Диссертация (1136265), страница 94
Текст из файла (страница 94)
// Chadwick Genetic information: acquisition, access, and control. Springer, 1999. – Р.139-148.468.Mandel G. N. Left-Brain versus Right-Brain: Competing Conceptions ofCreativity in Intellectual Property Law // University of California Davis Law Review.– 2010. – Vol. 44. – P. 283-361.469.Marsden C. T. Introduction. Information and communications technologies,globalisation and regulation. // Regulating the global information society. Edited byChristopher T.
Marsden. - Routledge, 2000. – P. 1-40.470.Mokyr J. Intellectual Property Rights, the Industrial Revolution, and theBeginnings of Modern Economic Growth // American Economic Review. – 2009. –Vol. 99. Issue 2. – P.349-355.471.Moore A.D. Personality Based, Rule-Utilitarian, and Lockean Justifications ofIntellectual Property // The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics. Edited byKenneth E. Himma, Herman T. Tavani. - John Wiley & Sons, 2008. – P.105-130.472.Nelken D. Eugen Ehrlich, Living Law, and Plural Legalities // Theoreticalinquires in law.
– 2008. – Volume 9. Issue 2. – P.443-471.473.Petra M. How Do Patent Laws Influence Innovation? Evidence from Nineteenth-Century World's Fairs // American Economic Review. – 2005. – Vol. 95. – № 4. –P.1214-1236.474.Pound R. A Survey of Social Interests // The Sociology of law: a social-structuralperspective. Editor, William M Evan. - Free Press, 1980. – P. 69-81.475.Pound R. A Theory of Social Interests // Papers and Proceedings of the AmericanSociological Society. – 1921. – Vol.
XV. – P. 16-45.476.Priest G. L. What Economists Can Tell Lawyers About Intellectual Property //390Research In Law And Economics, The Economics Of Patents And Copyrights. Ed. byJohn Palmer. – 1986. – Vol.8. – P.19-24.477.Reichman J.H. Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms //Columbia Law Review. – 1994. – Volume 94. – P.2432-2558.478.Reidenberg J.R. Fourth Annual Baker Botts Lecture: The Rule of IntellectualProperty Law in the Internet Economy // Houston Law Review. – 2007.
– Vol. 44. –№ 4. – P.1074-1095.479.Reidenberg J.R. Lex Informatica: The Formulation of Information Policy Rulesthrough Technology // Texas Law Review. – 1998. – № 3. – P. 553-594.480.Rosen M. The Republic at Work: S. Marco's Reliefs of the Venetian Trades // TheArt bulletin. – 2008. - Volume 90. – P.54-75.481.Sachs J.D. Globalization and Patterns of Economic Growth // Globalization:What's New? - New York: Columbia University Press. – 2005. – P.214-227.482.Santos B. de S., Rodrìguez-Garavito C.A.
Law, politics, and the subaltern incounter-hegemonic globalization // Law and globalization from below: towards acosmopolitan legality. Ed. by Bonaventura de Sousa Santos and César A. RodrìguezGaravito. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. – 2005.
– P.1-26.483.Shaffer G., Pollack M. A. Hard vs. Soft Law: Alternatives, Complements andAntagonists in International Governance // Minnesota Law Review. – 2010. – Vol. 94.– P.706-799.484.Sichelman T.M., O'Connor S.M. Patents as Promoters of Competition: The GuildOrigins of Patent Law in the Venetian Republic // San Diego Law Review. – 2012.
–Volume 49. – P.1267-1282.485.Stiglitz J. E. Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights // Duke LawJournal. – 2008. – Vol. 57. – P. 1693-1723.486.Stiglitz J. E. More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving toward the Post-Washington Consensus // Wider Perspectives on Global Development. Ed. by UnitedNations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.
- PalgraveMacMillan, Houndmills, 2005. – P.16-48.487.Stroup D.G. Law and Language: Cardozo's Jurisprudence and Wittgenstein'sPhilosophy // Valparaiso University Law Review. – 1984. – Vol. 18. – № 2. – P.331371.391488.Teubner G. How the Law Thinks: Toward a Constructivist Epistemology of Law// Law & Society Review. – 1989. – Vol. № 5. – P.727-757.489.Trubek M.D., Trubek L.G.
Hard and Soft Law in the Construction of SocialEurope: the Role of the Open Method of Co-ordination // European Law Journal. –2005. – Vol. 11. – № 3. – P. 343-364.490.Ullrich H. Legal protecton of innovative technologes: property or policy? //Economics, Law and Intellectual Property: Seeking Strategies for Research andTeaching in a Developing Field. Granstrand, Ove (Ed.). - Kluwer Academic, 2003.
–P. 439-487.491.Wahlgren P. On the Future of Legal Science // Scandinavian Studies in Law. –2000. – Vol. 40. – P.515-525.492.Wahlgren P. On the Future of Legal Science // Scandinavian Studies in Law. –2000. – Vol. 40. – P.515-525.493.Weisser-Lohmann E. Privileg oder Recht? Geistiges Eigentum bei Hegel // DieDebatte um geistiges Eigentum: Interdisziplinäre Erkundungen. Rechtswissenschaft Politikwissenschaft - Philosophie. Transcript Verlag, Bielefeld, – 2010. – S.11-30.494.Wessel R.A. Regulating Technological Innovation through Informal InternationalLaw: The Exercise of International Public Authority by Transnational Actors //Regulating Technological Innovation: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Eds.
M.A.Heldeweg and E. Kica. - Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 2011. – P.77-94.495.Woodmansee M. The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditionsof the Emergence of the ―Author‖ // Eighteenth-Century Studies. – 1984. – Vol. 17. –№ 4. – P.425-448.Электронные ресурсы497.Commentary of the Charter of Fundamental Rights / EU Network of IndependentExperts on Fundamental Rights. 2006. P.
163-164. [Электронный ресурс] // URL:http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamentalrights/files/networkcommentaryfinal_en.pdf(Дата обращения: 10.01.2017)498.Kostylo J. Commentary on the Venetian Statute on Industrial Brevets (1474) /Primary Sources on Copyright (1450-1900). Ed. by L. Bently & M. Kretschmer,3922008. [Электронный ресурс] // URL:http://copy.law.cam.ac.uk/cam/tools/request/showRecord?id=commentary_i_144(Дата обращения: 10.01.2017).499.Nordhaus W.D.
Schumpeterian Profits in the American Economy: Theory andMeasurement. / Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper № 1457. April 2004.[Электронный ресурс] // URL:http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cd/d14b/d1457.pdf(Дата обращения: 10.01.2017).500.Passinhas S.
Dimensions of Property under European Law. Fundamental Rights,Consumer Protection and Intellectual Property: Bridging Concepts?. / EUI PhDtheses;DepartmentofLaw.2010.[Электронныйресурс]//URL:http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/13759(Дата обращения: 10.01.2017).501.Teubner G. Rechtswissenschaft und -praxis im Kontext der Sozialtheorie. 2014.[Электронный ресурс] // URL:http://www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/49070637/Sozialtheorie_RechtEND2013.pdf(Дата обращения: 10.01.2017).
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
