Диссертация (1148128), страница 46
Текст из файла (страница 46)
Structural balance: a generalization of Heider's theory.//Psychological Review. 1956. Vol. 63. №. 5. — P. 277—293.165.Castells M. Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society//International Journal of Communication 1. 2007. — P. 238—266.166.Castells M., Cardoso, G. (ed.).
The network society: From knowledge to policy.Washington, DC : Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations, 2006. —P. 3—23.167.Cha M., Mislove A., Gummadi K. P. A measurement-driven analysis ofinformation propagation in the flickr social network //Proceedings of the 18thinternational conference on World wide web. ACM. 2009. — P. 721—730.221168.Chaffee S. H., Hochheimer J. L.
The Beginnings of Political CommunicationResearch in the United States: Origins of the 'Limited Effects' Model. 1985. —P. 267—296.169.Choi S. The two-step flow of communication in Twitter-based public forums//Social Science Computer Review. 2015. Vol. 33.
№. 6. — P. 696—711.170.Coleman J. S. Foundation of social theory Cambridge, MA //Debus, Marc(2007):Pre-ElectoralAlliances,CoalitionRejections,andMultipartyGovernments, Baden-Baden. 1990. — P. 300—321.171.Coleman J. S. Social capital in the creation of human capital //American journalof sociology. 1988.
— P. S95—S120.172.Coleman J. S., MacRae D. Electronic processing of sociometric data for groupsup to 1,000 in size //American Sociological Review. 1960. Vol. 25. №. 5. —P. 722—727.173.Converse P. E. Changing conceptions of public opinion in the political process//The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1987. Vol. 51. — P. S12—S24.174.Csardi G., Nepusz T.
The igraph software package for complex networkresearch //InterJournal, Complex Systems. 2006. Vol. 1695. №. 5. — P. 1—9.175.Davis J. A. Structural balance, mechanical solidarity, and interpersonal relations//American Journal of Sociology. 1963. — P. 444—462.176.De Bruijn N. G. Generalization of Pólya’s fundamental theorem in enumerativecombinatorial analysis //Nederl. Akad. Wetensch. Proc. Ser. A. 1959.
Vol. 62.— P. 59-69.177.De P., Singh A. E., Wong T., Yacoub W., Jolly A. M. Sexual network analysisof a gonorrhoea outbreak //Sexually transmitted infections. 2004. Vol. 80. №. 4.— P. 280—285.178.De Fleur M. L. The Growth and Decline of Research on the Diffusion of theNews, 1945-1985 //Communication Research. 1987. Vol. 14. №. 1.
— P. 109—130179.Dembo T. The dynamics of anger //Field theory as human-science. 1976. —P. 324—422.222180.Dunbar R. I. M. Neocortex size as a constraint on group size in primates//Journal of Human EVolution. 1992. Vol. 22. №. 6. — P.
469—493.181.Emerson R. M. Exchange theory, part I: A psychological basis for socialexchange //Sociological theories in progress. 1972. Vol. 2. — P. 38—57.182.Emerson R. M. Exchange theory, part II: Exchange relations and networks//Sociological theories in progress. 1972. Vol. 2. — P. 58—87.183.Everett M.
G. Graph theoretic blockings k‐ plexes and k‐ cutpoints //Journal ofMathematical Sociology. 1982. Vol. 9. №. 1. — P. 75—84.184.Fagiolo G., Reyes J., Schiavo S. The eVolution of the world trade web: aweighted-network analysis //Journal of EVolutionary Economics. 2010. Vol. 20.№. 4. — P. 479—514.185.Ferguson R. Word of mouth and viral marketing: taking the temperature of thehottest trends in marketing //Journal of consumer marketing. 2008. Vol.
25.№. 3. — P. 179—182.186.Ferrara E. A large-scale community structure analysis in Facebook //EPJ DataScience. 2012. Vol. 1. №. 1. — P. 1—30.187.Freeman L. C., Romney A. K., Freeman S. C. Cognitive structure and informantaccuracy //American anthropologist. 1987. Vol. 89. №. 2. — P. 310—325.188.Freeman L. C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness //Sociometry, 1977. Vol.
40. — P 35—41.189.Freeman L. C. Turning a profit from mathematics: The case of social networks//Journal of Mathematical Sociology. 1984. Vol. 10. №. 3-4. — P. 343—360.190.Friedkin N. E. The development of structure in random networks: an analysis ofthe effects of increasing network density on five measures of structure //SocialNetworks. 1981. Vol. 3. №. 1. — P. 41—52.191.Galton F. Hereditary talent and character //Macmillan's Magazine. 1865.Vol. 12. №.
157-166. — P. 318—327.192.Gilder G. Metcalfe’s law and legacy //Forbes ASAP. 1993. Vol. 13. P. S158193.Granovetter M. Network sampling: Some first steps //American Journal ofSociology. 1976. — P. 1287—1303.223194.Granovetter M. S. The strength of weak ties //American journal of sociology.1973. — P. 1360—1380.195.Gould R. V. Multiple networks and mobilization in the Paris Commune, 1871//American Sociological Review.
– 1991. — P. 716—729.196.Gruzd A., Roy J. Investigating political polarization on Twitter: A Canadianperspective //Policy & Internet. 2014. Vol. 6. №. 1. — P. 28—45.197.Guetzkow H., Simon H. A. The impact of certain communication nets uponorganization and performance in task-oriented groups //Management science.1955. Vol. 1. №. 3-4. — P. 233—250.198.Habermas J., Lennox S., Lennox F.
The public sphere: An encyclopedia article(1964) //New German Critique. 1974. №. 3. P. 49—55.199.Hagman E.P. The Companionships of Preschool Children // University of IowaStudies in Child Welfare, edited by Stoddard G.D. Iowa City, IA: University ofIowa. 1933. — P.
10—69.200.Hardt H. Reading the Russian revolution: International communication researchand the journalism of Lippmann and Merz //Mass Communication and Society.2002. Vol. 5. №. 1. — P. 25—39.201.Heider F. Attitudes and cognitive organization //The Journal of psychology.1946. Vol. 21. №. 1. — P. 107—112.202.Heil G. H., White H. C. An algorithm for finding simultaneous homomorphiccorrespondences between graphs and their image graphs //Behavioral Science.1976. Vol. 21.
№. 1. — P. 26—35.203.Hilbert M., Vásquez J., Halpern D., Valenzuela S., Arriagada E. One step, Twostep, network step? Complementary perspectives on communication flows inTwittered citizen protests //Social Science Computer Review. 2016. —P. 0894439316639561.204.Holland P. W., Leinhardt S. A method for detecting structure in sociometric data//American Journal of Sociology. 1970. — P. 492—513.205.Homans G. C. Social behavior as exchange //American journal of sociology.1958.
— P. 597—606.224206.Hummon N. P., Carley K. Social networks as normal science∗ //Socialnetworks. 1993. Vol. 15. №. 1. — P. 71—106.207.Jackson N., Lilleker D. G. Building an architecture of participation? Politicalparties and web 2.0 in Britain. // Journal of Information Technology & Politics,2009. №6. — P. 232—250.208.Katz E. Communication Research and the Image of Society // American Journalof Sociology. Vol. 65. 1960. — P.
435—440.209.Kenney M. et al. Organisational adaptation in an activist network: Socialnetworks, leadership, and change in al-Muhajiroun //Applied ergonomics. 2013.Vol. 44. №. 5. — P. 739—747.210.Khonsari K. K., Nayeri Z. A., Fathalian A., Fathalian L. Social network analysisof Iran's Green movement opposition groups using Twitter //Advances in SocialNetworks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2010 International Conference on.IEEE, 2010. — P. 414—415.211.Killworth P., Bernard H. Catij: A new sociometric and its application to a prisonliving unit //Human Organization.
1974. Vol. 33. №. 4. — P. 335—350.212.Kinnunen J. Gabriel Tarde as a founding father of innovation diffusion research//Acta sociologica. 1996. Vol. 39. №. 4. — P. 431-442.213.Koutra D., Jin D., Ning Y., Faloutsos C. Perseus: an interactive large-scalegraph mining and visualization tool //Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment.2015. Vol. 8. №.
12. — P. 1924-1927.214.Krackhardt D. Graph theoretical dimensions of informal organizations//Computational organization theory. 1994. Vol. 89. №. 112. — P. 123 140.215.Kubey R. W., Peluso T. Emotional response as a cause of interpersonal newsdiffusion: The case of the space shuttle tragedy. 1990. Vol 24, Issue 4. —P. 382—400.216.Kumar R., Novak J., Tomkins A.
Structure and eVolution of online socialnetworks //Link mining: models, algorithms, and applications. Springer NewYork. 2010. — P. 337—357.225217.Kwak H., Lee C., Park H., Moon S What is Twitter, a social network or a newsmedia? //Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web.ACM. 2010. — P. 591—600.218.Kwon K. H., Stefanone M. A., Barnett G. A. Social network influence on onlinebehavioral choices exploring group formation on social network sites//American Behavioral Scientist. 2014. Vol. 58. №.
10. — P. 1345—1360.219.Lang K., Lang G. E. Personal influence and the new paradigm: Someinadvertent consequences //The ANNALS of the American Academy ofPolitical and Social Science. 2006. Vol. 608. №. 1. — P. 157—178.220.Lampe C., Ellison N., Steinfield C. A Face (book) in the crowd: Socialsearching vs. social browsing //Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversaryconference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM. 2006. — P.
167—170.221.Lasswell H. D. The structure and function of communication in society//The communication of ideas. 1948. Vol. 37. — P. 215—228.222.Lasswell H.D. The Theory of Political Propaganda // Reader in Public Opinionand Communication. / Ed. by B. Berelson and M. Janowitz. Glencoe: Free Press.1953. — P. 176—180.223.Laumann E.O., Guttman L.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
