Диссертация (Функционально-семантическая категория аспектуальности в русском жестовом языке), страница 52
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Функционально-семантическая категория аспектуальности в русском жестовом языке". PDF-файл из архива "Функционально-семантическая категория аспектуальности в русском жестовом языке", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "филология" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве МГУ им. Ломоносова. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с МГУ им. Ломоносова, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой кандидатскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени кандидата филологических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 52 страницы из PDF
P. 35–64.146. Broselow, McCarthy 1984 – Broselow E., McCarthy J. A Theory of InternalReduplication // The Linguistic Review. 1984. № 3. P. 25–88.147. Brunelli 2006 – Brunelli M. The grammar of Italian Sign Language, with astudy about it’s restrictive relative clauses. Master’s Thesis. Venezia, 2006. 88 p.291148. Bybee, Dahl 1989 – Bybee J., Dahl Ö. The creation of tense and aspectsystems in the languages of the world // Studies in language. 1989. Vol. 13 (1). P. 51–103.149.
Bybee et al. 1994 – Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W. The Evolution ofGrammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1994. 398 p.150. Campr, Hruz, Trojanova 2008 – Campr P., Hruz M., Trojanova J. Collectionand Preprocessing of Czech Sign Language Corpus for Sign Language Recognition //Proceedings of the International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation.Marrakech, 2008.151.
Carlson 1977 – Carlson G.N. Reference to Kinds in English: Ph.D. thesis.Amherst: University of Massachusetts, 1977.152. Cogill-Koez 2000 – Cogill-Koez D. A model of signed language ‘classifierpredicates’ as templated visual representations // Sign Language Linguistics. 2000.Vol. 3. P. 209–236.153.
Comrie 1976 – Comrie B. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of VerbalAspect and Related Problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976. 142 p.154. Comrie 1985 – Comrie B. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1985. 131 p.155. Coseriu 1980 – Coseriu E.
Aspects verbal ou aspectos verbaux? Quelquesquestions de theorie et de methode // La notion d’aspect. Paris, 1980. P. 13–25.156. Coseriu 1996 – Coseriu E. El Sistema romanico de las categorias verbales //El Sistema verbal romanico. Mexico, 1996 P. 95–125.157. Crasborn, van der Kooij, Broeder, Brugman 2004 – Crasborn O., van derKooij E., Broeder D., Brugman H. Sharing sign language corpora online: proposalsfor transcription and metadata categories // Proceedings of the LREC 2004 SatelliteWorkshop on Representation and processing of sign languages. 2004. P.
20–23.158. Cusic 1981 – Cusic D. Verbal Plurality and Aspect. Ph.D. Dissertation.Stanford: Stanford University, 1981.292159. Dahl 2010 – Dahl E. Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar:Exploring the Inflectional Semantics in the Rigveda // Brill Studies in Indo-EuropeanLanguage and Linguistics. Leiden: Brill, 2010. 475 p.160. Dahl 1985 – Dahl Ö. Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell, 1985.213 p.161. De Swart 1998 – De Swart H.
Aspectual Shift as Type Coercion // NaturalLanguage and Linguistic Theory. 1998. Vol. 16 (2). P. 347–385.162. De Swart, Verkyul 1999 – De Swart H., Verkuyl H. Tense and aspect insentence and discourse: lecture notes of the 11th European summer school in logic,language, and information. Utrecht: Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, 1999.163. Dik 1985 – Dik S.
Copula auxiliation: how and why? // Historicaldevelopment of auxiliaries. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1985. P. 56–84.164. Dik 1994 – Dik S. Verbal Semantics in Functional Grammar // Bache S.,Basboll H., Lindberg C.-E. (eds.) Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical andTheorethical Contributions to Language Typology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1994.P. 23–42.165. Dik 1997 – Dik S. The Theory of Functional Grammar: the structure of theclause. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997. 529 p.166. Dowty 1979 – Dowty D.R. Word meaning and Montague Grammar: Thesemantics of verbs and times in Generative Semantics and Montague’s PTQ //Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
1979.167. Dressler 1968 – Dressler W. Studien zur verbalen Pluralitаt. Wien:Оsterreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1968.168. Dudis 2011 – Dudis P. Response: Some Observations on Form-MeaningCorrespondences in Two Types of Verbs in ASL // Mathur G., Napoli D. (eds.) DeafAround the World: the Impact of Language. New York: Oxford university press,2011.
P. 83–95.169. Duffy 2007 – Duffy Q. The ASL Perfect formed by preverbal FINISH.Master’s Thesis. Boston, 2007. 43 p.293170. Dukic, Milkovic, Wilbur 2010 – Dukic L., Milkovic M., Wilbur R. Evidenceof telicity marking by nonmanuals in HZJ. Poster // Theoretical issues in signlanguage research 10. 2010.171. Efthimiou, Fotinea 2008 – Efthimiou E., Fotinea S.
Annotation andMaintenance of the Greek Sign Language Corpus // Proceedings of the 3rd Workshopon the Representation and Processing of Sign Languages: Construction andExploitation of Sign Language Corpora workshops series, 2008.172. Fischer 1973 – Fischer S. Two Processes of Reduplication in American SignLanguage // Foundations of Language. 1973. Vol. 9. P.
469–480.173. Givon 1995 – Givon T.Functionalism and grammar. Amsterdam,Philadelphia: Benjamins, 1995.174. Golston, Thurgood 1999 – Golston C., Thurgood E. Reduplication as Echo:Evidence from Bontok and Chumash // Perspectives in Linguistics: Papers in honorof P. J. Mistry. – New Dehli: Indian Institute of Language Studies, 1999. – P. 81–105.175. Grenoble 1992 – Grenoble L. An Overview of Russian Sign Language // SignLanguage Studies.
Maryland: Linstok Press, 1992. Vol. 21 (77). P. 321–338.176. Grose 2003 – Grose D. A Nonmanual Perfect Marker in ASL: the Head Nod.Master’s Thesis. Purdue University, 2003.177. Haspelmath, Sims 2010 – Haspelmath M., Sims A. Understandingmorphology. London: Hodder Education, 2010. 366 p.178. Heine 1994 – Heine B. On the Genesis of Aspect in African Languages: TheProximative // Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the BerkeleyLinguistics Society: Special Session on Historical Issues in African Linguistics.Berkley: Berkley Linguistic society, 1994. P. 35–46.179. Heine, Kuteva 2004 – Heine B., Kuteva T.
World Lexicon ofGrammaticalization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. 387 p.180. Hendriks 2008 – Hendriks B. Jordanian Sign Language: Aspects of grammarfrom a cross-linguistic perspective. PhD Thesis. Amsterdam, 2008. 257 p.294181. Hockett 1995 – Hockett C.F. Peiping Morphophonemics // Reading inLinguistics I & II. – Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. – P. 130–143.182. Hohenberger 2008 – Hohenberger A.
The word in sign language: empiricalevidence and theorethical controversies // Linguistics. 2008. Vol. 46 (2). P. 249–308.183. Hopper 1988 – Hopper P. Emergent Grammar and the A Priori GrammarPostulate // Tannen D. (ed.) Linguistics in Context: Connecting Observation andUnderstanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 1988. P. 117–134.
320 p.184. Humphries, Padden, O’Rourke 1994 – Humphries T., Padden C., O’RourkeT.J. A Basic Course in American Sign Language. Silver Spring, MD: T.J. Publishers,1994. 288 p.185. Jantunen, Takkinen 2010 – Jantunen T., Takkinen R. Syllable Structure inSign Language Phonology // Brentari D.
(ed.). Sign Languages. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2010. P. 312–331.186. Jespersen 1924 – Jespersen O. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: GeorgeAllen & Unwin Ltd., 1924.187. Johnston, Schembri 2006 – Johnston T., Schembri A. Issues in the creation ofa digital archive of a signed language // Sustainable data from digital fieldwork.Sydney: University of Sydney Press, 2006. P.
7–16.188. Jones 1978 – Jones P. On the interface of ASL phonology and morphology //Communication and cognition. 1978. № 11. P. 69–78.189. Johnson 1981 – Johnson M. A unified temporal theory of tense and aspect //Syntax and Semantics. 1981. № 14. P. 145– 171.190. Johnston, Schembri 2007 – Johnston T., Schembri A. Australian SignLanguage (Auslan). An introduction to Sign Language Linguistics. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 2007. 323 p.191. Kimmelman 2009 – Kimmelman V. Parts of speech in Russian SignLanguage: The role of iconicity and economy // Sign Language & Linguistics.
2009.Vol. 12 (2). P. 161–186.295192. Kimmelman 2011 – Kimmelman V. Word order in Russian Sign Language //Sign Language Studies. 2011. Vol. 12 (3). P. 412–445.193. Kimmelman 2013 – Kimmelman V. Doubling in RSL and NGT: a pragmaticaccount // M. Balbach, L. Benz, S. Genzel, M. Grubic, A. Renans, S. Schalowski, M.Stegenwallner, A. Zeldes (eds.) Interdisciplinary Studies on Information Structure.Potsdam, 2013. Vol. 17. P. 99–118.194. Kimmelman 2014 – Kimmelman V. Information Structure in Russian SignLanguage and Sign Language of the Netherlands. Amsterdam, 2014.
