Диссертация (1147122), страница 65
Текст из файла (страница 65)
The authoritarian personality, 50 years later. What lessons are there forPolitical Psychology? // Political Psychology. 2001. Vol.22. pp. 1-26.115.Maslow A. The authoritarian character structure // The Journal of Social Psychology.S.P.S.S.I. Bulletin. 1943. Vol.18. pp. 401-411.116.McCann S. Threatening times and fluctuations in American church memberships //Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin.
1999. Vol.25. pp. 325-336.117.McCloskey H., Chong D. Similarities and differences between left-wing and right-wingradicals // British Journal of Political Science. 1985. Vol.15. pp. 329-363.118.McCourt K., Bouchard T., Lykken D., Tellegen A., Keyes M. Authoritarianismrevisited: genetic and environmental influences examined in twins reared apart and together //Personality and Individual Differences. 1999. Vol.27. pp. 985-1014.119.McFarland S., Ageyev V., Abalkina M. The authoritarian personality in the UnitedStates and the Former Soviet Union: comparative studies // Stone W.F., Lederer G., Christie R.Strength and weakness: the authoritarian personality today. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993.pp.199-228.120.McFarland S., Ageyev V., Djintcharadze N.
Russian authoritarianism two years aftercommunism // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996. Vol.1. pp. 210-217.244121.McFarland S.G., Ageev V.S., Abalkina-Paap M.A. Authoritarianism in the FormerSoviet Union // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992. Vol.63 (6). pp. 1004-1010.122.McHoskey J.W. Case closed? On the John F.
Kennedy assassination: biasedassimilation of evidence and attitude polarization // Basic and Applied Social Psychology.1995. Vol.17. No.3. pp. 395-409.123.McKee I., Feather N. Vengeance and authoritarianism: the pattern of motivationalvalues underlying punitive personality types and punishment goals // Australian Journal ofPsychology. 2003. Vol.55. p.53124.Mehrabian A., Kisionsky S. Model for affiliative and conformity behavior //Psychological Bulletin. Vol.74. pp.
110-126.125.Merton R. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free press, 1957. 489 p.126.Miller A. Political issue and trust in government: 1964-1970 // American PoliticalScience Review. 1974. Vol.68. pp. 951-972.127.Mishler W., Rose R. Political support for incomplete democracies: realist vs idealisttheories and measures // International Political Science Review. 2001. Vol. 22 (4) pp.
303-320.128.Mishler W., Willerton J. The dynamic of presidential popularity in post-communistRussia: cultural imperative versus neo-institutional choice // Journal of Politics. 2003. Vol.65.No.1. pp. 111-141.129.Mockabee S. A question of authority: religion and cultural conflict in the 2004 Election// Political Behavior. 2007.
Vol.29. pp. 221-248.130.Muller E.N., Jukam T.O. On the meaning of political support // American PoliticalScience Review. 1977. Vol.71. pp. 1561-1595.131.Muller E.N., Jukam T.O., Seligson M. Diffuse political support and anti-systempolitical behavior: A comparative analysis // American Journal of Political Science. 1982.Vol.26. pp. 240-264.132.Na E.Y., Loftus E.F. Conservative authoritarianism, attribution and internal - externallocus of control // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology.
1998. Vol.29. pp. 595-615.133.Oesterreich D. Flight into security: a new approach and measure of the authoritarianpersonality // Political Psychology. 2005. Vol.26. No.2. pp. 275-297.134.Olson M. Rapid growth as a destabilizing force // Journal of Economic History. 1963.Vol.23.
No.4. pp.529-552.135.Ommundsen R., Larsen K.S. Attitudes toward illegal aliens: the reliability and validityof a Likert-Type Scale // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1997.Vol.137. pp. 665-667.136.Ossinovsky E.Legitimacy political powerin Putin’s Russia.Availablehttp://www.ut.ee/ABVKeskus/sisu/publikatsioonid/2010/pdf/Ossinovski_MA.pdfat:245137.Oyamot C., Borgida E., Fisher E.
Can values moderate the attitudes of right-wingauthoritarians // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2006. Vol.2. pp. 486-500.138.Pek J., Leong F. Sex-related self-concepts, cognitive styles and cultural values oftraditionality-modernity as predictors of general and domain-specific sexism // Asian Journal ofSocial Psychology.
2003. Vol.6. pp. 31-49.139.Peterson B.E., Doty R.M., Winter D.G. Authoritarianism and attitudes towardcontemporary social issues // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1993. Vol.19.pp. 174-184.140.Peterson B.E., Lane M.D. Implications of authoritarianism for young adulthood:longitudinal analysis of college experiences and future goals // Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin. 2001.
Vol.27. pp. 678-690.141.Peterson B.E., Smirles K.A., Wentworth P.A. Generativity and authoritarianism:implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting // Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology. 1997. Vol.72. pp. 1202-1216.142.Pratto F., Sidanius J. Stallworth L.M., Malle B.F. Social dominance orientation: apersonality variable predicting social and political attitudes // Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology.
1994. Vol.67. No.4. pp. 741-762.143.byPublic opinion in the European Union. This survey has been requested and co-ordinatedtheEuropeanEurobarometerCommission,80.Directorate-GeneralAutumn2013.forCommunication.p.48.AvailableStandardat:http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/eb/eb80/eb80_publ_en.pdf144.Pye L.
Introduction: political culture and political development // Pye L., Verba S.Political culture and political development. Princeton. Princeton University Press, 1965. pp.326.145.Pye L. Political culture / International Encyclopedia of social sciences. London, 1968.Vol.12. pp.218-225.146.Pye L. Political culture revisited // Political Psychology. 1991. Vol.12.
No.3. pp. 487-508.147.Pye L., Verba S. Political culture and political development. Princeton. PrincetonUniversity Press, 1965. 574 p.148.Railings S., Gustly S., Reike M. A comparative assessment of the construct validity ofthree authoritarianism measures // The Journal of Research in Personality. 1993. Vol.27 (4).pp.
328-348.149.Rigby K. Relationships among three concepts of authoritarianism in adolescentschoolchildren // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1998. Vol.128. pp. 825-832.246150.Rigby K., Metzer J.C., Ray J.J. Working-class authoritarianism in England andAustralia // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1986.
Vol.126. pp. 261-262.151.Rigby K., Rump E. The generality of attitude to authority // Human Relations. 1979.Vol.32. pp. 469-487.152.Rigby T.H., Feher F. (eds) Political legitimation in communist states. London, 1982.177 p.153.Robinson J.P., Shaver P.R., Wrightsman L.S. Measures of personality and socialpsychological attitudes. Academic Press. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers. San DiegiCalifornia, 1991. 753 p.154.Roets A., Van Hiel A., Cornelis L. Does materialism predict racism? Materialism as adistinctive social attitude and a predictor of preju dice // European Journal of Personality.
2006.Vol.20. pp. 155-168.155.Rogowski R. Rational legitimacy: a theory of political support. Prienceton: PriencetonUniversity Press, 1974156.Roiser M., Willing C. The hidden history of authoritarianism // History of the HumanSciences. 1995. Vol.8. No.4. pp. 77-97.157.Rokeach M. Political and religious dogmatism: an alternative to the authoritarianpersonality // Psychological Monographs: General and Applied.
1956. Vol.70. No.18. pp.1-43.158.Rokeach M. The open and closed mind. New York, 1960. 447 p.159.Rokech M. McGovney W.C., Denny M.R., A distinction between dogmatic and rigidthinking // The journal of abnormal and social psychology. 1955. Vol.51. pp. 87-93.160.Rose R. The impact of president Putin on popular support for Russia’s regime // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2007. Vol.23. No.2. pp. 97-117.161.Ross M. Does Oil Hinder Democracy? // World Politics. 2001. Vol.53. No.3. pp. 325-361.162.Rowatt W.C., Franklin L.M., Cotton M. Patterns and personality correlates of implicitand explicit attitudes toward Christians and Muslims // Journal for the Scientific Study ofReligion.
2005. Vol.44. pp. 29-43.163.Rubinstein G. Authoritarianism among border police officers, career soldiers, andairport security guards at the Israeli border // The Journal of Social Psychology. 2006. Vol.146.pp. 751-761.164.Rubinstein G. Two peoples in one land: a validation study of Altemeyer’s Right-Wingauthoritarianism in the Palestinian and Jewish societies in Israel // Journal of Cross-CulturalPsychology. 1996. Vol.27. pp.
216-230.247165.Sakwa R. The dual state in Russia // Post-Soviet Affairs. 2010. Vol.26. No.3. pp. 185-206.166.Sales S. Economic threat as a determinant of conversion rates in authoritarian andnonauthoritarian churches // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1972. Vol.23. №3.pp. 420-428.167.Sales S. Threat as a factor in authoritarianism: an analysis an archival data // Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology. 1973. Vol.28.
No.1. pp. 44-57.168.Samelson F. The authoritarian character from Berlin to Berkeley and beyond: theodyssey of a problem // Stone W.F., Lederer G., Christie R. Strength and weakness: theauthoritarian personality today. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1993. pp. 22-46.169.Sanford R.N. The authoritarian personality in contemporary perspective // Handbook ofPolitical Psychology Knutson J., (ed.). San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1973. pp. 139-170.170.Schachter S., Ellerston N., VcBride D., Gregory D. An experimental study ofcohesiveness and productivity // Human Relations. 1951.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
