Диссертация (1174356), страница 24
Текст из файла (страница 24)
Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-partproximal humeral fractures / G. Konrad, L. Audigé, S. Lambert [et al.] // Clin. Orthop.Relat. Res. – 2012 Feb. – N 470 (2). – P. 602–609.242. Koval, K. J. Functional outcome after minimally displaced fractures of theproximal part of the humerus / K. J. Koval, M. A. Gallagher, J.
G. Marsicano [et al.] //J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 1997 Feb. – N 79 (2). – P. 203–207.243. Kralinger, F. The medial periosteal hinge, a key structure in fractures of theproximal humerus: a biomechanical cadaver study of its mechanical properties / F.143Kralinger, S. Unger, M. Wambacher [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. – 2009. – N 91(7). – P.
973–976. – DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B7.21857.244. Krappinger, D. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerusfractures / D. Krappinger, N. Bizzotto, S. Riedmann [et al.] // Injury. – 2011. – N 42. –P. 1283–1288.245. Kristiansen, B. The Neer classification of fractures of proximal humerus. Anassessment of interobserver variation / B. Kristiansen, U.
L. Andersen, C. A. Olsen [etal.] (1988) // Skeletal. Radiol. – 1988. – N 17. – P. 420–422.246. Laflamme, G. Y. Percutaneous humeral plating of fractures of the proximalhumerus: results of a prospective multicenter clinical trial / G. Y. Laflamme, D. M.Rouleau, G. K.
Berry [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2008. – N 22 (3). – P. 153–158. –DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181694f7d.247. Launonen, A. P. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures / A. P.Launonen [et al.] // Arch. Osteoporos. – 2015. – Vol. 10. – P. 209.248. Lee, C. K. Post-traumatic avascular necrosis of the humeral head indisplaced proximal humeral fractures / C. K. Lee, H.
R. Hansen // J. Trauma. – 1981. –N 21 (9). – P. 788–791.249. Lekic, N. Treatment of two-part proximal humerus fractures: intramedullarynail compared to locked plating / N. Lekic, N. M. Montero, R. C. Takemoto [et al.] //HSS J. – 2012 Jul. – N 8 (2). – P. 86–91.250. Lenarz Levy, J. C. Reverse shoulder prosthesis for acute four-part fracture:tuberosity fixation using a horseshoe graft / J. C.
Lenarz Levy, B. Badman // J. Orthop.Trauma. – 2011. – N 25 (5). – P. 318–324.251. Li, Y. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment for displaced 3-part or4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: A meta-analysis of randomizedcontrolled trials / Y. Li, L. Zhao, L.
Zhu [et al.] // PLoS One. – 2013. – N 8 (9). – P.e75464.252. Lin, T. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis with a locking compressionplate is superior to open reduction and internal fixation in the management of the144proximal humerus fractures / T. Lin, B. Xiao, X. Ma [et al.] // BMC Musculoskelet.Disord. – 2014 Jun. – N 16 (15).
– P. 206.253. Lind, T. The epidemiology of fractures of the proximal humerus / T. Lind,K. Krøner, J. Jensen // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. – 1989. – N 108. – P. 285–287.254. Lopiz, Y. Proximal humerus nailing: a randomized clinical trial betweencurvilinear and straight nails / Y. Lopiz, J. Garcia-Coiradas, C. Garcia-Fernandez [et al.]// J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2014. – N 23. – P. 369–376.255. Maier, D. Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults / D. Maier, M.Jaeger, K. Izadpanah [et al.] // J.
Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2014. – N 96. – P. 251–261.256. Maier, D. Treatment of proximal humeral fractures – a review of currentconcepts enlightened by basic principles / D Maier., M. Jäger, P. C. Strohm [et al.] //Acta Chir. Orthop. Traumatol. Cech. – 2012. – N 79. – P. 307–316.257. Majed, D. Proximal humeral fracture classification systems revisited / D.Majed, I. Macleod, A. M.
J. Bull [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2011. – N 20 (7). –P. 1125–1132. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.01.020.258. Maldonado, Z. M. Straining of the intact and fractured proximal humerusunder physiological-like loading / Z. M. Maldonado, J. Seebeck, M. O. Heller [et al.] //J. Biomech.
– 2003. – N 36 (12). – P. 1865–1873.259. Marsh, J. L. Fracture and dislocation classification compendium – 2007:Orthopaedic. Trauma Association classification, database and outcomes committee /J. L. Marsh, T. F. Slongo, J. Agel [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2007. – N 21 (10suppl.). – P. S1–133.260. Matassi, F. Locking plate and fibular allograft augmentation in unstablefractures of proximal humerus / F.
Matassi, R. Angeloni, C. Carulli [et al.] // Injury. –2012. – N 43 (11). – P. 1939–1942. – DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.08.004.261. Matheson, L. N. Reliability of a visual analog version of the Quick DASH /L. N. Matheson, J. M. Melhorn, T. G. Mayer [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2006.– N 88. – P. 1782–1787.145262.
Matsumura, N. Morphologic features of humeral head and glenoid version inthe normal glenohumeral joint / N. Matsumura, K. Ogawa, S. Kobayashi [et al.] // J.Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2014. – N 23 (11). – P. 1724–1730.263. Mattiassich, G. Delta III reverse shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment ofcomplex 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus: 6 to 42 months of follow-upBMC / G.
Mattiassich, L. L. Marcovici, R. M. Krifter, [et al.] // Musculoskelet. Disord.– 2013. – N 14 (1). – P. 1–10.264. Milin, L. Comparison of modified Hackethal bundle nailing versusanterograde nailing for fixation of surgical neck fractures of the humerus: retrospectivestudy of 105 cases / L. Milin, F.
Sirveaux, F. Eloy [et al.] // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg.Res. – 2014. – N 100. – P. 265–70.265. Molé, D.Surgical technique: the anterosuperior approach for reverseshoulder arthroplasty / D. Molé, F. Wein, C. Dézaly [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. –2011. – N 469 (9). – P. 2461–2468.266. Moonot, P. Early results for treatment of three- and four-part fractures of theproximal humerus using the PHILOS plate system / P.
Moonot, N. Ashwood, M.Hamlet (2007) // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. – 2007. – N 89. – P. 1206–1209.267. Muckter, H. Angle- and rotation-stable internal fixation of proximalhumerus fractures with the humerus fixator plate. Early clinical experience with a newlydeveloped implant. Der Chirurg / H. Muckter, L. Herzog, M. Becker [et al.] //Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der Operativen Medizen. – 2001.
– N 72 (11). – P. 1327–1335.268. Müller, M. The compherensive classification of fractures of long bones / M.Müller. – New York : Springer, 1990. – 201 p.269. Murray, I. R. Proximal humeral fractures: current concepts in classification,treatment and outcomes / I. R. Murray, A. K. Amin, T. O. White [et al.] // J. Bone JointSurg. Br.
– 2011. – N 93 (1). – P. 1–11. – DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B1.25702.270. Neer, C. S Displaced proximal humerus fractures. Part1. Classification andevaluation / C. S. Neer // J. Bone Joint Surg. (Am.). – 1970a. – N 52 (6). – P. 1077–1089.146271. Neer, C. S. Displaced proximal humera fractures. II. Treatment of three-partand four-part displacement / C. S.
Neer // J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. – 1970b. – N 52 (6). –P. 1090–1103.272. Neer, C. S. Cuff-tear arthropathy / C. S. Neer II, E. V. Craig, H. Fukuda // J.Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 1983. – N 65 (9). – P. 1232–1244.273. Neviaser, A. S. Rate of avascular necrosis following proximal humerusfractures treated with a lateral locking plate and endosteal implant / A. S. Neviaser,C. M. Hettrich, J.
S. Dines [et al.] // Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. – 2011. – N 131 (12).– P. 1617–1622. – DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1366-6.274. Neviaser, R. J. Proximal Humerus Fractures: pin, plate or replace / R. J.Neviaser [et al.] // Instr. Course Lect. – 2015. – N 64. – P. 203–214. – PMID:25745906.275.
Noda, M. Does the location of the entry point affect the reduction ofproximal humeral fractures? A cadaveric study / M. Noda, Y. Saegusa, T. Maeda //Injury. – 2011 Sep. – N 42 (suppl. 4). – P. S35–38.276. Ockert, B. Long-term functional outcomes (median 10 years) after lockedplating for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus / B.
Ockert, G. Siebenburger,M. Kettler [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2014. – N 23. – P. 1223–1231. – DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.009.277. Olerud, P. Hemiarthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 4part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial / P.Olerud, L. Ahrengart, S. Ponzer [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. - 2011 Oct.
– N20(7). – P. 1025–33. – Epub 2011 Jul 23.278. Olerud, P. Internal fixation versus nonoperative treatment of displaced 3-partproximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial / , P.Olerud, L. Ahrengart, S. Ponzer [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2011a.
– N 20. – P.747–755. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2010.12.018.279. Olerud, P. Quality of life and functional outcome after a 2-part proximalhumeral fracture: a prospective cohort study on 50 patients treated with a locking plate /147P. Olerud, L. Ahrengart, A. S¨oderqvist [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. – 2010 Sep. –N 19 (6). – P. 814–822. – Epub 2010 Mar 19.280. Osterhoff, G. Calcar comminution as prognostic factor of clinical outcomeafter locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures / G.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
