Диссертация (1150529), страница 16
Текст из файла (страница 16)
Y.: OxfordUniversity Press, 1995.10. Çåíêåâè÷ Í. À. Ìåõàíèçìû çàêëþ÷åíèÿ ñäåëêè íà Â2 ðûíêàõ: Ñðàâíèòåëüíûé àíàëèç // Âåñòíèê Ñ.-Ïåòåðá. óí-òà. Ñåð. 8: Ìåíåäæìåíò. 2008. Âûï. 1. Ñ. 330.11. Perry M. An Example of Price Formation in Bilateral Situations: A BargainingModel with Incomplete Information // Econometrica. 1986. Vol. 54, N 2. P. 313321.10712. McAfee R. P. A Dominant Strategy Double Auction // Journal of EconomicTheory.
1992. Vol. 56, issue 2. P. 434450.13. Maskin E. S., Riley J. G. Auction Theory with Private Values // AmericanEconomic Review. 1985. Vol. 75, N 2. P. 150155.14. Maskin E. S., Riley J. G. Optimal Multi-Unit Auctions // The Economics ofMissing Markets, Information, and Games / Ed. by F. Hahn.
Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press; Clarendon Press. 1989. P. 312335.15. Maskin E. S. Auctions and Privatization // Privatization: Symposium in Honorof Herbert Giersch / Ed. by H. Siebert. Tübingen: Mohr (Siebeck). 1992. P. 115136.16. Klemperer P. The Economic Theory of Auction. Northampton, MA: EdwardElgar Publishing, Inc., 2000.17. Krishna V. Auction Theory.
2nd edition, Academic Press, 2009.18. Brams S. J., et al. A simple bargaining mechanism that elicits truthfulreservation prices // Group Decision and Negotiation. 2014. DOI 10.1007/s10726-014-9395-5.19. Brams S. J., Mitts J. Law and mechanism design: procedures to induce honestbargaining // NYU Annual survey of American law.
2014. vol. 68, issue 4. P. 729790.20. Âàñèí À. À., Ãóñåâ À. Ã., Øàðèêîâà À. À. Òåîðåòèêî-èãðîâîé àíàëèç îäíîýòàïíûõ è äâóõýòàïíûõ àóêöèîíîâ îäíîðîäíîãî òîâàðà // ÓÁÑ. 2010. Vol. 31.1. P. 210238.21. Âàñèí À. À., Äàéëîâà Å. À. Òåîðåòèêî-èãðîâàÿ ìîäåëü âçàèìîäåéñòâèÿ àãåíòîâ íà äâóõýòàïíîì ðûíêå ñî ñëó÷àéíûì ôàêòîðîì // Ìàòåìàòè÷åñêàÿ òåîðèÿ èãð è åå ïðèëîæåíèÿ. 2012.
Ò. 4, 4. Ñ. 322.22. Nash J. F. The Bargaining Problem // Econometrica. 1950. Vol. 18. P. 155162.23. Kalai E., Smorodinsky M. Other solutions to the Nash bargaining problem //Econometrica. 1975. Vol. 43. P. 513518.24. Rubinstein A. Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model // Econometrica. 1982. Vol.
50. P. 97-109.25. Banks J. S., Duggan J. A bargaining model of collective choice // Amer. Polit.Sci. Rev. 2000. Vol. 94. P. 7388.10826. Banks J. S., Duggan J. A general bargaining model of legislative policy-making// Quart. J. Polit. Sci. 2006. Vol. 1. P. 4985.27. Cho S., Duggan J. Uniqueness of stationary equilibria in a one dimensionalmodel of bargaining // Journal of Economic Theory. 2003. Vol. 113. P. 118130.28.
Cardona D., Ponsati C. Uniqueness of stationary equilibria in bargaining onedimensional policies under (super) majority rules // Games and EconomicBehavior. 2011. Vol. 73. P. 65-75.29. Predtetchinski A. One-dimensional bargaining with a general voting rule //METEOR Research Memorandum 07/045, Maastricht University.
2007.30. Predtetchinski A. One-dimensional bargaining // Games and EconomicBehavior. 2011. Vol. 72(2). P. 526-543.31. Cardona D., Ponsati C. Bargaining one-dimensional social choices // Journal ofEconomic Theory. 2007. Vol. 137. P. 627651.32. Merlo A., Wilson C. A stochastic model of sequential bargaining with completeinformation // Econometrica. 1995. Vol. 63. P. 371399.33. Ponsati C., Sakovics J.
Rubinstein bargaining with two-sided outside options /Ponsati C., Sakovics J. - Economic Theory. 1998.34. Eraslan H., Merlo A. Majority rule in a stochastic model of bargaining // Journalof Economic Theory. 2002. Vol. 103, issue 1. P. 3148.35. Kalandrakis T. Regularity of pure strategy equilibrium points in a class ofbargaining games // Economic Theory. 2006.
Vol. 28. P. 309329.36. Herings P., et al. One-dimensional bargaining with Markov recognitionprobabilities // Journal of Economic Theory. 2010. Vol. 145. P. 189215.37. Kultti K., Vartiainen H. Multilateral non-cooperative bargaining in a generalutility space // International Journal of Game Theory. 2010. Vol. 39. P. 677689.38. Arrow K. Social choice and individual values. New York: John Wiley and Sons,Inc., London: Chapman and Hall, Limited, 1951.39. Klamler C.
On the closeness aspect of three voting rules:BordaCopelandMaximin // Group Decision and Negotiation. 2006. vol. 14, Issue 3. P. 233240.40. Nanson E. J. Methods of Election // Transactions and Proceedings of the RoyalSociety of Victoria. 1882. vol. 18. P. 197240.10941. Baldwin J. M.
The technique of the Nanson preferential majority system ofelection // Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 1926. Vol. 39. P. 4252.42. Schulze M. A new monotonic, clone-independent, reversal symmetric, andcondorcet-consistent single-winner election method // Social Choice andWelfare. 2011. volume 36, number 2. P. 267303.43. Tideman T.N.
Independence of clones as a criterion for voting rules // SocialChoice and Welfare. 1987. Vol. 4. P. 185206.44. Kemeny J. Mathematics without numbers // Daedalus. 1959. Vol. 88. P. 577591.45. Young H. P. Group choice and individual judgements. Chapter 9 of Perspectiveson public choice: a handbook, edited by Dennis Mueller Cambridge UP. 1997.P. 181200.46. Brams S. J., Fishburn P.C. Approval voting // The American Political ScienceReview. 1978. vol.
72, no. 3. P. 831847.47. Brams S. J., Fishburn P.C. Going from theory to practice: The mixed success ofapproval voting // Social Choice and Welfare. 2005. Vol. 25(23). P. 457474.48. Hillinger C. The case for Utilitarian Voting // Homo Oeconomicus. 2005. vol. 23. P. 295321.49. Gaertner W., Xu Y. A general scoring rule // Mathematical Social Sciences. 2012.
vol. 63, no. 3. P. 193196.50. Smith W.D. Range voting. Technical Report 56, NEC Research, Princeton,NJ, USA, 2000.51. Balinski M., Laraki R. A theory of measuring, electing, and ranking //Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 2007. vol. 104,no. 21. P. 87208725.52. Brams S. J., Kilgour D. M., Sanver M.R.
A minimax procedure for electingcommittees // Public choice. 2007. vol. 132, no.3-4. P. 401420.53. Kilgour D.M. Approval balloting for multi-winner elections. Handbook onapproval voting, Springer, 2010. P. 105124.54. Aleskerov F. T., Yuzbashev D. A., Yakuba V. I. Threshold aggregation of thethree-graded rankings // Automation and Remote Control. January 2007. Vol. 68, Issue 1.
P. 133138.11055. Àëåñêåðîâ Ô. Ò., Þçáàøåâ Ä. À., ßêóáà Â. È. Ïîðîãîâîå àãðåãèðîâàíèåòðåõãðàäàöèîííûõ ðàíæèðîâîê // Àâòîìàò. è òåëåìåõ. 2007. 1. Ñ. 147152.56. Ìàçàëîâ Â. Â., Êîíäðàòüåâ À. Þ. Çàäà÷à î ñäåëêàõ ñ íåïîëíîé èíôîðìàöèåé // Âåñòí. Ñ.-Ïåòåðá. óí-òà. Ñåð. 10.
2012. Âûï. 1. Ñ. 3340.57. Ìàçàëîâ Â. Â., Êîíäðàòüåâ À. Þ. Ðàâíîâåñèå â ñäåëêàõ ñ ïîðîãîâûìè ñòðàòåãèÿìè // Ìàòåìàòè÷åñêàÿ òåîðèÿ èãð è åå ïðèëîæåíèÿ. 2013. Ò. 5, 2. Ñ. 046063.58. Êîíäðàòüåâ À. Þ. Ðàâíîâåñèå ïî Íýøó â ñòàöèîíàðíîì ñîñòîÿíèè â ìíîãîøàãîâîé ìîäåëè äâîéíîãî çàêðûòîãî àóêöèîíà // Ñîâðåìåííûå ïðîáëåìû íàóêè è îáðàçîâàíèÿ.
2013. 6. URL: http://www.scienceeducation.ru/113-11533 (äàòà îáðàùåíèÿ: 12.01.2014)59. Kondratev A. Y. Stationary State in a Multistage Auction Model //Contributions to game theory and management. 2014. Vol. 7, SPbSU. P. 151158.60. Mazalov V. V., Kondratev A. Y. The bargaining solution among thresholdstrategies // Automation and Remote Control. March 2015. Vol.
76, Issue 3. P. 507520.61. Kondratev A. Y. The relationship between discrete and continuous equilibriain bargaining model // Collected abstracts of papers presented on the SeventhInternational Conference Game Theory and Management. St. Petersburg, RussiaJune 26-28, 2013. P. 115116.62. Kondratev A. Y.
N-threshold approximation of continuous equilibrium ininternet auction// Extended abstracts presented on international workshop"Networking Games and Management". Petrozavodsk, Russia, june 23-25, 2013. P. 5152.63. Êîíäðàòüåâ À. Þ. Ìîäåëè ñäåëîê ñ ÷åñòíûìè ñòðàòåãèÿìè // ÒðóäûVII Ìîñêîâñêîé ìåæäóíàðîäíîé êîíôåðåíöèè ïî èññëåäîâàíèþ îïåðàöèé(Ìîñêâà, Ðîññèÿ, Îêòÿáðü 15-19, 2013). Ò. II. Ñ. 183185.64.
Êîíäðàòüåâ À. Þ. Ìíîãîøàãîâàÿ çàäà÷à î ñäåëêàõ ñ íåïîëíîé èíôîðìàöèåé // XII Âñåðîññèéñêîå ñîâåùàíèå ïî ïðîáëåìàì óïðàâëåíèÿ ÂÑÏÓ-2014,Ìîñêâà, 16-19 èþíÿ 2014 ã.: Òðóäû. Ñ. 83148320.65. Kondratev A. Y., Mazalov V. V. Bargaining about meeting time // Game theoryand management. Abstracts.
St. Petersburg. 2012. P. 122123.66. Kondratev A. Y. Bargaining about meeting time with piecewise-linear utilities// Game theory and management. Abstracts. 2014. P. 118119..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
