Диссертация (1145911), страница 22
Текст из файла (страница 22)
№ 2-3. P. 103–7.164. McKinnon P.J. ATM and ataxia telangiectasia. // EMBO Rep. 2004. Т. 5. № 8. P. 772–6.165. McPherson S., Longo F.J. Chromatin structure-function alterations during mammalianspermatogenesis: DNA nicking and repair in elongating spermatids. // Eur. J. Histochem. 1993.
Т. 37.№ 2. P. 109–28.166. Melnyk J. et al. Failure of transmission of the extra chromosome in subjects with 47,XYYkaryotype. // Lancet. 1969. Т. 2. № 7624. P. 797–8.167. Meistrich, M.L., van Beek, M.E.. Spermatogonial stem cells. // In Cell and molecular biology ofthe testis: ed. Desjardins C. and Ewing L.L.
// NY: Oxford University Press. 1993. P. 266–295.168. Ménézo Y., Dale B., Cohen M. DNA damage and repair in human oocytes and embryos: areview. // Zygote. 2010. Т. 18. № 4. P. 357–65.169. Menkveld R. et al. Semen parameters, including WHO and strict criteria morphology, in a fertileand subfertile population: an effort towards standardization of in-vivo thresholds. // Hum. Reprod.2001. Т. 16. № 6. P. 1165–71.170. Merwe F.H. van der et al. The use of semen parameters to identify the subfertile male in thegeneral population. // Gynecol.
Obstet. Invest. 2005. Т. 59. № 2. P. 86–91.171. Meschede D. et al. Familial pericentric inversion of chromosome 1 (p34q23) and male infertilitywith stage specific spermatogenic arrest. // J. Med. Genet. 1994. Т. 31. № 7. P. 573–5.172. Miharu N., Best R.G., Young S.R. Numerical chromosome abnormalities in spermatozoa offertile and infertile men detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. // Hum. Genet. 1994. Т.
93. №5. P. 502–6.173. Milazzo J.P. et al. Chromosome constitution and apoptosis of immature germ cells present insperm of two 47,XYY infertile males. // Hum. Reprod. 2006. Т. 21. № 7. P. 1749–58.174. Milligan C.E., Schwartz L.M. Programmed cell death during animal development. // Br. Med.Bull. 1997. Т. 53. № 3.
P. 570–90.175. Molyneaux K.A. et al. The chemokine SDF1/CXCL12 and its receptor CXCR4 regulate mousegerm cell migration and survival. // Development. 2003. Т. 130. № 18. P. 4279–86.176. Morel F. et al. Meiotic segregation analysis in spermatozoa of pericentric inversion carriersusing fluorescence in-situ hybridization. // Hum. Reprod. 2007. Т. 22. № 1.
P. 136–41.177. Moreno R.D. et al. Vesicular traffic and golgi apparatus dynamics during mammalianspermatogenesis: implications for acrosome architecture. // Biol. Reprod. 2000. Т. 63. № 1. P. 89–98. 106 178. Morris J.K. et al. Is the prevalence of Klinefelter syndrome increasing? // Eur. J. Hum. Genet.2008. Т. 16. № 2. P. 163–70.179. Morton N.E. Parameters of the human genome // Proc. Nadl. Acad. Sci. USA.
1991. Т. 88. №September 1991. P. 7474–7476.180. Mroz K., Hassold T.J., Hunt P.A. Meiotic aneuploidy in the XXY mouse: evidence that acompromised testicular environment increases the incidence of meiotic errors. // Hum. Reprod. 1999.Т. 14. № 5. P.
1151–6.181. Muratori M. et al. Origin and biological significance of DNA fragmentation in humanspermatozoa. // Front. Biosci. 2006. Т. 11. P. 1491–9.182. Muriel L. et al. Increased aneuploidy rate in sperm with fragmented DNA as determined by thesperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test and FISH analysis. // J. Androl. 2007. Т. 28.
№ 1. P. 38–49.183. Nakao M. Epigenetics: interaction of DNA methylation and chromatin. // Gene. 2001. Т. 278. №1-2. P. 25–31.184. Namekawa S.H. et al. Postmeiotic sex chromatin in the male germline of mice. // Curr. Biol.2006. Т. 16. № 7. P. 660–7.185. Negoescu A. et al. In situ apoptotic cell labeling by the TUNEL method: improvement andevaluation on cell preparations. // J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1996. Т. 44. № 9. P. 959–68.186.
Ng H.H., Bird A. DNA methylation and chromatin modification. // Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.1999. Т. 9. № 2. P. 158–63.187. Nguyen H.T. et al. Gain of 20q11.21 in human embryonic stem cells improves cell survival byincreased expression of Bcl-xL. // Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2014. Т. 20. № 2. P. 168–77.188.
Niemann R. Klinefelter syndrome: the commonest form of hypogonadism, but often overlookedor untreated. Cardiological disorders. // Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2013. Т. 110. № 40. P. 675.189. Nishikawa N. et al. Sex chromosomal analysis of spermatozoa from infertile men usingfluorescence in situ hybridization. // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.
2000. Т. 17. № 2. P. 97–102.190. Oakes C.C. et al. Developmental acquisition of genome-wide DNA methylation occurs prior tomeiosis in male germ cells. // Dev. Biol. 2007. Т. 307. № 2. P. 368–79.191. Oates R.D. et al. Clinical characterization of 42 oligospermic or azoospermic men withmicrodeletion of the AZFc region of the Y chromosome, and of 18 children conceived via ICSI. //Hum. Reprod. 2002.
Т. 17. № 11. P. 2813–24.192. Ogur G. et al. Chromosomal segregation in spermatozoa of 14 Robertsonian translocationcarriers. // Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2006. Т. 12. № 3. P. 209–15.193. Olson S.D., Magenis R.E. Preferential paternal origin of de novo structural chromosomerearrangements. // The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements: ed. Daniel A. // NY:Alan R Liss. 1988.
P. 583–599. 107 194. Palermo G. et al. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into anoocyte. // Lancet. 1992. Т. 340. № 8810. P. 17–8.195. Payne J.F. et al. Redefining the relationship between sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentationas measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay and outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.// Fertil. Steril. 2005.
Т. 84. № 2. P. 356–64.196. Peer S. et al. Is fine morphology of the human sperm nuclei affected by in vitro incubation at 37degrees C? // Fertil. Steril. 2007. Т. 88. № 6. P. 1589–94.197. Pentikäinen V., Erkkilä K., Dunkel L. Fas regulates germ cell apoptosis in the human testis invitro. // Am. J. Physiol. 1999.
Т. 276. № 2 Pt 1. P. E310–6.198. Perrin A. et al. Molecular cytogenetic and genetic aspects of globozoospermia: a review. //Andrologia. 2013. Т. 45. № 1. P. 1–9.199. Peters A.H. et al. Loss of the Suv39h histone methyltransferases impairs mammalianheterochromatin and genome stability. // Cell.
2001. Т. 107. № 3. P. 323–37.200. Pradhan, A. K., Fisher, D. L., Pollatsek, A. Risk Perception Training for Novice Drivers:Evaluating Duration of Effects on a Driving Simulator. // Transportation Research Record. 2006. P.58-64.201. Pylyp L.Y. et al. Chromosomal abnormalities in patients with oligozoospermia and nonobstructive azoospermia. // J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2013. Т. 30. № 5.
P. 729–32.202. Reijo R. et al. Diverse spermatogenic defects in humans caused by Y chromosome deletionsencompassing a novel RNA-binding protein gene. // Nat. Genet. 1995. Т. 10. № 4. P. 383–93.203. Reik W., Dean W., Walter J. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development.
// Science.2001. Т. 293. № 5532. P. 1089–93.204. Rhemrev J.P. et al. Quantification of the nonenzymatic fast and slow TRAP in a postadditionassay in human seminal plasma and the antioxidant contributions of various seminal compounds.
// J.Androl. 2000. Т. 21. № 6. P. 913–20.205. Rice J.C., Allis C.D. Histone methylation versus histone acetylation: new insights into epigeneticregulation. // Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2001. Т. 13. № 3. P. 263–73.206. Rives N. et al. Relationship between clinical phenotype, semen parameters and aneuploidyfrequency in sperm nuclei of 50 infertile males. // Hum.
Genet. 1999. Т. 105. № 3. P. 266–72.207. Roeder G.S., Bailis J.M. The pachytene checkpoint. // Trends Genet. 2000. Т. 16. № 9. P. 395–403.208. Rolland M. et al. Decline in semen concentration and morphology in a sample of 26,609 menclose to general population between 1989 and 2005 in France. // Hum. Reprod. 2013. Т. 28. № 2. P.462–70.
108 209. Rossi P. et al. Transcriptome analysis of differentiating spermatogonia stimulated with kitligand. // Gene Expr. Patterns. 2008. Т. 8. № 2. P. 58–70.210. Sahin F.I. et al. Chromosome heteromorphisms: an impact on infertility. // J. Assist. Reprod.Genet. 2008. Т. 25.
№ 5. P. 191–5.211. Sakkas D., Alvarez J.G. Sperm DNA fragmentation: mechanisms of origin, impact onreproductive outcome, and analysis. // Fertil. Steril. 2010. Т. 93. № 4. P. 1027–36.212. Sánchez M.P. et al. Renal agenesis and the absence of enteric neurons in mice lacking GDNF. //Nature.
1996. Т. 382. № 6586. P. 70–3.213. Sarrate Z. et al. FISH studies of chromosome abnormalities in germ cells and its relevance inreproductive counseling. // Asian J. Androl. 2005. Т. 7. № 3. P. 227–36.214. Sciurano R.B. et al. Focal spermatogenesis originates in euploid germ cells in classicalKlinefelter patients. // Hum. Reprod. 2009. Т.
24. № 9. P. 2353–60.215. SCSA Diagnostic Business Briefing. Sperm DNA Fragmentation. The role of the Urologist. //Male Infertility. 2005.216. Seli E. et al. Extent of nuclear DNA damage in ejaculated spermatozoa impacts on blastocystdevelopment after in vitro fertilization. // Fertil. Steril. 2004. Т. 82. № 2. P. 378–83.217. Shah K. et al. The genetic basis of infertility. // Reproduction.
2003. Т. 126. № 1. P. 13–25.218. Shamsi M.B., Kumar R., Dada R. Evaluation of nuclear DNA damage in human spermatozoa inmen opting for assisted reproduction. // Indian J. Med. Res. 2008. Т. 127. № 2. P. 115–23.219. Shashi V. et al. Molecular analysis of recombination in a family with Duchenne musculardystrophy and a large pericentric X chromosome inversion.
// Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996. Т. 58. № 6. P.1231–8.220. Sheth F. et al. Cytogenetic analysis of Down syndrome in Gujarat. // Indian Pediatr. 2007. Т. 44.№ 10. P. 774–7.221. Shi Q., Martin R.H. Aneuploidy in human spermatozoa: FISH analysis in men withconstitutional chromosomal abnormalities, and in infertile men. // Reproduction. 2001.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
