — Vol. 45.— N 3. — P. 480–492.153.
McClelland, J. L. Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: what does theevidence rule out? / J. L. McClelland, K. Patterson // Trends Cogn. Sci. — 2002. —Vol. 6. — N 11. — P. 465–472.203154. McClelland, J. L. An interactive activation model of context effects in letterperception: I. An account of basic findings / J. L. McClelland, D. E. Rumelhart //Psychol.
Rev. — 1981. — Vol. 88. — N 5. — P. 375–407.155. McConkie, G. W. The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading /G. W. McConkie, K. Rayner // Percept. Psychophys. — 1975. — Vol. 17. — N 6. —P. 578–586.156. McConkie, G. W. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading / G. W.McConkie, K. Rayner // Bull. Psychon.
Soc. — 1976. — Vol. 8. — N 5. — P. 365–368.157. McDonald, S. A. Effects of number-of-letters on eye movements during readingare independent from effects of spatial word length / S. A. McDonald // Vis. Cogn. —2006. — Vol. 13. — N 1. — P. 89–98.158. McDonald, S.
A. An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eyemovement control in reading. / S. A. McDonald, R. H. S. Carpenter, R. C. Shillcock //Psychol. Rev. — 2005. — Vol. 112. — N 4. — P. 814–840.159. Moret-Tatay, C. Is the go/no-go lexical decision task preferable to the yes/no taskwith developing readers? / C.
Moret-Tatay, M. Perea // J. Exp. Child Psychol. — 2011.— Vol. 110. — N 1. — P. 125–132.160. Morton, J. The logogen model and orthographic structure / J. Morton // CognitiveProcesses in Spelling. / ed. by U. Frith. — London: Academic Press, 1980. — P. 117–133.161. New, B. Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database / B. New, C. Pallier, M.Brysbaert, L. Ferrand // Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput.
— 2004. — Vol. 36. —N 3. — P. 516–524.162. Norris, D. The Bayesian reader: Explaining word recognition as an optimalBayesian decision process / D. Norris // Psychol. Rev. — 2006. — Vol. 113. — N 2. —P. 327–357.163. Norris, D. Models of visual word recognition / D. Norris // Trends Cogn. Sci. —2013. — Vol. 17. — N 10. — P. 517–524.164. Norris, D. The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech204/ D. Norris, J. M. McQueen, A.
Cutler, S. Butterfield // Cognit. Psychol. — 1997. —Vol. 34. — N 3. — P. 191–243.165. Norris, D. Language-universal constraints on speech segmentation / D. Norris,J. M. McQueen, A. Cutler, S. Butterfield, R. Kearns // Lang. Cogn. Process. — 2001. —Vol. 16. — N 5–6. — P. 637–660.166.
Oxford handbook of eye movements / ed. by. S. Liversedge, I. Gilchrist, S.Everling. — The Oxford handbook of eye movements — Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 2011. — 1048 p.167. Paap, K. R. An activation–verification model for letter and word recognition: Theword-superiority effect. / K. R. Paap, S. L. Newsome, J.
E. McDonald, R. W.Schvaneveldt // Psychol. Rev. — 1982. — Vol. 89. — N 5. — P. 573–594.168. Pelli, D. G. Feature detection and letter identification / D. G. Pelli, C. W. Burns,B. Farell, D. C. Moore-Page // Vision Res. — 2006. — Vol. 46. — N 28. — P. 4646–4674.169. Perea, M. Neighborhood Effects in Visual Word Recognition and Reading / M.Perea // The Oxford Handbook of Reading / ed. by A. Pollatsek, R.
Treiman. — NewYork: Oxford University Press, 2015. — P. 76–87.170. Perea, M. Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? / M.Perea, M. Carreiras // Psychon. Bull. Rev. — 2006. — Vol. 13. — N 3. — P. 418–422.171. Perea, M. Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexicaldecision: A test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts / M. Perea, P.Gómez, I. Fraga // Psychon. Bull. Rev.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
