Диссертация (1174356), страница 26
Текст из файла (страница 26)
1745–1750.317. Siffri, P. C. Biomechanical analysis of blade plate versus locking platefixation for a proximal humerus fracture: comparison using cadaveric and synthetichumerus / P. C. Siffri, R. D. Peindl, E. R. Coley [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2006. –N 20 (8). – P.
547–554. – DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000244997.52751.58.318. Silverstein, M. P. Analysis of failure with the use of locked plates forstabilization of proximal humerus fractures / M. P. Silverstein [et al.] // Bull. Hosp. Jt.Dis. – 2015. – Vol. 73 (3). – P. 185–189.319. Sirveaux, F. Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatmentof glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff results of a multicentrestudy of 80 shoulders / F. Sirveaux, L. Favard, D. Oudet [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg.Br. – 2004. – N 86 (3).
– P. 388–395.320. Sirveaux, F. Shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humerus fracture / F.Sirveaux, O. Roche, D. Molé // Orthop. Traumatol. Surg. Res. – 2010. – N 96. – P. 683–694.321. Skedros, J. G. Suprascapular Neuropathy after Primary Rotator Cuff RepairAttributed to Suprascapular Notch Constriction in the Setting of Double CrushSyndrome / J. G.
Skedros [et al.] // J. Brachial. Plex. Peripher. Nerve. Inj. – 2015. – Vol.10. – P. 66–73.322. Smith, A. M. Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeralfractures / A. M. Smith, R. M. Mardones, J. W. Sperling [et al.] // J. Shoulder ElbowSurg. – 2007. – N 16 (1).
– P. 14–24. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.008.323. Smith, W. R. Locking plates: tips and tricks / W. R. Smith, B. H. Ziran, J. O.Anglen [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. – 2007. – N 89 (10). – P. 2298–2307.152324. Solberg, B. D. Locked plating of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures inolder patients: the effect of initial fracture pattern on outcome / B. D. Solberg, C.
N.Moon, D. P. Franco [et al.] // J. Orthop. Trauma. – 2009. – N 23. – P. 113–119. – DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819344bf.325. Solberg, B. D. Surgical treatment of three and four-part proximal humeralfractures / B. D. Solberg, C. N. Moon, D. P. Franco [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. –2009. – N 91 (7).
– P. 1689–1697. – DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00133.326. Soliman, O. A. Four-part fracture dislocations of the proximal humerus inyoung adults: results of fixation / O. A. Soliman, W. M. Koptan // Injury. 2013. – N44. – P. 442–447.327. Spross, C. Surgical treatment of Neer group VI proximal humeral fracturesretrospective comparison of PHILOS and hemiarthroplasty / C. Spross, A. Platz, M.Erschbamer, [et al.] // Clin. Orthop.
Relat. Res. – 2012. – N 470. – P. 2035–2042.328. Sproul, R. C. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximalhumerus fractures / R. C. Sproul, J. J. Iyengar, Z. Devcic [et al.] // Injury. – 2011. – N42 (4). – P. 408–413. – DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.058.329. Struyf, F. Scapulothoracic muscle activity and recruitment timing in patientswith shoulder impingement symptoms and glenohumeral instability / F. Struyf [et al.] //J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. – 2014.
– Vol. 24. – P. 277–284.330. Sudkamp, N. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeralfractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective,multicenter, observational study / N. Sudkamp, J. Bayer, P. Hepp, [et al.] // J. Bone Jt.Surg.
Am. – 2009. – N 91(6). – P. 1320–1328. – DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00006.331. Sun, J. C. Treatment of three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures withlocking proximal humerus plate / J. C. Sun, Y. L. Li, G. Z. Ning [et al.] // Eur. J.Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. – 2013. – N 23(6). – P. 699–704. – DOI: 10.1007/s00590012-1040-x.332. Tauber, M. Shoulder arthroplasty for traumatic avascular necrosis / M.Tauber, S. Karpik, N.
Matis [et al.] // Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2007. – N 465. – P.208–214.153333. Tepass, A. Current strategies for the treatment of proximal humeralfractures: an analysis of a survey carried out at 348 hospitals in Germany, Austria, andSwitzerland / A. Tepass, G. Blumenstock, K. Weise [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. –2013. – N 22 (1). – P. 8–14.334. Thanasas, C. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: asystematic review / C.
Thanasas, G. Kontakis, A. Angoules [et al.] // J. Shoulder ElbowSurg. – 2009. – N 18 (6). – P. 837–844. – DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004.335. Thomas, M. Normal values of the shoulder strength in dependency on ageand gender–comparison with the Constant, UCLA, ASES scores and SF36 healthsurvey / M.
Thomas, O. Dieball, M. Busse // Z. Orthop. Ihre. Grenzgeb. – 2003. – N141. – P. 160–170. – DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-38662.336. Thomazeau, H. Is it worth fixing proximal humeral fractures at increasedvascular risk? / H. Thomazeau, J. Richou, T. Benkalfalte [et al.] // Orthop. Traumatol.Surg. Res. – 2012. – N 98 (4).
– P. 383–389. – DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.01.008.337. Tolat, A. R. Failure of humeral fracture fixation plate in a young patient usingthe Philos system: case report / A. R. Tolat, A. Amis, S. Crofton [et al.] // J. Shoulder Elb.Surg/Am.ShoulderElb.Surg.–N15(6).–P. e44–e47.–DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2006.01.014.338. Trepat, A. D. Comparative study between locking plates versus proximalhumeral nail for the treatment of 2-part proximal humeral fractures / A. D.
Trepat, D.Popescu, J. A. Fernández-Valencia, [et al.] // Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. – 2011Sep 7. – N 22 (5). – P. 373–379.339. Vachtsevanos, L. Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults / L.Vachtsevanos, [et al.] // World J. Orthop. – 2014 Nov 18. – N 5(5). – P.
685–693. –PMID: 25405098.340. Van Seymortier, P. The reverse shoulder prosthesis (Delta III) in acuteshoulder fractures: technical considerations with respect to stability / P. Van Seymortier,D. Stoffelen, Y. Fortems [et al.] // Acta. Orthop. Belg. – 2006. – N 72 (4). – P. 474–477.341. Verdano, M. A. Humeral shaft fractures treated with antegrade intramedullarynailing: what are the consequences for the rotator cuff? / M. A. Verdano, A. Pellegrini, P.154Schiavi [et al.] // Int. Orthop. – 2013. – N 37 (10). – P. 2001–2007.
– DOI:10.1007/s00264-013-2007-1.342. Voigt, C. Are polyaxially locked screws advantageous in the plateosteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly? A prospective randomizedclinical observational study / C. Voigt, A. Geisler, P. Hepp [et al.] // J. Orthop Trauma.– 2011. – N 25. – P.
596–602. – DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318206eb46.343. Wijgman, A. J. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-partfractures of the proximal part of the humerus / A. J. Wijgman [et al.] // J. Bone JointSurg. Am. – 2002. – Vol. 84-A, N 11. – P. 1919–1925.344. Wilmanns, C. Rotator cuff alterations resulting from humeral head fractures/ C. Wilmanns, F. Bonnaire // Injury. – 2002 Nov. – N 33 (9).
– P. 781–789.345. Yang, H. A prospective clinical study of proximal humerus fractures treatedwith a locking proximal humerus plate / H. Yang, Z. Li, F. Zhou [et al.] // J. Orthop.Trauma. – 2011. – N 25 (1). – P. 11–17. – DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181d2d04c.346. Yang, P. Biomechanical effect of medial cortical support and medial screwsupport on locking plate fixation in proximal humeral fractures with a medial gap: afinite element analysis / P. Yang, Y. Zhang, J. Liu [et al.] // Acta.
Orthop. Traumatol.Turc. – 2015. – N 49 (2). – P. 203–209. – DOI: 10.3944/aott.2015.14.0204.347. Yen-Nien, Chen. Numerical investigation of fracture impaction in proximalhumeral fracture fixation with locking plate and intramedullary nail / Yen-Nien Chen,Chih-Wei Chang, Chia-Wei Lin [et al.] // International Orthopaedics.348. Yoon, R. S. A comprehensive update on current fixation options for two-partproximal humerus fractures: a biomechanical investigation / R.
S. Yoon, D. Dziadosz,D. A. Porter [et al.] // Injury. – 2014 Mar. – N 45 (3). – P. 510–514.349. Young, A. A. Locked intramedullary nailing for treatment of displacedproximal humerus fractures / A. A. Young, J. S Hughes // Orthop. Clin. North Am. –2008. – N 39. – P.
417–428.350. Young, S. W. Comparison of functional outcomes of reverse shoulderarthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty in the primary treatment of acute proximal155humerus fracture / S. W. Young, B. S. Segal, P. C. Turner [et al.] // ANZ J. Surg.
–2010. – N 80. –P. 789–793.351. Zhang, A. L. Hospital readmissions after surgical treatment of proximalhumerus fractures: is arthroplasty safer than open reduction internal fixation? / A. L.Zhang, W. W. Schairer, B. T. Feeley // Clinical. Orthop. Relat. Res. – 2014. – N 472. –P. 2317–2324. – DOI: 10.1007/s11999-014-3613-y.352. Zhang, L. The clinical benefit of medial support screws in locking plating ofproximal humerus fractures: a prospective randomized study / L. Zhang, J. Zheng, W.Wang [et al.] // Int.
Orthop. 2011. – N 35. – P. 1655–1661. – DOI: 10.1007/s00264-0111227-5.353. Zhu, Y. Locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment oftwo-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial witha minimum of three years of follow-up / Y. Zhu, Y. Lu, J. Shen [et al.] // J. Bone JointSurg. Am. – 2011 Jan 19. – N 93(2). – P. 159–168..
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
