Pertseva_summary (1137619), страница 9

Просмтор этого файла доступен только зарегистрированным пользователям. Но у нас супер быстрая регистрация: достаточно только электронной почты!

Текст из файла (страница 9)

From our perspective, in this text, Nancy seeks todemonstrate to what extent the so-called “autonomous portrait”, a portrait parexcellence, not so much represents, but presents the subject, actually producing thesubject on its surface. Nevertheless, as far as the autonomy of the portrait, as35shown above, is thought of along the lines of a model distinct from the autonomyof the subject, being an autonomy of the exterior, production of the subject by theportrait also appears as completion of the metaphysics of the Subject ofrepresentation, demonstrating her/his dependence on the others.

At that, as weshow in paragraph 4.1.5, drawing on the text of “The Other Portrait”, such modelof an autonomous portrait appears already overcome for Nancy in morecontemporary practices of a portrait in which we deal not so much with the portraitof a subject, as with the portrait of the other, and not so much with its presence, aswith its withdrawal. The portrait which, as we tried to show, was the place oftransition from metaphysics of the Subject to the ontology of the singular pluralthus makes transition itself.

In the conclusions to this chapter, we summarize thisoscillating movement of Nancy’s thought from one model of the portrait (as theportrait of the subject) to another (as the portrait of the other), from the completionof the Subject to the ontology of the singular plural.In the intermediate conclusion to part II, we sum up the analysis of therole of the topic of subjects’ visibility in the works by Rancière and Nancy in the“overcoming” of the post-structuralism, and also consider the resources of thethought of the authors of French phenomenology - Jean-Paul Sartre and MauriceMerleau-Ponty, which the two contemporary authors use in so doing.The general conclusion presents the results we obtained. First of all, wedraw the conclusions on the topic as a whole: in our study we, managed to showhow the topic of visibility of subjects ousts the transparency of reflectiveconsciousness. Secondly, we identified some of its constants (challenges related totheorizing of the two aspects of the subject - activity/passivity and of theheterogeneity of the visible), invariant within the approaches of different authors,and we also tracked a number of tendencies (from being-subject throughbecoming-subject to completing-subject, from the binary opposition I/the Other tothe shared otherness, from intellectual vision to the sensual one, and from it - to thevision oscillating between the sensible and the intellectual, between the image andthe text).

Thirdly, we outline the results concerning each of the considered authors36relating them with one another. The authors are presented as the key ones for thetopic development, mapping in pairs its scope (Sartre contrasts favorably withMerleau-Ponty, Rancière – with Nancy, but it should also be noted that Rancièreborrows some solutions from Sartre, transforming them, and Nancy benefits fromthose of Merleau-Ponty). Finally, we sketch the ways for the further study of thetopic associating it with a more attentive and close reading of some texts of theauthors spontaneously not associated with it work, but susceptible, according toour assumption, to a more nuanced interpretation, similar to that we proposed inour chapter 1 on Sartre.37Author’s publications on the topic of the thesis study1.

Pertseva. А.А. Jacques Rancière: Philosopher and his Subject // Philosophy.Language. Culture. Vol. 6. 2015. P. 477-491.2. Pertseva А.А. Appearance, Politics, Subjectivation: from Foucault toRancière // The Philosophy Journal. 2015. Vol. 8. N. 3. P. 121–143.3. Pertseva A.А. Visibility of the Subject Between Imagination and Perception.Sartre and Merleau-Ponty // The Philosophy Journal. 2016. Vol. 9.

N. 3. P.77–105.4. Pertsevа А.А. Historicism and Subjectiv(iz)ation: from Foucault to Rancièreand Backwards // History of philosophy. 2017. Vol. 22. N. 1. P. 92-105.5. Pertseva А.А. Image of the Other in Merleau-Ponty's Early Theory ofImagination // The Philosophy Journal. 2017. Vol. 10. N. 1. P. 116–135.6. Pertseva, A.

Le Regard de l’Autre chez Sartre: L’Entre-Deux deL’Imagination et de la Perception // Bulletin d'Analyse Phénoménologique.2017. Vol. 13. N. 2. P. 413-432.7. Pertseva А.А. Sit and Watch // LOGOS. Philosophical and Literary Journal.Vol. 28. N. 2. 2018. P. 269-273..

Характеристики

Список файлов диссертации