Диссертация (1145027), страница 93
Текст из файла (страница 93)
Failure after 1441: Bush and Chirac in the UN SecurityCouncil // Foreign Policy Analysis. – 2005. – Vol. 1. – No. 3 (November). – P. 333-360.414.McArdle-Kelleher C. U.S. Foreign Policy and Europe, 1990-2000 // TheBrookings Review. – 1990. – Vol. 8. – No. 4 (Fall). – P. 4–10.415.McCgwire M. The Rise of Fall of the NPT: An Opportunity for Britain //International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-).
– 2005. – Vol. 81. –No. 1. – P. 115-140.416.McCormick J.M. (2004). The Foreign Policy of the George W. BushAdministration // High Risk and Big Ambition: The Presidency of George W. Bush / Ed.by S.E. Schier. – Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press, 2004. – P. 189-223.417.McLellan D.S. The "Operational Code" Approach to the Study of PoliticalLeaders: Dean Acheson's Philosophical and Instrumental Beliefs // Canadian Journal ofPolitical Science. – 1971.
–Vol. 4. – No. 1 (March). – P. 52-75.418.Milner H. The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: ACritique // Review of International Studies. – 1991. – Vol. 17. – No. 1 (January). – P. 6785.419.Mitchell D., Massoud T.G. Anatomy of Failure: Bush’s Decision-Making Processand the Iraq War // Foreign Policy Analysis. – 2009. – Vol. 5. – No. 3 (July). – P. 265286.420.Moravcsik A.
Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of InternationalPolitics // International Organization. – 1997. – Vol. 51. – No. 4 (Autumn). – P. 513–553.335421.Mulford M., Berejikian J. Behavioral Decision Theory and the Gains Debate inInternational Politics // Political Studies. – 2002. – Vol. 50. – No. 2.
– P. 209-229.422.Müller M. Education and the Formation of Geopolitical Subjects // InternationalPolitical Sociology. – 2001.– Vol. 5. – No. 1 (March).– P. 1-17.423.Myers D.J. Threat Perception and Strategic Response of the Regional Hegemons:A Conceptual Overview // Regional Hegemons: Threat Perception and StrategicResponse / Ed. by David Meyers.
– Boulder: Westview Press, 1991. – P. 1-30.424.Neier A. The New Double Standard // Foreign Policy. – 1996-1997. – No. 105. –P. 91-102.425.Neumann I.B. John Vincent and the English School of International Relations //The Future of International Relations: Mastering in the Making / Ed. by I.B. Neumann,O. Waever. – London: Routledge, 1997.
– P. 41-70.426.Newsom D.D. African Development and U.S. Foreign Policy // Journal ofOpinion. – 1973. – Vol. 3. – No. 3 (Autumn). – P. 12–16.427.Nye J.S., Jr. Old Wars and Future Wars: Causation and Prevention // Journal ofInterdisciplinary History. – 1988. – Vol. 18. – N . 4, The Origin and Prevention of MajorWars (Spring). – P.
581-590.428.Nye J.S., Jr. The US and Europe: Continental Drift? // International Affairs. –2000. – Vol. 76. – No. 1 (January). – P. 51–59.429.O’Loughlin J., O’Tuathail G., Kolossov V.A ‘Risky Westwards Turn’? Putin’s 9-11 Script and Ordinary Russians // Europe-Asia Studies.
– 2004. – Vol. 56. – No. 1(January). – P. 3–34.430.Painchaud P. Territorialisation and Internationalism: The Case of Quebec //Publius. – 1977. – Vol. 7. – No. 4 (Federalism and Ethnicity: Autumn). – P. 161-175.431.Powell R. Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory // TheAmerican Political Science Review.
– 1991. – Vol. 85. – No. 4 (December). – P. 13031320.432.Purkitt H.E., Dyson J.W. The Role of Cognition in U.S. Foreign Policy towardSouthern Africa // Political Psychology. – 1986. – Vol. 7. – No. 3 (September). – P. 507–532.433.Pursiainen C. The Impact of International Security regimes on Russia’sBehaviour: The Case of the OSCE and Chechnya // Understandings of Russian ForeignPolicy / Ed. by T.
Hopf. – University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999. –P. 109–170.336434.Putnam R.D. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games// International Organization. – 1988. – Vol. 42. – No. 3(Summer). – P. 427–460.435.Radway L. Let Europe Be Europe // World Policy Journal. – 1983.
– Vol. 1. – No.1 (Fall). – P. 23–43.436.Razvi M. Dictatorships and Double Standards: Rationalism and Reason in Politicsby Jeanne J. Kirkpatrick // Pakistan Horizon. – 1982. – Vol. 35. – No. 4. – P. 136-137.437.Renshon J. Stability and Change in Belief Systems: The Operational Code ofGeorge W.
Bush // The Journal of Conflict Resolution. – 2008. – Vol. 52. – No. 6(December). – P. 820-849.438.Reubens E.P. Economic Aid to Asia: Progress Report // Far Eastern Survey. –1951. – Vol. 20. – No. 1 (January). – P. 6–12.439.Rioux J.S.Peace Studies and Third Party Intervention as Conflict Management:The Case of Africa // New Security Challenges as Challenges to Peace Research / Ed. byK.K.
Khudoley. – St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, 2004. – P. 88-105.440.Robinson S.B. Experiential Learning by U.S. Presidents: Domestic andInternational Influences in the Post-Cold War World // Rethinking Foreign PolicyAnalysis: States, Leaders, and the Microfoundations of Behavioural InternationalRelations / Ed. by S.G. Walker, A. Malici, and M. Schafer. – New York and London:Routledge, 2011. – P. 189-204.441.Rozman G.
The North Korean Nuclear Crisis and U.S. Strategy in Northeast Asia// Asian Survey. – 2007. – Vol. 47. – No. 4 (July/August). – P. 601–621.442.Satterfield J.M., Seligman M.E.P. Military Aggression and Risk Predicted byExplanatory Style // Psychological Science. – 1994. – Vo . 5. – No. 2 (March). – P. 7782.443.Schafer M., Crichlow S. Bill Clinton's Operational Code: Assessing SourceMaterial Bias // Political Psychology. – 2000. – Vol. 21.
– No. 3 (September). – P. 559571.444.Schafer M., Robinson S., Aldrich B. Operational Codes and the 1916 EasterRisking in Ireland: A Test of the Frustration – Aggression Hypothesis // Foreign PolicyAnalysis. – 2006. – Vol. 2. – No. 1. – P. 63-82.445.Schaffner C.
Building a European House? Or at Two Speeds into a Dead End?Metaphors in the Debate on the United Europe // Conceiving of Europe: Diversity inUnity / Ed. by A. Musolff, C. Schaffner and M. Townson. – Aldershot: Ashgate, 1996. –P. 31-60.337446.Shestopal E.B. Political Perception: Psychological Mechanisms and PoliticalImplications for Russia // Politics, Culture, and Socialization.
– 2012. – Vol. 3. – No. 1(special double issue). – P. 115-131.447.Sigelman L., Shiraev E. The Rational Attacker in Russia? Negative Campaigningin Russian Presidential Elections // Journal of Politics. – 2002. – Vol. 64.– No. 1(February). –P. 45-62.448.Simon H.A. Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with PoliticalScience // American Political Science Review.
– 1984. – Vol. 79, – No. 3 (September). –P. 293-304.449.Spivak G.S. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” revised edition, from the “History”chapter of “Critic of Postcolonial Reason” // Can the Subaltern Speak? Reflections on theHistory of an Idea / Ed. by R.C. Morris. – New York: Columbia University Press, 2013. –P. 21-78.450.Stein A.A. Coordination and Collaboration: Regimes in an Anarchic World //International Organization. – 1982. – Vol.
36. – No. 2, International Regimes (Spring). –P. 299-324.451.Stewart D.J. The Greater Middle East and Reform in the Bush Administration'sIdeological Imagination // Geographical Review. – 2005. – Vol. 95. – No. 3 (July). – P.400–424.452.Taagepera R. Baltic Values and Corruption in Comparative Context // Journal ofBaltic Studies.
– 2002. – Vol. XXXIII. – No. 3 (Fall). – P. 243-258.453.Thompson H.O. South Africa and the Marxist Movement: A Study in DoubleStandards by Panos D. Bardis // International Journal of World Peace. – 1989. – Vol. 6. –No. 3. – P. 117-121.454.Tkachenko S.L. The Study of International Political Economy in Russia //Communist and Post-Communist Studies. – 2004. – Vol. 37.
– No. 1. – P. 111-120.455.Tolman E.C. Cognitive Maps in Rats and Men // Psychological Review. – 1948. –№ 55. – P.189-208.456.Tversky A., Wakker P. Risk Attitudes and Decision Weights // Econometrica. –1995. – Vol. 63. – No. 6 (November). – P. 1255-1280.457.Valenty L.O., Shiraev E.B. The 1996 Russian Presidential Candidates: A ContentAnalysis of Motivational Configuration and Conceptual/Integrative Complexity //Profiling Political Leaders: Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality and Behaviour / Ed. byO. Feldman, L.O. Valenty. – Westport: Praeger, 2001.
– P. 37-65.338458.Vandergeest P., Peluso N.L. Territorialisation and State Power in Thailand //Theory and Society. – 1995. – Vol. 24. – No. 3 (June). – P. 385-426.459.Varma S.C. Eyeless in Asia // Social Scientist. – 1972. – Vol. 1. – No. 5(December). – P. 47–50.460.Vertzberger Y.Y.I.
Rethinking and Re-Conceptualizing Risk in Foreign PolicyDecision-Making: A Socio-Cognitive Approach // Political Psychology. – 1995. – Vol.16. – No. 2 (June). – P. 347-380.461.Vongalis-Macrow A. I, Teacher: Re-Territorialisation of Teachers’ Multi-FacetedAgency in Globalized Education // British Journal of Sociology of Education. – 2007. –Vol. 28. – No.
4 (July). – P. 425-439.462.Vucetic S. A Racialized Peace? How Britain and the U.S. Made Their Relations“Special” // Foreign Policy Analysis. – 2011. – Vol. 7. – No. 4. – P. 403-421.463.Waever O. The Language of Foreign Policy // Journal of Peace Research. – 1990.– Vol. 27, – No. 3 (August). – P. 335-343.464.Waever O. Securitisation and Desecuritisation // On Security / Ed. byR.D. Lipschutz. – New York: Columbia University Press, 1995. – P. 46–86.465.Walker S.G.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
