Диссертация (1136389), страница 44
Текст из файла (страница 44)
P. 235-257.147. Hale H. E. Explaining Machine Politics in Russia’s Regions: Economy,Ethnicity, and Legacy // Post-Soviet Affairs. – 2003. – Vol. 19, № 3. – P. 228 – 263.doi:10.2747/1060-586X.19.3.228.148. Hall P. A., Taylor R. C. R. Political science and the three newinstitutionalisms* // Political studies. – 1996. – Vol. 44, № 5. – Р. 936 – 957.149. Haile S.
(2015) Weibull AFT Regression Functions in R [Electronicsource]//URL:https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/SurvRegCensCov/vignettes/weibull.pdf (date of access:02.09.2017).138.224Heckathorn D. D., Maser S. M. Bargaining and Constitutional Contracts //American Journal of Political Science. – 1987.
– № 31. – P. 142 – 168.151. Hegre H., Ellingsen T., Gates S., Gleditsch N. P. Toward a DemocraticCivil Peace? Democracy, Political Change. and Civil War, 1816-1992 // The AmericanPolitical Science Review. – 2001. – Vol. 95, № 1. – P. 33 – 48.152. Higley J., Burton M. The Elite Variable in Democratic Transitions andBreakdowns // American Sociological Review. – 1989. – Vol. 54, № 1. – P. 17 – 32.doi:10.2307/2095659.153. Kahn J., Trochev A., Balayan N. The Unification of Law in the RussianFederation // Post-Soviet Affairs.
– 2009. – Vol. 25, № 4.154. Kahn J., Trochev A., Balayan N. How Federal Is the Russian Federation?In: D. H. Halberstam, M. W. Reimann (eds.), Federalism and Legal Unification: AComparative Empirical Investigation of Twenty Systems, 2nd ed. Dordrecht,Netherlands: Springer, 2014. P. 355 – 390.155. Karl T. L., Schmitter P. Models of Transition in Latin America, Southernand Eastern Europe // International Social Science Journal. – 1991. – Vol.43, № 128. –P. 269 – 284.156.
Kato J. Institutions and Rationality in Politics – Three Varieties of NeoInstitutionalists // British Journal of Political Science. – 1996. – Vol. 26, № 4. – P. 553582.157. Keating M. Regional Autonomy in the Changing State Order: AFramework of Analysis // Regional Politics and Policy.
– 1992. – Vol. 2, № 3. – P. 45 –61. doi:10.1080/13597569208420848.158. Kitschelt H., Wilkinson S. I. Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns ofDemocratic Accountability and Political Competition. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press, 2007.159. Knight J. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1992.160. Konitzer A., Wegren S. K. Federalism and Political Recentralization in theRussian Federation: United Russia as the Party of Power // Publius: The Journal ofFederalism. – 2006. – Vol.
36, № 4. – P. 503 – 522. doi:10.1093/publius/pjl004.161. Kopstein J. S., Reilly D. A. Geographic Diffusion and the Transformationof the Postcommunist World // World Politics. – 2000. – Vol. 53, № 1. – P. 1 – 37.doi:10.1017/S0043887100009369.162. Krupnikov Y., Shipan C. Measuring Gubernatorial Budgetary Power ANew Approach // State Politics and Policy Quarterly. – 2012. – Vol. 12, № 4.
– P. 438 –455.150.225Laakso M., Taagepera R. Effective’ Number of Parties: A Measure withApplication to West Europe // Comparative Political Studies. – 1979. – Vol. 12, № 1. –P. 3 – 27.164. Lankina T. Governing the Locals: Local Self-Government and EthnicMobilization in Russia. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2004.165. Lijphart A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method // TheAmerican Political Science Review. – 1971. – Vol. 65, № 3.166. Lijphart A. (eds.) Parliamentary versus Presidential Government.
Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1992.167. Lijphart A. Constitutional Design for Divided Societies // Journal ofDemocracy. – 2004. – Vol. 15, № 2. – P. 96 – 109.168. Linz J.J. The Virtues of Parliamentarism // Journal of Democracy. – 1990a.– Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 84 – 91.169. Linz J. J. The perils of Presidentialism // Journal of Democracy. – 1990b. –Vol. 1, № 1. – P. 51 – 69.170. Lipset S. M. Some social requisites of democracy: Economic developmentand political legitimacy // American political science review.
– 1959. - Vol. 53. - №. 1.– P. 69 – 105.171. Macridis R. C., Brown B. E. (eds.) Comparative Politics. Notes andreadings. Homewood, Illinois: The Dorsey Press, 1977.172. Magaloni B., Kricheli R. Political Order and One-party Rule // AnnualReview of Political Science. – 2010. - № 13. – P. 123 – 143.doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.031908.220529.173. March J. G., Olsen J.
P. The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factorsin Political Life // American Political Science Review. – 1984. – Vol. 78, № 3. – P. 734– 739.174. March J. G., Olsen J. P. Rediscovering Institutions: The OrganizationalBasis of Politics. New York: The Free Press, 1989.175. Matsuzato K., Tahara F. Russia’s Local Reform of 2003 from a HistoricalPerspective: A Comparison with China // Acta Slavica Iaponica. – 2014. - № 34. – P.115 – 139.176. McFaul M. Institutional design, uncertainty, and path dependency duringtransitions: Cases from Russia // Constitutional Political Economy.
– 1999. – Vol. 10,№ 1. – P. 27-52.177. McGregor J. The Presidency in East Central Europe // RFR/RL ResearchReport. – 1994. – Vol. 3, № 2. – P. 12 – 16.178. Moses J. C. Russian Local Politics in the Putin–Medvedev Era // EuropeAsia Studies. – 2010. – Vol.
62, № 9. – P. 1427 – 1452.doi:10.1080/09668136.2010.515791.163.226Moses J. C. Russian Mayors Embattled // Russian Analytical Digest. –2013. - № 139. – P. 12–14.180. Moses J. C. Putin and Russian Subnational Politics in 2014 //Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. – 2015. – Vol. 23, № 2.– P.
181 – 203.181. Mouritzen P. E., Svara J. H. Leadership at the Apex: Politicians andAdministrators in Western Local Governments. Pittsburgh: University of PittsburghPress, 2002.182. Norris P. et al. Driving Democracy. Do Power-Sharing Institutions Work?New York, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.183. North D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance.Cambridge: Cambridge university press, 1990.184. Obydenkova A., Libman A. National Autocratization and the Survival ofSub-National Democracy: Evidence from Russia’s Parliamentary Elections of 2011 //Acta Politica.
– 2013. – Vol. 48, № 4. – P. 459 – 489. doi:10.1057/ap.2013.8.185. Ostrom E. Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: TowardComplementarity // The American Political Science Review. – 1991. – Vol. 85, № 1. –P. 237 – 243.186. Ostrow J. M. Comparing Post-Soviet Legislatures. A Theory ofInstitutional Design and Political Conflict.
Ohio State University Press, 2000.187. Panov P., Ross С. Sub-National Elections in Russia: Variations in UnitedRussia’s Domination of Regional Assemblies // Europe-Asia Studies. – 2013. – Vol. 65,№ 4. – P. 737 – 752. doi:10.1080/09668136.2013.767581.188. Peters G. B. Institutional Theory in Political Science. New York:Continuum, 2001.189. Petrov N., Lipman M, Hale H. E. Three Dilemmas of Hybrid RegimeGovernance: Russia from Putin to Putin // Post-Soviet Affairs. – 2014. – Vol. 30, № 1. –P. 1 – 26.
doi:10.1080/1060586X.2013.825140.190. Power T. J., Gasiorowski M. J. Institutional Design and DemocraticConsolidation in the Third World // Comparative Political Studies. – 1997. – Vol. 30, №2. – P. 123 – 155.191. Przeworski A. Democracy and Development: Political Institutions andWell-Being in the World, 1950-1990 // Cambridge University Press, 2000. № 3.192.
Przeworski A., Teune H. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. WileyInterscience, 1970.193. Quattrone G. A., Tversky A. Contrasting rational and psychologicalanalyses of political choice // American Political Science Review. – 1988. – Vol. 82. №. 3. – P. 719 – 736.179.227Reddaway P., Orttung R. W. (eds.) The Dynamics of Russian Politics:Putin’s Reform of Federal-Regional Relations. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield,2004. Vol.
1.195. Reisinger W. M., Moraski B. J. Regional Changes and Changing RegionalRelations with the Centre. In: V. Gel’man, C. Ross (Eds.), The Politics of Sub-NationalAuthoritarianism in Russia. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2010. P. 67 – 84.196. Remington T The evolution of executive-legislative relations in Russiasince 1993 // Slavic Review. – 2000.
– Vol. 59, № 3. – P. 499-520.197. Remington T. F. The Russian Parliament. Institutional Evolution in aTransitional Regime, 1989 – 1999. New Haven, London: Yale University Press, 2001.198. Remington T. Patronage and the party of power: President–Parliamentrelations under Vladimir Putin // Europe-Asia Studies. – 2008. – Vol.
60, № 6. – P. 959987.199. Reuter O. J. Regional Patrons and Hegemonic Party Electoral Performancein Russia // Post-Soviet Affairs. – 2013. – Vol. 29, № 2. – P. 101 – 135.200. Reuter O. J., Remington T. F. Dominant Party Regimes and theCommitment Problem: The Case of United Russia // Comparative Political Studies.
–2009. – Vol. 42, № 4. – P. 501 – 526. doi:10.1177/0010414008327426.201. Riker W. Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for theStudy of Institutions // American Political Science Review. – 1980. - № 76. – P. 753 –766.202. Riker W. H. The heresthetics of constitution-making: the presidency in1787, with comments on determinism and rational choice // American Political ScienceReview. – 1984. – Vol. 78, - №. 1. – P. 1 – 16.203.
Roberts T. L. The Durability of Presidential and Parliament-BasedDictatorships // Comparative Political Studies. – 2015. – Vol. 48, № 7. – P. 915-948.204. Rogers, W., Henley, J. (1982) Weibull Regression and Hazard Estimation[Electronic source] // URL: http://www.sascommunity.org/sugi/SUGI82/Sugi-82113%20Rogers%20Hanley.pdf (accessed: 02.09.2017).205. Ross C. Federalism and Democratisation in Russia.
Manchester:Manchester University Press, 2002.206. Ross C. Municipal Reform in the Russian Federation and Putin’s ‘ElectoralVertical’ // Demokratizatsiya: The Journal of Post-Soviet Democratization. – 2007. –Vol. 15, № 2. – P. 191 – 208. doi:10.3200/DEMO.15.2.191-208.207. Rustow, D. A. Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model// Comparative politics. – 1970. – Vol. 2, № 3.
– P. 337-363.208. Sartori G. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry IntoStructures, Incentives, and Outcomes. NYU Press, 1997.194.228Scharpf F. W. Institutions in comparative policy research // Comparativepolitical studies. – 2000. – Vol. 33, № 6-7. – P. 762 – 790.210. Schedler A. (eds.) Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of UnfreeCompetition. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2006.211. Schedler A. The New Institutionalism in the Study of AuthoritarianRegimes // SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 1451602.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
