Диссертация (1174341), страница 24
Текст из файла (страница 24)
S. Myerson // Foot AnkleInt. –2002. – Vol. 23. – P. 938–945.136165. Radiographic features that enable assessment of first metatarsal rotation: therole of pronation in hallux valgus / S. Eustace, J. O’Byrne, J. Stack [et al.] // Skeletal.Radiol. – 1993. – Vol. 22. – P. 153.166. Reeves, C. Complications of Hallux Valgus Surgery / С. Reeves, A. Shane //Complications in Foot and Ankle Surgery.
– 2017. – Vol. 1. – P. 135–149.167. Regnauld, B. The Foot (Techniques Chimgicales du Pied) / B. Regnauld.–New York : Springer-Verlag, 1986.168. Result of arthrodesis of the hallux metatarsophalangeal joint using bone graftfor restoration of length / M. S. Myerson, L. C. Schon, F.
X. McGuigan, A. Oznur // FootAnkle Int. – 2000. – Vol. 21. – P. 297–306.169. Robinson, A. H. Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus / A. H.Robinson, J. P. Limbers // J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2005. – N 87 (8). – P. 1038–1045.170. Roddy, E. Prevalence and associations of hallux valgus in a primary care population / E. Roddy, W. Zhang, M. Doherty // Arthritis Rheum. – 2008. – N 59.
– P. 857–862.171. Ross, F. D. The relationship of abnormal foot pronation to hallux abducto valgus: a pilot study / F. D. Ross // Prosthet. Orthot. Int. – 1986. – Vol. 10. – P. 72.172. Roukis, T. S. Minimum incision metatarsal osteotomies / T. S. Roukis, V. L.Schade // Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. – 2008. – Vol. 25. – P. 587–607.173.
Roukis, T. S. Percutaneous and minimum incision metatarsal osteotomies: asystematic review / T. S. Roukis // J. Foot Ankle Surg. – 2009. – Vol. 48. – P. 380–387.174. Salvage of a failed Keller resection arthroplasty / F. Machacek Jr., M. E. Easley, F. Gruber [et al.] //J. Bone Joint Surg. – 2004. – Vol. 86. – P. 1131–1138.175. Sangeorzan, B.
J. Modified Lapidus procedure for hallux valgus / B. J.Sangeorzan, S. T. Hansen // Foot Ankle. – 1989. – Vol. 9. – P. 262–266.176. Saro, C. Outcome after distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus: a prospective randomized controlled trial of two methods / C. Saro, B. Andrén, Z. Wildemyr,L. Felländer-Tsai / /Foot Ankle Int. –2007. – Vol.
28. – P. 778–787.177. Scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus. A prospective clinical and pedobarographic study / S. Jones, H. A. Al Hussainy, F. Ali [et al.] // J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. –2004. – Vol. 86 (6). – P. 830–836.137178. Scarf osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus: a review of 123 cases with4.8 years of follow-up / M. Fresion, L.
E. Gayet, G. Bouche [et al.] // Rev. Chir. Orthop.Repar. Appar. Mot. – 2005. – Vol. 91. – P. 257–266.179. Schaff, P. S. An overview of foot pressure measurement systems / P. S. Schaff// Clin. Podiatr. Med. Surg. – 1993. – Vol. 10. – P. 403–415.180. Schneider, W. Keller procedure and chevron osteotomy in hallux valgus: fiveyear results of different surgical philosophies in comparable collectives / W.
Schneider,K. Knahr // Foot Ankle Int. – 2002. – Vol. 23. – P. 321–329.181. Scranton, P. E. Metatarsalgia diagnosis and treatment / P. E. Scranton // J.Bone Joint Surg. – 1980. – N 62. – P. 723.182. Seringe, R. Les déformations du pied de l’enfant et de l’adulte / R. Seringe, P.Wicart, E. Toullec.
– Paris : Elsevier Masson, 2010. – 314 p.183. Shereff, M. Extraosseous and intraosseous arterial supply to the first metatarsal and MTP joint / M. Shereff, Q. Yang, F. Kummer // Foot Ankle. – 1987. – Vol. 8. –P. 82–91.184. Silver, D. The operative treatment of hallux valgus / D.
Silver // J. bone jointsurg. – 1923. – N 5. – P.225–232.185. Simple bunionectomy with medial capsulorrhaphy / H. B. Kitaoka, M. G.Franco, A. L. Weaver, D. M. Ilstrup // Foot Ankle. – 1991. – Vol. 12. – P. 86–91.186. Smith, A. M. Perioperative complications of the Scarf osteotomy / A. M.Smith, T. Alwan, M. S. Davies //Foot Ankle Int. – 2003. – Vol. 24. – P. 222–227.187. Smith, R. W. Hallux valgus assessment: report of Research Committee ofAmerican Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society / R.
W. Smith, J. C. Reynolds, M. J. Stewart // Foot Ankle. – 1984. – Vol. 5. – P. 92.188. Srivastava, S. Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: comparison betweenmanual and computer-assisted measurements / S. Srivastava, N. Chockalingam, T. ElFakhri // J. Foot Ankle Surg. – 2010. – Vol. 49(6). – P. 523–528.189. Stephens, M. M. Pathogenesis of hallux valgus / M. M. Stephens // Eur. J.Foot Ankle Surg. – 1994.
– Vol. 1. – P. 7–10.138190. Suresh, S. S. Scarf osteotomy – Is it the procedure of choice in hallux valgussurgery? A preliminary report / S. S. Suresh // Oman Med. J. – 2007. – Vol. 22 (3). – P.47–50.191. Surgery vs orthosis vs watchful waiting for hallux valgus: a randomized controlled trial / M. Torkki, A. Malmivaara, S. Seitsalo [et al.] // JAMA. –2001.
– N 285. –P. 2472–2480.192. Talbot, K. D. Assessing sesamoid subluxation: how good is the AP radiograph?/ K. D. Talbot, C. L. Saltzman // Foot Ankle Int. – 1998. – Vol. 19. – P. 547.193. The effect of screw type on the biomechanical properties of SCARF and crescentic osteotomies of the first metatarsal / I. Popoff, J. P. Negrine, M. Zecovic [et al.] //J. Foot Ankle Surg. –2003. – Vol. 42. – P. 161–164.194. The effects of a new foot-toe orthosis in treating painful hallux valgus / S. F.Tang, C.
P. Chen, J. L. Pan [et al.] // Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. – 2002. – N 83. – P. 1792–1795.195. The Grading of Hallux Valgus. The Manchester Scale / A. P. Garrow, A. Papageorgiou, A. J. Silman [et al.] // Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association.– 2001. – Vol. 91. – P. 74–78.196. The Ludloff metatarsal osteotomy: guidelines for optimal correction based ona geometric analysis conducted on a sawbone model / M. Nyska, H. J.
Trnka, B. G. Parks,M. S. Myerson // Foot Ankle Int. –2003. – Vol. 24. – P. 34–39.197. The measurement of pressures under the foot / T. Duckworth, R. P. Belts, C. I.Franks, J. Burke // Foot Ankle. – 1982. – Vol. 3. – Р. 130–141.198. The minimally invasive hallux valgus correction (S.E.R.I.) / S. Giannini, F.Vannini, C. Faldini [et al.] // Interactive Surgery. – 2007.
– Vol. 1. – P. 17–23.199. The minimally invasive osteotomy “S.E.R.I.” (simple, effective, rapid, inexpensive) for correction of bunionette deformity / S. Giannini, C. Faldini, F. Vannini [etal.] // Foot Ankle Int. – 2008. – Vol. 29. – P. 282–286.200. The modified Wilson osteotomy for hallux valgus / P. Keogh, J. S. Jaishanker,R. J. O’Connell, M. Whitу // Clin. Orthop. – 1990. – Vol. 255. – P. 263–267.139201. The SCARF osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus deformities / K. H.Kristen, C. Berger, S. Steizig [et al.] // Foot Ankle Int.
– 2002. – Vol. 23. – P. 221–229.202. The scarf osteotomy for the treatment of hallux valgus deformity: a review of84 cases / X. Crevoisier, E. Mouhsine, V. Ortolano [et al.] // Foot Ankle Int. –2001. –Vol. 22. – P. 970–976.203. The SERI distal metatarsal osteotomy and scarf osteotomy provide similarcorrection of hallux valgus / S. Giannini, M. Cavallo, C. Faldini [et al.] // Clin.
Orthop.Relat. Res. – 2013. – N 471 (7). – P. 2305–2311.204. Tinetti, M.E. Risk factors for falls among elderly persons living in the community / M. E. Tinetti, M. Speechley, S. F. Ginter // N. Engl. J. Med.– 1988. – N 319. –P. 1701–1707.205. Treatment of hallux valgus deformity / L. Fraissler, C. Konrads, M.
Hoberg[et al.] // EFORT Open Rev. – 2016. – N 1. – P. 295–302.206. Vallier, G. T. The Keller resection arthroplasty: a 13 year experience / G. T.Vallier, S. A. Petersen, M. O. La Grone // Foot Ankle. –1991. – Vol. 11. – P. 187–194.207. Valtin, B. Les osteotomies metatarsiennes. In: Traitement chirurgical de l’hallux valgus.
Table ronde / B. Valtin // Chir. Orthop. Masson. – 1997. – N 83. – P. 34–35.208. Valtin, B. Quelle osteotomie pour quell hallux valgus? Table ronde sur «Lesosteotomies de premier metatarsien dans le traitement chirurgical de l’hallux valgus» / B.Valtin // Chir. Pied. Expansion Scientifiq ue Francaise. – 1994. – Vol. 10 (2). – P. 121–128.209. Van Enoo, R. E.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
