Диссертация (1138670), страница 28
Текст из файла (страница 28)
G. The National Innovation System in theMaking and the Development of Small Business in Russia Studies on RussianEconomic Development, Vol. 16, No. 2, (2005), pp. 184–190110. Enright, M. “Regional Clusters and Economic Development: AResearch Agenda”, in Staber, U., Schaefer, N. and Sharma, B., (Eds.)“Business Networks: Prospects for Regional Development, Berlin”: Walter deGruyter, (1996) pp. 190- 213.111. Ferrary, M., Granovetter, M.
The role of venture capital firms in SiliconValley's complex innovation network, Economy and Society,38:2(2009),326— 359112. Freeman J. and Hannan M. T., “Niche Width and the dynamics ofOrganizational Populations”, American Journal of Sociology 88 (6) (1983), pp.1116-1145.166113. Freeman, C. (1995), “The National System of Innovation in HistoricalPerspective”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, No.
19, pp. 5–24114. Fukuda K., Watanabe C. Japanese and US perspectives on the NationalInnovation Ecosystem. Technology in society. Vol 30 iss1 Jan 2008115. Hackney R., Burn, J & Salazar, A. Strategies for value creation inelectronic markets: towards a framework for managing evolutionary change.Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 2002, 13 (2), pp. 91-103116.
Hayek, F. Individualism and economic order. Chicago: University ofChicago Press, 1948.117. Hayek F. The Constituion of Liberty. Chicago, 1960;118. Hayek F. Law, Legislation, and Liberty. Vol. 1. Chicago, 1973.119. He J., Fallah M.H., The typology of technology clusters and itsevolution — Evidence from the hi-tech industries, Technol. Forecast. Soc.Change (2011),120. Heylighen F. “The science of self-organization and adaptivity” //http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/EOLSS-Self-Organiz.pdf121. Hodgson G. Evolution and Optimality// The Elgar Companion toInstitutional and Evolutional Economics.
Aldershot, 1994. Vol. 1. P. 209.122. Horn P.M. The changing nature of innovation. Research technologymanagement, Nov\Dev 2005; 48,6 ABI/INFORM123. Gladwell M. The tipping point: How Little Things Can Make a BigDifference. Boston: First Back Bay Books, 2002124. Gladwell M. Outliers: the story of success. Little, Brown andCompany,2008125.
Graf H. Gatekeepers in regional networks of innovators// Cambridgejournal of economics 2011, 35, pp.173-198.126. Iansiti М., Levien R. Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics ofBusiness Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability.Harvard Business Press (August 1, 2004)167127. Iansiti M., Sinofsky S. One Strategy: Organization, Planning, andDecision Making. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
2010128. Industrial relations as a key to strengthening innovation in Europe.European Comission/innovation paper #36. Directorate- General forEnterprise. EUR 17060. 2003. P.45129. Isaak R. From collective learning to Silicon Valley replication: the limitsto synergistic entrepreneurship in Sophia Antipolis.
Research in InternationalBusiness and Finance 23 (2009) 2 (June) Pp. 134-143130. LangloisR.,EverettM.WhatisEvolutionaryEconomics?//Evolutionary and Neo-Schumpeterian Approach to Economics. Boston etc.:Kluwer Acad. Publ., 1993. P. 29.131. Lundvall, B-Å. (ed.) (1992). National Innovation Systems: Towards aTheory of Innovation and Interactive Learning, Pinter, London132. Making Silicon Valley: innovation and the growth of high tech, 19301970. Christophe Lecuyer - Business & Economics-2006133. Malerba F., Ed. (2004). Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Concepts,Issues and Analysis of six Major Sectors in Europe,.
Cambridge Universitypress, UK, 2004134. Marín C.A., Stalker I., Mehandjiev N., chapter “Engineering BusinessEcosystems Using Environment-Mediated Interactions” in book “EngineeringEnvironment-Mediated Multi-Agent Systems: International Workshop”,EEMMAS 2007, Dresden, Germany, October 5, 2007.
Selected Revised andInvited Papers. Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008. pp. 240 – 258135. Mattar Y. Post-industrialism and Silicon Valley as models of industrialgovernance in Australian public policy Telematics and Informatics 25 (2008)246–261136. Maxwell I. Managing Sustainable Innovation: The Driver for GlobalGrowth/ NewYork: Springer, 2009.168137. Menger C. Problems of Economics and Sociology.
Urbana: Univ. ofIllinois Press 1963.138. Metcalfe, S. (1995), “The Economic Foundations of Technology Policy:Equilibrium and Evolutionary Perspectives”, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbookof the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, BlackwellPublishers, Oxford (UK)/Cambridge (US).139. Mitleton-Kelly, E. 2003. Ten Principles of Complexity and EnablingInfrastructures.InMitleton-Kelly,E.(eds.) ComplexSystemsandEvolutionary Perspectives on Organizations: The Application of ComplexityTheory to Organizations.
Pergamon, Amsterdam. pp. 23-50140. Möller, K., Sense-making and agenda construction in emerging businessnetworks — How to direct radical innovation, Industrial MarketingManagement (2009),141. Moore, J.F., The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the ageof business ecosystems, Harper Business, New York, 1997.142.
Nelson R., Winter S. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.Harward Univ. Press, Cambrige, 1982.143.Peltoniemi, M. 2004. Cluster, Value Network and Business Ecosystem:Knowledge and Innovation Approach. Paper Presented at “Organisations,Innovation and Complexity: New Perspectives on the Knowledge Economy”conference, September 9-10, in Manchester, UK.144.
Peltoniemi M., Vuori E. Business ecosystem as the new approach tocomplex adaptive business environments // http://www.iwoce.org/definitionsof-ecosystems.pdf145. Power, T.; Jerjian, G. Ecosystem: Living the 12 principles of networkedbusiness. Pearson Education Ltd. 2001. -289 p146. Praise for Tapan Munroe’s What Makes Silicon Valley Tick? TheEcologyofInnovationathttp://www.novavistapub.com/uploads/SVTick-web.pdf169Work//147.Pyka A., Scharnhorst A. Innovation networks: new approaches inmodeling andanalyzing. Springer 2009.148. Rampersad G., Quester P., Troshani I.
Managing innovation networks:Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networksIndustrial Marketing Management 39 (2010) 793–805149. Richardson A. Innovation X: Why a Company's Toughest Problems AreIts Greatest advantage. Jossey-Ba. 2010150. Rosenfeld, S.A. (1997) “Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstreamof Economic Development”, European Planning Studies, 5,1,151. Rothschild M., Bionomics: Economy as ecosystem. New York,NY:Henry Holt and company, Inc.
1991152. Russel M.G. et al. Business Angels and Investment Organizations asNetworkedCo-creatorsoftheFinnishInnovationEcosystem//http://www.leydesdorff.net/th9/THIX-FinnishInnovationEcosystemCocreation-final.pdf153. Russel M.G. et al. Explaining innovation with indicators of mobilityandnetworks:InsightsintocentralinnovationnodesinEurope//http://www.leydesdorff.net/th9/THIX-InnovationEcosystemMobility-final.pdf154. Rycroft R.R., Kash D.E. Self-organizing innovation networks:implications for globalization.
Technovation 24 (2004) 187–197155. Rycroft R.W Technology-based globalization indicators: the centralityof innovation network data Technology in Society 25 (2003) 299–317156. Rycroft R.W., Kash D. E. Self-organizing innovation networks:implications for globalization Technovation 24 (2004) 187–197157. Rycrof R.W. Does cooperation absorb complexity? Innovation networksand the speed and spread of complex technological innovation TechnologicalForecasting & Social Change 74 (2007) 565–578158. Saxennian A.L.Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition inSilicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1994170159. Saxennian A.L. The New Argonauts: Regional Advantage in a GlobalEconomy, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 2006160.
Saxennian A.L. Creating a Twentieth Century Technical Community:FrederickTerman‘sSiliconValley//http://people.ischool.berkeley.edu/~anno/Papers/terman.html161. Scharmer C.O. Theory U: Learning from the Future as It Emerges.Cambridge, MA: SoL Press 2009162. Suzuki K-i., Kim S-H., Bae Z-T. Entrepreneurship in Japan and SiliconValley: a comparative study Technovation 22 (2002) 595–606163. Tinbergen, J. On the theory of economic policy. Amsterdam: NorthHolland. 1952.164. Thorgren, S., et al., Designing interorganizational networks forinnovation: An empirical examination of network configuration, formation andgovernance. J.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
