диссертация (1169638), страница 51
Текст из файла (страница 51)
Т. 4: Россия и современный мир:272экономика и право. В 2 ч. Ч. 2. / под общ. ред. А.В. Мальгина; [науч. ред.:М.Л. Энтин и др.]; / МГИМО МИД РФ, РАМИ. – Москва: МГИМОУниверситет. – С. 257–266.143. Ястребова А.Ю. Международно-правовая защита беженцев: дис.… канд. юрид. наук: 12.00.10. / Ястребова Алла Юрьевна; МГУ им.М.В.Ломоносова – Москва, 1991 г. – 234 с.144. ЯстребоваА.Ю.Международно-правовыемеханизмырегулирования миграции: доктринальные подходы и опыт РоссийскойФедерации: Дис.
… док. юрид. наук: 12.00.10. / Ястребова Алла Юрьевна. –Москва, 2018. – 580 с.145. Ястребова А.Ю. Соотношение прав индивида и прав государствав сфере миграции / А.Ю.Ястребова // Многосторонние институты идиалоговые форматы: материалы IX Конвента РАМИ (Москва, 27–28 октября2015 г.) / под ред. А.В. Мальгина / МГИМО МИД России, РАМИ – Москва:МГИМО-Университет, 2016 – С. 324–330.146.
At the EU+ level, data indicate a varying level of divergence indecision practices for applicants from selected countries of origin, Annual reporton the situation of asylum in the EU 2016, EASO 30.06.2017. URL:http://publications.europa.eu/webpub/easo/annual-report-2016/en/# (access date:15 May 2018)147. Byrne R. Harmonization and Burden Redistribution in the TwoEuropes. / R. Byrne // Journal of Refugee Studies. – 2003 – Vol.
16. № 3. – P.336–358.148. C. Costello. The Asylum Procedures Directive and the Proliferation ofSafe Country Practices: Deterrence, Deflection and the Dismantling ofInternational Protection? / Costello C. // European Journal of Migration and Law.– 2005. – Vol. 7. № 1. – P. 35–70.149. Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EuropeanUnion – PROTOCOLS – Protocol (№ 3) on the statute of the Court of Justice ofthe European Union OJ C 115, 9.5.2008, P.
210–229. [Электронный ресурс]273URL:https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2008-09/statut_2008-09-25_17-29-58_783.pdf (access date: 25 May 2018)150. COURTMANAGEMENTOFJUSTICEREPORT2016OFTHEEUROPEAN[Электронныйресурс]UNIONURL:https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201706/rapport_gestion_2016_en_.pdf (access date: 25 May 2018)151. Dowd R.and McAdam J.International Cooperation andResponsibility-Sharing to Protect Refugees: What, Why, and How? / R. Dowd andJ.
McAdam // International and Comparative Law Quarterly. – 2017. – Vol. 66, №4. – P. 863–892.152. Dziedzic L. Reforming the Common European Asylum System/ L.Dziedzic // The New European Refugee Law. // European Journal of Migration andLaw. – 2016. – Vol. 18, Issue 4. – P. 481–485.153. Garlick M. V. International Protection in Court: The AsylumJurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the EU and UNHCR / M. V. Garlick //Refugee Survey Quarterly. – 2015.
– Vol. 34, № 1. – P. 107–130.154. Garlick M. V. The Common European Asylum System and theEuropean Court of Justice. New jurisdiction and new challenges / M. V. Garlick //The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice ten years on successes and futurechallenges under the Stockholm Programme – Brussels, Centre for EuropeanPolicy Studies (CEPS) – 2010. – P. 49–63. [Электронный ресурс] URL:http://aei.pitt.edu/32646/1/69._The_Area_of_Freedom,_Security_and_Justice_ten_years_on.pdf (date of access: 03.06.2018)155.
Gilbert J. On the history of the international protection of refugees / J.Gilbert // IRRC – 2001. Vol. 83 № 843 P. 727–737. [Электронный ресурс] URL:https://www.icrc.org/ara/assets/files/other/727_738_jaeger.pdf (date of access:18.05.2018)156. Guild E. The Complex Relationship of Asylum and Border Controlsin the European Union // Reforming the Common European Asylum System. The274New European Refugee Law. Edited by Vincent Chetail, Philippe De Bruycker andFrancesco Maiani. Brill | Nijhoff. – 2016. – P. 39–54157.
Ippolito F., Velluti S. The Recast Process of the EU Asylum System:A Balancing Act Between Efficiency and Fairness / F. Ippolito, S. Velluti// Refugee Survey Quarterly. – 2011. – Vol. 30, № 3. – P. 24–62.158. J. Poon Non-Refoulement Obligations in EU Third CountryAgreements[Электронныйресурс]/PoonJ.//EDALURL:http://www.asylumlawdatabase.eu/en/journal/non-refoulement-obligations-euthird-country-agreements (access date: 30 May 2018)159. Juss S. S. The Post-Colonial Refugee, Dublin II, and the End of NonRefoulement / S.
S. Juss // International Journal on Minority and Group Rights. –2013 – Vol. 20, № 2. – P. 307–335.160. JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION MANAGEMENT REPORT2016[Электронныйресурс]URL:https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/201606/rapport_gestion_2015_en_version_web.pdf (access date: 25 May 2018)161. Kaunert C., Leonard S. The European Union Asylum Policy after theTreaty of Lisbon and the Stockholm Programme: Towards SupranationalGovernance in a Common Area of Protection? / C.
Kaunert, S. Leonard // RefugeeSurvey Quarterly. – 2012. – Vol. 31, №. 4. – P. 1–20. [Электронный ресурс]URL:https://academic.oup.com/rsq/article/31/4/1/1572616(dateofaccess:18.05.2018)162. Lambert H. (eds) The Global Reach of European Refugee Law / H.Lambert, J. McAdam and M. Fullerton (eds) // International & Comparative LawQuarterly. – 2014. – Vol.
63. №. 4.– P.1001–1003.163. Lavenex S. ‘Failing Forward’ Towards Which Europe? OrganizedHypocrisy in the Common European Asylum System. JCMS. – 2018. – Vol. 56. –№.5. P. 1195–1212.275164. McAdam J. Regionalizing International Refugee Law in the EuropeanUnion: Democratic Revision or Revisionist Democracy? / J.
McAdam // VictoriaUniversity of Wellington Law Review. – 2007. – Vol. 38, №. 2. – 255–280.165. McAdam J. The European Union Qualification Directive: TheCreation of a Subsidiary Protection Regime / J. McAdam // International Journal ofRefugee Law. – 2005. – Vol. 17, № 3. – P.
461–516.166. Morgades-Gil S. The Right to Benefit from an Effective RemedyagainstDecisionsImplyingtheReturnofAsylum-seekerstoEuropean Safe Countries. Changes in the Right to Appeal in the Context of theEuropean Union’s Dublin System Vis-a-vis International and European Standardsof Human Rights / S. Morgades-Gil // European Journal of Migration and Law. –2017. – Vol. 19, № 3. – P. 255–280.167. Schmälter J. A European response to non-compliance: TheCommission’s enforcement efforts and the Common European Asylum System.West European Politics.
– 2018 – P. 1– 24168. Servent A. R. A New Form of Delegation in EU Asylum: Agencies asProxies of Strong Regulators. JCMS. – 2018. – Vol. 56. № 1. P. 83– 100.169. Thielemann R. Between Interests and Norms: Explaining BurdenSharing in the European Union / R. Thielemann // Journal of Refugee Studies. –2003. – Vol. 16, № 3. – P. 253–273.170. Thym D. The Schengen Law: A Challenge for Legal Accountability inthe European Union. European Law Journal. – 2002 – Vol. 8, № 2.
– P. 218– 245.171. Werner B. Why is the Court of Justice of the European Union notmore Contested? Three Mechanisms of Opposition Abatement / B. Werner //JCMS. – 2016. – Vol. 54, № 6 – P. 1449–1464.172. Young S. C. Dublin IV and EXCOM: Aspirational Blunders andIllusive Solidarity / S. C. Young // European Journal of Migration and Law.
–2017. – Vol. 19, № 4. – P. 370–395.276Судебная практикаРешения Суда ЕС:173. H.I.D.ипротивB.A.Комиссарапоходатайствамопредоставлении статуса беженца и др. (Ирландия) (H.I.D. and B.A. v. RefugeeApplications Commissioner and Others (Ireland)), C-175/11, Решение от 31января 2013 г.174. J. N. v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, Case C-601/15 PPU,Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 15 February 2016 [Электронныйресурс]URL:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62015CJ0601 (access date: 27 May 2018)175. Judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-643/15, C-647/15Slovakia v Council, Court of Justice of the European Union, [Электронныйресурс]PRESSRELEASE№91/2017,6September2017URL:https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-12/cp140180en.pdf(access date: 30 May 2018)176.
N.S.противГосударственногосекретаряМинистерствавнутренних дел (Великобритания) и М.Е. и др. против Комиссара походатайствам о предоставлении статуса беженцев и Министра по вопросамюстиции, равенства и правовой реформы (Ирландия) (N.S. v. Secretary ofState for the Home Department (United Kingdom) and M.E. and Others v. RefugeeApplications Commissioner & Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform(Ireland)), Объединенные дела C-411/10 и C-493/10, Решение [БП] от 21декабря 2011 г.177. Брахим Самба Диуф против Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi et del’Immigration (Люксембург) (Brahim Samba Diouf v.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
