2Резюме_Порошин_English_12.12.2018 (Условия устойчивости однопартийного доминирования в политических режимах различного типа), страница 3
Описание файла
Файл "2Резюме_Порошин_English_12.12.2018" внутри архива находится в папке "Условия устойчивости однопартийного доминирования в политических режимах различного типа". PDF-файл из архива "Условия устойчивости однопартийного доминирования в политических режимах различного типа", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "политические науки" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве НИУ ВШЭ. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с НИУ ВШЭ, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата политических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 3 страницы из PDF
Opposition Politics in Japan: Strategies under a One-Party Dominant Regime. – London and New York:Nissan Institute/Routledge, 2000.77Cornelius W., Craig A. The Mexican Political System in Transition. – Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, 1991.78Lin C.-L. Paths to Democracy: Taiwan in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.
– YaleUniversity, 1998.79Otake H. Defense Controversies and One-party Dominance: the Opposition in Japan and West Germany // PempelT.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.80Bienen H. Armies and Parties in Africa. – New York: Africana, 1978.646J.Myburgh and H.Giliomee on South Africa81, T.Inoguchi on Japan82, M.Bogaardson African regimes83, E.Krauss and J.Pierre on Sweden and Japan84, M.Kreuzer onGermany85, A.Levite and S.Tarrow on Israel and Italy86, M.Aronoff on Israel87,K.Matlosa and S.Karume on South Africa88, M.Muramatsu and E.S.Krauss onJapan89, A.Abedi and S.Schneider on Canada, Australia, Germany and Austria90,B.Ames on Mexico91, S.Tarrow on Italy92, T.Eisenstadt on Mexico93, S.Lindberg andJ.Jones on African regimes94, S.Friedman on South Africa95, R.Kaufman onMexico96, P.Toit on Zambia and Malawi97, H.Giliomee and C.Simkins on South81Myburgh J., Giliomee H.
One-Party Dominance in South-Africa // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) DominantPolitical Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.82Inoguchi T. The Political Economy of Conservative Resurgence under Recession: Public Policies and PoliticalSupport in Japan, 1977-1983 // Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes.
–Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.83Bogaards M. (2004) Counting Parties and Identifying Dominant Party System in Africa // European Journal ofPolitical Research, 43.84Krauss E.S., Pierre J. The Decline of Dominant Parties: Parliamentary Politics in Sweden and Japan in the 1970s //Pempel T.J. (ed.) Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press,1990.85Kreuzer M. (2009) How Party Systems Form: Path Dependency and the Institutionalization of the Postwar GermanParty System // British Journal of Political Science, 39.86Levite A. Tarrow S.
(1983) The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems: A Comparison ofIsrael and Italy // Comparative Politics, 15(3).87Aronoff M. Israel under Labor and the Likud: the Role of Dominance Considered // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.88Matlosa K., Karume S. (2004) Ten Years of Democracy and the Dominant Party System in South Africa // ElectionUpdate 2004: South Africa, 5(10).89Muramatsu M., Krauss E.S.
The Dominant Party and Social Coalitions in Japan // Pempel T.J. (ed.) UncommonDemocracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.90Abedi A., Schneider S.G. Federalism, Parliamentary Government, and Single-Party Dominance: An Examinationof Dominant Party Regimes in Canada, Australia, Germany, and Austria. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting ofthe American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, 2006.91Ames B. (1970) Bases of Support for Mexico’s Dominant Party // American Political Science Review, 64.92Tarrow S. Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: "The Softer they Rise, the Slower they Fall!" // Pempel T.J.
(ed.)Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. – Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1990.93Eisenstadt T. Courting Democracy in Mexico: Party Strategies and Electoral Institutions. – New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2004.94Lindberg S.I., Jones J. Laying a Foundation for Democracy or Undermining It? Dominant Parties in Africa’sBurgeoning Democracies // Bogaards M., Boucek F.
(eds.) Dominant Political Parties and Democracy: Concepts,Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.95Friedman S. No Easy Stroll to Dominance: Party Dominance, Opposition and Civil Society in South Africa //Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam:Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.96Kaufman R.R. Dominant Party and Opposition Parties in Mexico: From Crisis to Reform to Crisis // Giliomee H.,Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy.
– Amsterdam: Harwood AcademicPublishers, 1999.97Toit P. Bridge or Bridgehead? Comparing the Party Systems of Botswana, Namibia, Zimbabwe, Zambia and Malawi// Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam:Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.7Africa and Mexico98, R.B.Collier on Mexico99, P.Köllner on Japan100, M.Cook onMexico101, T.Cheng on Mexico, Taiwand and Turkey102, R.K.Carty on Canada103,H.Adam on South Africa104, L.Schlemmer on South Africa105, A.Diaw and M.Dioufon Senegal106, S.Rigger on Taiwan and Mexico107.Russian scholars that focus on topics concerning dominant party regimes areE.Meleshkina108,Y.Korgunyuk109,B.Makarenko110,98G.Golosov111,Giliomee H., Simkins C.
The Dominant Party Regimes of South Africa, Mexico, Taiwan and Malaysia: AComparative Assessment // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination andDemocracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.99Collier R.B. The Сontradictory Alliance: State-labor Relations and Regime Change in Mexico, University ofCalifornia (Berkeley), 1992; Collier R.B.
The Transformation of Labor-Based One-Partyism at the End of the 20thCentury: The Case of Mexico // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination andDemocracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.100Köllner P. (2006) The Liberal Democratic Party at 50: Sources of Dominance and Change in the Koizumi Era //Social Science Japan Journal, 9(2).101Cook M.L. The Mexican Paradox: Neo-Liberalism and Labor Entrenchment in Mexico’s Ruling Party // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy.
– Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.102Cheng T. (2001) One-Party Hegemony and Democratic Transition: Comparing Mexico, Taiwan and Turkey //Conference on The Rise of the DPP and PAN in Taiwan and Mexico, Duke University.103Carty R.K. Dominance without Factions: The Liberal Party of Canada // Bogaards M., Boucek F. (eds.) DominantPolitical Parties and Democracy: Concepts, Measures, Cases, and Comparisons. – New York: Routledge, 2010.104Adam H.
Corporatism as Minority Veto under ANC Hegemony in South Africa // Giliomee H., Simkins C. (eds.)The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers, 1999.105Schlemmer L. Democracy or Democratic Hegemony? The Future of Political Pluralism in South Africa // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999.106Diaw A., Diouf M. The Senegalese Opposition and its Quest for Power // Olukoshi A.O. (ed.) The Politics ofOpposition in Contemporary Africa.
– Nordic Africa Institute, 1998.107Rigger S. Grassroots Electoral Organization and Political Reform in the ROC on Taiwan and Mexico // GiliomeeH., Simkins C. (eds.) The Awkward Embrace: One-party Domination and Democracy. – Amsterdam: HarwoodAcademic Publishers, 1999; Rigger S. From Opposition to Power: Taiwan's Democratic Progressive Party. – Boulder:Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2001; Rigger S. Politics in Taiwan: Voting for Democracy. – New York: Routledge, 1999.108Meleshkina E.Y. Dominirovanie po-russki ili mirovoy fenomen? (in Russian, ‘Domination Russian-style or worldphenomenon?’) // Politicheskaya nauka. – 2006.
– Vol. 1; Golosov G.V., Meleshkina E.Y. Politicheskie partii i vybory(in Russian, ‘Political parties and elections’). – SPb.: Borey-art, 2001.109Korgunyuk Y.G. Stanovlenie partiynoy sistemy v sovremennoy Rossii (in Russian, ‘Emergence of party system inmodern Russia’). – М.: Fond Indem, Moskovskiy gorodskoy pedagogicheskiy universitet, 2007.110Makarenko B.I. Partii bez demokratii (in Russian, ‘Parties without democracy’) // Korgunyuk Y.G., MeleshkinaE.Y., Podvintsev O., Shashkova Ya. Partiynaya organizatsiya i partiynaya konkurentsia v “nedemokraticheskikh”rezhimakh.
– M.: ROSSPEN, 2012; Makarenko B.I., Lokshin I.M., Meleshkina E.Y., Mironyuk M.G.., Petrov N.V.Partii i partiynye sistemy: sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya (in Russian, Parties and party systems: modern trends ofdevelopment’). – M.: ROSSPEN, 2015; Makarenko B.I., Lokshin I.M. Sovremennye partiynye sistemy: stsenariievolyutsii i tendentsii razvitiya (in Russian, Modern party systems: scenarios of evolution and trends of development)// Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya.
