Диссертация (1173950), страница 47
Текст из файла (страница 47)
Pedone. – 3rd ed. 1997. – 664 p.315.Comprendre l’ OMC: док. ВТО [Electronic resource] // WTO[Officialwebsite].URL:http://www.wto.org/french/thewto_f/whatis_f/tif_f/understanding_f.pdf;225URL:http://www.wto.org/french/thewto_f/whatis_f/tif_f/fact2_f.htm#seebox.316.Cottier, T., Oesch, M. International Trade Regulation: Law and Policyin the WTO, the European Union and Switzerland: Cases, Materials andComments. – Berne : Staempfli Publishers, 2005.
– 1072 p.317.Cottier, T. The Challenge of the WTO Law: Collected Essays. –London : Cameron May, 2006. – 615 p.318.Crawford, J. The international law Commission’s articles on stateresponsibility: introduction, text and commentaries. – Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2002. – 387 p.319.Crawford, J. Chance, Order, Change: The Course of InternationalLaw, General Course on Public International Law. Hague Academy ofinternational law. 2004.
– 540 p.320.De Minstral, A., Winter, J. Giving direct effect to NAFTA. – Canada :The Institute for Research on Public Policy, 2004. – 200 p.321.Dordi, C. The Absence of Direct Effect of WTO in the EC and inother countries. – Torino : Giappichelli, 2010. – 414 p.322.Eaglton, C.
International Government. – New York, 1957. – 665 p.323.Evans, G. Lawmaking under the trade constitution: a study inlegislating by the World Trade Organization. – The Hague; Boston : KluwerLaw International. – 2000. – Vol. 14. – 282 p.324.Gray, J. The nature and sources of the law. 2nd ed. / R. Gray (ed.). –New York : MacMillan, 1921. – 348 p.325.Hart, H.L. A.
The Concept of Law. – Oxford : Oxford UniversityPress, 1961. – 237 p.326.Helsen, H. Principles of International Law, 1952. – 461 p.327.Higgins, R. Problems and Process: International Law and How WeUse It. – Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1994. – 304 p.328.Hobe, S. Der offene Verfassungsstaat zwischen Souveränität undInterdependenz: Eine Studie zur Wandlung des Staatsbegriffs der226deutschsprachigen Staatslehre im Kontext internationaler institutionalisierterKooperation. – Berlin.
1998. – 512 p.329.Howse, R. Adjudicating Legitimacy and Treaty Interpretation inInternational Trade Law: The Early Years of WTO Jurisprudence /J.H.H.Weiler (ed.). The EU, the WTO and the NAFTA: Towards a CommonLaw of International Trade. – Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2000. – 258p.330.Howse, R. The WTO system: law, politics and legitimacy.
2007. –320 p.331.Iwasawa, Y. International Law, Human Rights and Japanese Law:The Impact of International Law on Japanese Law. – Oxford : ClarendonPress, 1998. – 355 p.332.Jackson, J.H. Legal Problems of International Economic Relations:Cases, Materials And Text on The National and International Regulation ofTransnational Economic Relations. – St.
Paul, Minn. : West Group. – 4th ed.2002. – 1338 p.333.Jackson, J.H. The World Trading System: Law and Policy ofInternational Economic Relations. – 2nd ed. – Cambridge : MassachusettsMIT Press, 1997. – 453 p.334.Jackson, J.H., Davey, W.J., Sykes, A.O. International EconomicRelations: Cases, Materials and Text on the National and InternationalRegulation of Transnational Economic Relations.
St. Paul, Minn. : West. –6th ed. 2013. – 1338 p.335.Jackson, J.H. The World Trade Organization: Constitution andJurisprudence. Routledge, 1998. – 128 p.336.Jacobs, F.G., Roberts, S. The effect of Treaties in Domestic Law.London : Sweet and Maxwell, 1987. – 288 p.337.Koivurova, T. Introduction to International Environmental Law.Routledge, 2004. – 218 p.338.227Martinez del Aguila, S.
La posibilidad de invocar los acuerdos de laOMC frente al juez peruano: una via para revisar las medidas de laadministracion publica. Bachelor Thesis. 2013. – 227 p.339.Mavroidis, P.C., Bermann, G.A., Wu, M. The Law of the WTO,Documents, Cases and Analysis. – Minnesota : West Publishing, Eagan,2010. – 1345 p.340.McRae, D. The Contribution of International Trade Law to theDevelopment of International Law // Recueil des Cours.
– 1996. – Vol. 260.– 416 p.341.Mitchell, A.D. Legal Principles in WTO Disputes. – Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2008. – 364 p.342.Oppenheim, L. International Law: A Treatise. – 3rd ed. / R.F.Roxburgh. – London, Longmans, 1920. – 799 p.343.Pauwelyn, J. Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: HowWTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law. – Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 554 p.344.Petersmann, E.-U.
International Trade Law and the GATT/WTODispute Settlement System 1948-1996: An Introduction, International TradeLaw and the GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement System. – London : KluwerLaw International, 1997. – 718 p.345.Qureshi, A.H. The World Trade Organization: implementinginternational trade norms. – Manchester, New York : Manchester UniversityPress. – 260 p.346.Sinclair, I. The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. 2nd ed. –Manchester : Manchester University Press, 1984.
– 268 p.347.Shaw, M. International law. 6th ed. – Cambridge : CambridgeUniversity Press, 2008. – 1542 p.348.Thürer, D., Aubert, J.-F., Müller, J.-P. (Hrsg.). Verfassungsrecht derSchweiz. – Zürich, 2001. – 1479 p.349.228Tomer, B. International Governance in the WTO: Judicial Boundariesand Political Capitulation. – London : Cameron and May, 2004. – 352 p.350.Trading into the Future: WTO, The World Trade Organization. – 2nded. – Geneva : WTO, 1998. – 69 p.351.Trebilcock, M.J., Howse, R. The Regulation of International Trade.
–2nd ed. – London and New York, Routledge. 1999. – 632 p.352.Triepel, H. Völkerrecht, Landesrecht. – Leipzig. 1899. – 111 p.353.Van den Bossche, P., Zdouc, W. The Law and Policy of the WorldTrade Organization. – 3rd ed. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press,2013. – 1112 p.354.WTO accessions and trade multilateralism: Case Studies and Lessonsfrom the WTO at Twenty / U. Dadush, C. Osakwe. – Cambridge :Cambridge University Press, 2015.
– 1010 p.355.WTO Analytical Index – Guide to WTO Law and Practice. – 3rd ed. 2Volume set. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2012. – 2340 p.356.WTO Appellate Body Repertory of Reports and Awards 1995–2013.– 5th ed. 2 Volume set. – Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2014.
–2192 p.357.WTO – Technical Barriers and SPS Measures // Wolfrum R., Stoll P.-T., Seibert-Fohr A. (ed.). Max Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law. –1st ed. – 2007. – Vol. 3. – Leiden, Boston. – 568 p.358.Wu, Chia-Sheng. The analysis of the relationships betweeninternational law and domestic law, 1998.359.Zandavali, M.F. O Juiz Brasileiro e as Normas da OMC: o caso daimportação de automóveis usados. Dissertação.
– Sao Paulo, 2008. – 106 p.Статьи и иные публикации360.Antoniadis, A. WTO law and the EU: a Nexus of Reactive, Coactiveand Proactive Approaches // World Trade Review. – 2007. – Vol. 6, N.1. –P. 45–87.361.229Arcuri, A., Poli, S. What Price for the Community Enforcement ofWTO Law? // EUI Working Papers LAW 2010/01. – 2010. – P. 1–38.362.Barcelo, J.J.
The Paradox of Excluding WTO Direct and IndirectEffect // Cornell Law Faculty Publications. – 2006. – P. 147–172.363.Bartels, L. Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings// Journal of World trade. – 2001. – Vol. 35. – P. 499–519.364.Bhuiyan. Mandatory and discretionary legislation: the continuedrelevance of the distinction under the WTO // Journal of InternationalEconomic Law. – 2002. – Vol. 5, N 3. – P.571–604.365.Bleckmann, A. Das Verhältnis des Völkerrechts zum Landesrecht imLichte der «Bedingungstheorie» // Archiv des Völkerrechts.
– 1979. – Vol.18, N 3. – P. 257–283.366.Brandon, E. Does International Law Mean Anything in CanadianCourts? // Journal of environmental law and practice. – 2001. – Vol. 11, N 3.– P. 397–443.367.Bronckers, M., Van den Broek, N. Financial Compensations in theWTO: Improving Remedies of WTO Dispute Settlement // Journal ofInternational Economic Law. – 2005. – Vol. 8, N 1. – P. 101–126.368.Buergenthal, T. Self – Executing and Non – Self-Executing Treatiesin National and International Law // Recueil des Cours de l'Academie deDroit International.
– 2002. – Vol. 235. – P. 303–400.369.Bush, M.L., Reinhardt, E. Testing International Trade Law: EmpiricalStudies of GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement / D.M. Kennedy, J.D. Southwick(ed.). The Political Economy of International Trade Law: Essays in Honor ofRobert E. Hudec. – New York, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press. –P. 457–481.370.Cassese, S. Shrimps, Turtles and Procedure: Global Standards forNational Administrations // New York University School of Law, Institutefor International Law and Justice Working Paper. – 2004.
– N 4. – P. 1–23.371.230Charnovitz, S. Mapping the law of WTO accession. WTO AT TEN:GOVERNANCE,DISPUTESETTLEMENTANDDEVELOPINGCOUNTRIES // M.E. Janow, V. Donaldson, A. Yanovich (eds.). JurisPublishing, Inc., Forthcoming; GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 237;GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 237. – P. 855–920.372.Charnovitz, S. The WTO and the Rights of the individual // Inter-economics. – 2001. – P. 98–108.373.Cottier, T., Oesch, M. WTO Law, Precedents and Legal Change //Turku Law Journal. – 2001. – Vol. 3.
– P. 27–41.374.Cottier, T., Schefer, K. The Relationship Between World TradeOrganization Law, National Law and Regional Law // Journal ofInternational Economic Law. – 1998. – Vol. 1. – P. 83–122.375.Coyle, J. Incorporative Statutes and the Borrowed Treaty Rule //Virginia Journal of International Law. – 2010. – Vol. 50. – P. 655–717.376.Delimatsis, P. Transparency in the WTO Decision-Making // TILECDiscussion Paper N 2012-006. – P. 1–20.377.Desmedt, A. L’Accès des particuliers aux droits et obligations del’OMC dans la CE // Revue de Droit Commercial (Editions Kluwer). 2003.– P.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
