2Резюме_Порошин_English_12.12.2018 (Условия устойчивости однопартийного доминирования в политических режимах различного типа), страница 4

– 2015. – Vol. 3; Makarenko B.I. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya partiy ipartiynykh system (in Russian, ‘Modern trends of development of parties and party systems’). PhD Dissertation. 2016.https://www.hse.ru/sci/diss/182234596111Golosov G. (2013) Authoritarian Party Systems: Patterns of Emergence, Sustainability and Survival // ComparativeSociology, 12(5); Golosov G.

Electoral Integrity and Voter Turnout in Contemporary Autocracies // Garnett H.A.,Zavadskaya M. (eds.) Electoral Integrity and Political Regimes: Actors, Strategies and Consequences. – New York:Routledge, 2018; Golosov G.V. Partiynye sistemy stran mira: regionalnoe i khronologicheskoe raspredelenie, modeliustoychivosti (in Russian, ‘Party systems of the world: regional and chronological distribution, patterns ofsustainability’). – Politicheskaya nauka. 2012. – Vol. 3; Golosov G.V., Meleshkina E.Y. Politicheskie partii i vybory(in Russian, ‘Political parties and elections’).

– SPb.: Borey-art, 2001.8O.Kharitonova112, M.Zavadskaya113, S.Shkel114, A.Melville115, D.Streltsov116. AlsoRussian scholars are active in debates on prospects for developing a dominant partysystem in Russia. Particularly, studies by E.Meleshkina117, V.Gel’man118,Kharitonova O.G. Nedemokraticheskie politicheskie rezhimy (in Russian, ‘Undemocratic political regimes’) //Politicheskaya nauka. – 2012. – Vol. 3.113Zavadskaya M.

When Do Elections Subvert Authoritarianism? Electoral Malpractice and Variety of Post-ElectoralScenarios // Garnett H.A., Zavadskaya M. (eds.) Electoral Integrity and Political Regimes: Actors, Strategies andConsequences. – New York: Routledge, 2018; Zavadskaya M., Welzel C. (2015) Subverting Autocracy: EmancipativeMass Values in Competitive Authoritarian Regimes // Democratization, 22(6); Zavadskaya M.A. Vremya vybirat’:manipulirovanie elektoral’nymi tsiklami v sovremennykh avtoritarnykh rezhimakh (in Russian, ‘Playing with thetime: electoral schedule in authoritarian regimes’) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta.

Seriya «Politologiya». – 2015.– Vol. 4; Zavadskaya M.A. Elektoral’nye tsikly v sorevnovatel’nykh avtoritarnykh rezhimakh (in Russian, ‘Electoralcycles into competitive authoritarian regimes’) // Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Seriya «Politologiya». – 2014. –Vol. 3; Zavadskaya M.A. Elektoralny avtoritarizm v Evrope: rasshirenie Evropeyskogo Soyuza i strategiiinkumbentov na vyborakh (in Russian, ‘Electoral authoritarianism in Europe: enlargement of the European Union andincumbents’ electoral strategies’) //Belokurova E.V., Nozhenko M.V.

(eds.) Sdelano v Evrope: vzglyad rossiyskikhissledovateley. Vol. 1. – SPb.: NORMA, 2014; Zavadskaya M., Welzel C. (2013) Repression, and Subversion:Incumbent Defeat in Competitive Autocracies // World Values Survey Association. Series «World Values Research»,2; Zavadskaya M.A. Kogda vybory vykhodyat iz-pod kontrolya? Neprednamerennye elektoralnye posledstviya vsorevnovatel’nykh avtoritarnykh rezhimakh? (in Russian, ‘When elections get out of hand? Unintended electoraloutcomes in the competitive authoritarian regimes?’) // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2012.

– Vol. 3.114Shkel' S.N. Postsovetskiy avtoritarizm v sravnitel’noy perspektive (in Russian, ‘Post-soviet authoritarianism incomparative perspective’). – Ufa: Gilem, 2014; Shkel’ S.N. Neopatrimonial’nye praktiki i ustoychivost avtoritarnykhrezhimov v Evrazii (in Russian, ‘Neopatrimonial practices and persistence of authoritarian regimes in Eurasia’) //Politiya. – 2016. – Vol. 4.115Melville A.Y., Stukal D.K., Mironyuk M.G. «Tsar gory», ili pochemu v postkommunisticheskikh avtokratiyakhplokhie instituty (in Russian, ‘«King of the Mountain»’, or why postcommunist autocracies have bad institutions’) //Polis.

Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 2013. – Vol. 2; Melville A.Y. Zachem «Tsaryu gory» khoroshie instituty? (inRussian, ‘Why «King of the Mountain» needs good institutions?’) // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2013. – Vol. 3.116Streltsov D. Political Parties in Disarray // Inoguchi T.

(ed.) Japanese and Russian Politics. – New York: PalgraveMacmillan, 2015; Streltsov D.V. Sovremenny yaponskiy parlament (in Russian, ‘Modern parliament of Japan’) . –M.: Nauka, 1994.117Meleshkina E.Y. Dominirovanie po-russki ili mirovoy fenomen? (in Russian, ‘Domination Russian-style or worldphenomenon?’) // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2006. – Vol. 1.118Gel'man V.Y. Pespektivy dominiruyushchey partii v Rossii (in Russian, ‘Perspectives for dominant party inRussia’) // Pro et Contra. – 2006. – Vol.

4; Gel’man V.Y. Ot «besformennogo plyuralizma» k «dominiruyushcheyvlasti»? Transformatsiya rossiyskoy partiynoy sistemy (in Russian, ‘From «feckless Pluralism» to «dominant powerpolitics»? The transformation of Russia’s party system’) // Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, 2006.

– Vol.1; Gel’man V.Y. Politicheskie partii v Rossii: ot konkurentsii – k ierarkhii (in Russian, ‘Political parties in Russia:from competition to hierarchy’) // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 2008. – Vol. 5; Gel’man V.Y. Rastsvet i upadokelektoral’nogo avtoritarizma v Rossii (in Russian, ‘The rise and decline of electoral authoritarianism in Russia’) // –Politiya. – 2012. – Vol. 4; Gel’man V.Y. Treshchiny v stene (in Russian, (‘Cracks in the Wall’) // Pro et Contra. –2012. – Vol. 1-2.1129Y.Korgunyuk119, B.Makarenko120, R.Turovsky121, A.Makarkin122, A.Kynev123,G.Mikhaleva124, G.Golosov125, M.Zavadskaya126 and P.Panov127 discuss thetransformation of the party system and political regime in Russia towards singleparty dominance.There is an insufficiency of academic studies that analyze, first, thedeterminants of single-party dominance survival within regimes that overcome thecritical longevity threshold, and second, explore the dominant party regime from theperspective of the conditions for their persistence.Research question.

The main research question is formulated as follows:what institutional and political factors determine the persistence of single-partydominance?Korgunyuk Y.G. Stanovlenie partiynoy sistemy v sovremennoy Rossii (in Russian, ‘Emergence of party system inmodern Russia’). – М.: Fond Indem, Moskovskiy gorodskoy pedagogicheskiy universitet, 2007.120Makarenko B.I. Postsovetskaya partiya vlasti: «Edinaya Rossiya» v sravnitel’nom kontexte (in Russian, ‘Postsoviet party of power: «United Russia» in comparative context’) // Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.

– 2011. – Vol.1; Makarenko B.I. Stsenarii evolyutsii partiynoy sistemy (in Russian, ‘Scenarios of evolution of party system’) //Lipman M., Petrov N. (eds.) ROSSIYA-2020: Stsenarii razvitiya. – M.: ROSSPEN, 2012; Makarenko B.I. Stsenariievolyutsii partiynoy sistemy (in Russian, ‘Scenarios of evolution of party system’) // Pro et Contra. – 2010. – Vol. 45.121Reuter O.J., Turovsky R.F. (2014) Dominant Party Rule and Legislative Leadership in Authoritarian Regimes //Party Politics, 20.122Makarkin A. «Edinaya Rossiya»: partiya-instrument (in Russian, ‘«United Russia»: party-instrument’) //Neprikosnovenny zapas. – 2013. – Vol. 1.123Kynev A.V., Lyubarev A.E. Partii i vybory v sovremennoy Rossii: evolyutsia i devolyutsia (in Russian, ‘Partiesand elections in modern Russia: evolutiona and devolution’). – M.: Fond «Liberal’naya missiya», Novoe literaturnoeobozrenie, 2011; Kynev A.

«Partiya vlasti» kak partiya (in Russian, ‘«Party of power» as a party’) // Neprikosnovennyzapas. – 2013. – Vol. 1.124Mikhaleva G.M. Rossiyskie partii v kontexte transformatsii (in Russian, 'Political parties in Russia in context oftransformation’). – M.: Knizhny dom «Liberkom», 2009.125Golosov G.V. Rossiyskaya partiynaya sistema i regional’naya politika, 1993-2003 (in Russian, ‘Party system inRussia and regional policy, 1993-2003’).

– SPb: Izdatel’stvo Evropeyskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge, 2006;Golosov G.V., Likhtenshtein A.V. «Partiya vlasti» i rossiyskiy institutsional’ny dizayn: teoreticheskiy analiz (inRussian, ‘«Party of power» and institutional design in Russia: theoretical analysis’) // Polis.