Диссертация (1174356), страница 23
Текст из файла (страница 23)
– Vol. 7. – P. 125.207. Goldstein, B. Shoulder anatomy and biomechanics / B. Goldstein // Phys.Med. Rehab. Clinics. North Am. – 2004. – N 15. – P. 313–349.208. Gracitelli, M. E. Locking intramedullary nails compared with locking platesfor two- and three-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a randomized139controlled trial / M.
E. Gracitelli, E. A. Malavolta, J. H. Assuncao [et al.] // J. ShoulderElb. Surg. / Am. Shoulder Elb. Surg. [et al.]. – 2016. – N 25(5). – P. 695–703. – DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.003.209. Gradl, G. Decision making in displaced fractures of the proximal humerus:fracture or surgeon based? / G. Gradl, M. Knobe, H. C. Pape [et al.] // Int. Orthop.
–2015. – N 39 (2). – P. 329–334. – DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2630-5.210. Gradl, G. Is locking nailing of humeral head fractures superior to lockingplate fixation? / G. Gradl, A. Dietze, M. Kääb [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2009Nov. – N 467 (11). – P. 2986–2993.211. Gupta, A. K.
Surgical management of complex proximal humerus fractures:A systematic review of 92 studies including 4500 patients / A. K. Gupta, J. D. Harris,B. J. Erickson [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2015. – N 29 (1). – P. 54–59.212. Hageman, M. G. The factors influencing the decision making of operativetreatment for proximal humeral fractures / M. G. Hageman [et al.] // Shoulder ElbowSurg. – 2015. – Vol. 24. – P.
21–26.213. Halder, A. M. Anatomy and biomechanics of the shoulder / A. M. Halder, E.Itoi, K. N. An // Orthop. Clin. North Am. – 2000. – N 31. – P. 159–176.214. Handoll, H. H. G. Developing, delivering and documenting rehabilitation ina multi-centre randomised controlled surgical trial: experiences from the ProFHER trial/ H.
H. G. Handoll, L. Goodchild, S. D. Brealey [et al.] // Bone Joint Res. – 2014 Dec. –N 3 (12). – P. 335–340.215. Handoll, H. H. G. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures inadults / H. H. G. Handoll, S. Brorson // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. – 2015 Nov. –N 11. – P. CD000434.216. Handoll, H.
H. G. Interventions for treating proximal humeral fractures inadults / H. H. G. Handoll, B. J. Ollivere, K. E. Rollins // Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.– 2012. – N 12. – P. CD000434. – Epub 2012 Dec 12.217. Hardeman, F. Predictive factors for functional outcome and failure inangular stable osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus / F. Hardeman, P. Bollars, M.Donnelly [et al.] // Injury. – 2012 Feb. – N 43 (2). – P. 153–158.140218. Hasty, E.
K. Trends in surgical management and costs for operativetreatment of proximal humerus fractures in the elderly / E. K. Hasty, E.W. Jernigan 3rd,A. Soo [et al.] // Orthopedics. – 2017 Apr. – N 18. – P. 1–7.219. Hatzidakis, A. M. Angular-stable locked intramedullary nailing of two-partsurgical neck fractures of the proximal part of the humerus: A multicenter retrospectiveobservation-al study / A.
M. Hatzidakis, M. J. Shevlin, D. L. Fenton [et al.] // J. BoneJoint Surg. Am. – 2011. – N 93 (23). – P. 2172–2179.220. Hertel, R. Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prostheticdesign / R. Hertel, U. Knothe, F. T.
Ballmer // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002. – N 11. –P. 331–338. – DOI: 10.1067/mse.2002.124429.221. Hertel, R. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture ofthe proximal humerus / R. Hertel, A. Hempfing, M. Stiehler [et al.] // J. Shoulder ElbowSurg. – 2004. – N 13 (4). – P.
427–433. – DOI: 10.1016/S1058274604000795.222. Hettrich, C. M. Quantitative assessment of the vascularity of the proximalpart of the humerus / C. M. Hettrich, S. Boraiah, J. P. Dyke [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg.Am. – 2010. – N 92(4). – P. 943–948.223. Hill, S. A. The grooved defect of the humeral head. A frequent unrecognizedcomplication of dislocation of the shoulder / S. A. Hill, M. D. Sachs // Joint. Radiology.– 1940. – N 35. – P.
690.224. Hinds, R. M. Geriatric proximal humeral fracture patients show similarclinical outcomes to non-geriatric patients after osteosynthesis with endosteal fibularstrut allograft augmentation / R. M. Hinds, M. R. Garner, W. H. Tran [et al.] // J.Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2015. – N 24 (6). – P. 889–896.225. Hirschmann, M. T. Internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractureswith an anatomically preshaped interlocking plate: a clinical and radiologic evaluation /M. T.
Hirschmann, V. Quarz, L. Audige [et al.] // J. Trauma. – 2007. – N 63 (6). – P.1314–1323. – DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000240457.64628.38.226. Hodgson, S. A. Rehabilitation of two-part fractures of the neck of thehumerus (two year follow-up) / S. A. Hodgson, S. J. Mawson, J. M. Saxton [et al.] // J.Shoulder Elbow Surg.
– 2007. – N 16 (2). – P. 143–145.141227. Iyengar, J. J. Nonoperative treatment of proximal humerus fractures: Asystematic review / J. J. Iyengar, Z. Devcic, R. C. Sproul [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma2011. – N 25 (10). – P. 612–617.228. Jakob, R. P. Four-part valgus impacted fractures of the proximal humerus /R. P. Jakob, A. Miniaci, P. S. Anson [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg.
Br. – 1991. – N 73. –P. 295–298.229. Johnson, J. W. Relationship of bicipital groove rotation with humeral headretroversion: A three-dimensional computed tomographic analysis / J. W. Johnson, J. D.Thostenson, L. J. Suva [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2013. – N 95(8). – P. 719–724.230. Jost, B. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis ofcomplications, revision strategies and outcome / B. Jost, C. Spross, H. Grehn [et al.] // J.ShoulderElbowSurg.–2013.–N22(4).–P.542–549.–URL:10.1016/j.jse.2012.06.008.231. Juan, Wang. Meta-analysis suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty inproximal humerus fractures is a better option than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly / JuanWang, Yanbin Zhu, Fei Zhang [et al.] // International Orthopaedics.
– March 2016. –Vol. 40, iss. 3. – P. 531–539.232. Kannus, P. Increasing number and incidence of osteoporotic fractures of theproximal humerus in elderly people / P. Kannus, M. Palvanen, S. Niemi [et al.] // BMJ(clinical research ed.). – 1996. – N 313 (7064). – P. 1051–1052.233.
Katthagen, J. C. Is there any advantage in placing an additional calcar screwin locked nailing of proximal humeral fractures? / J. C. Katthagen, M. Schwarze, L.Bauer [et al.] // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. – 2015. – N 101 (4). – P. 431–435. –DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.018.234. Kempton, L. B.
A radiographic analysis of the effects of prosthesis designon scapular notching following reverse total shoulder arthroplasty / L. B. Kempton, M.Balasubramaniam, E. Ankerson [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2011. – N 20 (4). –P. 571–576.142235. Kettler, M.
Treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the PHILOSangular stable plate. Presentation of 225 cases of dislocated fractures / M. Kettler, P.Biberthaler, V. Braunstein [et al.] // Unfallchirurg. – 2006. – N 109 (12). – P. 1032–1040. – DOI: 10.1007/s00113-006-1165-7.236. Kim, S.
H. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States:nationwide emergency department sample, 2008 / S. H. Kim, R. M. Szabo, R. A.Marder // Arthritis Care Res. – 2012 Mar. – N 64 (3). – P. 407–414.237. Kim, S. H. Outcomes for four-part proximal humerus fractures treated with alocking compression plate and an autologous iliac bone impaction graft / S. H. Kim,Y. H.
Lee, S. W. Chung [et al.] // Injury. – 2012. – N 43 (10). – P. 1724–1731. – DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.029.238. Klein, M. Treatment of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus inelderly patients with the Delta III reverse shoulder prosthesis / M. Klein, M. Juschka, B.Hinkenjann [et al.] // J. Orthop Trauma. – 2008. – N 22 (10). – P. 698–704.239.
Koike, Y. Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a Polarushumeral nail / Y. Koike, T. Komatsuda, K. Sato // J. Orthop. Traumatol. Off. – 2008. –N 9 (3). – P. 135–139. – DOI: 10.1007/s10195-008-0019-1.240. Konrad, G. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeralfractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique / G.Konrad, J. Bayer, P. Hepp [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2010. – N 92 (suppl. 1,pt. 1). – P. 85–95.241. Konrad, G.