Диссертация (1136265), страница 93
Текст из файла (страница 93)
– Harvard University Press, 2004. – 464 p.410.Pound R. Social Control Through Law. – Hew Haven: Yale University Press,1942. – 138 p.411.Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Edited byJosef Drexl. – Munich: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. – 512 p.412.Rifkin J.
The Age of Access. – Tarcher, 2001. -320 p.413.Rose M. Authors and Owners: The Invention of Copyright. – Harvard UniversityPress, 1993. – 176 p.414.Science as an open enterprise: open data for open science. The Royal SocietyScience Policy Centre report. – The Royal Society: London, 2012. -104 p.385415.Senden L. Soft Law in European Community Law. – Hart Publishing Ltd., 2004.– 592 p.416.Stiglitz J.E. Making globalization work. – New York: Norton & Company, 2006.-358 p.417.Structure of Intellectual Property Law: Can One Size Fit All? Ed. by Kur A.,Mizaras V. ATRIP.
– Edward Elgar Pub, 2011. – 384 p.418.Suber P. Open access. – MIT Press Essential Knowledge, 2012. - 242 p.419.Understanding Knowledge as a Commons. – Cambridge: MIT, 2007. - 382 p.420.Varga C. The Paradigms of Legal thinking. – Budapest, 2012. – 418 p.421.Weber M. Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß der verstehenden Soziologie. 5.Aufl., hrsg. von Johannes Winckelmann. – Tübingen, 1980. – 945 s.422.Williams R. Culture and Society: 1780-1950.
– New York: Anchor BooksDoubleday & Company, 1960. – 382 pСтатьи423.Aarnio A. Paradigms in Legal Dogmatics. Toward a Theory of Change andProgress in Legal Science. // Proceedings of the Conference on Legal Theory. Ed. byA. Peczenik, L. Lindahl and B. van Roermund. Dordrecht: Reidel. – 1984. – P.25-38.424.Abbott K.W., Snidal D. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance //International Organization. – 2000. – Vol. 54. – № 3. – P. 421-456.425.Alexy R.
The Existence of Human Rights // Archiv für Rechts-undSozialphilosophie. Beiheft. – 2013. – № 136. – S.9-18.426.Anderman S.D. The competition law/IP «interface»: an introductory note // Theinterface between Intellectual Property rights and competition policy. Ed. S.D.Anderman. - New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. – P. 1-34.427.Bambauer D.E. Rules, Standards, and Geeks // Brooklyn Journal of CorporateFinance & Commercial Law. – 2011. – Vol. 5. – P.49-62.428.Black J. Decentring regulation: understanding the role of regulation and selfregulation in a "post-regulatory" world // Current Legal Problems.
– 2001. – Vol.54.Issue 1. – P.103-146.386429.Black J. Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation // Capital MarketsLaw Journal. – 2008. – Vol. 3. – № 4. – P.425-457.430.Boyle J. The Politics of Reason: Critical Legal Theory and Local Social Thought// University of Pennsylvania Law Review. – 1985.
– № 133. – P.685-780.431.Bracha O. The Commodification of Patents – 1600-1836: How Patents BecameRights and Why We Should Care // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review. – 2005. –Vol.38. – P.177-244.432.Carroll M. W. One Size Does Not Fit All: A Framework for Tailoring IntellectualProperty Rights. // Ohio State Law Journal. – 2009. – Vol. 70. – № 6. – P.1361-1434.433.Cate F.H. Introduction: Sovereignty and the Globalization of IntellectualProperty, Symposium // Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies.
– 1998. – Vol. 6.Issue 1. – P.1-9.434.Chapman A.R. The Human Rights Implications of Intellectual PropertyProtection // Journal of International Economic Law. – 2002. -Vol. 5.- Issue 4. –P.861–882.435.Cohen J. DRM and Privacy // Berkeley Technological Law Journal. – 2003. –Vol. 18. – P. 575-617.436.Cohen J. Examined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as Object.
//Stanford Law Review. – 2000. – Vol.52. – P.1373-1437.437.Corrall S., Pinfield S. Coherence of ―Open‖ Initiatives in Higher Education andResearch: Framing a Policy Agenda // iConference 2014 Proceedings. – 2014. –P.293-313.438.Damsted B.G. Limiting Locke: A Natural Law Justification for the Fair UseDoctrine // The Yale Law Journal. – 2003. – Vol. 112.
– № 5. – P.1179-1221.439.Dewey J. Logical Method and Law // The Essential Dewey: Pragmatism,education, democracy, Volume 1. Ed. by John Dewey, Larry Hickman, Thomas M.Alexander. - Indiana University Press, 1998. – P.355-362.440.Dusollier S. Pruning the European Intellectual Property Tree - In Search ofCommon Principles and Roots // Constructing European Intellectual Property:Achievements and New Perspectives. C.
Geiger ed. - Edward Elgar Publishing, 2012.– P.24-57.387441.Gallagher W.T. Strategic Intellectual Property Litigation, the Right of Publicity,and the Attenuation of Free Speech: Lessons from the Schwarzenegger BobbleheadDoll War (and Peace) // Santa Clara Law Review. – 2005.
– Vol. 45. – № 581. –P.581-615.442.Geiger Ch. Implementing Intellectual Property Provisions in Human RightsInstruments: Towards a New Social Contract for the Protection of Intangibles // MaxPlanck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper Series.Vol.6. № 2. Jul29, – 2014. Paper – № 14‐10. – P.1-36.443.Gervais D.
Making copyright whole: A principled approach to copyrightexceptions and limitations // University of Ottawa Law and Technology Journal. –2008. – Volume 5. Issue 1-2. – P.1-41.444.Gong W. Information Sovereignty Reviewed // Intercultural CommunicationStudies. – 2005. – Vol. XIV. – № 1. – Р. 119-135.445.Gordon W.G. A property right in self-expression: Equality and individualism inthe natural law of intellectual property // Yale Law Journal. – 1993. – Vol.102. – №7.– P.1540-1578.446.Griffiths J.
What is Legal pluralism? // Journal of Legal Pluralism and UnofficialLaw. – 1986. – № 24. – P.1-55.447.Habermas, J. Paradigms of law // Habermas on law and democracy. Criticalexchanges. Michel Rosenfeld, Andrew Arato (Eds.). - University of California Press,1998. – P.13-25.448.Hardin G. The Tragedy of the Commons // Science. New Series. – 1968.
– Vol.162. – № 3859. – P.1243-1248.449.Helberger N., Hugenholtz B. No Place Like Home for Making a Copy: PrivateCopying in European Copyright Law and Consumer Law // Berkeley TechnologyLaw Journal.– 2007. - Volume 22. - Issue 3. – P.1061-1098.450.Heller M.A. The Dynamic Analytics of Property Law // Contemporary LegalScolarship. – 2001. - Vol. 2. - № 1. – P.75-95.451.Heller M.A.
The Tragedy of the Anticommons: Property in the Transition fromMarx to Markets // Harvard Law Review. – 1998. - Vol. 111. - № 3. – P.621-688.452.Helpman E. Innovation, imitation, and intellectual property rights //Econometrica. – 1993. – Vol. 61 (6). – P.1247 -1280.388453.Hoecke Van M., Warrington M. Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and LegalDoctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law // International andComparative Law Quarterly. – 1998.
– № 47. – P.495-536.454.Holbrook A. Are intellectual property rights quanta of innovation? // The Role ofIntellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Innovation. Edited by David Castle. Edward Elgar, 2009. – P.24-36.455.Hugenholtz B. Code as code, or the end of intellectual property as we know it //Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law. – 1999. – Vol.
6. – № 3. –P.308-318.456.Hugenholtz P. B. Codes of Conduct and Copyright Enforcement in Cyberspace //Copyright enforcement and the internet. Information law series. - 2010. Vol. 21 – P.303-320.457.Jaszi P. Toward a Theory of Copyright: The Metamorphoses of ―Authorship‖. //Duke Law Journal. – 1991. Volume 40. – № 2. – P. 455-502.458.Johnson D.
R., Post, D. G. Law and Borders - The Rise of Law in Cyberspace //Stanford Law Review. – 1996. – Vol. 48. – P.1367-1402.459.Kapczynski A. Access to Knowledge: A Conceptual Genealogy // Access toknowledge in the age of intellectual property.
Edited by Gaëlle Krikorian and AmyKapczynski. - NY: Zone books, 2010. – P.17-56.460.Koops B.-J. Criteria for Normative Technology: An Essay on the Acceptability of'Code as Law' in Light of Democratic and Constitutional Values // RegulatingTechnologies. Edited by Roger Brownsword and Karen Yeung. - Hart Publishing,2008. – Р.157-174.461.Kuhn T. Metaphor in Science // Kuhn T. The road since structure: philosophicalessays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. - The University of ChicagoPress, 2000. – P.196-207.462.Kuhn T. The Natural and the Human Sciences // Kuhn T.
The road sincestructure: philosophical essays, 1970-1993, with an autobiographical interview. - TheUniversity of Chicago Press, 2000. – P.216-223.463.Lee P. Patent Law and the Two Cultures // Yale law journal. – 2010. – Vol.120. –P.2-82464.Lemley M. A. The Myth of the Sole Inventor // Michigan Law Review. – 2012. –389Vol. 110.
– P.709-760.465.Levin M. The Need for Climate Improvement in Intellectual Property Law //Patents and Technological Progress in a Globalized World. – Berlin: Springer Verlag,2009. – P.811-828.466.Long C. Patents and Cumulative Innovation // Washington University Journal ofLaw & Policy. – 2000. – Vol.2. – P. 229-246.467.Mackenzie R. Paradigms of author/creator property rights in intellectual propertylaw: Ethical Implications for the Acquisition, Access, and Control of GeneticInformation.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
