Диссертация (1137013), страница 32
Текст из файла (страница 32)
Т. 16. № 3. С. 298–315.152. Schaffer R., Kuczynski K., Skinner D. Producing genetic knowledge andcitizenship through the Internet: mothers, pediatric genetics, andcybermedicine // Sociology of Health & Illness. 2008. Vol. 30 (1). Pp. 145– 159.153. Schlager M. A., Fusco J., Schank P. Evolution of an online educationcommunity of practice // Building virtual communities / под ред.Renninger K.
A., Shumar W. New York: Cambridge University Press.2002, С. 129-158.154. Seo K., Han Y.-K. Online teacher collaboration: A case study of voluntarycollaboration in a teacher-created online community // KEDI Journal ofEducational Policy. 2013. Т. 10. № 2. С. n/a.155. Setoyama Y., Yamazaki Y., Namayama K. Benefits of peer support inonline Japanese breast cancer communities: differences between lurkersand posters. // Journal of medical Internet research.
2011. Т. 13. № 4. С.e122.156. Shaw A. Centralized and decentralized gatekeeping in an open onlinecollective // Politics & Society. 2012. 40 (3). Pp. 349–388.192157. Shirkey C. Power Laws, Weblogs, and Inequality. 2003 URL:http://shirky.com/writings/powerlaw_weblog.html.(датаобращения:10.03.2015)158. Shneiderman В. Web science: a provocative invitation to computer science// Communications of the ACM, 2007, Vol. 50 No. 6, Pp. 25 – 27.159.
Smith A. 6 new facts about Facebook. 03.02.2014 // Pew Research Center[Электронныйресурс].URL:http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2014/02/03/6-new-facts-about-facebook/(датаобращения13.04.2016).160. Smith M., Rainie L., Shneiderman B., Himelboim I. Mapping TwitterTopic Networks: From Polarized Crowds to Community Clusters // PewResearchInternetProject.2014.URL:http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/02/PIP_Mapping-Twitternetworks_022014.pdf (дата обращения: 20.10.2014).161. Steinfield C., DiMicco J.
M., Ellison N. B., Lampe C. Bowling Online:Social Networking and Social Capital within the Organization //Proceedings of the fourth international conference on Communities andtechnologies. 2009. С. 245 – 254.162. Stewart S.A., Abidi S.S.R. Applying Social Network Analysis toUnderstand the Knowledge Sharing Behaviour of Practitioners in a ClinicalOnline Discussion Forum // Journal of Medical Internet Research.
2012. Т.14. № 6. С. e170.163. Tai-Quan Peng, Lun Zhang, Zhi-Jin Zhong, Jonathan JH Zhu. Mapping thelandscape of Internet Studies: Text mining of social science journal articles2000–2009 // New Media & Society, 2013 Т. 15 №. 5. С. 644-664.164. Tilly C.
From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.1978.165. Tseng F.-C., Kuo F.-Y. A study of social participation and knowledgesharing in the teachers’ online professional community of practice //Computers & Education. 2014. Т. 72. С. 37–47.193166. Van Dijk J. A theoty of the digital divide // The Digital Divide. Theinternet and social inequality in international perspective / под ред.Ragnedda M., Muschert G.W.New York. Routledge, 2013. C. 29 – 51.167. Van Dijk J.
The Network Society. 3rd Edition. Sage. 2012.168. Van Dijk Jan A.M.G. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the InformationSociety. London, Sage. 2005.169. Van Dijk Jan A.M.G. The review on The Handbook of Internet Studies //European Journal of Communication. 2013, Т. 28. №5. C. 587 – 590.170. Van Laer J. Activists online and offline: The Internet as an informationchannel for protest demonstrations // Mobilization. 2010. 15 (3). Pp. 347–366.171. Virtual community // Dictionary of the Social Sciences [Электронныйресурс] / под ред.
Calhoun C. Oxford, Oxford UP. 2002. URL:http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195123715.001.0001/acref-9780195123715-e-1764 (дата обращения: 05.10.2015).172. Voskresenskiy V., Musabirov I., Alexandrov D. Private and Public OnlineGroups in Apartment Buildings of St. Petersburg // Proceedings of the 8thACM Conference on Web Science WebSci ’16. New York, NY, USA:ACM, 2016. С. 301–306.173. Wakefield S.R.
“Your Sister in St. Scully”: An Electronic Community ofFemale Fans of The X-Files // Journal of Popular Film and Television.2001. Т. 29. № 3. С. 130–137.174. Wasko M.M., Faraj S. Why Should I Share? Examining Social Capital andKnowledge Contribution in Electronic Networks of Practice // MISQuarterly. 2005. Т. 29. № 1. С. 35–57.175.
Wasko M.M., Teigland R. Public goods or virtual commons? Applyingtheories of public goods, social dilemmas, and collective action toelectrnoic networks of practice // Journal of Information TechnologyTheory and Application. 2004. Т. 6. № 1. С. 25–42.194176. Watson N. Why We Argue about Virtual Community: A Case Study of thePhish.Net Fan Community // Virtual Culture: Identity and Communicationin Cybersociety / под ред. Jones S. London: SAGE. 2002. С.
102–133.177. Watts D.J., Strogatz S.H. Collective dynamics of `small-world’ networks //Nature. 1998. Т. 393. № 6684. С. 440 - 442.178. Wellamn B. Physical place and cyberplace: The Rise of PersonalizedNetworking // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Т. 25,№ 2. 2001. С. 227-252.179. Wellman B. An egocentric network tale: comment on Bien et al. (1991) //Social Networks. 1993. Т. 15. № 4. С. 423–436.180. Wellman B. Little Boxes, Glocalization, and Networked Individualism //Digital Cities II: Computational and Sociological Approaches LectureNotes in Computer Science.
/ под ред. Tanabe M., van den Besselaar P.,Ishida T. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2002. С. 10–25.181. Wellman B. The community question: The intimate networks of EastYorkers //American journal of Sociology. 1979. Т.84. № 5 С. 1201-1231.182. Wellman B. и др. Does the Internet Increase, Decrease, or SupplementSocialCapital?SocialNetworks,Participation,andCommunityCommitment // American Behavioral Scientist. 2001. Т. 45. № 3. С.
436–455.183. Wellman B., Boase J., Chen W. The Networked Nature of Community:Online and Offline // IT&Society, Т. 1, №1. 2002. С. 151 - 165.184. Wellman B., Gulia M. Virtual communities as communities: Net surfersdon’t ride alone // Communities in Cyberspace / под ред. Kollock P.,Smith M. N.Y., Routledge, 1999. С. 167 - 193.185.
Wellman B., Leighton B. Networks, Neighborhoods, and CommunitiesApproaches to the Study of the Community Question // Urban AffairsReview. 1979. Т.14. № 3. С.363-390.186. Wellman B., Quan-Haase A., Boase J., Chen W., Hampton K., Diaz I.,Miyata K. The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked195Individualism // Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2003. Т.8. № 3.187.
Welser H.T. и др. Visualizing the signatures of social roles in onlinediscussion groups // Journal of Social Structure. 2007. Т. 8. № 2. С. 564–586.188. Wenger E. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. 1999.189. Wenger E., McDermont R., Snyder W.M. Cultivating Communities ofPractice. Harvard Business School Press. Boston. MA. 2002.190. Wickramasinghe V., Weliwitigoda P. Benefits gained from dimensions ofsocial capital: A study of software developers in Sri Lanka // InformationTechnology and People.
2011. Т. 24. № 4. С. 393–413.191. Witte J. C., Mannon S. E. The Internet and Social Inequality. N.Y.,Routledge, 2010.192. Yuan E.J. A culturalist critique of ‘online community’ in new mediastudies // New Media Society. 2013. Т. 15. № 5. С. 665–679.193. Zhang J., Ackerman M.S., Adamic L. Expertise networks in onlinecommunities: structure and algorithms // Proceedings of the 16thinternational conference on World Wide Web. : ACM, 2007. С. 221–230.196.
![](https://s.studizba.com/z.php?f=/templates/si/i/noavatar.png&w=100&h=100&t=1"){kind=avatar}
