Диссертация (1139993), страница 18
Текст из файла (страница 18)
Eleventh edition. Elsevier. 2016: 1170-1300.109.White J.R. Evidence report for imaging in the management of ureteralcalculousdisease,<www.auanet.org/common/pdf/education/clinical-guidance/Imaging-Evidence-Report.pdf>; 2012.110.Wiener S.V., Detras L.A., Pais V.M. Jr. Effect of stone composition onoperative time during ureteroscopic holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laserlithotripsy with active fragment retrieval // Urology. 2012; 80 (4): 790-4.111.
Wilson D.M. Clinical and laboratory approaches for evaluation ofnephrolithiasis // J Urol. 1989; 141: 770-4.112. Worster A., et al. The accuracy of noncontrast helical computed tomographyversus intravenous pyelography in the diagnosis of suspected acute urolithiasis: ameta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2002; 40: 280.113.Wu D.S., et al. Indinavir urolithiasis.
Curr Opin Urol. 2000; 10: 557.114.Xiang, H., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnosticaccuracy of low-dose computed tomography of the kidneys, ureters and bladder forurolithiasis. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol, 2017. 61: 582.115.Zarse C.A., et al. CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unitvalue, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragilityin vitro // Urol Res. 2007; 35: 201.116.Zhang G.M., Sun H., Xue H.D., Xiao H., Zhang X.B., Jin Z.Y. Prospectiveprediction of the major component of urinary stone composition with dual-sourcedual-energy CT in vivo // Clin Radiol. 2016; 71 (11): 1178-83.117.Zheng, X., et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for characterizingurinary calcified calculi and uric acid calculi: A meta-analysis // Eur J Radiol.2016; 85: 1843.118.
Zhong P., Preminger G.M. Mechanisms of differing stone fragility inextracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy // J Endourol. 1994; 8 (4): 263-8..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
