Диссертация (1140938), страница 16
Текст из файла (страница 16)
Miller, D. Sinha et al. // ClinicalGastroenterology and Hepatology: The Official Clinical Practice Journal ofthe American Gastroenterological Association. — 2007. — Vol. 5 — №5. —P. 616–623.127. Gregory, F.A. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knifepapillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy / F.A. Gregory //Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. — 1995. — Vol. 41.
— №1. — P. 25–32.128. Griffin, N. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopicretrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis /N. Griffin, M.L. Wastle, W.K. Dunn et al. // European Journal ofGastroenterology & Hepatology. — 2003 — Vol. 15. — №7 — P. 809–813.109129.
Gurusamy, K.S. Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis ofcommon bile duct stones / K.S. Gurusamy, V. Giljaca, Y. Takwoingi et al. //The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. — 2015. — №2. —Art. CD011548.130. Hirao, K. Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopiccholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography /K. Hirao, A. Miyazaki, T. Fujimoto et al. // AJR. American journal ofroentgenology. R. — 2000. — Vol. 175.
— №. 3. — P. 713–720.131. Horwood, J. Prospective evaluation of a selective approach tocholangiography for suspected common bile duct stones / J. Horwood, F.Akbar, K. Davis, R. Morgan // Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons ofEngland. — 2010. — Vol. 92. — №3. — P. 206–210.132. Houdart, R.
Predicting common bile duct lithiasis: determination andprospective validation of a model predicting low risk / R. Houdart,T. Perniceni, B. Darne et al. // American Journal of Surgery. –— 1995. —Vol. 170. — №1. — P. 38–43133. Huguier, M. Selective contraindications based on multivariate analysis foroperative cholangiography in biliary lithiasis / M. Huguier, P. Bornet,Y. Charpak et al. // Surgery, Gynecology & Obstetrics. — 1991.
—Vol. 172. — №6. — P. 470–474.134. Hunt, D.R. Common bile duct stones in non-dilated bile ducts? An ultrasoundstudy / D.R. Hunt // Australasian Radiology. — 1996. — Vol. 40. — №3. —P. 221–222.135. Hussein, F.M.Y. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and bile duct stenosis bymagnetic resonance cholangiogram / F.M.Y. Hussein, B. Alsumait, S. Amanet al. // Australasian Radiology. –— 2002 — Vol.
46. —№l. — P. 41–46.136. Jadvar, H. [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography andpositron emission tomography: computed tomography in recurrent andmetastatic cholangiocarcinoma / H. Jadvar, R.W. Henderson, P.S. Conti //Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography.
— 2007. — Vol. 31. — №2. —P. 223–228.137. Jakobsen, H.L. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for common bile duct stonesduring laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective / H.L. Jakobsen,P. Vilmann, J. Rosenberg // Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy &Percutaneous Techniques. — 2011. — Vol. 21. — №6. — P. 450–452.138. Johnson, S.R. Long-term results of surgical repair of bile duct injuriesfollowing laparoscopic cholecystectomy / S.R. Johnson, A.
Koehler,110L.K. Pennington, D.W. Hanto // Surgery. — 2000. — Vol. 128. — №4. —P. 668–677139. Kaltenthaler, E. A systematic review and economic evaluation of magneticresonance cholangiopancreatography compared with diagnostic endoscopicretrograde cholangiopancreatography / E. Kaltenthaler, Y.B. Vergel,J. Chilcott et al. // Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England). —2004. — Vol. 8. — №10. — P.
100–101.140. Karakan, T. EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patientswith intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomizedtrial / T. Karakan, M. Cindoruk, H. Alagozlu et al. // GastrointestinalEndoscopy. — 2009. — Vol. 69. — №2. — P. 244–252.141. Kay, C.L. Which test to replace diagnostic ERCP--MRCP or EUS? /C.L. Kay // Endoscopy. — 2003. — Vol.
35. — №5. — P. 426–428.142. Khan, O.A. Randomized clinical trial of routine on-table cholangiographyduring laparoscopic cholecystectomy / O.A. Khan, S. Balaji, G. Branagan etal. // The British Journal of Surgery.— 2011. — Vol. 98. — №3. —P. 362–367.143. Kim, T.H. Can a small endoscopic sphincterotomy plus a large-balloondilation reduce the use of mechanical lithotripsy in patients with large bileduct stones? / T.H. Kim, H.J. Oh, J.Y. Lee, Y.W. Sohn // SurgicalEndoscopy. –— 2011. — Vol. 28. — №10. — P.
3330–3337.144. Lahmann, B.E. Choledocholithiasis--principles of diagnosis andmanagement / B.E. Lahmann, G. Adrales, R.W. Schwartz // CurrentSurgery. — 2004. — Vol. 61. — №3. — P. 290–293.145. Larkin, C.J. Precut sphincterotomy: indications, pitfalls, and complications /C.J. Larkin, K. Huibregtse // Current Gastroenterology Reports. — 2001.
—Vol. 3. — №2. — P. 147–153.146. Lincender, L. [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP):correlation with diagnosis using ERCP] / L. Lincender, D. Vrcic, E. Sadagic etal. // Medicinski Arhiv. — 2002. — Vol. 56. — №1. — P. 25–28.147. Liu, C.L. Detection of choledocholithiasis by EUS in acute pancreatitis: aprospective evaluation in 100 consecutive patients / C.L. Liu, C.M.
Lo,J.K. Chan et al. // Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. — 2001. — Vol. 54. — №3. —P. 325–330.148. Maccioni, F. Magnetic resonance cholangiography: past, present and future:a review / F. Maccioni, M. Martinelli, N. Al Ansari et al. // European Review111for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences. — 2010. — Vol. 14. — №8.
—P. 721–725.149. Maple, J.T. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspectedcholedocholithiasis / J.T. Maple, T. Ben-Menachem, M.A. Anderson et al. //Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. — 2010. — Vol. 71. — №1. — P. 1–9.150. Motohara, T. MR cholangiopancreatography / T. Motohara, R.C. Semelka,T.R. Bader // Radiologic Clinics of North America.
— 2003. — Vol. 41. —№1. — P. 89–96.151. Nathan, T. Prediction of therapy in primary endoscopic retrogradecholangiopancreatography / T. Nathan, J. Kjeldsen, O.B. Schaffalitzky deMuckadell // Endoscopy. — 2004. — Vol. 36. — №6. — P. 527–534152. Notash, A.Y. Preoperative clinical and paraclinical predictors ofcholedocholithiasis / A.Y. Notash, J. Salimi, F.
Golfam // Hepatobiliary &pancreatic diseases international: HBPD INT. — 2008. — Vol. 7. — №3. —P. 304–307.153. Oto, A. Multidetector row CT of the liver / A. Oto, E.P. Tamm, J. Szklaruk //Radiologic Clinics of North America. — 2005. — Vol. 43. —№5. —P. 827–848.154. Pamos,S.Prospectiveevaluationofmagneticresonancecholangiopancreatography in patients with biliary disease: comparative studywith conventional ultrasonographyand endoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatography diagnostic algorithm / S. Pamos, A.
Benages,E. Medina et al. // Digestive and Liver Disease: Official Journal of the ItalianSociety of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of theLiver.— 2003. — Vol. 35. — №3. — P. 186–192.155. Pasanen, P.A. A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography andendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosisof benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis / P.A. Pasanen,K.P. Partanen, P.H.
Pikkarainen et al. // The European Journal of SurgeryActa Chirurgica. — 1993. — Vol. 159. — №1. — P. 23–29.156. Penman, I.D. Endoscopic ultrasound / I.D. Penman // Endoscopy. — 2001. —Vol. 33. — №. 11. — P. 940–948.157. Petrov, M.S. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versusendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyforsuspectedcholedocholithiasis / M.S. Petrov, T.J. Savides // The British Journal ofSurgery. — 2009. — Vol. 96.
— №9. — P. 967–974.112158. Pilleul, F. Preoperative evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous tumorsperformed by pancreatic magnetic resonance imaging and correlated withsurgical and histopathologic findings / F. Pilleul, A. Rochette, C. Partensky etal. // Journal of magnetic resonance imaging: JMRI. — 2005.
— Vol. 21. —№3. — P. 237–244.159. Polkowski, M. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrogradecholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones:a randomized trial comparing two management strategies / M. Polkowski,J. Regula, A. Tilszer, E. Butruk // Endoscopy. — 2007. — Vol. 39. — №4. —P. 296–303.160. Prat, F. Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests / F. Prat,B.
Meduri, B. Ducot et al. // Annals of Surgery. — 1999. — Vol. 229. —№3. — P. 362–368.161. Reisman Y. Clinical presentation of (subclinical) jaundice--the Euricterusproject in The Netherlands. United Dutch Hospitals and Euricterus ProjectManagement Group / Y. Reisman, C.H. Gips, S.M.
Lavelle, J.H. Wilson //Hepato-Gastroenterology. — 1996. — Vol. 43. — №11. — P. 1190–1195.162. Rickes, S. Impact of the operator’s experience on value of high-resolutiontransabdominal ultrasound in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: aprospective comparison using endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as thegold standard / S. Rickes, G. Treiber, K. Mönkemüller et al. // ScandinavianJournal of Gastroenterology. — 2006. — Vol.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
