Диссертация (1140856), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
– P. 470–477.158 137. Park JB. Increasing the width of keratinized mucosa around endosseousimplant using acellular dermal matrix allograft // Implant Dent. – 2006. - №15. – P.275-281.138. Pizzo M, Modica F, Bethaz N, Priotto P, Romagnoli R. The connective tissuegraft: A comparative clinical evaluation of wound healing at the palatal donor site. Apreliminary study // J. Clin Periodontol. – 2002.
– № 29. – P. 848–854.139. Raetzke PB. Covering localized areas of root exposure employing the“envelope” technique // J. Periodontol. – 1985. – №56(7). – P. 397-402.140. Rahmani ME, Lades MA: Comparative clinical evaluation of AcellularDermal Matrix Allograft and connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingivalrecession // The Journal Contemporary Dental Practice.
– 2006. – № 7(2). – P. 63-70.141. Reiser GM, Bruno JF, Mahan PE, et. al. The subepithelial connective tissuegraft palatal donor site: anatomic considerations for surgeons // Int. J. PeriodonticsRestorative Dent. – 1996. – №16(2). – P. 130-137.142. Roos-Jansåker AM, Renvert H, Lindahl CH, Renvert S. Nine- to fourteenyear follow-up of implant treatment. Part III. Factors associated with peri-implantlesions // J. Clin Periodontol. – 2006.
– № 33. – P. 296-301.143. Roccuzzo M, De Angels N, Bonino L, Bunino M, Bonino F. Kerati- nizedmucosa and soft tissues conditions around posterior man- dibular implants // J.Parodontol d’Implantol Orale. – 2010. – №29. – P. 261–269.144. Rotundo R, Pini-Prato G. Use of a new collagen matrix (mucograft) for thetreatment of multiple gingival recessions: case reports // Int. J. Periodontics RestorativeDent. – 2012.
– №32(4). – P. 413-419.145. Rocchietta I, Schupbach P, Ghezzi C, Maschera E, Simion M.Soft tissueintegration of a porcine collagen membrane: an experimental study in pigs // Int. J.Periodontics Restorative Dent. – 2012. – №32(1). – P. 34-40.146. Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M. Clinical evaluation of anew collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue inpatients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial // J.Clin Periodontol. – 2009. – №36. – P. 868-876.159 147. Scarano A, Barros RR, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, novaes AB Jr. Acellular dermalmatrix graft for gingival augmentation: a preliminary clinical, histologic, andultrastructural evaluation // J. Periodontol.
– 2009. – №80. – P.253-259.148. Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone,connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces// J. Maxillofac Surg. – 1981. – №9. – P.15-25.149. Sclar, A.G. (2003) Soft Tissue and Esthetic Considerations in ImplantTherapy // Quintessence.– 2003. – P.205-221.150. Scarano A, Barros RR , Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Novaes AB Jr.
Acellular dermalmatrix graft for gingival augmentation: a preliminary clinical, histologic, andultrastructural evaluation // J. Periodontol. – 2009. – №80. – P. 253-259.151. Schrott AR, Jimenez M, Hwang JW, et al. Five-year evaluation of theinfluence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability aroundimplants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses // Clin Oral Implants Res. –2009. – №20(10). – P.1170-1177.152. Schmitt C.M., Tudor C., Kiener K., Wehrhan F., Schmitt J, Eitner S., AgaimyA., Schlegel K.A. Vestibuloplasty: porcine collagen matrix versus free gingival graft: aclinical and histologic study// J.
Periodontol. — 2013. — Vol. 84 (7). — P. 914–923.153. Schupbach, P. and R. Glauser. The defense architecture of the humanperiimplant mucosa: a histological study // The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. – 2007.– №97(6). – P. 15-25.154. Shimono M, Ishikawa T, Enokiya Y, et al. Biological characteristics of thejunctional epithelium // J. Electron Microsc (Tokyo). – 2003. – №52(6). – P.627-639.155.
Simion M, Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Dellavia C. Evaluation of a resorbablecollagen matrix infused with rhPDGF-BB in peri-implant soft tissue augmentation: apreliminary report with 3.5 years of observation // Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent.– 2012. – №32(3). – P. 273-282.156. Souza Sl, novaes AB Jr, grisi dC, Taba M Jr, grisi MF, de An- drade PF.Comparative clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular160 dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recessions: six- to 12-month changes //J. Int. Acad Peri – odontol. – 2008. – №10. – P. 87-94.157.
Soileau KM, Brannon RB. A histologic evaluation of various stages of palatalhealing following subepithelial connec- tive tissue grafting procedures. A comparison ofeight cases // J. Periodontol – 2006. – №77. – P. 1267–1273.158. Steflik DE, Sisk AL, Parr GA, Lake FT, Hanes PJ. Experimental studies ofthe implant-tissue interface // J. Oral Implantol.
– 1993. – №19. – P. 90-94.159. Stetler KJ, Bissada NF. Significance of the width of keratinized gingiva onthe periodontal status of teeth with submarginal restorations // J. Periodontol. – 1987. –№ 58(10). – P. 696-700.160. Strub JR, Gaberthüel TW, Grunder U. The role of attached gingiva in thehealth of peri-implant tissue in dogs. 1. Clinical findings // Int. J. PeriodonticsRestorative Dent. – 1991.
– №11(4). – P. 317-333.161. Studer SP, Lehner C, Bucher A, Schärer P. Soft tissue correction of a singletooth pontic space: A comparative quantita- tive volume assessment // J. Prosthet Dent.– 2000. – № 83. – P. 402–411.162. Sullivan HC, Atkins JH. Free autogenous gingival grafts. 3. Utilization ofgrafts in the treatment of gingival recession // Periodontics. – 1968. – №6(4). – P. 152160.163.
Tal H. Subgengival acellular dermal matrix allograft for the treat- ment ofgingival recession // J. Periodontol. – 1999. – №70. – P. 1118-1124.164. Vieira Ede O, Fidel Junior RA, Figueredo CM, Fischer RG. Clinicalevaluation of a dermic allograft in procedures to increase attached gingiva width // BrazDent J. – 2009.
– №20(3). – P.191-194.165. Warrer, K., Buser, D., Lang, N. P. & Karring, T. (1995) Plaque-induced periimplantitis in the presence or absence of keratinized mucosa. An experimental study inmonkeys // Clinical Oral Implants Research. – №6. – P. 131–138.166. Wainwright DJ. Use of an acellular al- lograft dermal matrix (AlloDerm) inthe management of full-thickness burns // Burns. – 1995. – №21. – P. 243–248.161 167. Wehrhan F, Nkenke E, Melnychenko I, et al. Skin repair using a porcinecolla- gen I/III membrane—Vascularization and epithelization properties // DermatolSurg.
– 2010. – №36. – P. 919–930.168. Wei PC, laurrel l, geivelis M, lingen MW, Maddalozzo d. Acellular dermalmatrix allografts to achieve increased attached gingiva. Part 1. A clinical study. // J.Periodontol. – 2000. – №71. – P. 1297-1305.169. Wennström J, Lindhe J. Role of attached gingiva for maintenance ofperiodontal health. Healing following excisional and grafting procedures in dogs // J.Clin Periodontol. – 1983. – №10(2). – P. 206-221.170. Wennström JL. Lack of association be- tween width of attached gingiva anddevelopment of soft tissue recession.
A 5-year longitudinal study // J. Clin Periodontol –1987. – №14. – P. 181–184.171. Wennstrom JL, Bengazi F, Lekholm U. The influence of the masticatorymucosa on the peri-implant soft tissue condition // Clin Oral Implants Res. – 1994. –№5. – P. 1–8.172. Wennerberg A. and Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of currentknowledge and opinions // The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants –2010.– №25.– P.
63–74.173. Woodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Iasella JM, Scheetz J: Theclinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coveragecompared to coronally positioned flap alone // Journal of Periodontology. – 2004. –№75(1). – P. 44-56.174. Yan JJ, Tsai AY, Wong MY, Hou LT. Comparison of acellular dermal graftand palatal autograft in the reconstruction of keratinized gingiva around dental implants:a case report // The International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry.
–2006. – P. 287–292.175. Yeung SC. Biological basis for soft tissue management in implant dentistry //Aust Dent J. – 2008. – № 53. – P. 539-542.162 176. Yukna RA, Tow HD, Caroll PB, Vernino AR, Bright RW. Comparativeclinical eval- uation of freeze-dried skin allografts and autogenous gingival grafts inhumans // J. Clin Periodontol – 1977. – №4. – P. 191–199.177. Zigdon, H., Machtei, EE. The dimensions of keratinized mucosa aroundimplantsaffect clinical and immunological parameters // Clinical Oral ImplantsResearch. – 2008. – P.
387–392.178. Zucchelli G, Mele M, Stefanini M, Mazzotti C, Marzadori M, MontebugnoliL, de Sanctis M. Patient morbidity and root coverage outcome after subepithelialconnective tissue and de-epithelialized grafts: a comparative randomized-controlledclinical trial // J. Clin Periodontol. – 2010. – №37(8). – P. 728-738.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
