Диссертация (1100258), страница 37
Текст из файла (страница 37)
H. Davis // Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology. – 1983а. – Vol. 44 (1). – P. 113–126.– 170 –201. Davis, M. H. The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactionsand helping: a multidimensional approach / M. H. Davis // Journal of Personality. –1983b.
– Vol. 52 (2). – P. 167–184.202. Davis, M. H. Empathy: A social psychological approach / M. H. Davis. –Boulder, CO : Westview Press, 1996. – 260 p.203. Duan, Ch. The current state of empathy research / Ch. Duan, C. Hall //Journal of Counseling Psychology. – 1996. – Vol. 43 (3). – P. 261–274.204. Elliott, R. Classical person-centered and experiental perspectives on Rogers(1957) / R. Eliott, E. Friere // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. –2007. – Vol. 44 (3).
– P. 285–288.205. Empathy and its development / ed. by N. Eisenberg, J. Strayer. –Cambridge, New York : Cambridge University Press, 1987. – 407 p.206. Empathy reconsidered. New directions in psychotherapy / ed. byA. C. Bozarth, L. S. Greenberg. – Washington, DC : АPA, 1997. – 477 p.207. Farber, B. On the enduring and substantial influence of Carl Rogers’ notquite necessary nor sufficient conditions / B. Farber // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research,Practice, Training. – 2007.
– Vol. 44 (3). – P. 289–294.208. Ferenczi, Sh. The elastisity of psychoanalytic technique / Sh. Ferenczi //The evolution of psychoanalytic technique / ed. by M. Bergmann, F. Hartman. – NewYork : Columbia University Press, 1990. – P. 216–229.209. Goldfried, M. What has psychotherapy inherited from Carl Rogers? /M. Goldfried // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. – 2007. – Vol.44 (3). – P. 249–252.210.
Goldstein, A. P. Empathy: development, training, consequences /A. P. Goldstein, G. Y. Michaels. – Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum, 1985. – 287 p.211. Håkansson, J. E. Exploring the phenomenon of empathy : DoctoralDissertation / J. E. Håkansson. – Stockholm University, 2003. – 140 p.212. Hall, J. Dispositional empathy in scientists and practitioner psychologists:group differences and relationship to self-reported effectiveness / J. Hall, M. Davis,M. Connelly // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. – 2000. –Vol.
37 (1). – P. 45–56.– 171 –213. Hatcher, Sh. An analogue study of empathic process: Working withdifference / Sh. Hatcher // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. – 2005.– Vol. 42 (2). – P. 198–210.214. Hein, G. I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and itsmodulation /G.Hein, T.Singer // Current Opinion in Neurobiology. – 2008. – Vol. 18. –P.
153–158.215. Hill, C. My personal reactions to Rogers (1957): The facilitative but neithernecessary nor sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change / C. Hill //Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. – 2007. – Vol. 44 (3). – P. 260–264.216. Hill, C. Helping skills training for undergraduates: Outcomes and predictionof outcomes / C.Hill, M. Roffman, J.
Stahl, S. Friedman, A. Hammel // Journal ofCounseling Psychology. – 2008. – Vol. 55 (3). – P. 359–370.217. Hoffman, M. L. The contribution of empathy to justice and moral judgment/ M. L. Hoffman // Empathy and its development / ed. by N. Eisenberg, J. Strayer. –Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1987. – P. 47–80.218. Hoffman, M. L. Empathy and moral development: Implications for caringand justice/ M. L. Hoffman. – New York : Cambridge University Press, 2000. – 342 p.219. Kahn, E. Carl Rogers and Heinz Kohut: A historical Perspective / E.
Kahn,A. Rachman // Psychoanalytic Psychology. – 2000. – Vol. 17 (2). – P. 294–312.220. Kohut, H. How does analysis cure? / H. Kohut. – Chicago : The UniversityChicago Press, 1984. – 240 p.221. Lamm, C. The neural substrate of human empathy: effects of perspectivetaking and emotion regulation / C.
Lamm, Ch. D. Batson, J. Decety // Journal ofCognitive Neuroscience. – 2004. –Vol. 19. – № 1. – P. 42–58.222. Lazarus, A. On necessity and sufficiency in counseling and psychotherapy(revisited) / A. Lazarus // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training. – 2007. –Vol. 44 (3). – P. 253–256.223. Montag, K.
Theodor Lipps and the concept of empathy: 1851–1914 /K. Montag, J. Gallinat, A. Heint //American Journal of Psychiatry. – 2008. – Vol. 165. –№ 10. – P. 1261.– 172 –224. O’Hara M. Relational empathy: beyond modernist egocentrism topostmodern holistic contextualism / M. O’Hara // Empathy reconsidered. New directionsin psychotherapy / ed. by A. C. Bozarth, L. S. Greenberg. – Washington, DC : APA,1997. – P. 295–319.225. Orange, D.
There is no outside: Empathy and authenticity in psychoanalyticprocess / D. Orange // Psychoanalytic Psychology. – 2002. – Vol. 19 (4). –P. 686–700.226. Patterson,C. H.Relationshipcounselingandpsychotherapy/C. H. Patterson. – New York : Harper&Row Publishers, 1974. – 207 p.227. Perez-Albeniz, F. Gender differences in empathy in parents at high- andlow-risk of child physical abuse / F. Perez-Albeniz, J. de Paul // Child Abuse & Neglect.– 2004 – Vol. 28 (3).
– P. 289–300.228. Pigman, G. W. Freud and the history of empathy / G. W. Pigman //International Journal of Psychoanalysis. – 1995. – Vol. 76. – P. 237–256.229. Preston, S. Empathy: Its Ultimate and Proximate Bases / S. Preston,F. de Waal // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. – 2002. – Vol. 25. – P. 1–72.230. Rachman, A. Sandor Ferenci’s contributions to the evolution ofpsychoanalysis / A. Rachman // Psychoanalytic Psychology. – 2007. – Vol. 24 (1). –P.74–96.231. Ravenscroft, I.
Folk psychology as a theory / I. Ravenscroft // StanfordEncyclopediaofPhilosophy.–[Электрон.ресурс].–URL:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/folkpsych-theory/ (дата обращения: 01.12.12).232. Rizzolatti, G. The mirror-neuron system / G. Rizzolatti, L. Craighero //Annual Review of Neuroscience. – 2004. – Vol. 27. – P. 169–192.233. Rogers C.
Freedom to learn for the 80’s / C. Rogers. – Columbus, OH,1983. – 486 p.234. Rogers, C. Client-centered therapy / C. Rogers // Comprehensive textbookon psychiatry / ed. by H. I. Kaplan, B. J. Sadock. – Baltimore : Williams & Wilkins,1988. – P. 3–40.235. Rogers C. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeuticpersonality change / C. Rogers // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training.
–2007. – Vol. 44 (3). – P. 240–248.– 173 –236. Samstag, L. The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeuticpersonality change: Reactions to Rogers’ 1957 article / L. Samstag // Psychotherapy:Theory, Research, Practice, Training. – 2007. – Vol. 44 (3). – P. 295–299.237. Sawicki, M. The phenomenology of Edith Stein / M. Sawicki. – [Электрон.ресурс].–URL:http://www.library.nd.edu/colldev/subject_home_pages/catholic/personal_connections.shtml (дата обращения: 01.12.12).238. Scheler, M. The nature of sympathy / M.
Scheler. – New Brunswick, NJ :Transaction publishers, 2011. – 274 p.239. Silbershatz G. Comments on «The necessary and sufficient conditions oftherapeutic personality change» / G. Silbershatz // Psychotherapy: Theory, Research,Practice, Training. – 2007. – Vol. 44 (3). – P. 265–267.240. Staemler, F.-M. Aggression, time and understanding: contribution to theevolution of geshtalt therapy / F.-M. Staemler. – New York : Routledge, Taylor&FransisGroup, 2009.
– 384 p.241. Stein, E. On the problem of empathy / E. Stein. – Washington, DC : ICSPublications, 1989. – 135 p.242. Stueber K. Empathy / K. Stueber // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. –[Электрон.ресурс].–URL:http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empathy/(датаобращения: 01.12.12).243. Stueber K. Measuring empathy / K. Stueber // Stanford Encyclopedia ofPhilosophy.–[Электрон.ресурс].–http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/empathy/measuring.html (дата обращения: 01.12.12).244. StueberK.Rediscoveringempathy/K.Stueber.–Cambridge:Massachussets Institute of Technology, 2006.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
