Диссертация (1137502), страница 34
Текст из файла (страница 34)
448 p.68. Croft W. The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies //Cognitive Linguistics. 2009. № 4 (4). P. 335–370.69. Croft W., Poole K.T. Inferring universals fromgrammatical variation:Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis // Theoretical Linguistics. 2008. № 1 (34). P.1–37.70. Cysouw M. Building semantic maps: the case of person marking // New Challenges inTypology: Broadening the Horizons and Redefining the Foundations / M. Miestamo, B. Wälchli(Eds.), Walter de Gruyter, 2007.
P. 225–248.71. Dahl Ö. From questionnaires to parallel corpora in typology // Sprachtypologie undUniversalienforschung. 2007. № 2 (60). P. 172–181.72. Di Sciullo A.-M., Williams E. On the definition of word / A.-M. Di Sciullo, E. Williams,Cambridge, MA: MIT press, 1987.73.
Dinu G., Pham N.T., Baroni M. DISSECT - DIStributional SEmantics CompositionToolkit // Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics: System Demonstrations. Sofia, Bulgaria: Association for Computational Linguistics,2013. P.
31–36.74. Divjak D., Gries S.T. Ways of trying in Russian: clustering behavioral profiles // CorpusLinguistics and Linguistic Theory. 2006. № 1 (2). P. 23–60.15375. Dubossarsky H., Weinshall D., Grossman E. Verbs change more than nouns: a bottomup computational approach to semantic change // Lingue e linguaggio. 2016. № 1. P. 7–28.76. Eger S. Lexical Semantic Typologies from Bilingual Corpora: A Framework //Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics - Volume 1:Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of theSixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation / Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association forComputational Linguistics, 2012.
P. 90–94.77. Ester M. [et al.]. A Density-based Algorithm for Discovering Clusters in Large SpatialDatabases with Noise // Proceedings of the Second International Conference on KnowledgeDiscovery and Data Mining / Portland, Oregon: AAAI Press, 1996. P. 226–231.78.
Everitt B. Cluster analysis / B. Everitt, Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley, 2011.79. Fillmore C.J. Frame semantics // Linguistics in the Morning Calm. Seoul, South Korea:Hanshin Publishing Co. 1982. P. 111–137.80. Fillmore C.J., Atkins B.T. Describing Polysemy: The Case of «Crawl» // Polysemy:Theoretical and Computational Approaches / Y. Ravin, C. Leacock (Eds.), Oxford UniversityPress, 2000. P.91–110.81.
François A. Semantic maps and the typology of colexification: Intertwining polysemousnetworks across languages // Studies in Language Companion Series / M. Vanhove (Ed.), JohnBenjamins Publishing Company, 2008. P. 163–215.82. Frey B.J., Dueck D. Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points // Science.2007. № 5814 (315). P.
972–976.83. Ganter B., Wille R. Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations / B. Ganter,R. Wille, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1999.84. Geeraerts D.. [Рец. на:] A. Wierzbicka. Lexicography and conceptual analysis. AnnArbor, 1985 // Language in society. 1988. V. 17.85. Geeraerts, D. The lexicographical treatment of prototypical polysemy // Meanings andPrototypes (RLE Linguistics B: Grammar). Routledge, 2014. P. 205–220.86. Georgakopoulos Thanasis, Polis Stéphane. The semantic map model: State of the artand future avenues for linguistic research // Language and Linguistics Compass. 2018.
№ 2 (12).P. 1–33.87. Gibbs R.W. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought / R.W. Gibbs,Cambridge University Press, 2008. 550 p.15488. Goddard C. Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction / C. Goddard, OxfordUniversity Press, 2011. 512 p.89. Cox T.F., Cox M.A.A. Multidimensional Scaling / T.F. Cox, M.A.A. Cox, Chapmanand Hall, 2001.90. Harris Z.S. Co-Occurrence and Transformation in Linguistic Structure // Language.1957.
№ 3 (33). P. 283–340.91. Haspelmath M. Indefinite pronouns / M. Haspelmath, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.92. Haspelmath M. The geometry of grammatical meaning: semantic maps and crosslinguistic comparison // The new psychology of language. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003.P. 211–242.93. Janda L.A., Solovyev V.D. What constructional profiles reveal about synonymy: A casestudy of Russian words for sadness and happiness // Cognitive Linguistics. 2009. № 2 (20). P.367–393.94. Johnson S.C.
Hierarchical clustering schemes // Psychometrika. 1966. № 32 (2). P. 241–254.95. Jurafsky D., Martin J.H. Speech and Language Processing, 2nd Edition / D. Jurafsky,J.H. Martin, 2nd edition, Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, 2008. 1032 p.96. Kashkin E., Vinogradova O. The domain of surface texture // The Typology of PhysicalQualities / E. Rakhilina, T. Reznikova (Eds.), John Benjamins Publishing Company, to appear.97. Kay P. [et al.]. World Color Survey / P. Kay, B. Berlin, L.
Maffi, W. Merrifield, Centerfor the Study of Language and Information, 2007.98. Keenan, E. L., & Comrie, B. Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar //Linguistic inquiry. 1977. № 8(1). P. 63-99.99. Key M.R., Comrie B. IDS - The Intercontinental Dictionary Series.
2007.100. Kholkina L. Lexical typology of Chinese qualitative features // The Typology ofPhysical Qualities / E. Rakhilina, T. Reznikova (Eds.), John Benjamins Publishing Company, toappear.101. Kibrik A.A. Toward a typology of verbal lexical systems: A case study in NorthernAthabaskan // Linguistics. 2012. № 3 (50).
P. 495–532.102. Kibrik, А. Е. Does intragenetic typology make sense? // Sprache im Raum und Zeit:in memoriam Johannes Bechert. Bd. 2: Beiträge zur empirischen Sprachwissenschaft / W. Boederet al. (Eds.), Tübingen: Narr, 1998. P. 61–68.155103. Kilgarriff A. [et al.]. Itri-04-08 the sketch engine // Information Technology. 2004. №105. P.
116.104. Kopecka A., Narasimhan B. Events of Putting and Taking: A crosslinguisticperspective / A. Kopecka, B. Narasimhan, John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2012. 389 p.105. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M., Divjak D., Rakhilina E. Aquamotion verbs in Slavic andGermanic: A case study in lexical typology // New Approaches to Slavic Verbs of Motion / V.Hasko, R.
Perelmutter (Eds.), John Benjamins Publishing, 2010. P. 315–341.106. Koptjevskaja-Tamm M., Rakhilina E., Vanhove M. The semantics of lexical typology// The Routledge Handbook of Semantics / N. Riemer (Ed.), 2016. P. 434–454.107. Kozlov A., Privizentseva M. Typology of dimensions // The Typology of PhysicalQualities / E. Rakhilina, T. Reznikova (Eds.), John Benjamins Publishing Company, to appear.108. Kutuzov A., Kuzmenko E.
Comparing Neural Lexical Models of a Classic NationalCorpus and a Web Corpus: The Case for Russian // Lecture Notes in Computer Science / Springer,2015. P. 47–58.109. Kyuseva M., Parina E., Ryzhova D. Methodology at work: semantic fields «sharp»and «blunt» // The Typology of Physical Qualities / E. Rakhilina, T.
Reznikova (Eds.), JohnBenjamins Publishing Company, to appear.110. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by / G. Lakoff, M. Johnson, Chicago;London, 1980.111. Lakoff G., Turner M. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor / G.Lakoff, M. Turner, Chicago, 1989.112. Levin I., Reznikova T. Lexical typology in Slavic languages / Encyclopedia of SlavicLanguages and Linguistics, Brill, to appear.113.
Levinson, S. C., & Majid, A. Differential ineffability and the senses // Mind &Language. 2014. № 29(4). P. 407–427.114. Lin D., Pantel P. DIRT – Discovery of Inference Rules from Text // Proceedings ofthe Seventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining/ New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2001. P. 323–328.115. List J.-M. [et al.]. CLICS: Database of Cross-Linguistic Colexifications[Электронный ресурс].
URL: http://CLICS.lingpy.org (дата обращения: 19.02.2018).116. Loukachevitch N. [et al.]. Creating Russian WordNet by Conversion // Proceedings ofConference on Computatilnal linguistics and Intellectual technologies Dialog-2016. Moscow,2016. P. 405–415.156117.
MacQueen J. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariateobservations // Proc. 5th Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statistics and Probability, 1967. P. 281–297.118. Majid A. Comparing lexicons cross-linguistically // The Oxford Handbook of theWord / J.R. Taylor (Ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. P. 364–379.119. Majid A., Bowerman M.
Cutting and breaking events: A crosslinguistic perspective[Special issue] // Cognitive linguistics. № 18 (2). 2007.120. Majid A., Enfield N.J., Staden M. van. Parts of the body: Cross-linguisticcategorisation. [Special issue]. // Language Sciences. 2006.
№ 2–3 (28). P. 137–360.121. Majid A., Jordan F., Dunn M. Semantic systems in closely related languages //Language Sciences. 2015. (49). P. 1–18.122. Majid A. [и др.]. How similar are semantic categories in closely related languages? Acomparison of cutting and breaking in four Germanic languages // Cognitive Linguistics. 2007.№ 2 (18). P. 179–194.123. Miller G.A. WordNet: A Lexical Database for English // Communications of the ACM.1995. № 11 (38). P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
