Диссертация (1139266), страница 63
Текст из файла (страница 63)
Принято на 85 пленарном заседании(Венеция, 17 - 18 декабря 2010 года). CDL-AD(2010)039;463. Семинар ОБСЕ по человеческому измерению. Конституционное правосудие.Краткийсводныйотчет.Варшава,14-16мая2008года//www.osce.org/ru/odihr/33162?download=trueПрецеденты Европейского суда по правам человека:464. Bellizzi v. Malta, Judgment of 21.06.2011, application № 46575/09 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;465.
De Wilde, Ooms and Versyp (“Vagrancy”) v. Belgium, Judgment of 18.06.1971,applications № 2832/66; 2835/66; 2899/66 // http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;466. D.N. v. Switzerland, Judgment of 29.03.2001, application № 27154/95 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;467. Hoffer and Annen v. Germany, Judgment of 13.01.2011, applications № 397/07and 2322/07 // http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;468. Hümmer v. Germany, Decision of 08.06.2010, application № 26171/07 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;469. Jenny v.
Switzerland, Decision of 16.01.1996, application № 27043/95 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;470. Kress v. France, Judgment of 07.06.2001, application № 39594/98 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;471. Matterne v. Germany, Decision of 03.02.2009, application №. 4041/06 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;472. Svarc and Kavnik v. Slovenia, Judgment of 08.02.2007, application № 75617/01 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/;473.
Yvon V. France, Judgment of 24.04.2003, application № 44962/98 //http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/Научные публикации на английском, немецком и французском языках:474. Barnstedt E.L. Administration of the Federal Constitutional Court. Collection ofreports.Strasbourg.11February2000//316http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLJU(2000)013-bil;475. Barnstedt E.L. Administrative assistance in dealing with proceedings before theFederal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), with particular reference toconstitutionalcomplaintproceedings//http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLJU(2004)026-e;476.
Bell J., Boyron S., Whittaker S. Principles of French Law. Oxford UniversityPress, 2008;477. Benda E. Klein E. Klein O. Verfassungsprozessrecht. Ein Lehr- und Handbuch.Verlag C.F. Müller Heidelberg, 2012;478. Blake W., Hacker H., Hopwood S. Seasonal Affective Disorder: Clerk Trainingand the Success of Supreme Court Certiorari Petitions // Law and Society Review,Volume 49, Issue 4 (2015);479. Blankenagel A. Constructing and defending one’s self: some thoughts concerningthe institutional identity of constitutional courts // Tel Aviv University Studies inLaw, vol.
15, 2000;480. Ciaudo A. Un acteur spécifique du procès constitutionnel: le secrétaire général duConseil constitutionnel // Revue française de droit constitutionnel. 2008/1. № 73;481. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and ConstitutionalCourts in Post-Communist Europe in a Comparative Perspective / Sadurski W. TheHague: Kluwer Law International, 2002;482. Corley P., Collins P.
Jr., Hammer J. The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs onU.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content: APSA 2013 Annual Meeting Paper;483. Fabbrini F. Kelsen in Paris: France’s Constitutional Reform and the Introductionof a Posteriori Constitutional Review of Legislation // 9 German Law Journal (2008);484. Flemig S.
Attitude versus doctrine: a Jurimetric analysis of the German FederalConstitutional Court. Canadian Political Science Association Annual Conferencepaper. 2010;485. Genevois B. Secrétaire général du Conseil constitutionnel: un témoignage //http://www.conseil-constitutionnel.fr/;317486. Harvie Wilkinson III J. Serving Justice. A Supreme Court Clerk’s View. NewYork, 1974.487. Heun W. Access to the German Federal Constitutional Court / ConstitutionalCourts in Comparison: The U.S.
Supreme Court and the German FederalConstitutional Court / edited by R. Rogowski, T. Gawron. New York: BerghahnBooks, 2002;488. Heyde W. Justice and the Law in the Federal Republic of Germany. Heidelberg.C.F. Müller Juristischer Verlag, 1994;489. In Chambers: Stories of Supreme Court Law Clerks and Their Justices / edited byPeppers T.C., Ward A.
University of Virginia Press. 2012;490. Karakamisheva T. Constitutional Complaint - Procedural and Legal Instrument forDevelopment of the Constitutional Justice (Case Study - Federal Republic ofGermany, Republic of Croatia, Republic of Slovenia and Republic of Macedonia) //Конституционное правосудие. 2009. N 1(43);491. Kerševan E. Can there be a final time limit for the Constitutional Court to reach adecision? // Конституционное правосудие. Ереван, 2 (56), 2012;492. Kommers D.P., Miller R.A. The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the FederalRepublic of Germany: Third edition, Revised and Expanded.
Duke University Press,2012;493. Körner С. Der "Dritte Senat" // http://www.lto.de/recht/job-karriere/j/jobprofilwissenschaftlicher-mitarbeiter-am-bundesverfassungsgericht/;494. Kuijer M. The Blindfold of Lady Justice – Judicial Independence and Impartialityin Light of the Requirements of Article 6 ECHR. Wolf Legal Publishers, 2004;495. MaryskinConstitutionalA.V.
The law clerks’ role when preparing the decisions of theCourtoftheRepublicofBelarus.Report//http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLJU(2009)060-e;496. Massing O. The Legal Assistants at the German Federal Constitutional Court: A“Black Box” of Research? A Comment / Constitutional Courts in Comparison: TheU.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court / edited by R.Rogowski, T. Gawron.
New York: Berghahn Books, 2002;318497. Mavcic A. Individual complaint as a domestic remedy to be exhausted or effectivewithin the meaning of the ECHR. Comparative and Slovenian aspect. //http://www.concourts.net/lecture/constitutional%20complaint1.pdf;498. Melart T., Zore L. The individual constitutional complaint in Slovenia(unpublished dissertation for Co.Co.A. at the University of Trento, Italy, 2008) //http:/www.jus.unitn.it/cocoa/papers/papers.html;499. Nelson W.E., Rishikof H.I. Messinger S., Jo M. The Liberal Tradition of theSupreme Court Clerkship: Its Rise, Fall and Reincarnation.
Vanderbilt Law Review62, 2009;500. Parance B.P. The contribution of the question prioritaire de constitutionnalite toprivate law // The financial crisis of 2008 : French and American responses:proceedings of the 2010 Franco-American Legal Seminar. Portland, Me.: Universityof Maine School of Law, 2011;501. Pasquino P. The new constitutional adjudication in France. The reform of thereferral to the French Constitutional Council in light of the Italian model // IndianJournal of Constitutional Law, vol.
3, Issue 1, 2009;502. Pásztor T. Constitutional complaints // http://www.nt.hu/publications/;503. Pededze D. The staff of the Constitutional Court and the constitutional complaint// http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-JU(2003)016-bil;504.
Peppers T. C. Courtiers of the Marble Palace: The Rise and Influence of theSupreme Court Law Clerk. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006;505. Petrovski S. Competencies of the Secretary of the Constitutional Court of theFormerYugoslavRepublicofMacedonia.Report//http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-JU(2000)013-bil;506. Quint P.E. Leading a Constitutional Court: Perspectives from the Federal Republicof Germany // University of Pennsylvania Law Review. Volume 154;507.
RibicicC.StrengtheningConstitutionalDemocracy.http://www.venice.coe.int/WCCJ/Papers/SLO_Ribicic_E.pdf;508. Schmaltz C. Implementation through education – Constitutional Courts’ «soft»enforcementmechanisms.//http://www.coe.int/t/dgi/hr-natimplement/Source/echr/Conference_07072014_PresentationCSchmaltz.pdf;319509. Shapiro C. The law clerk proxy wars: secrecy, accountability, and ideology in theSupreme Court // Florida State University Law Review, Vol. 31, № 1.
2009;510. Somody B., Vissy B. Citizens’ role in constitutional adjudication in Hungary:from the actio popularis to the constitutional complaint //Annales Universitatisscientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eotvos nominatae. 2012. T. LIII;511. Sovdat. J. The Organization of the Work of Legal Advisors in Support of theDecision-Making of the Constitutional Court.Presentation and Experience of theConstitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia // http://www.us-rs.si/osodiscu/konference/3csg-bled-29-30-september-2005/contributions-3406/paper-byms-jadranka-sovdat-constitutional-court-of-slovenia/;512. Steinman.
T. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia: CurrentProblemsConcerningtheOrganisationandProceedings//http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-JU(2002)033-e;513. Steinman.T. The presentation of the case management system of the Constitutionalcourt of the Republic of Slovenia // http://www.us-rs.si/o-sodiscu/konference/3csgbled-29-30-september-2005/contributions-3406/paper-by-ms-tatjana-steinmanconstitutional-court-of-slovenia/;514. Stras D.R.
The Supreme Court's Gatekeepers: The Role of Law Clerks in theCertiorari Process // Texas Law Review, Vol. 85, 2007;515. Tallroth P. Who Safeguards Our Rights? The Finnish Institutions and theDiscussion about a Constitutional Court. Helsinki, 2012;516. The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia / Mahkamah KonstitusiRepublik Indonesia. 2015;517. Vitkauskas D., Dikov G. Protecting the Right to a Fair Trial Under the EuropeanConvention on Human Rights. Council of Europe, 2012;518.
von Paczensky C. The constitutional complaint - avoiding excessive case-load //http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLINF(1998)003-e;519. vonPaczenskyC.TheconstitutionaljurisdictioninGermany.http://repository.enu.kz:8080/bitstream/handle/data/10383/PACZENSKY.pdf;320520. Walter S. Competencies and functioning of the Federal Constitutional Court ofGermany.Report.http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-JU(2002)035-e;521. Wieland J. The role of legal assistants at the German Federal Constitutional Court/ Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U.S.
Supreme Court and the GermanFederal Constitutional Court / edited by R. Rogowski, T. Gawron. New York:Berghahn Books, 2002;522. ZeynalovA.Report//http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDLJU(2005)039-e;Материалы Секретариата Конституционного Суда РФ:523. Письмо Секретариата КС РФ № 8047/15-01/14 // Архив автора;524.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
