Диссертация (1145048), страница 48
Текст из файла (страница 48)
409-418214.Holt L.L., Lotto A.J., Diehl R.L. Auditory discontinuities interact withcategorization: Implications for speech perception // Journal of the acousticalsociety of America. - Vol. 116. - 2004 – P. 1763-1773215.Hubel D.H., Wiesel T.N. Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functionalarchitecture in the cat’s visual cortex.
Journal of Physiology. - V. 160(1). - 1962 –P. 106–154.216.Jager G., Postman A. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical andcoordinatespatialrelations:areviewofthecurrentevidence//Neuropsychologia. - Vol. 41 (4). - 2003. - P. 504-515.217.Jonides J., Gleitman H. A conceptual category effect in vsual search: O asletter or as digit // Perception and Psychophysics. - Vol. 12 (6). -1972.- P. 457 460218.Julez B. Foundations of Cyclopean Perception.
-Cambridge, MA: MITPress.- 2006. – 428 p.219.Kawahara J., Di Lollo V., & Enns J. T. Attentional requirements in visualdetection and identification: evidence from the attentional blink // Journal of283Experimental Psychology: Human Perception andPerformance. – Vol. 27.
–2001. - P. 969-984220.Kaufman L, Kaufman J. Explaining the moon illusion // Proceedings of theNational Academy of Sciences. – Vol.97. – 2000. – P. 500- 505.221.Kaufman L. and Rock, I. "The Moon Illusion: I" // Science. - Vol. 136. -1962.- P.
953-961.222.Kaufman L. and Rock, I. "The Moon Illusion: II" // Science. Vol. 136. – 1962.- P. 1023-1031.223.Kaufman L. and Rock, I. "The Moon Illusion" // Scientific American.- V.207(1).- 1962. - P. 120-130.224.Kay P. Color categories are not arbitrary // Cross-cultural Research.- Vol. 39.-№ 1.- 2000. – P. 39–55.225.Kirpichnikov A., Rozhkova G. Classification of visual illusions treated asnormal percepts evoked in specific conditions // Abstracts of the 34th EuropeanConference on Visual Perception.
Toulouse, France. August 28th – September 1st2011. Perception. 40. (ECVP Abstract Supplement). - 2011. – P. 201.226.Kosslyn S. M. Mental images and the brain // Cognitive Neuropsychology. -Vol. - 22. – 2005. - P. 333–347.227.Kosslyn S.M., Behrmann M., Jeannerod M. The cognitive neuroscience ofmental imagery. Neuropsychologia. –Vol. 33(11). - 1995. – P. 1335–1344228.Kuhl P.K. Human adults and human infants show a “perceptual magnet effect”for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not // Perception andpsychophysics.
- Vol. 50. – 1991. – P.93-107.229.Kunst-Wilson, W. R., & Zajonc, R. B. Affective discrimination of stimuli thatcannot be recognized. // Science. - Vol. 207. - 1980. - P. 557-558.230.Lennie P. The physiological basis of variations in visual latency // VisionResearch. – Vol. 21(6). – 1981. – P. 815–824.231.Levin, D.T., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S.B., & Simons, D.J. Change blindnessblindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability //Visual Cognition. – Vol. 7.
– 2000. - P. 397-412.284232.Liberman. A.M., Harris, K.S. Hoffman, H.S., & Griffith, B.C.Thediscrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries // Journalof Experimental Psychology. - Vol. 54.- 1957. – P. 358 - 368.233.Livingston K., Andrews J., Harnad S. Categorical perception effects inducedby category learning // Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning MemoryCognition.- Vol. 24.
– 1998. – P. 732–753.234.Luce R.A. A treshold theory for simple detecton experiments // PsychologicalReview. – Vol.70 (1). – 1963.-P. 61-79235.Mack, A., & Rock, I. Inattentional blindness. - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1998. – 288 p.236.MacmillanN. A. Beyond the categorical/continuous distinction:Apsychophysical approach to processing modes // Categorical perception: thegroundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad.
- N.Y.: Cambridge University Press,1990. - P. 53–85237.Maki W.S., Frigen K., Paulson K. Associativepriming by targets and distractorsduring rapid serial visual presentation: Does word meaning survive the attentionalblink? // Jornal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.- Vol. 23.
- № 4. – 1997. – P. 1014 – 1034.238.Marr D. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representationand Processing of Visual Information. - New York: Freeman, 1982.239.Marcel, A. J. Conscious and preconscious recognition of polysemous words:Locating the selective effects of prior verbal context. Attention and performanceVIII/ Ed. Nickerson R. S., Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1980. - P. 435-457.240.Marcel, A. J. Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visualmasking and word recognition.
// Cognitive Psychology. - Vol.15. - 1983 - P.197-237.241.Marcel A. J. Perception with and without awareness // Paper presented at themeeting of the Experimental Psychology Society. Stirling, Scotland, 1974.242.McCready D. Size-distance perception and accommodation-convergencemicropsia: A critique // Vision Research. – Vol. 5. – 1965. – P. 189-206.285243.McCready D. On size, distance and visual angle perception // Perception &Psychophysics. -V. 37 (4). - 1985 - P. 323-334.244.McCready, D. Moon illusions redescribed // Perception & Psychophysic. –Vol.
39. -1986.- P. 64-72.245.Merikle P. M., Joordens S. Measuring unconscious influences // ScientificApproaches to Consciousness / Ed. J. D. Cohen & J. W. Schooler. Mahwah - NJ:Erlbaum, 1997. – P. 109-123.246.Merikle, P.M., Daneman M. Psychological investigations of unconsciousperception // Journal of Consciousness Studies.
-Vol. 5. - 1998. - P. 5-18.247.McCullough S., Emmorey K. Categorical perception of affective and linguisticfacial expressions // Cognition. – Vol. 110. - № 2.- 2009.- P. 208–221248.McCauley, C., Parmelee, C. M., Sperber, C. D., & Carr, T. H. Early extractionof meaning from pictures and its relation to conscious identification.
// Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. - Vol. 6. - 1980. P. 265-276.249.Miller, G. A., Bruner, J. S., & Postman, L. Familiarity of letter sequences andtachistoscopic identification // Journal of General Psychology.
– Vol. 50. - 1954. P. 129-139250.Miller J. D., Wier C. C., Pastore R. E., Kelly W. J., Dooling R. J.Discrimination and labeling of noise-buzz sequences with varying noise-leadtimes: An example of categorical perception // Journal of the Acoustical Societyof America. - Vol. 60 (2). - 1976. - P. 410–417.251.Milner D., Goodale M. Visual brain in action. - Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress, 1995. – 248 p.252.Murphy, S. T., & Zajonc, R. B. (1993).
Affect, cognition, and awareness:Affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. // Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology. - Vol. 64. - 1980. - P.723-739.253.Newell F.N., Bulthoff H.H. Categorical perception of familiar objects //Cognition. - Vol. 85. - 2002. – P. 113–143.286254.Newell A., and Simon H. A.
Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbolsand search. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. - Vol.19(3). - 1976. – P. 113-126.255.Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburghinventory. Neuropsychologia.-Vol. 9(1).- 1971.
– P. 97–113.256.Oliva A., Torralba A.Modeling the shape of the scene: a holisticrepresentation of the spatial envelope // International Journal of Computer Vision.- Vol. 42(3) – 2001. – P. 145-175.257.Torralba A., Oliva A.Statistics of natural image categories // Network:computation in neural systems. - Vol. 14. – 2003.- P. 391-412.258.Paramei G. V. Singing the Russian blues: an argument for culturally basiccolor terms // Cross-cultural Research. - Vol. 39 (1).- 2005.
– P.10–38.259.Pashler H. The Psychology of Attention. – Cambridge: MA: MIT Press, 1998.260.Pastore R. E. Categorical perception: some psychophysical models //Categorical perception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. N.Y:Cambridge University Press, 1990 – P. 29–52.261.Plaunt D.C. Semantic and Associative Priming in a Distributed Attractor Network// Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Hillsdaile.
- NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005. – P. 39-42262.Posner M.I. Chronometricexplorations of mind. - Hillstade, 1978. - 242 p.263.Potter, M. C., Staub, A., O'Connor, D. H.Pictorial and conceptualrepresentation of glimpsed pictures.// Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Perception and Performance. – Vol. 30. – 2004. – P. 478-489.264.Proffitt D.R., Creem S.H. Separate memories for visual guidance and explicitawareness // In: B.N. Challis, B.M. Velichkovsky (Eds.). Stratification incognition and consciousness. - Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1999 – 293 p.265.Proudfoot K. An autostereogram decoder. 2003 [Электронный ресурс] //http://graphics.stanford.edu/~kekoa/talks/gcafe-20030417/287266.Pylyshyn Z.
Is vision continuous with cognition? The case for Cognitiveimpenetrability of visual perception. // Behavioral and Brain Sciences. – Vol. 22(3). -1999. – P. 341-423267.Repp B. H., Liberman A. M. Phonetic categories are flexible // Categoricalperception: the groundwork of cognition / Ed. S. Harnad. - N.Y.: CambridgeUniversity Press, 1990. – P. 89–112.268.Rensink R.A. Seeing seeing // Psyche.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
