диссертация (1169799), страница 43
Текст из файла (страница 43)
– 2012. – № 2. – С. 25-31.180. Энтин М. Л. Влияние права прав человека на прогрессивное развитиесовременного международного права. Часть I / М. Л. Энтин // Московский журналмеждународного права. — 2017. — №2. — С. 29-44.181. Энтин М. Л. Влияние права прав человека на прогрессивное развитиесовременного международного права.
Часть II / М. Л. Энтин, Е. Г. Энтина //Московский журнал международного права. – 2017. – №4. — С. 31-49.На иностранных языках182. Ahern K. R. Evidence from Illegal Insider Trading Tips // Marshall School ofBusiness, University of Southern California. – 2014. – 83 p. // URL:http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2511068(датаобращения:10.10.2017).183. Astrid E., Benedikt P. The Integration of Switzerland into the Framework of EULaw by Means of the Bilateral Agreements // The Rising Complexity of European Law.– 2014. – p. 39-66.184.
Austin J. Unusual Trade or Market Manipulation? How Market Abuse is Detectedby Securities Regulators, Trading Venues and Self-Regulatory Organizations // Journalof Financial Regulation. – 2015. – Vol. 1. – No. 2. – P. 263–283.197185. Barnes P. Law Enforcement and the History of Financial Market Manipulation //Accounting History. – 2014. – Vol. 19. – No 4. – P. 563-564.186. Busch D., Van Rijn Mirik B.
J. Towards Single Supervision and Resolution ofSystemically Important Non-Bank Financial Institutions in the European Union //European Business Organization Law Review. – 2018. – Vol. 19. – No 2, P. 301–363.187. Cathcart B. The Rothschild Libel: Why has it taken 200 years for an anti-Semiticslur that emerged from the Battle of Waterloo to be dismissed? (3 May 2015) // URL:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-rothschild-libel-why-has-ittaken-200-years-for-an-anti-semitic-slur-that-emerged-from-the-10216101.html(датаобращения: 10.10.2017).188.
Ćemalović U. Framework for the approximation of national legal systems with theEuropean Union’s acquis: from a vague definition to jurisprudential implementation //Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy. – 2015. – Vol. 11. – P. 241-258.189.
Christensen H. B., Hail L., Leuz C. Capital-Market Effects of SecuritiesRegulation: Prior Conditions, Implementation, and Enforcement // Review of FinancialStudies. – 2016. – Vol. 29. – No 11. – P. 2885-2924.190. Craig P. Delegated Acts, Implementing Acts and the New Comitology Regulation// European Law Revie. – 2011.
– Vol. 36. – No 5. – P. 671-688.191. Cumming D. J., Groh A. P., Johan S. Same Rules, Different Enforcement: MarketAbuse in Europe // Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money. –2018. – Vol. 54. – P. 130-151.192. De Jong B. J. Can Fluctuations in Prices or Volumes of a Security Trigger a Dutyfor Listed Companies to Disclose Inside Information? // European Business OrganizationLaw Review.
– 2016. – Vol. 17. – No 4. – P. 523-539.193. Di Noia C., Gargantini M. The Market Abuse Directive Disclosure Regime inPractice: Some Margins for Future Actions // European Company and Financial LawReview. – 2012. – Vol. 9. – No 4. – P. 484–529.194. Duncan A. The Lamfalussy Process and EU Bank Regulation: Another Step on theRoad to Pan-European Bank Regulation? // Annual Review of Banking & Finance Law.– 2006. – Vol.
25. – P. 389-442.198195. Engle E. Insider Trading in U.S. and E.U. Law: A Comparison // EuropeanBusiness Law Review. – 2010. – Vol. 26. – P. 465-490.196. Enriques L, Gatti M. Is there a uniform EU Securities law after the FinancialServices Action Plan? // Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance. – 2008. – Vol. 14.– No 1. – P.
43-82.197. Faure M. G., Leger C. The Directive on Criminal Sanctions for Market Abuse: AMove towards Harmonizing Inside Trading Criminal Law at the EU Level? // BrooklynJournal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law. – 2015. – Vol. 9. – No 2. – P. 387427.198. Fischel D., Ross D. Should the law prohibit manipulation in financial markets? //Harvard Law Review. – 1991.
– No 105. – P. 530-532.199. Fischer-Appelt D. The European Securities and Markets Authority: the beginningsof a powerful European securities authority? // Law and Financial Markets Review. –2011. – Vol. 5. – No 1. – P. 21-32.200. Gijs Jan B., Jens B.-H. Controlling delegated powers in the post-Lisbon EuropeanUnion // Journal of European Public Policy. – 2016. – Vol. 23. – No 4.
– P. 531-549.201. Gilotta S. Disclosure in Securities Markets and the Firm’s Need for Confidentiality:Theoretical Framework and Regulatory Analysis // European Business Organization LawReview. – 2012. – Vol. 13. – No 1. – P. 45-88.202. Groussot X., Minssen T. Res Judicata in the Court of Justice Case-Law: BalancingLegal Certainty with Legality // European Constitutional Law Review.
– 2007. – Vol. 3.– No 3. – P. 385-417.203. Howell E. The evolution of ESMA and direct supervision: Are there implicationsfor EU supervisory governance? // Common Market Law Review. – 2017. – Vol. 54. –No 4. – P. 1027–1057.204. Kern A., A review of Stock Market Efficiency, Insider Dealing and Market Abuseby Paul Barnes // King's Law Journal. – 2009. – Vol. 20.
– No 3. – P. 547-552.205. Kern A., Maly V. The new EU market abuse regime and the derivatives markets //Law and Financial Markets Review. – 2015. – Vol. 9. – No 4. – P. 243-250.199206. Klöhn L. Inside Information Without an Incentive to Trade? What's at Stake in'Lafonta v. AMF' (April 25, 2014) // Humboldt University of Berlin - Faculty of Law. –2014. – 24 p. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2429513 (дата обращения: 02.11.2017).207. Krause H., Brellochs M. Insider trading and the disclosure of inside informationafter Geltl v Daimler—A comparative analysis of the ECJ decision in the Geltl v Daimlercase with a view to the future European Market Abuse Regulation // Capital Markets LawJournal.
– 2013. – Vol. 8. – No 3. – P. 283–299.208. Kumm M. Constitutionalising Subsidiarity in Integrated Markets: The Case ofTobacco Regulation in the European Union // European Law Journal. – 2006. – Vol. 12.– No 4. – P. 503-533.209. Labin D.K., Soloveva A.V. International investment law as international law:Russian and Western approaches // American Journal of International Law. – 2018. –Vol. 112. – P. 202-206.210. Lachat A.
H. The economics behind market abuse and a comparative analysis ofthe legal framework in Switzerland and the EU. – 2009. – 93 p.211. Lock T. The Future Relationship between the Two European Courts // The Lawand Practice of International Courts and Tribunals. – 2009. – Vol. 8. – P. 375-398.212. Luca E., Matteo G.
Is there a uniform EU Securities law after the Financial ServicesAction Plan? // Stanford Journal of Law, Business & Finance. – 2008. – Vol. 14. – № 1.– P. 43-82.213. Luchtman M., Vervaele J. Enforcing the Market Abuse Regime: Towards anIntegrated Model of Criminal and Administrative Law Enforcement in the EuropeanUnion? // New Journal of European Criminal Law. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – No.
2. – P. 192 –220.214.McConnell P. J. LIBOR Manipulation: Operational Risks Resulting from Brokers’Misbehavior // Journal of Operational Risk. – 2013. –Vol. 8. – No 3. – Р. 59-99.215. Miglietti M. The first exercise of article 83(2) TFEU under review : an assessmentof the essential need of introducing criminal sanctions // New Journal of EuropeanCriminal Law. – 2014. – Vol. 5. – No 1. – P. 5-25.200216. Möllers T. M.
J. Sources of Law in European Securities Regulation EffectiveRegulation, Soft Law and Legal Taxonomy from Lamfalussy to de Larosiere // EuropeanBusiness Organization Law Review II. – 2015. – Vol. 11. – No 3. – P. 379-407.217. Moloney N.
The European Securities and Markets Authority and InstitutionalDesign for the EU Financial Market – A Tale of Two Competences: Part (1) Rule-making// European Business Organization Law Review. – 2011. – Vol. 12. – No 1. – P. 41-86.218. Moloney N. The European Securities and Markets Authority and InstitutionalDesign for the EU Financial Market – A Tale of Two Competences: Part (2) Rules inAction // European Business Organization Law Review. – 2011.
– Vol. 12. – No 2. – P.177-225.219. Morajane T. C. R What Constitutes 'Inside Information' for Purposes of InsiderTrading?: Zietsman v Directorate of Market Abuse // Journal of Contemporary RomanDutch Law. – 2017. – Vol. 80. – No 1. – P. 506-523.220. Nelemans M. RedefiningTrade-BasedMarketManipulation // ValparaisoUniversity Law Review. – 2008. – Vol. 42. – No 4. – P. 1169-1220.221. Pelizzon L., Sartore D. Deciphering the Libor and Euribor Spreads during thesubprime crisis // North American Journal of Economics and Finance. – 2013. – No 26.– Р.
565-585.222. Putninёsˇ T. J. Market manipulation: a survey. Stockholm School of Economics inRiga // Journal of Economic Surveys. – 2012. – Vol. 26. – No 5. – P. 952-967.223. Response to Internal Market Synoptic review. Article 114 TFEU - an expandingLegal Basis?.
The General Council of the Bar of England and Wales // URL:https://www.barcouncil.org.uk/media/207724/bar_council_of_ew_internal_market_synoptic_review_-__the_expansion_of_article_114_legal_basis.pdf(датаобращения:10.10.2017).224. Samuli M. Criminal competence and the choice of legal basis: space in themargins? // European Criminal Law Review. – 2015. – Vol. 5. – No 2. – P. 222-242.225. Shahzad K., Mertens G. The European Market Abuse Directive: Has it Worked? //Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting. – 2017.
– Vol. 28. – No 1.– Р. 1-43.201226. Siems M., Nelemans M. The Reform of the EU Market Abuse Law: Revolution orEvolution? // The Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. – 2012. – Vol.19. – P. 195-205.227. Slater D. The scope of EC harmonising powers revisited? // German Law Journal.– 2003. – Vol. 04. – No. 2. – P. 137-147.228. Smith H. Market abuse update // Law and Financial Markets Review. – 2012. –Vol. 6. – No 1. – P. 68-77.229. Veil R., Koch P. Towards a Uniform European Capital Markets Law: Proposals ofthe Commission to Reform Market Abuse // Bucerius Law School Working Paper №1/2012. – 25 p. // URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1998376(дата обращения: 02.11.2017).230.
Ventoruzzo M. Do Market Abuse Rules Violate Human Rights? The GrandeStevens v. Italy Case (October 1, 2014) // European Corporate Governance Institute(ECGI) - Law Working Paper No. 269/2014; Bocconi Legal Studies Research Paper No.2517760. URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2517760.231. Ventoruzzo M. When Market Abuse Rules Violate Human Rights: Grande Stevensv. Italy and the Different Approaches to Double Jeopardy in Europe and the US //European Business Organization Law Review. – 2015. – Vol. 16. – No 1. – P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
