Диссертация (1147112), страница 37
Текст из файла (страница 37)
4 (Nov., 2005). — P. 1248–1274.102.Martinez M.D. Does Turnout Decline Matter? Electoral Turnout and Partisan Choice inthe 1997 Canadian Federal Election / Michael D. Martinez and Jeff Gill // Canadian Journal ofPolitical Science / Revue canadienne de science politique. — Vol.
39. — No. 2 (Jun., 2006). —P. 343–362.103.Martins R. Does voter turnout affect the votes for the incumbent government? / RodrigoMartins, Francisco José Veiga // European Journal of Political Economy. — Vol. 36 (2014). —P. 274–286.104.McAllister I. Public Perceptions of Electoral Fairness in Russia. / Ian McAllister,Stephen White // Europe-Asia Studies. — 2011. — Vol. 63:4.
— P. 663–683.105.McIntosh Mary E. Publics Meet Market Democracy in Central and East Europe, 1991–1993 / McIntosh Mary E., Martha Abel Mac Iver, Daniel G. Abele, Dina Smeltz. // SlavicReview. — Vol. 53. — No. 2. (Summer, 1994). — P. 483–512.106.McMurray Joseph C. Aggregating Information by Voting: The Wisdom of the Expertsversus the Wisdom of the Masses. // Review of Economic Studies. — 2013.
— 80(1). — P.277–312.107.Mebane Walter R. Jr. A Layman’s Guide to Statistical Election Forensics[Электронный ресурс]. // ElectionGuide Digest. — 2010. — Режим доступа:http://www.electionguide.org/digest/post/271/ (Дата обращения: 22.01.2014).188108.Mebane Walter R. Jr. Comment on «Benford’s Law and the Detection of ElectionFraud». // Political Analysis. — 2011. — Vol. 19. — P. 269–272.109.SecondMebane Walter R.
Jr. Election Forensics: The Meanings of Precinct Vote Counts’Digits[Электронныйресурс].—2013.—https://pages.shanti.virginia.edu/PolMeth/files/2013/07/Mebane.pdfРежим(Датадоступа:обращения:21.10.2014).110.Mebane Walter R. Jr. Fraud in the 2009 Presidential Election in Iran? // CHANCE. —Vol. 23. — No. 1. — 2010. — P.
6–15.111.Munson H. International Election Monitoring: A Critique Based on One Monitor'sExperience in Morocco // Middle East Report. No. 209, Behind the Ballot Box: AuthoritarianElections and Oppositional Strategies in the Middle East — Winter, 1998. —P. 36–39.112.Myagkov M. The Forensics of Election Fraud: Russia and Ukraine. / Mikhail Myagkov,Peter C.
Ordeshook, Dimitri Shakin. — New York: Cambridge University Press. — 2009. —289 P.113.Nagel J. T. Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections. /Jack H. Nagel and John E. McNulty // The American Political Science Review. — Vol. 90. —No. 4 (Dec., 1996). — P. 780–793.114.Neretin Yu. On statistical researches of parliament elections in the Russian Federation[Электронный ресурс]. — 2012. — Режим доступа: http://arxiv.org/abs/1205.1461 (Датаобращения: 19.06.2016).115.Nigrini Mark J.
Benford’s law: applications for forensic accounting, auditing, and frauddetection. — 2012. — John Wiley & Sons, Inc. — Hoboken, New Jersey. — 330 P.116.Norden L. Post-Election Audits: Restoring Trust in Elections. / Norden L., Burstein A.,Hall J.L., Chen M. Brennan Center for Justice. — NY. — 2007.
— 83 P.117.Norris P. Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. CambridgeUniversity Press. — NY. — 2005. — 367 P.118.Özgür E. Altruism and voting: A large-turnout result that does not rely on civic duty orcooperative behavior. // Journal of Economic Theory. — Volume 147. — Issue 6, November2012. — P. 2124–2157.119.Pericchi L., Torres D.
Quick Anomaly Detection by the Newcomb–Benford Law, with189Applications to Electoral Processes Data from the USA, Puerto Rico and Venezuela. //Statistical Science. — 2011. — Vol. 26. — No. 4. — P. 502–516.120.Peterssen P.A. The dog that didn’t bark: Would increased electoral turnout make adifference? / Per Arnt Pettersen Lawrence E. Rose. // Electoral Studies. — Vol. 26 (2007). — P.574–588.121.Pietronero L. Explaining the uneven distribution of numbers in nature: the laws ofBenford and Zipf / L. Pietronero, E. Tosatti, V. Tosatti, A. Vespignani. // Physica A.
— Vol. 293.— 2001. — P. 297–304.122.Rodriguez Ricardo J. First Significant Digit Patterns From Mixtures of UniformDistributions. // The American Statistician. — 2004. — Vol. 58:1. — P. 64–71.123.Roth A. Meet the woman who says she’s going to fix Russia’s rigged elections[Электронный ресурс]. // The Washington Post. — 14.05.2016. — Режим доступа:https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/meet-the-woman-who-says-shes-going-to-fixrussias-rigged-elections/2016/05/14/13f9ed7e-0e36-11e6-bc53-db634ca94a2a_story.html (Датаобращения: 19.06.2016).124.Rowe K.
The Partisan Consequences of Turnout Revisited [Электронный ресурс]. /Kelly Rowe and Ignacio Lago and Santiago Lago-Peñas. MPRA Paper No. 45423. — 2012.Режим доступа: http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/45423/ (Дата обращения: 25.10.2014).125.Saltman Roy G. The History and Politics of Voting Technology. Palgrave Macmillan. —NY. — 2006. — P. 71–137.126.Santa-Cruz A. Constitutional Structures, Sovereignty, and the Emergence of Norms:The Case of International Election Monitoring // International Organization. — Vol. 59. — No.3 (Summer, 2005). — P.
663–693.127.Schuler I. National Democratic Institute: SMS as a Tool in Election Observation. //Innovations. — 2009. — 3 (2). — P. 143–158.128.Shikano S. When Does the Second-Digit Benford’s Law-Test Signal an Election Fraud?Facts or Misleading Test Results / Susumu Shikano and Verena Mack. // Jahrbucher f.Nationalokonomie u.
Statistik (Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart 2011). — Bd. (Vol.) 231/5+6. — P.719–732.129.Simpser A. Does Electoral Manipulation Discourage Voter Turnout? Evidence from190Mexico . // The Journal of Politics. — Vol. 74. — No. 3. — July 2012. — P. 782–795.130.Simpser A. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections. — CambridgeUniversity Press. — 2004. — 304 P.131.Simpser A., Donno D. Can International Election Monitoring Harm Governance? // TheJournal of Politics. — Vol. 74. — No. 2. — April 2012. — P. 501–513.132.Sjoberg F.
M. Autocratic adaptation: The strategic use of transparency and thepersistence of election fraud. // Electoral Studies. — 33 (2014). — P. 233–245.133.Smets K., van Ham C. The embarrassment of riches? A meta-analysis of individual-level research on voter turnout. // Electoral Studies. — Vol. 32.
— 2013. — P. 344–359.134.Stark P. B. Conservative Statistical Post-Election Audits // The Annals of AppliedStatistics. — Vol. 2. — No. 2 (Jun., 2008). — P. 550–581.135.Sutter D. Detecting and Correcting Election Fraud // Eastern Economic Journal. — Vol.29. — No. 3 (Summer, 2003). — P. 433–451.136.Taagepera R. Extension of the Nagayama Triangle for Visualization of PartyStrengths // Party Politics.
— 2004. — Vol. 10. — P. 301–306.137.TidemanT. Nicolaus.TheStructureoftheElection-GeneratingUniverse[Электронный ресурс]. / T. Nicolaus Tideman, Florenz Plassman. // MPSA 68th AnnualNational Conference. — April 22–25, 2010. — Chicago, IL, USA. — Режим доступа:http://conference.mpsanet.org/papers/archive.aspx/2010/912532.(Датаобращения:17.10.2010).138.Tóka G. Inequalities of Political Influence in New Democracies / Gábor Tóka andMarina Popescu // International Journal of Sociology. — Vol. 37.
— No. 4, Causes andConsequences of Political Inequality in Cross-National Perspective (Winter, 2007/2008). — P.67–93.139.Tóka G. The impact of turnout on election outcomes in a cross-national perspective[Электронный ресурс]. / 14th International Conference of Europeanists. — Chicago, USA. —2004. — Режим доступа: www.personal.ceu.hu/staff/Gabor_Toka/Papers/Toka04Chicago.pdf.(Дата обращения: 25.10.2014).140.Tucker H.J.
Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections? / Harvey J.Tucker, Arnold Vedlitz and James DeNardo // The American Political Science Review. — Vol.19180. — No. 4 (Dec., 1986). — P. 1291–1304.141.Van der Eijk, C. Political effects of low turnout in national and European elections /Cees van der Eijk, Marcel van Egmond. // Electoral Studies. — Vol. 26 (2007). — P. 561–573.142.Woon J. Democratic Accountability and Retrospective Voting: A LaboratoryExperiment // American Journal of Political Science.
— Vol. 56. — No. 4 (October 2012). — P.913–930..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
