Диссертация (1147439), страница 39
Текст из файла (страница 39)
136–157.287. Scherer K.R. Ways to study the nature and frequency of our daily emotions: replyto the commentaries on “Emotions in everyday life” // Soc. Sci. Inf. 2004b. Т. 43.№ 4. С. 667–689.288. Scherer K.R. What are emotions? And how can they be measured? // Soc. Sci. Inf.2005. Т. 44. № 4. С. 695–729.289. Scherer K.R., Dan E., Flykt A. What determines a feeling’s position in affectivespace? A case for appraisal // Cogn. Emot. 2006. Т. 20. № 1.
С. 92–113.290. Schwartz B.L. Sources of information in metamemory : Judgments of learning andfeelings of knowing // Psychon. Bull. Rev. 1994. Т. 1. № 3. С. 357–375.291. Schwartz B.L., Metcalfe J. Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhancesfeeling-of-knowing judgments. // J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1992. Т. 18.№ 5. С. 1074–83.292. Schwartz R. Visual Versions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006.293. Schwarz N. Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions ofaffective states // Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of socialbehavior / под ред. R.
Sorrentino, E.T. Higgins. New York, NY: Guilford Press,1990. Вып. 2. С. 527–561.294. Schwarz N., Clore G.L. Mood, Misattribution, and Judgments of Weil-Being:Informative and Directive Functions of Affective States // J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.1983. Т. 45. № 3. С. 513–523.295. Schwarz N., Clore G.L. Mood as Information: 20 Years Later // Psychol. Inq.2003. Т. 14. № 3. С. 296–303.296. Seamon J.G. и др. The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effectsof stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition andaffect judgments // J. Exp. Psychol.
Learn. Mem. Cogn. 1995. Т. 21. С. 711–721.297. Seely J., Chow C. Role of mutual inhibition in binocular rivalry // J. Neurophysiol.2011. Т. 4. № 2007. С. 2136–2150.208298. Selfridge O.G. Pandemonium: A paradigm for learning // Symposium on themechanization of thought processes. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office,1959. С. 513–526.299. Selfridge O.G., Neisser U. Pattern Recognition by Machine // Sci. Am. 1960. Т.203.
№ 2. С. 60–68.300. Shah A.K., Oppenheimer D.M. Heuristics made easy: an effort-reductionframework. // Psychol. Bull. 2008. Т. 134. № 2. С. 207–22.301. Shalgi S., Deouell L.Y. Is any awareness necessary for an Ne? // Front. Hum.Neurosci. 2012. Т. 6. № May. С. 124.302. Slovic P. и др. The affect heuristic // Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007. Т. 177. № 3. С.1333–1352.303. Smith C. a, Ellsworth P.C. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. // J. Pers.Soc. Psychol.
1985. Т. 48. № 4. С. 813–38.304. Smith G.F., Dorfman D.D. The effect of stimulus uncertainty on the relationshipbetween frequency of exposure and liking. // J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1975. Т. 31. №1. С. 150–155.305. Smith G.J.W., Carlsson I. Subjective prerequisites for the construction of anobjective world // Conscious. Emot.
Agency, Conscious Choice, Sel. Percept.2005.306. Stemmer B. и др. Error detection in patients with lesions to the medial prefrontalcortex: an ERP study // Neuropsychologia. 2004. Т. 42. № 1. С. 118–130.307. Steup M. Epistemology // The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy / под ред.E.N. Zalta. , 2013. Вып. Winter 201.308. Storbeck J., Clore G.L. On the interdependence of cognition and emotion. // Cogn.Emot. 2007. Т. 21. № 6. С. 1212–1237.309. Storbeck J., Clore G.L.
The Affective Regulation of Cognitive Priming // Emotion.2008. Т. 8. № 2. С. 208 –215.310. Thomas N.J.T. Are Theories of Imagery Theories of Imagination? An ActivePerception Approach to Conscious Mental Content // Cogn. Sci. 1999. Т. 23. № 2.С. 207–245.209311. Thomaz C.E., Giraldi G.A. A new ranking method for Principal ComponentsAnalysis and its application to face image analysis // Image Vis. Comput.
2010. Т.28. № 6. С. 902–913.312. Thompson V. Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective // two mindsDual Process. beyond. 2009a.313. Thompson V. Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective // In two minds:dual processes and beyond / под ред. J. Evans, K.
Frankish. Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press., 2009b. С. 171–195.314. Thompson V., Morsanyi K. Analytic thinking: do you feel like it? // Mind Soc.2012. Т. 11. № 1. С. 93–105.315. Tinio P.P.L., Leder H. Natural scenes are indeed preferred, but image qualitymight have the last word. // Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat.
Arts. 2009a. Т. 3. № 1. С.52–56.316. Tinio P.P.L., Leder H. Just how stable are stable aesthetic features? Symmetry,complexity, and the jaws of massive familiarization. // Acta Psychol. (Amst).2009b. Т. 130. № 3. С. 241–50.317. Tinio P.P.L., Leder H., Strasser M. Image quality and the aesthetic judgment ofphotographs: Contrast, sharpness, and grain teased apart and put together. //Psychol. Aesthetics, Creat. Arts. 2011. Т. 5. № 2.
С. 165–176.318. Titchener E.B. A text-book of psychology. New York: The MacMillan Company,1928.319. Topolinski S., Reber R. Gaining Insight Into the “Aha” Experience // Curr. Dir.Psychol. Sci. 2010. Т. 19. № 6. С. 402–405.320. Topolinski S., Strack F. Scanning the “Fringe” of consciousness: what is felt andwhat is not felt in intuitions about semantic coherence. // Conscious. Cogn. 2009a.Т. 18. № 3. С. 608–18.321. Topolinski S., Strack F. The analysis of intuition: Processing fluency and affect injudgements of semantic coherence // Cogn. Emot. 2009b. Т. 23. № 8. С.
1465–1503.210322. Torngren G., Montgomery H. Worse Than Chance? Performance and ConfidenceAmong Professionals and Laypeople in the Stock Market // J. Behav. Financ. 2004.Т. 5. № 3. С. 148–153.323. Trainor L.J., Tsang C.D., Cheung V.H.W. Preference for Sensory Consonance in2- and 4-Month-Old Infants // Music Percept. 2002. Т. 20. № 2. С. 187–194.324. Tsukiura T., Cabeza R. Remembering beauty: roles of orbitofrontal andhippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces. //Neuroimage. 2011.
Т. 54. № 1. С. 653–60.325. Unkelbach C. и др. Why positive information is processed faster: the densityhypothesis. // J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2008. Т. 95. № 1. С. 36–49.326. Veling H., Holland R.W., Knippenberg A. van. When approach motivation andbehavioral inhibition collide: Behavior regulation through stimulus devaluation //J. Exp. Soc.
Psychol. 2008. Т. 44. № 4. С. 1013–1019.327. Vickers D. Evidence for an accumulator model of psychophysical discrimination.// Ergonomics. 1970. Т. 13. № 1. С. 37–58.328. Vickers D. Where does the balance of evidence lie with respect to confidence //Proceedings of the seventeenth annual meeting of the international society forpsychophysics. , 2001. С. 148–153.329. Vos P.G. Theories of visual perception.
New York: Psychonomic Society, 2004.330. Vuust P., Frith C.D. Anticipation is the key to understanding music and the effectsof music on emotion // Behav. Brain Sci. 2008. Т. 31. № 05. С. 599–600.331. Vuust P., Kringelbach M.L. The Pleasure of Making Sense of Music // Interdiscip.Sci.
Rev. 2010. Т. 35. № 2. С. 166–182.332. Warren W. Direct perception: The view from here // Philos. Top. 2005. Т. 33. № 1.С. 335–361.333. Weaver I.C.A., Kelemen W.L. Comparing processing-based, stimulus-based, andsubject-based factors in metacognition // Metacognition / под ред. P. Chambres,M. Izaute, P.-J. Marescaux. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 2002. С. 49–60.334. Wessel J.R. Error awareness and the error-related negativity: evaluating the firstdecade of evidence. // Front. Hum. Neurosci.
2012. Т. 6. № April. С. 88.211335. Whittlesea B.W.A. Illusions of familiarity. // J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn.1993. Т. 19. № 6. С. 1235–1253.336. Whittlesea B.W.A., Leboe J.P. Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart)// J. Mem. Lang. 2003. Т. 49. № 1.
С. 62–79.337. Willems S., Linden M. Van der. Mere exposure effect: A consequence of directand indirect fluency-preference links. // Conscious. Cogn. 2006. Т. 15. № 2. С.323–41.338. Willems S., Linden M. van der, Bastin C. The contribution of processing fluencyto preference: A comparison with familiarity-based recognition // Eur. J. Cogn.Psychol. 2007. Т. 19. № 1. С. 119–140.339. Wilson W.R.
Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning //J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1979. Т. 37. № 6. С. 811–821.340. Winkielman P. и др. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. //Psychol. Sci. 2006. Т. 17. № 9. С. 799–806.341. Winkielman P., Berridge K.C., Wilbarger J.L. Unconscious affective reactions tomasked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behavior and judgmentsof value. // Personal. Soc. Psychol.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
