Диссертация (Концепция игрового столкновения как направление социологической интерпретации геолокационных игр), страница 32

№ 1. P. 52–60.84.Deterding S. Alibis for Adult Play: A Goffmanian Account of Escaping Embarrassment in AdultPlay // Games and Culture. Vol. 20. № 10. 2017. P. 1–20.12385.Enck C.E., Preston J.D. Counterfeit intimacy: A dramaturgical analysis of an erotic performance// Deviant Behavior. 1988.

Vol. 9. № 4. P. 369–381.86.Ferris K.O. Through a Glass, Darkly: The Dynamics of Fan-Celebrity Encounters // SymbolicInteraction. 2001. Vol. 24. № 1. P. 25–47.87.Frith J. The digital “lure”: Small businesses and Pokémon Go // Mobile Media andCommunication. 2017. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 51–54.88.Gallant M.J., Kleinman S. Symbolic Interactionism vs. Ethnomethodology // SymbolicInteraction. 1983. Vol.

6. № 1. P. 1–18.89.Garfinkel H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1967.90.Goffman E. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh,1956a.91.Goffman E. The Nature of Deference and Demeanor // American Anthropologist. 1956b. Vol.58. № 3. P. 473–502.92.Goffman E. Encounters: Two Studies in the Sociology of Interaction. Ringwood: PenguinUniversity Books, 1961.93.Goffman E. Behavior in Public Places.

Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings. NewYork: The Free Press, 1963.94.Goffman E. Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face to Face Behavior. New York: Pantheon Books,1967.95.Goffman E. Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1969.96.Goffman E. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Public Order. New York: Basic Books, Inc.,1971.97.Goffman E. The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidentialaddress // American Sociological Review. 1983. Vol. 48. № 1.

P. 1–17.98.Gonos G. “Situation” versus “Frame”: The “Interactionist” and the “Structuralist” Analysis ofEveryday Life // Sage Masters of Modern Social Thought / Ed. by G.A. Fine, G. Smith. Vol. IV. L.:Sage Publications, 2000.99.Goodwin C. Conversational Organization: Interaction between Speakers and Hearers. London:Academic Press, 1981.100.Goodwin C. Action and embodiment within situated human interaction // Journal of Pragmatics.2000. Vol. 32. № 10.

P. 1489–1522.101.Green A.I. Playing the (Sexual) Field: The Interactional Basis of Systems of Sexual Stratification// Social Psychology Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 74. № 3. P. 244–266.102.Hatuka T., Toch E. The emergence of portable private-personal territory: Smartphones, socialconduct and public spaces // Urban Studies. 2014. Vol. 53. № 10. P. 2192–2208.124103.Heath C., Hindmarsh J., Luff P. Video in Qualitative Research: Analysing Social Interaction inEveryday Life. London: Sage, 2010.104.Hindmarsh J., Heath C., Fraser M.

(Im)materiality, virtual reality and interaction: Grounding the«virtual» in studies of technology in action // Sociological Review. 2006. Vol. 54. № 4. P. 795–817.105.Hjorth L. Games and Gaming. Oxford: Berg New Media Series, 2011.106.Humphreys L. Involvement shield or social catalyst: Thoughts on sociospatial practice ofPokémon GO // Mobile Media and Communication. 2017. Vol. 5. № 1. P.

15–19.107.Ihde D. Bodies, Virtual Bodies and Technology // Body and Flesh. A Philosophical Reader.Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 1998. P. 349–357.108.Jacobsen M.H. The Contemporary Goffman. New York: Routledge, 2009.109.Jarrett B. Making Mediation Work: A Sociological View of Human Interaction // Studies inSymbolic Interaction. 2012. Vol. 40.

P. 1–26.110.Kendall S. Framing Authority: Gender, Face, and Mitigation at a Radio Network // Discourse &Society. 2004. Vol. 15. № 1. P. 55–79.111.Lemos A. Post-Mass Media Functions, Locative Media, and Informational Territories: NewWays of Thinking About Territory, Place, and Mobility in Contemporary Society // Space and Culture.2010. Vol. 13. № 4. P.

403–420.112.Licoppe C. From Mogi to Pokémon Go: Continuities and change in location-aware collectiongames // Mobile Media and Communication. 2017. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 24–29.113.Licoppe C. Recognizing mutual «proximity» at a distance: Weaving together mobility, socialityand technology // Journal of Pragmatics. 2009. Vol. 41. № 10. P. 1924–1937.114.Ling R.S. The ‘Unboothed’ Phone: Goffman and the Use of Mobile Communication // TheContemporary Goffman. New York: Routledge, 2009.115.Ling R.S. The Mediation of Ritual Interaction via the Mobile Telephone // Handbook of MobileCommunication Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008. P. 165–176.116.Luke R. The Phoneur: Mobile commerce and the digital pedagogies of the wireless web //Communities of difference: Culture, language, technology.

London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. P. 185–204.117.Lynch M. From naturally occurring data to naturally organized ordinary activities: comment onSpeer // Discourse Studies. 2002. Vol. 4. № 4. P. 531–537.118.Manovich L. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001.119.Martin J.A. (Re)Embodiment of the Digital Self and First Life Body in a New Social MediaEnvironment: Paid Sex Work in Second Life // Studies in Symbolic Interaction. 2014. Vol. 43. P. 143–171.125120.Maynard D.W. Goffman, Garfinkel, and Games // Sociological Theory.

1991. Vol. 9. № 2. P.277–279.121.Maynard D.W. The Contemporary Goffman. Book Reviews // American Journal of Sociology.2011. Vol. 117. № 1. P. 1251–1263.122.Mäyrä F. Pokémon GO: Entering the Ludic Society // Mobile Media and Communication. 2017.Vol. 5. № 1. P. 47–50.123.Mead G.H. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1934.124.Misztal B.A. Normality and Trust in Goffman’ s Theory of Interaction Order // SociologicalTheory.

2001. Vol. 19. № 3. P. 312–324.125.Perinbanayagam R.S. The Other in the Game: Mead and Wittgenstein on Interaction // Studiesin Symbolic Interaction. 2005. Vol. 28. P. 341–353.126.Perinbanayagam R.S., McCarthy E.D. Interactions and the Drama of Engagement // Studies inSymbolic Interaction. 2012. Vol.

39. P. 191–224.127.Piaget J. The stages of the intellectual development of the child // Educational psychology incontext: Readings for future teachers. 1965. P. 98-106.128.Pink S. et al. Tactile digital ethnography: Researching mobile media through the hand // MobileMedia Communication. 2015.

Vol. 4. № 2. P. 1–15.129.Potrac P., Jones R., Armour K. ‘It’s All about Getting Respect’: The Coaching Behaviors of anExpert English Soccer Coach // Sport, Education and Society. 2002. Vol. 7. № 2. P. 183–202.130.Puddephatt A.J. Chess playing as strategic activity // Symbolic Interaction. 2003. Vol. 26. P.263–284.131.Rawls A.W. Reply to Gallant and Kleinman on Symbolic Interactionism Vs. Ethnomethodology// Symbolic Interaction. 1985. Vol. 8.

№ 1. P. 121–140.132.Rawls A.W. The Interaction Order Sui Generis: Goffman’s Contribution to Social Theory //Sociological Theory. 1987. Vol. 5. № 2. P. 136–149.133.Rawls A.W. Interaction Order or Interaction Ritual: Comment on Collins // Symbolic Interaction.1989. Vol. 12. № 1. P. 103–109.134.Rawls A.W. Durkheim’s Epistemology: The Neglected Argument // American Journal ofSociology. 1996. Vol. 102. № 2. P.

430–453.135.Rawls A.W. Orders of Interaction and Intelligibility: Intersections between Goffman andGarfinkel by Way of Durkheim // Goffman’s Legacy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers,2003. P. 216–254.136.Rettberg J.W. Seeing Ourselves Through Technology: How We Use Selfies, Blogs and WearableDevices to See and Shape Ourselves. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. 120 p.126137.Richardson I. Ludic Mobilities: The Corporealities of Mobile Gaming // Mobilities.

2010. Vol.5. № 4. P. 431–447.138.Richardson I., Hjorth L. Mobile Games From Tetris to Foursquare // The Routledge Companionto Mobile Media. London: Routledge, 2014. P. 256–266.139.Richardson I., Wilken R. Haptic Vision, Footwork, Place-making: A Peripatetic Phenomenologyof the Mobile Phone Pedestrian // Second Nature.

2009. Vol. 2. P. 22–40.140.Schegloff E.A. Identification and recognition in telephone conversation openings // Everydaylanguage: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington, 1979. P. 23–78.141.Schelling T.C. The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960.142.Scott M.B. The Racing Game. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers, 1968.143.Scott S. Intimate deception in everyday life // Studies in Symbolic Interaction. 2012. Vol. 39. P.251-279.144.Shalin D.N. Interfacing biography, theory and history: The case of Erving Goffman // SymbolicInteraction. 2014.

Vol. 37. № 1. P. 2–40.145.Shalin D.N. Erving Goffman, Fateful Action, and the Las Vegas Gambling Scene // UNLVGaming Research & Review Journal. 2016. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 1–38.146.Sharrock W. The Omnipotence of the Actor // Goffman and Social Organisation: Studies in aSociological Legacy. London: Routledge, 1999.

P. 119–137.147.Sicart M. Reality has always been augmented: Play and the promises of Pokémon GO // MobileMedia and Communication. 2017. Vol. 5. № 1. P. 30–33.148.Smith R.J. Goffman’s Interaction Order at the Margins: Stigma, Role, and Normalization in theOutreach Encounter // Symbolic Interaction. 2011. Vol. 34. № 3. P. 357–376.149.Smith W. Theatre of Use: A Frame Analysis of Information Technology Demonstrations // Soc.Stud. Sci.

2009. Vol. 39. № June. P. 449–480.150.Snow D.A., Zurcher L.A., Peters R. Victory Celebrations As Theater: a Dramaturgical ApproachTo Crowd Behavior // Symbolic Interaction. 1981. Vol. 4. № 1. P. 21–42.151.Tellería A.S. Between the Public and Private in Mobile Communication. New York: Routledge,2017.152.Telles J.L. The Social Nature of Demeanor // The Sociological Quarterly.

1980. Vol. 21. № 3. P.321–334.153.Tseëlon E. Self presentation through appearance: a manipulative vs. a dramaturgical approach //Symbolic Interaction. 1992. Vol. 15. № 4. P. 501–514.154.Tuters M. From mannerist situationism to situated media // Convergence. The internationaljournal of research into new media technologies. 2012.