Диссертация (Механизмы анафоры при речепорождении и речепонимании экспериментальное исследование на материале русского языка), страница 42

Asudeh, P. Alrenga // Journal of Memory andLanguage. — 2004. — № 51. — P. 55–70.43.Arnold, J. E. Reference for and discourse patterns / J. E. Arnold — Doctoraldissertation, Stanford University, 1998. — 291 p.44.Arnold, J. E. Reference production: Production-internal and addressee-orientedprocesses / J.

E. Arnold // Language and Cognitive Processes. — 2008. — №23:4. — P. 495–527.45.Arnold, J. E. The effect of additional characters on choice of referring expression:Everyone counts / J. E. Arnold, Z. M. Griffin // Journal of Memory andLanguage. — 2007. — № 56(7). — P. 521–536.46.Arnold, J. E. The effect of thematic roles on pronoun use and fequency ofreference continuation / J. E. Arnold // Discourse Processes. — 2001. — № 31.— P. 137–162.47.Arnold, J. E. The rapid use of gender information: evidence of the time course ofpronoun resolution from eye tracking / J.

E. Arnold, J. G. Eisenband, S. BrownSchmidt, J. C. Trueswell // Cognition. — 2000. — № 76. — P. B13–B26.48.Avrutin, S. Comprehension of contrastive stress by agrammatic Broca`s aphasics/ S. Avrutin, S. Lubarsky, J. Green // Brain and Language. — 1999. — № 70. —P. 163–186.49.Avrutin, S.

Language Acquisition and Language Breakdown / S. Avrutin,M. Haverkort, A. van Hout // Brain and Language. — 2001. — № 77(3). — P.269–273.50.Baauw, S. The interpretation of stressed and non-stressed pronouns in Spanishlanguage breakdown / S. Baauw, E. Ruigendijk, F. Cuetos, S.

Avrutin //Aphasiology. — 2011. — № 25(3). — P. 386–406.24051.Badecker, W. The processing role of structural constraints on the interpretation ofpronouns and anaphora. / W. Badecker, K. Straub // Journal of ExperrimentalPsychology: Learning Memory and Cognition. — 2002.

— № 28. — P. 748–769.52.Boland, J. E. Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading andlistening. / J. E. Boland // The OnLine Study of Sentence Comprehension:Eyetracking, ERPs and Beyond. — New York, 2004. — P. 51–76.53.Bott, O. From verbs to discourse: A novel account of implicit causality / O. Bott,T. Solstad // Psycholinguistic approaches to meaning and understanding acrosslanguages, 2014. — P. 213–251.54.Brennan, S. A centering approach to pronouns / S. Brennan, M.

Friedman,C. Pollard // Proceedings of the 25th ACL, 1987. — P. 155–162.55.Brennan, S. E. Centering attention in discourse / S. E. Brennan // Language andCognitive Processes. — 1995. — № 102. — P. 137–167.56.Brown, P. M. Adapting production to comprehension: The explicit mention ofinstruments / P. M.

Brown, G. S. Dell // Cognitive Psychology. — 1987. —№ 19(4). — P. 441–472.57.Brown, R. The psychological causality implicit in language / R. Brown, D. Fish //Cognition, 14, 1983. — P. 237–273.58.Büring, D. Binding theory / D. Büring — Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress, 2005. — 281 p.59.Burkhardt, P. The role of the anterior left hemisphere in real-time sentencecomprehension: Evidence form split intransitivity / P. Burkhardt, M. Piñango,K. Wong // Brain and Language. — 2003.

— № 86. — P. 9–22.60.Burkhardt, P. The Syntax-Discourse Interface: Representing and InterpretingDependency / P. Burkhardt — Amsterdam: John Benjamins PublishingCompany, 2005. — 259 p.24161.Caramazza, A. Comprehension of anaphoric pronouns / A. Caramazza, E. Grober,C. Garvey, J. Yates // Journal of Verbal Learnign and Verbal Beheviour. —1977. — № 16.

— P. 601–609.62.Carlson, G. N. Thematic roles and language comprehension / G. N. Carlson,M. K. Tanenhaus // Syntax and Semantics. — New York. — P. 263–300.63.Chafe, W. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, and topics /W. Chafe // Subject and Topic. — New York, 1976. — P. 25–76.64.Chambers C., Smyth R. Structural parallelism and discourse coherence /C. Chambers, R. Smyth // Journal of Memory and Language.

— 1998. — № 39.— P. 593–608.65.Chernova, D. Contextual predictions and syntactic analysis: the case of ambiguityresolution / D. Chernova, V. Prokopenya // Proceedings of the 7th Tutorial andResearch Workshop on Experimental Linguistics. — St. Petersburg, 2016. —P. 55–58.66.Chomsky, N. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. / N. Chomsky // Theview from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger. —Cambridge, Mass., 1993.

— P. 1-52.67.Chomsky, N. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax / N. Chomsky — Cambridge,Mass.: MIT Press, 1965. — 296 p.68.Chomsky, N. Barriers. / N. Chomsky — Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986. —102 p.69.Chomsky, N. Lectures on Government and Binding. / N.

Chomsky — Dordrecht:Foris Publications, 1981. — 371 с.70.Chomsky, N. Minimalist inquires: The framework. / N. Chomsky // Step by Step:Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik — Cambridge, MA,2000. — P. 89–155.24271.Chomsky, N. The minimalist program. / N. Chomsky — Cambridge, Mass.: MITPress, 1995. — 408 p.72.Cinque, G. A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress / G.

Cinque //Linguistic Inquiry. — 1993. — № 24. — P. 239–297.73.Clancy, P. M. Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse /P. M. Clancy // The pear stories: cognitive, cultural, and linguistic aspects ofnarrative production. — Norwood (NJ), 1980. — P. 127–202.74.Clark H. H. Definite reference and mutual knowledge / H. H. Clark,C.R. Marshall // Elements of discourse understanding. — Cambridge, 1981. — P.10–63.75.Clark, H.

H. In search of referents for nouns and pronouns / H. H. Clark,C. J. Sengul // Memory and Congnition. — 1979. — № 7. — P. 35–41.76.Clark, H. H. Referring as a collaborative process / H. H. Clark, D. Wilkes-Gibbs// Cognition. — 1986. — № 22. — P. 1–30.77.Clark, H. H. Speaking while monitoring addressees for understanding /H. H. Clark, M. A. Krych // Journal of Memory and Language. — 2004. —№ 50.

— P. 62–81.78.Clark, H. H. Using language / H. H. Clark — Cambridge, UK: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1996. — 432 p.79.Clifton C. Eye movements in reading words and sentences / C. Clifton, A. Staub,K. Rayner // Eye movements: A window on mind and brain. — Amsterdam,2007. — P. 342–371.80.Crain, S. Investigations in Universal Grammar. A guide to experiments on theacquisition of syntax and semantics / S.

Crain, R. Thornton — Cambridge,MAMIT Press, 1998. — 360 p.24381.Crawley, R. A. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns /R. A. Crawley, R. J. Stevenson, D. Kleinman // Journal of PsycholinguisticResearch. — 1990. — № 19(4). — P. 245-264.82.Crawley, R. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns /R. Crawley, R.

Stevenson, D. Kleinman // Journal of Psycholinguistic Research.— 1990. — № 4. — P. 245–264.83.Daneman, M. Individual differences in working memory and reading /M. Daneman, P. A. Carpenter // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.— 1980. — № 19. — P. 450–466.84.Danes, F. Zur linguistischen der textstruktur / F. Danes // Folia Linguistica. —1970. — № 4(1–2). — P.

72–78.85.Dubey, A. A probabilistic corpus-based model of syntactic parallelism /A. Dubey, F. Keller, P. Sturt // Cognition. — 2008. — № 109. — P. 326–344.86.Ehrlich, K. Comprehension of Pronouns / K. Ehrlich // Journal of ExperimentalPrychology. — 1980. — № 32. — P. 247–255.87.Elman J. Rethinking Innateness. A Connectionist Perspective on Development / J.Elman, K. Plunkett, D. Parisi, A. Karmiloff-Smith, E.

Bates, M. H. Johnson —Cambridge MAMIT Press, 1996. — 450 p.88.EyeLink Data Viewer User`s Manual. — CanadaSR Research Ltd., 2002–2014.— 154 p.89.Fedorova, O.V. Experimental approach to reference in discourse: Workingmemory capacity and language comprehension in Russian / O.V. Fedorova, E.A.Delikishkina, A.M. Uspenskaya // Proceedings of the Pacific Asia Conference onLanguage, Information and Computation. — Sendai, 2010. — P.

125–132.90.Ferreira, V. S. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexicalproduction / V. S. Ferreira, G. S. Dell // Cognitive Psychology. — 2000. —№ 40. — P. 296–340.24491.Fletcher, C.R. Markedness and topic continuity in discourse processing /C. R. Fletcher // Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. — 1984. —№ 23. — P.

487–493.92.Fodor, J. D. Prosodic disambiguation in silent reading / J. D. Fodor // Proceedingsof the North East Linguistic Society, 32. — Amherst, 2002. — P. 113–132.93.Fox, B. Anaphora in popular written English narratives / B. Fox // Coherence andgrounding in discourse. — Amsterdam, 1987. — P. 157–174.94.Frazier, L. Semantic evaluation of syntactic structure: Evidence from eyemovements. / L. Frazier, M. N.

Carminatti, A. E. Cook, H. Majewski, K. Rayner// Cognition. — 2006. — № 99. — P. B53–B62.95.Frazier, L. Sentence processing: a tutorial review. / L. Frazier // Attention andPerformance XII, 1987. — P. 559–586.96.Frederiksen, J. Understanding anaphora: Rules used by readers in assigning /J. Frederiksen // Discourse Processes.

— 1981. — № 4. — P. 323–347.97.Fukumura, K. Choosing anaphoric expressions: Do people take into accountlikelihood of reference? / K. Fukumura, P. G. van Gompel // Journal of Memoryand Language. — 2010. — № 62. — P. 52–66.98.Fukumura, K. Choosing referring expressions. PhD dissertation / K. Fukumura —University of Dundee, 2010. — 288 p.99.Fussel, S. R. The effects of intended audience on message production andcomprehension: Reference in a common ground framework / S. R.

Fussel,R. M. Krauss // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. — 1989. — № 25(3).— P. 203–219.100. Garnham, A. Mental Models and the Interpretation of Anaphora / A. Garnham —Hove: Psychology Press, 2001. — 180 p.245101. Garnham, A. The locul fo implicit causality effects in comprehension /A. Garnham, M. Trazler, J.

Oakhill, M. A. Gernbacher // Journal of Memory andLanguage. — 1996. — № 35. — P. 517–543.102. Garvey, C. Implicit causality in verbs / C. Garvey, A. Caramazza // LinguisticInquiry. — 1974. — № 5. — P. 459–464.103. Gernsbacher, M. A. Accessing sentence participants: The advantage of firstmention / M. A. Gernsbacher, D. Hargreaves // Journal of Memory andLanguage. — 1988. — № 27.

— P. 699–717.104. Gernsbacher, M. A. Building and accessing clausal representations: Theadvantage of first mention versus the advantage of clause recency /M. A. Gernsbacher, D. J. Hargreaves, M. Beeman // Journal of Memory andLanguage. — 1989. — № 28. — P. 735–755.105. Gernsbacher,M.A.Surfaceinformationlossincomprehension/M. A.