диссертация (1169512), страница 42
Текст из файла (страница 42)
Нарочницкой. М.: Международные отношения, 2014.– C.214-233.108.Малышева Д.Б. Турецкая головоломка. // Сводобная мысль. – 2015. –№ 2. - С. 115-128.109.Малышева Д.Б. Политическая трансформация Турции в контекстереферендума 16 апреля // Контуры глобальных трансформаций: политика,экономика право. – 2017. – № 2. - С. 167-180.110.Матюхин В.В. Доминирование Партии справедливости и развития втурецком политическом процессе: идеологический аспект // Вестник РУДН.Серия : Политология.
– М., 2016. - № 2. С. 25-38111.Матюхин В.В. «Постсекулярная» Турция // Политическая наука. – М.:ИНИОН.РАН, 2013. - № 2. С. 126-141.112.Матюхин В.В., Кудряшова И.В. Турция: национальные интересы иимперскость // Политическая наука. – М.: ИНИОН.РАН, 2013. - № 3. С. 117136.113.Мелешкина Е.Ю. Доминирование по-русски или мировой феномен? //Политическая наука. – 2006. – №1.
– С.135-161.114.Мчедлова М.М. Возвращение религии, или новый мир: В поискахобъяснения // Политическая наука. – М.: ИНИОН.РАН, 2013. - № 2. С. 25-47115.Мчедлова М.М. Социокультурные смыслы политики: Новая логикаинтерпретации и религиозные референции // Полис. Политическиеисследования. – 2016. - № 1. С.157-174.116.Порошин А.В. Режим с доминантной партией как перспективаполитической трансформации посткоммунистических государств //Политическая наука. – М.: ИНИОН.РАН, 2014. – № 3. – С.
232-248.117.Пляйс Я.А. Партийное строительство в России. Анализдиссертационных исследований российских политологов // Полис. – 2007. –№5. – C.149-166.118.Пшизова С.Н. Финансирование политического рынка: теоретическиеаспекты практических проблем (I) / С.Н.Пшизова // Полис. – 2002. – №1. –C.18-30.119.Пшизова С.Н. Финансирование политического рынка: теоретическиеаспекты практических проблем (II) // Полис.– 2002. –№2.
– C.31-43.120.Стрельцов Д.В. Системы доминантных партий: некоторые подходы кметодологии исследования // Полис. Политические исследования. – 2017. № 3. – С. 105-118.121.Харитонова О.Г. Недемократические политические режимы//Политическая наука. – М.: ИНИОН.РАН, 2012. - № 3. С. 9-30.122.Хенкин С. «Партия власти»: российский вариант // Pro et Contra. –1996.–Т.1.–№1.–Режимдоступа:http://uisrussia.msu.ru/docs/nov/pec/1996/1/ProEtContra_1996_1_03.htm188123.Шугарт М.С., Кэри Дж. Президентские системы // Современнаясравнительная политология: Хрестоматия. – М.: Моск.
обществ. научн.фонд, 1997. с.198-246Статьив периодических научных изданиях и сборниках наиностранных языках124.Akdoğan Y. The Meaning of Conservative Democratic Political Identity /Yalçın Akdoğan // Yavuz H. The Emergence of a New Turkey: Democracy andthe AK Parti. – Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 2006. – P.49-65.125.Arian A., Barnes S.H. The Dominant Party System: a Neglected Model ofDemocratic Stability // The Journal of Politics.
– 1974. – Vol.36. – P.592-614.126.Aronoff J. M. Israel under Labor and the Likud: The Role of DominanceConsidered // Pempel T.J. Uncommon Democracies. The One-Party DominantRegimes. – 1990. – P.260-281.127.Bardakçı M. Coup Plots and the Transformation of Civil–MilitaryRelations in Turkey under AKP Rule / Mehmet Bardakçı // Turkish Studies.
–2013. – Vol.14. – Iss. 3. – P.411-428.128.Çandar C. Turgut Özal Twenty Years After: The Man and the Politician[Electronic Resource] / Cengiz Çandar // Insight Turkey. – 2013.– Vol. 15. – No.2.–P.27-36.–Modeofaccess:http://file.insightturkey.com/Files/Pdf/15_2_2013_candar.pdf129.Çarkoğlu A. Turkey's November 2002 Elections: a New Beginning? / AliÇarkoğlu // Middle East Review of International Affairs.
– 2002.–Vol. 6 – No. 4.– P.30-41.130.Dinç G. “Durmak yok, yola devam” A Close Look at AKP’s ElectionSuccess [Electronic Resource] / Güliz Dinç// Fokus Türkei. Friedrich-EbertStiftung. – 8.04.2008. – P.1-18. – Mode of access: http://library.fes.de/pdffiles/bueros/tuerkei/05726.pdf131.Ensaroğlu Y. Turkey's Kurdish Issue and the Peace Process / YılmazEnsaroğlu [Electronic Resource] // Insight Turkey. – 2013.– Vol. 15. – No. 2. p.717.–Modeofaccess:http://file.insightturkey.com/Files/Pdf/20130415155719_15_2_2013_ensaroglu.pdf132.Esping-Andersen G.
Single-Party Dominance: The Saga of SocialDemocracy // Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. –L.:Cornell University Press, 1990. – P.33-57.133.Görener A., Ucal M. The Personality and Leadership Style of RecepTayyip Erdogan: Implications for Turkish Foreign Policy / Aylin Görener,Meltem Ucal// Turkish Studies. – 2011. –Vol. 12. – No.3. – P.357-381.134.Gümüş B., Dural A.B.
Othering through Hate Speech: The Turkish Islamist(V)Akit Newspaper as a Case Study // Turkish Studies. - 2012, September. Vol.13. – No.3. – p.489-507189135.Gümüşçü Ş. The Emerging Predominant Party System in Turkey / ŞebnemGümüşçü // Government and Opposition. – 2013. – Vol.48 – Iss. 2. – P.223-244.136.Hate Speech and Beyond: Targeting the Gülen Movement in Turkey[Electronic Resource] // Rethink Institute.–Wash. D.C.–June 2014. – P.1-57. –Modeofaccess:http://www.rethinkinstitute.org/wpcontent/uploads/2014/06/Hate-Speech-and-Beyond.pdf137.Heper M.
The Justice and Development Party Government and the Militaryin Turkey // Turkish Studies. – 2005. – Vol. 6.– N 2. – P. 215 - 231.138.Kadıoğlu A. Civil Society, Islam and Democracy in Turkey: A Study ofThree Non-Governmental Organizations// The Muslim world. – 2005. – Vol.95. –No.1. – P.23-41.139.Kalaycıoğlu E. Justice and Development Party at the Helm: Resurgence ofIslam or Restitution of the Right-of-Center Predominant Party // Turkish Studies.– 2010. – Vol. 11.
– No. 1. – P.29-44.140.Katz R. Party organizations and Finance / Richard S. Katz // L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and Pippa Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Votingin Global Perspective. – L.: Sage, 1996. – P. 107-33.141.Kurban D. Not a Roadmap for Peace. [Electronic Resource] / Dilek Kurban// German Institute for International and Security Affairs. – 2013.– November. –P.1-8.–Modeofaccess:https://www.swpberlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2013C35_kun.pdf142.LaPalombara J.
Reflections on Political Parties and Political Development,Four Decades Later // Party Politics. – 2007. – Vol. 13, No 2. – P. 141-154.143.Müftüler-Baç M., Keyman F. The Era of Dominant-Party Politics // Journalof Democracy. –2012.– Vol.23.– No.1.–P.85-99.144.Öztürk A.E. Turkey's Diyanet under AKP rule: from protector to imposerof state ideology // Southeast European and Black Sea Studies. – 2016. – Vol.16 –Iss. 4.– P.619-635145.Pelin A. Authoritarian Party Structures in Turkey: A Comparison of theRepublican People’s Party and the Justice and Development Party / A.Pelin //Turkish Studies. – 2010.
– Vol. 11.– No. 2. – P.197-215.146.Pusane Ö.K. Turkey's Kurdish Opening: Long Awaited Achievements andFailed Expectations / Özlem Kayhan Pusane // Turkish Studies. – 2014. – Vol.15.– №1.– P.81-99147.Şen M. Transformation of Turkish Islamism and the Rise of Justice andDevelopment Party / M. Şen // Turkish Studies. – 2010. –Vol. 11.– No.1. – P.5984.148.Smith G. Hard and Soft Dominance: Assessing the Case of the BavarianCSU // Bogaards M., Boucek F. Dominant Political Parties and Democracy:Concepts, Measures, Cases and Comparisons.
– 2010. –P.98-108.149.Tarrow S. Maintaining Hegemony in Italy:' The softer they rise, the slowerthey fall' // Pempel T.J. ed. Uncommon Democracies. The One-Party DominantRegimes. – L.: Cornell University Press, 1990. –P.306-332.190150.Taşpınar Ö. Turkey: The New Model? // The Islamists Are Coming: WhoThey Really Are / Ed. by Wright R. Wash.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press,United States Institute of Peace Press, 2012. – P. 127-136.151.Tepe S. A Pro-Islamic Party? Promises and Limits of Turkey's Justice andDevelopment Party // Yavuz H.
The Emergence of a New Turkey : Democracyand the AK Parti.– Salt Lake City: The University of Utah Press, 2006. – P. 107–135.152.Yavuz H. Political Islam and the Welfare (Refah) Party in Turkey / HakanYavuz // Comparative Politics. – 1997. – Vol. 30. – No. 1. – P.63-82.153.Yeğen M. The Kurdish Peace Process in Turkey: Genesis, Evolution andProspects.
[Electronic Resource] / Mesut Yeğen // Global Turkey in Europe. –May,2015.–P.1-15.–Modeofaccess:http://www.iai.it/sites/default/files/gte_wp_11.pdf154.Akıner N., Akbulutgiller B., Erkan G. Dershane Tartışması: AK Partiİktidarı ve Gülen Hareketi Arasındaki Uyuşmazlığa Dair Haber Söylemi // SosyalBilimler Dergisi. – 2014. – Cilt 16 – Sayı 2.– P. 87-113.155.Arklan Ü. Siyasal liderlikte karizma olgusu: Recep Tayyip Erdoğanörneğinde teorik ve uygulamalı bir çalışma / Ümit Arklan// Selçuk ÜniversitesiSosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi. – 2006.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
