Диссертация (1147240), страница 36
Текст из файла (страница 36)
Communications and history: theories of media. Knowledge andcivilization. New York, 1988.72.Lau R.R., Redlawsk D.P. How voters decide: Information processing duringelection campaigns. Cambridge University Press, 2006.73.Littlejohn S.W., Foss K.A. Theories of human communication. Belmont,2008. P.3.74.Marsh D., Rhodes R.F.W. Policy networks in British government. Oxford,1992.75.McLuhan M.
The medium is the massage: An inventory of effects. NewYork, 1967.76.McNair B. Journalism and democracy: An evaluation of political publicsphere. London: Routledge, 2000.77.Noll R., Owen B. The Political Economy of Deregulation: Interest Groups inthe Regulatory Process. Washington, 1983.19878.Schramm W. Mass media and national development: the role of informationin the developing countries.
Stanford, 1964.79.Searle J. R, Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. London,Cambridge university press, 1969.80.Shapiro C., Varian H.R. US government information policy. 1997.81.The Dictionary of Political Analysis / Ed. by J.C. Plano, R.E. Riggs H.S.Robin.
Santa Barbara, USA, Great Britain, 1982.82.Tunstall J. Communications Deregulation: The Unleashing of America’sCommunications Industry. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986. PP. 145-147.83.Voltmer K. P. The Media in Transitional Democracies. Polity Press, 2013.Статьина русском языке:84.Володенков С.В. Информационно-коммуникационная революция и еевлияние на современный политический процесс. // Политэкс.
Политическаяперспектива. Т. 7. №4. 2011. С. 159-167.85.Володенков С.В. Практика и особенности использования онлайн-ресурсов в современных политических кампаниях в США. // Политэкс.Политическая экспертиза. Т. 8. № 1. 2012. С.155-163.86.Воробьев В.П. Политология журналистики (медиаполитология): изпервого опыта. // Журналистика в 2001 году: СМИ и вызовы нового века.Тезисы научно-практической конференции. М., 2002.87.Гончаров В.Э., Елизаров В.П. Казус Навального: сетевой фандрайзингкак инструмент политической мобилизации. // Политэкс. Политическаяперспектива. Т. 7.
№4. 2011. С. 168-182.88.Грачев М.Н. К вопросу об определении понятий «политическаякоммуникация» и «политическая информация». Вестник Российскогоуниверситета дружбы народов. Cерия: Политология. 2003. № 4. С. 34–419989.Гуггенберг Г. Теория демократии / Полис. Политические исследования.1991. №4.90.Засурский Я.Н. Информационное общество и СМИ. // ИО. 1999. №1.91.ЗасурскийЯ.Н.СМИкакфакторпроцессовобщественнойтранcформации на рубеже тысячелетия.
// Образование в ХХI веке.Екатеринбург, 2000.92.Зуев С.Э. Измерения информационного пространства (политики,технологии, возможности) // Музей будущего: информационный менеджмент/ сост. А.В.Лебедев. М., 2001.93.Кастельс М., Киселева Э. Россия в информационную эпоху // МирРоссии. 2001. N 1.94.Курочкин А.В. Сетевой подход к обеспечению эффективной политикинациональной безопасности. // Политэкс. Политическая перспектива. Т. 7.№4.
2011. С. 183-189.95.Мальцева Д. А. Инновации в политике: внедрение IT-технологий впроцесс управления. // Политэкс. Политическая перспектива. Т. 7. №4. 2011.С. 210-215.96.Мирошниченко И.В. Инкорпорирование социальных сетей в процесспринятия политических решений. // Политэкс. Политическая экспертиза.
Т. 7.№4. 2011. С. 150-158.97.Морозова Е.В., Мирошниченко И.В. «Инвесторы политическогокапитала»: социальные сети в политическом пространстве региона. // Полис.№2. 2009. С. 60-76.98.Радиков И. В. Активность российского гражданского общества какресурс политической модернизации. // Политэкс. Политическая экспертиза.Т.
8. №1. 2012. С. 267-271.99.Ракитянский, Н. М. Психологические аспекты информационнойбезопасности // Проблемы теории и практики управления. 1992. № 2. С. 106–110.200100. Соловьев А.И. Политическая коммуникация: к проблеме теоретическойидентификации. // Полис. 2002. № 3.на английском языке:101. Aalberg T., van Aelst P., Curran J. Media systems and political informationenvironment: A cross-national comparison / The International Journal ofPress/Politics. 2010. V.15. PP.255-271.102. Berger R.H.
Information policy: a framework for evaluation and policyresearch. Norwood, 1993.103. Blumler J.G., Kavanagh D. The third age of political communication. //Political communication. V. 12. 1999. P. 209-230.104. Bordewijk J.L., Kaam B. Towards a classification of new teleinformationservices // Intermedia.
1986. Vol. 14. № 1. Р.16-21.105. Braddock R. An extension of the “Lasswell Formula” // Journal ofCommunication. 1958. V.8. P.88-93.106. Brockington D. A Low information theory of ballot position effect. //Political behavior. 2012. V. 31(3). Pp. 511-530.107. Esser F., De Vreese C. H., Stromback J. and others.
Political informationopportunities in Europe: a longitudinal and comparative studyof thirteentelevision systems / The international journal of press/politics. 2012. V. 17(3). PP.247-27.108. Gurevitch M.,Blumler J. R. Political communication systems anddemocratic values // Media power in politics / Ed. by D.A. Graber. Washington,1994. P. 27.109. Iyengar Sh., Curran J., Lund A.B., Salovaara-Moring I., Hahn K.S., CoenSh. Cross-national versus Individual-level differences in political information: amedia systems perspective // Journal of elections, public opinion and parties. 2010.V.
20. №3. PP. 291-309.201110. Miller D. Deliberative democracy and social choice // Political Studies.1992. Vol. 40. P. 54.111. Plattner M.F. From Liberalism to Liberal Democracy // Journal ofDemocracy. 1999.V.10. №.3.112. Pye L. Political Communication // The Blackwell Encyclopedia of PoliticalInstitutions. Oxford- New York, 1987.113. Riggle E., Ottati М., Wyer R. S., Kuklinski J., Schwarz N. Bases ofpolitical judgments: The role of stereotypic and nonstereotypic information. //Political Behavior. 1992. V. 14(1). Pp.
67–87.114. Sinne K. Communication: mass political behavior // Political communicationissues and strategies for research. V. 4. L., 1975.115. Strawson P. F. Intention and convention in speech acts. //The PhilosophicalReview. V. LXXIII, 1964. № 4. P. 439—460.Интернет-ресурсы:116.
Across Platforms, 7 in 10 Adults Access Content From Newspaper MediaEach Week. Sense Maker Report/ Newspaper Association of America. URL:http://www.http://www.naa.org/Topics-and-Tools/SenseMakerReports/~/media/NAACorp/Public%20Files/TopicsAndTools/SenseMakerReports/SenseMaker_March2013.ashx.117. Chainan P. The role of online social media in political communication ofyoungactivistsinThailand.http://amic.org.sg/conference/AMIC2013/Full%20Papers/B6/pimonpan.pdf;118. Colliers. http://colliersmagazine.com/119. Commentary. http://www.commentarymagazine.com/202120. Continental Congress to the Inhabitants of the Province of Quebec.
(26October 1774), reprinted in Philip B. Kurland and Ralph Lerner, eds., TheFounders’ Constitution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), http://presspubs.uchicago.edu/founders/ documents/amendI_religions20.html.121. Democracy. http://www.democracyjournal.org/122. EditorandPublisherInternationalYearbook2006.URL:http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/yearbook/company_search_results.jsp.123. Gradinaru C. The potential role of new media in the creation ofCommunities.http://fssp.uaic.ro/argumentum/numarul%209/07_Gradinaru_tehno.pdf.124. Harper’s Magazine.
http://harpers.org/125. Human Events. http://www.humanevents.com/126. In These Times. http://inthesetimes.com/127. Jewish Currents. http://jewishcurrents.org/128. Liberty. http://www.libertyunbound.com/129. Media law handbook. / Ed.by J. Margolis. Bureau of InternationalInformation Programs United States Department of State. 2010. URL:http://www.america.gov/publications/books.130.
Moment. http://www.momentmag.com/131. Mother Jones. http://www.motherjones.com/132. National Review. http://www.nationalreview.com/133. New Republic. http://www.newrepublic.com/134. Newspaper circulation. Newspaper Association of America URL://www.http://www.naa.org/Trends-and-Numbers/Circulation-Volume/NewspaperCirculation-Volume.aspx.135. Reason.
http://reason.com/136. ReporterswithoutbordersURL:http://www.http://en.rsf.org/spip.php?page=classement&id_rubrique=297. (01.05.2013).203137. Social networking sites an politics. Pew Internet and American life project.http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2012/Social-networking-and-politics/Mainfindings/Social-networking-sites-and-politics.aspx138. Storck M. The role of social media in political mobilization: a case study oftheJanuary2011EgyptianUprising.2011.http://www.culturaldiplomacy.org/academy/content/pdf/participant-papers/201202-bifef/The_Role_of_Social_Media_in_Political_Mobilisation__Madeline_Storck.pdf;139.
The American Conservative. http://www.theamericanconservative.com/140. The American Prospect. http://prospect.org/141. The American Spectator. http://spectator.org/142. The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/143. The Brown Spectator. http://brown-spectator.com/144. The Nation. http://www.thenation.com/#145. The National Journal. http://www.nationaljournal.com/146. The Progressive. http://www.progressive.org/147.
The Week. http://theweek.com/148. The Weekly Standard. http://www.weeklystandard.com/149. Time. http://www.time.com/time/150. US News and World Report. http://www.usnews.com/news/151. Where people go for national/international news by medium. State of theU.S. newsmedia 2006/Projectfor excellence in journalism. URL:http://www.stateofthenewsmedia.com/2006/chartland.asp?id=225.152. Where people go for national/international news by medium.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
