Диссертация (1155556), страница 39
Текст из файла (страница 39)
Christopher Miller» / Decision of SupremeCourt of South Carolina № 299 S.C. 307 (1989) of September 5, 1989 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/south-carolina/supreme-court/1989/23076-2.html>.28. Case «Marlys Schaack v. Paul Schaack» / Decision of SupremeCourt of South Dakota № 414 N.W.2d 818 (1987) of November 4, 1987 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/south-dakota/supreme-court/1987/15555-1.html>.29. Case «Mary Summerford Wires v. Harold O. Wires» / Decision ofSupreme Court of Mississippi № 297 So. 2d 900 (1974) of July 29, 1974 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/mississippi/supreme-court/1974/47588-0.html>.30. Case «Maynard v. Hill» / Decision of U.S. Supreme Court№ 125 U.S.
190 of March 19, 1888 // <https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/125/190/case.html>.31. Case «McCurdy v. McCurdy» / Decision of Supreme Court ofOklahoma № 16487 of 12.07.1926 // <http://law.justia.com/cases/oklahoma/supreme-court/1926/54295.html>.32. Case «Mincey v. Mincey» / Decision of Supreme Court of SouthCarolina№224S.C.520(1954)ofFebruary1,1954 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/south-carolina/supreme-court/1954/16828-1.html>.33.
Case «O. B. Hendricks v. Helen W. Hendricks» / Decision ofCaliforniaCourtsofAppeal№ 20036ofMay17,1954 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/2d/125/239.html>.34. Case «Robert Lynn Walton v. Norma Janet Walton» / Decision ofCaliforniaCourtofAppeals№ 11952ofOctober13,1972 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/california/court-of-appeal/3d/28/108.html>.35.
Case «Ronald E. Dolan v. Lucille E. Dolan» / Decision of MaineSupreme Judicial Court № 259 A.2d 32 (1969) of November 25, 1969 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/maine/supreme-court/1969/259-a-2d-32-0.html>.36. Case «Rosemond M. Phillips v. George W. Phillips» / Decision ofSupremeCourtofCalifornia№ 6130ofDecember24,<http://law.justia.com/cases/california/supreme-court/2d/41/869.html>.1953 //22337.
Case «Sam Joe Billington v. Helen I. Billington» / Decision of Courtof Civil Appeals of Alabama № 531 So. 2d 924 (1988) of June 29, 1988 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/court-of-appeals-civil/1988/civ-6244.html>.38. Case «Sharon Aletha Phillips v. Ira Phillips, Jr.» / Decision of Courtof Civil Appeals of Alabama № 274 So. 2d 71 (1973) of January 10, 1973 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/alabama/court-of-appeals-civil/1973/civ-40.html>.39. Case «Sharon P. Grier v.
Michael H. Grier» / Decision of SupremeCourtofMississippi№ 616 So. 2d 337 (1993)ofApril1,1993 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/mississippi/supreme-court/1993/90-ca-1039-1.html>.40. Case «Victor Posner v. Sari Posner» / Decision of Florida SupremeCourt № 233 So. 2d 381 (1970) of March 25, 1970 // <http://law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/1970/37162-0.html>.41.
Case «William A. Reville v. Eleanor M. Reville» / Decision ofMaine Supreme Judicial Court № 370 A.2d 249 (1977) of March 3, 1977 //<http://law.justia.com/cases/maine/supreme-court/1977/370-a-2d-249-0.html>.42. Case «William Ernest Arrington v. Vanna Bryant ValenchesArrington» / Decision of Supreme Court of Virginia № 196 Va. 86 (1954) of June21, 1954 // <http://law.justia.com/cases/virginia/supreme-court/1954/4220-1.html>.43. Case «Williams v. North Carolina» / Decision of U.S. SupremeCourt№ 325 U.S.
226 (1945)ofMay21,1945 //<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/325/226/case.html>.2. Законодательство Российской ФедерацииСемейный кодекс Российской Федерации от 29.12.1995 № 223-ФЗ //СПС «КонсультантПлюс».3. Научные публикации на английском языке1.Al-Hibri A. Issues Regarding Family Law Affecting AmericanMuslims // Articles and Essays. – Режим доступа: <http://www.zawaj.com/articles/challenges_women_4.html>.2.Bodenheimer B.M. Reflections on the Future of Grounds forDivorce // Journal of Family Law.
– 1968. – № 8. – P. 179–218.2243.Bradway J.S. Collusion and the Public Interest in the Law ofDivorce // Cornell Law Review. – 1962, Spring. – Vol. 47. – № 3. – P. 374–394.– Режим доступа: <http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1753&context=clr>.4.Bradway J.S. Why divorce? // Duke Law Journal. – 1959. – P.
217–5.Brummer C.E. The Shackles of Covenant Marriage: Who Holds the235.Keys to Wedlock // University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review. – 2003. –Vol. 25. – № 2. – P. 261–300. – Режим доступа: <http://lawrepository.ualr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1288&context=lawreview>.6.Buehler C., Gerard J.M. Divorce Law in the United States: A Focuson Child Custody // Family Relations. – 1995, October. – Vol. 44. – № 4. – P.
439–458. – Режим доступа: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/584999?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.7.Burnham W. Introduction to the Law and Legal System of theUnited States. 5th Edition. – St. Paul (MN, USA)West, 2011. – 880 p.8.CaliforniaSummaryDissolution//<https://www.cadivorce.com/california-divorce-guide/planning-for-a-californiadivorce/california-summary-dissolution/>.9.Connecticut Marriage License and Blood Test Requirements //<https://statelaws.findlaw.com/connecticut-law/connecticut-marriage-license-andblood-test-requirements.html>.10. Di Pronio B. Abolition of Guilt in Marriage Dissolution: Wisconsin'sAdoption of No-Fault Divorce // Marquette Law Review.
– 1978, Summer. –Vol. 61. – № 4. – P. 672–690. – Режим доступа: <http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2138&context=mulr>.11. Do I Need a Blood Test to Get a Marriage License? //<https://www.usmarriagelaws.com/marriage-license/premarital-requirements/blood-test.shtml>.12. Fagan P.F. Encouraging marriage and discouraging divorce //Heritage Foundation Backgrounder. – 26.03.2001. – № 1421. – P. 1–20.22513. FamilyLaw//<http://www.ndcourts.gov/ndlshc/FamilyLaw/FamilyLaw.aspx>.14.
Family law self-help forms // <https://www.legalaidofnebraska.org/get-help/help-yourself-access-to-justice/family-law-self-help-forms/>.15. Felkey A.J. Will You Covenant Marry Me? A Preliminary Look at aNew Type of Marriage // Eastern Economic Journal. – 2011. – № 37. – P. 367–389.16. Friedman L.M. Rights of Passage: Divorce Law HistoricalPerspective // Oregon Law Review. – 1984. – № 63. – Режим доступа:<http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/orglr63&div=37friedman1984.pdf&id=&page=>.17. Friedman L.M., Hayden G.M. American Law: An Introduction.Third Edition. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
– XV; 360 p.18. Hamm M.S. Opportuning virtue: the binding ties of covenant marriageexamined // Regent University Law Review. – 1999. – Vol. 12. – P. 73–90. –Режимдоступа:<http://regentuniversityonline.com/acad/schlaw/student_life/studentorgs/lawreview/docs/issues/v12n1/12RegentULRev73.pdf>.19. How to Get an Agreed Divorce in Tennessee // <http://www.tncourts.gov/sites/default/files/docs/packet_-_divorce_forms_no_children_-_jan_2018.pdf>.20. Illinois Uncontested Divorce // <https://www.divorcesupport.com/divorce/Illinois-Uncontested-Divorce-3576.html>.21.
Jamil S. An analysis of irretrievable breakdown of marriage as aground for divorce // Law Mantra. – Vol. 3. – № 1. – Режим доступа:<https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Saema_Jamil/publication/282975589_An_analysis_of_irretrievable_breakdown_of_marriage_as_a_ground_for_divorce/links/562e348908ae04c2aeb5b8ee.pdf?origin=publication_detail>.22. Lisko E.A. Mandatory Premarital HIV Testing // <https://www.law.uh.edu/healthlaw/perspectives/HIVAIDS/990226Premarital.html>.23. MacKenna B.
Divorce by Consent and Divorce for Breakdown ofMarriage // The Modern Law Review. – 1967, March. – Vol. 30. – № 2. – P. 121–138. – Режим доступа: <https://www.jstor.org/stable/1092276?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents>.22624. Ranga P.D. Divorce under Personal Laws in India: A ComparativeStudy (a Thesis submitted for the award of the degree of Doctor of philosophy in–law).MaharshiDayanandUniversity,2014.–Режимдоступа:<http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/106247>.25. Rheinstein M. Trends in marriage and divorce law of Westerncountries // <http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2548&context=lcp>.26. Schmidt J. Selfish intentions: Kansas women and divorce innineteenth century America (A Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of therequirementsforthedegreeMasterofArts) //<http://www.jamesmadison.gov/pdf/Madison%20Fellows/JanealSchmidt.pdf>.– 2009.
– XIV; 82 p.27. Seventy-First Report: The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 – Irretrievablebreakdown of marriage as a ground of divorce / Law Commission of India //<http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/report71.pdf>. – 1978, April. – 46 p.28. Spaht K.S. Louisiana's covenant marriage: social commentary andlegal implications // <http://faculty.law.lsu.edu/katherinespaht/covenantmarriage.htm>.29. Steinbock, Jr. D.D.
The Case for No-Fault Divorce // Tulsa LawReview. – 1975. – Vol. 10. – № 3. – P. 427–435. – Режим доступа:<http://digitalcommons.law.utulsa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1274&context=tlr>.30. Stewart A.L. Covenant marriage: legislating family values // IndianaLaw Review. – 1999. – Vol. 32.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
