Диссертация (Демократия в постсоветских государствах Балтии сравнительный анализ факторов становления и развития), страница 72
Описание файла
Файл "Диссертация" внутри архива находится в папке "Демократия в постсоветских государствах Балтии сравнительный анализ факторов становления и развития". PDF-файл из архива "Демократия в постсоветских государствах Балтии сравнительный анализ факторов становления и развития", который расположен в категории "". Всё это находится в предмете "политические науки" из Аспирантура и докторантура, которые можно найти в файловом архиве РАНХиГС. Не смотря на прямую связь этого архива с РАНХиГС, его также можно найти и в других разделах. , а ещё этот архив представляет собой докторскую диссертацию, поэтому ещё представлен в разделе всех диссертаций на соискание учёной степени доктора политических наук.
Просмотр PDF-файла онлайн
Текст 72 страницы из PDF
3. P. 465–491.250. Kuran T. Now out of never: The element of surprise in the EastEuropean Revolution of 1989 // World Politics. 1991. Vol. 44. № 1. P. 7–48.381251. Kuzio T. Democratic Breakthroughs and Revolutions in FivePostcommunist Countries: Comparative Perspectives on the Fourth Wave //Demokratizatsiya. 2008. Vol. 16. № 1. P. 97–109.252. Lankina T., Getachew L. A Geographic Incremental Theory ofDemocratization: Territory, Aid, and Democracy in Postcommunist Regions //World Politics.
2006. Vol. 58. № 4. P. 536–582.253. Latvijas tautas fronte: Gads pirmais. Riga: Latvijas tautas fronte, 1989.P. 207–224.254. Levitsky S., Way L. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimesafter the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2010. 517 p.255.
Lijphart A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms andPerformance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999.351 p.256. Linz J. The perils of presidentialism // Journal of Democracy. 1990.Vol. 1. № 1. P. 51−69.257. Linz J., Stepan A. Problems of Democratic Transition andConsolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 479 p.258.
Lipset S. M. Some Social Requisites of Democracy: EconomicDevelopment and Political Legitimacy // American Political Science Review. 1995.№ 53. P. 69–105.259. Lipset S. Political Man. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1960. 432 p.260. Luong P. Institutional change and political continuity in Post-SovietCentral Asia: power, perceptions, and pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress. 2002. 320 p.261. Mahoney J.
Path Dependent Explanations of Regime Change // Studiesin Comparative and International Development. 2001. Vol. 36. № 1. P. 114–126.262. McFaul M. The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship:Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World // World Politics. 2002.Vol. 54. № 2. P. 212–244.382263. McFaul M. The orange revolution in a comparative perspective //A.
Aslund & M. McFaul (Eds.). Revolution in orange: The origins of Ukraine’sdemocratic breakthrough. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for InternationalPeace, 2006. P. 165–197.264. McFaul M. Transitions from Postcommunism // Journal of Democracy.2005. Vol. 16. № 3. P. 5–19.265. Melville A., Stukal D., Mironyuk M. Trajectories of RegimeTransformation and Types of Stateness in Postcommunist Countries // PerspectivesonURL:EuropeanPoliticsandhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.772749Society.(дата2013.обращения:21.02.2014).266. Misiunas R.
J., Taagapera R. The Baltic States: Years of dependence,1980–1986 // Journal of Baltic Studies. 1989. Vol. 20. № 1. P. 65–88.267. Møller J. Post-communist Regime Change: a comparative study.London and NY: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2009. 177 p.268. Møller J., Skaaning S. Democracy and Democratization in ComparativePerspective: Conceptions, Conjunctures, Causes and Consequences. Abingdon:Routledge, 2012.
242 p.269. Montgomery K., Remington T. Regime transition and the 1990 Sovietrepublican elections // Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics. 1994.Vol. 10. № 1. P. 55–79.270. Morris H. President, party and nationality policy in Latvia, 1991–1999// Europe-Asia Studies. 2004. Vol. 56. № 4. P. 543–569.271. Morrison K. Nontax Revenue, Social Cleavages, and AuthoritarianStability in Mexico and Kenya: Internationalization, Institutions, and PoliticalChange Revisited // Comparative Political Studies. 2011. Vol. 44. № 6.
P. 719–746.272. Muiznieks N. The influence of the Baltic popular movements on theprocess of Soviet disintegration // Europe-Asia Studies. 1995. Vol. 47. № 1. P. 3–25.383273. Muiznieks N. The Latvian Popular Front and Ethnic Relations // Reporton the USSR. № 1 (42). 20 October 1989. P. 20–21.274. Munck G., Verkuilen J. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy:Evaluating Alternative Indices // Comparative Political Studies. 2002. Vol. 35. № 1.P.
5–34.275. Nakrošis V., Bankauskaitė-Grigaliūnienė S. The Impact Of The EU OnAgencification and Depoliticisation in Lithuania // Baltic Journal Of PoliticalScience. 2014. № 3. P. 7–26.276. NationsURL:inTransit2015//Freedomhouse.https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2015/estonia(датаобращения: 10.03.2016).277. NationsURL:inTransit2015//Freedom.https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2015/latvia(датаобращения: 10.03.2016).278. NationsinTransit2015//Freedomhouse.URL: https://www.freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit/2015/lithuania (датаобращения: 10.03.2016).279.
Nugin R., Onken E. Defining Success in a Changing Society: SelfEvaluation and Social Reflections of a Coming Elite in the Baltic States // Journalof Baltic Studies. 2010. Vol. 41. № 4. P. 449–471.280. O’Donnell G. Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies // Journalof Democracy. 1998. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 112–126.281. O’Donnell G.
Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism.Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.219 p.282. Offe C. Capitalism by Democratic Design? Democratic Theory Facingthe Triple Transition in East Central Europe // Social Research. 1991. Vol. 58. № 4.P. 865–892.384283. Onken E. Memory and Democratic Pluralism in the Baltic States –Rethinking the Relationship // Journal of Baltic Studies. 2010. Vol.
41. № 3. P. 277–294.284. Park A. Ethnicity and independence: The case of Estonia incomparative perspective // Europe-Asia Studies. 1994. Vol. 46. № 1. P. 69–87.285. Pettai V., Hallik K. Understanding Process of Ethnic Control:Segmentation, Dependency and Co-optation in Post-communist Estonia // Nationsand Nationalism. 2002.
Vol. 8. № 4. P. 505–529.286. Pisarenko O. The acculturation modes of Russian speaking adolescentsin Latvia: Perceived discrimination and knowledge of the Latvian language //Europe-Asia Studies. 2006. Vol. 58. № 5. P. 751–773.287. Plaat J. Religious change in Estonia and the Baltic states during theSoviet period in comparative perspective // Journal of Baltic Studies. 2003. Vol. 34.№ 1.
P. 52–73.288. Plakans A. Latvia's return to independence // Journal of Baltic Studies.1991. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 259–266.289. Plakans A. The tribulations of independence: Latvia 1991–1993 //Journal of Baltic Studies. 1994. Vol. 25. № 1. P. 63–72.290. PolityIVCountryReport2010:http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/Latvia2010.pdfLithuania.(датаURL:обращения:12.06.2015).291.
PolityIVCountryReport2010:Lithuania.URL: http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/Lithuania2010.pdf (дата обращения:12.06.2015).292. PolityIVCountryReport2010:http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/Estonia2010.pdfLithuania.(датаURL:обращения:12.06.2015).293. Popular Front of Estonia: Charter, General Programme, Resolutions,Manifesto. Tallinn: Periodika, 1989. 178 p.385294. Pridham G. Post-Soviet Latvia – A Consolidated or DefectiveDemocracy? The Interaction between Domestic and European Trajectories // Journalof Baltic Studies.
2009. Vol. 40. № 4. P. 465–494.295. Pridham G. Securing the Only Game in Town: The EU's PoliticalConditionality and Democratic Consolidation in Post-Soviet Latvia // Europe-AsiaStudies. 2009. Vol. 61. № 1. P. 51–84.296. Przeworski A., Alvarez M., Cheibub J., Limongi F. Democracy andDevelopment: Political Institutions and Well-being in the World, 1950–1990. N.Y.:Cambridge University Press, 2000. 362 p.297. Przeworski A., Limongi F. Modernization: Theories and Facts // WorldPolitics. 1997. Vol. 49. № 2.
P. 155–183.298. Puteman C. The Problem of Political Obligation: A Critique of LiberalTheory. Cambridge, 1985.299. Rabkin R. Redemocratization, Electoral Engineering, and PartyStrategies in Chile, 1989−1995 // Comparative Political Studies. 1996. Vol. 29. № 3.P. 335-356.300. Raun T. The re-establishment of Estonian independence // Journal ofBaltic Studies.
1991. Vol. 22. № 3. P. 251–258.301. Raun T., Plakans A. The Estonian and Latvian national movements: Anassessment of Miroslav Hroch's model // Journal of Baltic Studies. 1990. Vol. 21. №2. P. 131–144.302. Remington T. Democratization, separation of powers, and statecapacity // The state after communism: Governance in the new Russia.
T. J. Colton& S. Holmes (Eds.) Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. 2006. P. 261–298.303. Roberts A. The Quality of Democracy in Eastern Europe: PublicPreferences and Policy Reforms. NY: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 239 p.304. Ross M. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? // World Politics. 2001. Vol. 53.№ 3. P.
325–361.305. Rudenshiold E. Ethnic dimensions in contemporary Latvian politics:Focusing forces for change // Soviet Studies. 1992. Vol. 44. № 4. P. 609–624.386306. Ruus J., Usackas V. The transition to polyarchy in Lithuania andEstonia // Journal of Baltic Studies. 1991. Vol. 22. № 1. P. 77–86.307. Schafer R., Schafer E. Latvia in transition: A study of change in aformer republic of the USSR // Journal of Baltic Studies. 1993. Vol. 24. № 2. P. 161–172.308.
