Диссертация (1147122), страница 64
Текст из файла (страница 64)
Eurobarometer surveys.Availableat:http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/cf/showchart_column.cfm?keyID=3&nationID=11,1,2,16,13,6,3,4,7,8,9,12,5,14,10,15,&startdate=2004.04&enddate=2004.0452. Fails M., Pierce H. Changing mass attitudes and democratic deepening // Political ResearchQuarterly. 2010. Vol.63. No.1. pp. 174-187.53.
Farris C. «Authoritarianism» as a Political Behavior Variable // The Journal of Politics. 1956.Vol.18. No.1. pp. 61-82.54. Feather N.T. Reactions to penalties for offenses committed by the police and public citizens:testing a social-cognitive process model of retributive justice // Journal of Personality andSocial Psychology. 1998. Vol.75. pp. 528-544.55. Feldman S. Enforcing social conformity: a theory of authoritarianism // Political Psychology.2003. Vol.24.
No.1. pp. 41-74.56. Feldman S., Lavine H., Lodge M., Verhulst B. Seeing negative: authoritarianism and automaticvigilanceforthreateningstimuli.2010.pp.1-29.Availablehttp://mysbfiles.stonybrook.edu/~stfeldma/ISPP%20Authoritarianism_Threat.pdfat:24057. Feldman S., Stenner K. Perceived threat and authoritarianism // Political Psychology. 1997.Vol.18. No.4. pp. 741-770.58. Fidrmuc J. Economic of Voting in Post-Communist Countries // Electoral Studies. 2000.Vol.19. No.2. pp.199-217.59.
Fiorina M.P. «Voting Behavior»: In Perspectives on Public Choice: A Handbook / ed. by D.Mueller. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997. pp. 391-415.60. Fiorina M.P. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: YaleUniversity Press, 198161. Friedman T. The First Law of Petropolitics // Foreign Affairs. 2006. May/June.
pp. 28-36.62. Fuchs D., Klingemann H.D. Citizens and the State: A changing relationship? Available at:http://www.uni-giessen.de/fb03/seminar/online/europa99/text1.htm63. Gabennesch H. Authoritarianism as a world view // American Journal of Sociology. 1972.Vol.75. No.5. pp. 857-875.64. Geddes B., Zaller J. Sources of popular support for authoritarian regimes // American Journalof Political Science. 1989. Vol.33.
pp. 319-347.65. Gilley B. The determinants of state legitimacy: results for 72 countries // International PoliticalScience Review. 2006. Vol.27. No.1. pp. 47-71.66. Goertzel T.G. Authoritarianism and social change in the Soviet Union // The Journal of SocialPsychology. 1989.
Vol.129. pp. 703-705.67. Grafstein R. The failure of Weber’s conception of legitimacy: it’s causes and implications //The Journal of Politics. 1981. Vol.43. No.2. pp. 456-472.68. Greenberg J., Solomon S., Veeder M., Pyszczynski T., Rosenblatt A., Kirkland S., Lyon D.Evidence for terror management theory II: the effects of mortality salience on reactions to thosewho threaten or bolster the cultural worldview // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.1990. Vol.58. pp. 308-318.69.
Greenstein F. Personality and political socialization: the theories of authoritarian anddemocratic character // Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 1965.Vol.361. Political Socialization: Its Role in the Political Process. pp. 81-95.70. Habermas J. Legitimation crisis. London: Heinemann, 1973. 163 p.71. Haerpfer C.W. Support for democracy and autocracy in Russia and the Commonwealth ofindependent states, 1992-2002 // International Political Science Review. 2008. Vol.29.
No.4.pp. 411-431.72. Hamilton V.L., Sanders J., McKearney S. Orientations toward authority in an authoritarianstate: Moscow in 1990 // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1995. Vol.1. pp. 356-365.73. Handbook of Political Science: In 8 Vols. New York. 1975. Vol.3.24174. Hanson S.E. The Leninist legacy, Institutional change and Post-Soviet Russia // Crawford B.,Lijphart A.
(ed) Liberalization and Leninist Legacies: Comparative perspectives on democratictransitions. Berkeley, 1997. pp. 238-252.75. Hastings B., Shaffer B. Authoritarianism: the role of threat, evolutionary psychology and thewill to power // Theory and Psychology.
2008. Vol.6. pp. 423-440.76. Heaven P., Bucci S. Right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and personality:an analysis using the IPIP measure // European Journal of Personality. 2001. Vol.15. pp. 49-56.77. Heaven P.C.L., Greene R.L. African Americans’ stereotypes of Whites: relationships withsocial dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and group identity // The Journal ofSocial Psychology. 2001.
Vol.141. pp. 141-143.78. Herzon F., Kincaid J., Dalton V. Personality and Public Opinion: The Case of authoritarianism,prejudice, and support for the Korean and Vietnam Wars // Polity. 1976. Vol.11. pp. 92-113.79. Hesli V., Bashkirova E. The Impact of Time and Economic Circumstances on PopularEvaluations of Russia's President // International Political Science Review. 2001. Vol.22. No.4.pp.
379-398.80. Hetherington M. The Political Relevance of Political Trust // The American Political ScienceReview. 1998. Vol.92. No.4. pp. 791-808.81. Hetherington M., Weiler J. Authoritarianism and polarization in American politics. New York:Cambridge University Press, 2009. 234 p.82. Hetherington M., Weiler J. Authoritarian disposition and political choice. 2005. Available at:http://www.gvpt.umd.edu/glayman/hetherington_weiler.pdf83. Hogan H.W. German and American authoritarianism, self-estimated intelligence and valuepriorities // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1980. Vol.
111. No.1. pp. 145-146.84. Horkheimer M., Adorno T. Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: The seabury press, 1969.258 p.85. Hyman H.H., Sheatsley P.B. The authoritarian personality: methodological critic // Christie R.,Jahoda F. Studies in the scope and method of «The authoritarian personality»: continuities insocial research. Glencose, IL: Free Press, 1954. pp. 50-122.86. Inglehart R. How Solid is Mass support for Democracy - And How can We Measure It?Available at: http://folk.uio.no/berasch/Inglehart-PS.pdf87. Inglehart R.
Political value orientations // Jennings M.K. Continuities in political action: Alongitudinal study of political orientations in three western democracies. Berlin, 1989. pp.67102.88. Inglehart R., Baker W. Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values// American sociological review. 2000.
Vol.65. pp.19-51.24289. Inkeles A. A model of the modern man: theoretical and methodological issues // ComparativeModernisation / ed. C.E. Black. New York: Free Press, 1976. pp. 320-348.90. Jackson D.N., Messik S.J., Solley S.M. How «rigid» is the «authoritarian» // The Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology. 1957. Vol.54. pp.
132-137.91. Janowitz M., Marvick D. Authoritarianism and political behavior // Public Opinion Quarterly.1953. Vol.17. pp. 185-201.92. Jay M. The dialectical imagination: a history of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of SocialResearch, 1923-1950. Little, Brown and company, 1973. 382 p.93. John L.M. «The Authoritarian Personality» 50 years later: What lessons are there for PoliticalPsychology? // Political Psychology, 2001. Vol.
22, No.1. pp. 1-26.94. Kam C., Kinder D. Terror and ethnocentrism: foundations of American support for the War onTerrorism // Journal of Politics. 2007. Vol.69. pp. 320-338.95. Kavanagh D. Political science and political behavior. London, 1983. 304 p.96. Kemmelmeier M., Burnstein E., Krumov K., Genkova P., Kanagawa C., Hirshberg G.M., EebH.P., Wieczorkowska G., Noels K.A.
Individualism, collectivism and authoritarianism in sevensocieties // Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2003. Vol.34. pp. 304-322.97. Kline P., Cooper C. A factorial analysis of the authoritarian personality // The British Journalof Psychology.
1984. Vol.75. pp. 171-176.98. Knafo A. Authoritarians, the next generation: values and bullying among adolescent children ofauthoritarian fathers // Analyses of Social Issues and public Policy. 2003. Vol.3. No.1. pp. 199204.99. Krauss S.W. Romanian authoritarianism 10 years after communism // Personality and SocialPsychology Bulletin. 2002. Vol.28. pp. 1255-1264.100.Lagos M. A road with no return? // Journal of Democracy. 2003. Vol.14 (2).
pp. 163-173.101.Lane R. Political culture. Residual category or general theory? // Comparative PoliticalStudies. 1992. Vol.25. No.3. pp. 362-387.102.Larsen K., Elder R., Bader M., Dougard C. Authoritarianism and attitudes toward AIDSvictims // The Journal of Social Psychology. 1990. Vol.13. pp. 77-80.103.Levinson D. Authoritarian personality and foreign policy // The Journal of ConflictResolution. 1957. Vol.1.
pp. 37-47.104.Levinson D.J., Sanford R.N. A scale for the measurement of anti-Semitism // TheJournal of Psychology. 1944. Vol.17. pp. 339-370.105.Lewis T.T. Authoritarian attitudes and personalities: a psychohistorical perspective //Psychohistory review. 1990. 18(2). pp.140-167.243106.Lewis-Beck M., Stegmaier M. Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes // AnnualReview of Political Science. 2000. Vol.3. pp.183-219.107.Lilbaka R.
The legitimacy of the political system: the case of Finland. Abo; AboAcademy University Press, 1999. pp. 35-39.108.Linz J., Stepan A. The problems of democratic transition and consolidation. SouthernEurope, South America and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UniversityPress, 1996. 480 p.109.Lippa R.A., Martin L.R., Friedman H.S. Gender-related individual differences andmortality in the term an longitudinal study: is masculinity hazardous to your health? //Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000. Vol.26.
pp. 1560-1570.110.Lipset S. Political Man: The social bases of politics. New York: Doubleday, 1960.432 p.111.Lipset S. The social requisites for democracy revisited: 1993 presidential address // TheAmerican Sociological Review. 1994. Vol.59. №1. pp. 1-22.112.Lipset S.M. Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and politicallegitimacy // American Political Science Review. 1959. Vol.53. No.1. pp.69-105.113.MacKinnon W., Centers R. Authoritarianism and urban stratification // AmericanJournal of Sociology. 1956. Vol.61. No.6. pp. 610-620.114.Martin J.L.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
